Atomic PC Clock allows you to make the most of your time. By using Atomic PC Clock, you will not be late for important appointments. Installation on your PC is quick and simple and with one easy mouse click you will have your computer showing the exact time within milliseconds. Atomic PC Clock will synchronize with atomic time servers at specified intervals, so you do not need to manually check the accuracy of the system time on your computer every hour. Atomic PC Clock also has a built-in calendar that shows you the current month along with the next 2 months. The calendar is easy to use and is always near at hand. Atomic PC Clock's intuitive user interface is ideal for both the novice and expert PC user.
- Spring Discount today
- Added built-in business calendar
- Added Full support for Windows® XP style
- Added the full Help file
Reviewing 1.1 Build 86 (Feb 1, 2009)
I can offer you a more reliable program with more functions. I can recommend it for using not only at home, but in your company's network.
http://www.nist-time.com/atc.php
Reviewing 1.0 Beta Build 71 (Dec 10, 2001)
Ok, this is good for non XP users. XP users that DO dl this program, please leave your name and address so I can come and slap you. Thank you. -/\/\-
Reviewing 1.0 Beta Build 71 (Dec 9, 2001)
The program is OK, but it really makes me wonder why these people that put programs out dont learn how to spell. At least run a basic spell check. Thats the only reason I didnt register the program, for example, he spells Syncronize SINCRONIZE Come on, get with the program!
Reviewing 1.0 Beta Build 71 (Dec 9, 2001)
Review of Atomic PC Clock 1.0 Beta Build 55 by xcop504 on September 8th, 2001 9:57 PM ***
I just wish that people that choose to live in our great country would learn to speak English so you could determine what point they are trying to make.
Xcop, what makes you think they even live in the US. Don't assume, it makes u look stupid.
Reviewing 1.0 Beta Build 71 (Dec 9, 2001)
As this utility works fine under 95, 98 and ME, it is totally unnecessary under NT/2000/XP. This is due to the manner the kernel mannages memory blocks.
No comments yet