Reviews of Dr.Web for Windows

1. 
   billco

   Reviewing 5.00.1.09020 (Sep 13, 2009)

   Anybody that criticises the GUI as simple, doesn't know what they're talking about. Simple GUI is GOOD. It's what goes behind the scenes that makes the malware checker.
   I can say that this thing caught a some trojans, boot sector virus, , and something causing my browser problems. Malware bytes didn't catch the latter 2. So this thing worked.. I don't know if NODor KAV would've done better.. I know I was using a free version, was great..
   http://www.freedrweb.com/cureit/
2. 
   RastaWorld

   Reviewing 5.00.1.08100 (Aug 12, 2009)

   Super low detect rate. Does not even come close to detecting variants from the past 6 months.
3. 
   emanresU deriseD

   Reviewing 5.00.1.08030 (Aug 3, 2009)

   You lost faith in one AV solution, and threw it into another, based on one virus. I'll be totally blunt: That doesn't make sense.
4. 
   starkside

   Reviewing 5.00.1.07270 (Jul 31, 2009)

   I've had Eset Smart Security for about two years. However, ESS failed to notice the virus when the time has come and I opened a keygen with Win32.Virut inside. I was suspicious, though (the file din't do anything, which is suspicious, I suppose), So I checked it with Dr. Web CureIt! AV package.
   
   This AV found about 15 instances of the virus! As mluch as I love ESS (got used to it by now, duh), I duly switchedover to Dr.Web, simply due to its efficiency.
5. 
   emanresU deriseD

   Reviewing 5.00.1.06040 (Jun 4, 2009)

   Did you come across this listing by accident? There's a reason you've probably never heard of this piece of crap. Move along.

Discuss Dr.Web for Windows

No comments yet