Reviews of Easy CD & DVD Creator Platinum Update

1. 
   stopbuggingme

   Reviewing 6.2.0.134 (May 29, 2006)

   Don't waste your time or money on this product. There are better alternatives like NERO. (version 6 not 7). Though it does some things okay, it's just too flaky for my choice of software.
   
   The one time I needed help they refused to help me because I didn't have a CID. "What is a SID" I asked? A number on the box top. "I didn't keep the box. But I do have my serial key, and my payment receipt will that work?"
   
   No you are out of luck and we will not support you they said.
   
   So though I very rarely need support, this is not the type of company I want to do business with. Besides it's bloated.
2. 
   jmarkos

   Reviewing 6.2.0.134 (Oct 21, 2004)

   Not an easy program to use. After a two weeks still not able to get the childrens pictures onto DVD. CD's that I did copy will not play can build a slide show without standing on my head. Tutorial and help can not be found. I DO NOT recomend it.
3. 
   ogman

   Reviewing 6.2.0.134 (Dec 23, 2003)

   Excellent software. Works great.
4. 
   mastercpu

   Reviewing 6.2.0.134 (Dec 22, 2003)

   I agree, I liked Nero for a long time, but that last version is convoluted, cartoony garbage. EzCd six is clean, simple, loaded with useful features and runs without a glitch. Unfortunately, early releases of six were very buggy. Anyone who felt burned when adopting it earlier should give it another try.
5. 
   rudolph

   Reviewing 6.2.0.134 (Dec 21, 2003)

   The only thing I really like about this is DirectCD (now called Drag-to-disc). EasyCd came with my notebook but I still usee nero for burning.
6. 
   mat0

   Reviewing 6.2.0.110 (Oct 31, 2003)

   i am a huge fan and power user of nero, since the first version 5 to the latest 6. but i must accept that easy cdd and dvd creator 6 with latest updates is an exccelent app. still lovving nero :o)
   i hate updatimg, tired of bugs, why these companies dont work hard enough to make a perfect product???
7. 
   finalcut

   Reviewing 6.2.0.110 (Oct 30, 2003)

   Easy CD
8. 
   dennis ball

   Reviewing 6.2.0.110 (Oct 30, 2003)

   This program hasn't worked well since version 3 of Adaptec Easy Cd Creator... I left this product a long time ago for Nero... Sigh, Nero's becoming too big and their product is looking to go the way of Adaptec/Roxio....
9. 
   jimklein

   Reviewing 6.0.3.4 (Jun 3, 2003)

   I'm back to Roxio 6 on WinXP. Roxio 5.x had it's share of issues & I went to Nero, but after applying so many updates it started saying that Nero was probably pirated. (it wasn't, I just try to stay up on updates). I even removed Nero completly rebooted. Applied the Nero CD & then the latest patch with the same issue. Because of that & liking the interface & features of Roxio I went back to 6.0 & everything works great. I also agree that Nero & Roxio don't seem to play well together. But Roxio 6 does work well & consistantly on XP.
10. 
    patmc7

    Reviewing 6.0.3.4 (Jun 2, 2003)

    I've found that Roxio may not work on a system that has Nero also installed. The two programs conflict with each other. Only by clearing Nero completely could I get Roxio to work properly. I like Roxio's simplicity but I've had trouble with open DirectCD disks after an upgrade.
11. 
    ehalepdp

    Reviewing 5.3.4.21 (Mar 13, 2003)

    The intent of the features that are in the product are well thought of and fun to use when they work. Some of the bugs have been cleaned up from 5.3.2 (Win98). I will update to 5.3.4.21 on my neighbors (xp)machine from 5.3.2 after I wait to see if any horror stories come up about XP in this update release for a couple of days more. Still, in my Win98 system everything is working 'sorta' and if not, there is a way around the problem in one feature or another (Copier, Soundstream, Cd Creator) in music Cd creation. Haven't use the data portion enough to comment. Photo Album has been good to me without any problems. Cd Label creator has only caused me problems in the CDDB database area of not finding songs and titles (some not all) but if I use Soundstream 'Get Names' first and it finds it then the Label Creator out of Soundstream will get the Contents of the Title and tracks for me that 'Get Names' found.
    
    If they don't drop support of ECDC V5 in favor of moving on to V6, we will eventually be 'clean and green'.
12. 
    mbear

    Reviewing 5.3.4.21 (Feb 13, 2003)

    Cluephone ringing kids: Nobody is asking if you personally *like* Easy CD Creator or if you prefer Nero or any of a half dozen other packages. The rating is if THIS update works well and unless you're using Easy CD Creator and applying this update then you've no business posting or rating in this thread, go troll somewhere else. I *do* use Easy CD Creator on one PC, Nero on another, and BOTH work fine for my needs. Each offers some features the other doesn't and neither regularly produces coasters. So stop going around waving your "I-use-Nero-so-I'm-l33t!" little p****es and stick to rating patches to Nero and leave discussion of Easy CD Creator patches alone. As to this patch, went in smooth and no apparent problems, my recorder was already supported (a Sony highspeed flashed with the latest Lite-On update) so no biggie there, nothing apparently different.
13. 
    jazjon

    Reviewing 5.3.4.21 (Feb 12, 2003)

    I give up on Roxio. Slow/Crashes/Buggy/Garbage. Nero works perfect for all my needs with no issues.
14. 
    grturne

    Reviewing 5.3.4.21 (Feb 12, 2003)

    Works reliably and effectively with properly matched hardware. I like it, and have always found it effective and fast.
15. 
    Alex T.

    Reviewing 5.3.4.21 (Feb 11, 2003)

    Easy CD creator is pure garbage. It is a horibbly broken program with loads of bugs and is very very slow. Nero is the best and a way more polished program.
16. 
    kjdenison

    Reviewing 5.3.4.21 (Feb 11, 2003)

    Just wait for Easy CD and DVD recorder 6, or if you have a mac your all set anyways because you have a program 10 times better already but either way
17. 
    golbex

    Reviewing 5.3.4.21 (Feb 11, 2003)

    Updates are good. I'm glad to see they had XP in mind as they were working on this one, too.
18. 
    jcorque

    Reviewing 5.3.2b Drive Update (Jan 31, 2003)

    I was never able to update ECD5 to 5.3.2.34. After the install my computer would not load Windows XP Pro. I went to safe mode to uninstall the update. Roxio Technical Support was unable to solve the problem. After reading comments from others I'm glad it wasn't me. I'm currently using ECD5 5.1.0.104 and works like a charm. By the way this update is listed as 5.3.2b so it can't be the one referred to by someone else as being released back in October 2002. I also use Nero burn as well as Musicmatch Jukebox. No problem with any of those programs.
19. 
    desrt2

    Reviewing 5.3.2.34 (Dec 5, 2002)

    I had used Easy CD Creator for 1 year with very little problems.
    I had to reformat my system last week. Last thing I did was to re-install EZCD with XP update.
    My PC will not finish the boot sequence now. And, it spit out a coaster last night.
    I also had the same issue with the app telling me it couldn't launch.
    It took me 4 days to recover from the format. I HOPE that I can go into safe-mode, do a system recovery to before the install. I have not allways had success with system restore, and "last known good menu" is a joke.
    I officially admit defeat at the hands of Roxio. I will now switch to Nero and continue to do all my imaging with CloneCD.
    To be objective; I loved the Easy CD package and when it did work, it was reliable. Since I do not live in a static world and like any other tweaker, am always in search of faster/bigger/friendlier products, I am dissapointed.
    So, if you dare to try, please make sure you have a drive image or custom restore disk available and your boot sequence starts from the CDROM.
20. 
    Revzonez

    Reviewing 5.3.2.34 (Dec 5, 2002)

    This isn't a new version,it was released back in October.
21. 
    nheimler

    Reviewing 5.3.2.34 (Nov 4, 2002)

    If you are using ECDC 5.3.1 stick with it! Had issues using this update under Windows XP. ECDC 5.3.2 just makes nice coasters for the coffee table. Even after a complete reinstall of OS and everything. OR hey...better yet stick with another program that you know works like Nero. Check out the new 5.5.9.17. Works like a charm!
22. 
    jrepin

    Reviewing 5.3.2.34 (Oct 25, 2002)

    That's one of the most buggy burning apps. Just give up on it and start using the real stuff like Nero Burning Rom.
23. 
    MyMaster

    Reviewing 5.3.2.34 (Oct 25, 2002)

    still fixing bugs? hahaha
24. 
    Banquo

    Reviewing 5.3.2.34 (Oct 25, 2002)

    I've been using version 5 with Windows XP for about a year now and have had no problems at all. Very easy to use, works perfectly fine. Pay no attention to the trolls who have nothing better to do than try to make people think they are l33t because they use Nero. They might grow up someday...
25. 
    halicon

    Reviewing 5.3.1 SP4 (Sep 24, 2002)

    I use two burning software packages and neither are easy cd creator, one being nero and the other being diskjuggler because of its capabilites. If you feel like waisting your time then by all means download it but most people don't have the time to waist.
26. 
    Faction

    Reviewing 5.3.1 (Sep 2, 2002)

    im a nero man myselfnever fails me .but i do use Roxio for makeing bootable cds . so i give it a 3
27. 
    x-cessive scratch

    Reviewing 5.3.1 (Sep 2, 2002)

    nero sucks anyways i never had any probs with easy cd creator 5 plat running windows xp nero sucked big time i bought both nero and easy cd creator 5 i was not thrilled with nero 1 bit so i got a refund this update makes my easy cd look better and run better
28. 
    pcspecialist

    Reviewing 5.3.1 (Sep 1, 2002)

    Nero totally blows this Roxio piece of @#*% away. Only reason I use Roxio is because digital cam uses the DirectCD format.
29. 
    BetaESP

    Reviewing 5.3.1 (Sep 1, 2002)

    Roxio always performs...This update (5.3.1) proves that they give what the customer wants. For example, I just bought a dvd burner (+R/+RW) and there last update only supported the (-R/-RW) format. Well since the +R/+RW format is going to be the mainstream format, they added support for this format and for my drive, and it could not work better. Also, under Windows XP, it works incredible!! Roxio Just performs and outshines any competition on the market. Can not wait to see what they have instore for the next update....
30. 
    mrzwiers

    Reviewing 5.1 (Mar 25, 2002)

    I tried to burn an Easy CD Creator file 3 times, 3 times a buffer underrun. Even at 2x speed, with every other program turned off, a UDMA 100 Hard drive and a Plextor 8x burner on a different IDE cable. My advice: Get Nero, it performs MUCH better, never has a buffer underrun with that, and is even smaller than this patch...
31. 
    crabbyappleton

    Reviewing 5.1 (Mar 19, 2002)

    12.4 megabyte "patch" for a program that *still* cannot perform as advertised, ie Take Two. Why not download an entire program such as Nero at 11.1 meg. At least it does what it says on the box. Put this horse down Roxio, it's lame.
32. 
    mtnsteve

    Reviewing 5.1 (Mar 19, 2002)

    If your running Windows 95/98 and you use the "Take Two" feature (back up/ recovery system) THINK TWICE about this "update"...it REMOVES it from your system! Because there was a problem with non DOS systems, they decided to just remove the feature....it's kinda like finding out the radio in your new car won't play am, so you return it to the dealer for service and they fix it by taking out the radio!
    
    Typical Roxio customer service....
    
    Gee, what if Microsoft took this approach, your next update would remove the whole operating system.
33. 
    grweldon

    Reviewing 5.02d (Jan 21, 2002)

    The Windows XP updater that Roxio makes available on thier website tells me that I don't have Easy CD Creator 5 Platinum installed so it can't run. This is right after a fresh re-install from the v5.0 CD! I like the software, but I can't use it with Windows XP so that makes it useless. Coupled with customer support that is the worst I've ever seen since Lview Pro.....
34. 
    tedbieri

    Reviewing 5.02d (Jan 8, 2002)

    It's Simple, Roxio finally put out an update that really works. No problem!
35. 
    rmcohen

    Reviewing 5.1a Update (Jan 3, 2002)

    Roxio: Just say no!
    
    I think Microsoft takes it on the chin a lot of times for this one specific suite of programs that's got to be the most unstable app out there.
36. 
    ditoa

    Reviewing 5.1a Update (Jan 3, 2002)

    Microsoft made the mistake of using Roxio to make the built in CD burning in Windows XP, they should have used ahead Nero or something, just look at all the updates there are to the CD Burning within Explorer on Windows Update already! Roxio cant program, if you want to make decent CDs get ANY other CD Burning program, in my opinion Nero is the best although it has some problems in multiple user system as they need to be Power Users but other than that it is tops :)
37. 
    Orbit

    Reviewing 5.1a Update (Jan 3, 2002)

    Yeah, let's add some more features to a program that isn't bug free in the first place. You're all right - BLOATWARE - what happened, why can't software companies just make a product that is absolutely rock solid and does what it's supposed to do? Now they have PHOTO EDITING ? Hmmm. Well, guess I can just throw my Photoshop out, then. Maybe Adobe will make some CD Burning software? Sure glad I read about your Win2000 issues, I just installed Win2K, but am using V 4 Deluxe. Thanks for clueing me in on the 2K problems. I'm sticking with V4 and CloneCD for my needs.
    All things must pass, I guess, and the era of EZCD being one of the best, seems to be nearing an end.
38. 
    CyberDoc999

    Reviewing 5.02c Update (Dec 13, 2001)

    Easy CD Creator is bloated and causes lots of problems. better to switch to Nero.
39. 
    NYC60

    Reviewing 5.02c Update (Dec 9, 2001)

    Has served my very well in Win98 SE. I use DirectCD daily, and have made excellent copies and customized data as well as audio CDs.
40. 
    skybluesmurf

    Reviewing 5.02c Update (Dec 8, 2001)

    well this is wierd... just got my update program from dell for XP computers and it came with version 5.1.1? and roxio is releaseing version 5.0.2? a little confuseing here i'd say...
41. 
    controler

    Reviewing 5.02c Update (Dec 8, 2001)

    Great program but I been running 5.02C for over a month
    and Roxio need to start posting the version on their site.
    For instance mine is 5.02(314) that is what I get in their help-about.
42. 
    chris_kabuki

    Reviewing 5.02c Update (Dec 8, 2001)

    Great update - finally everyone who whinged like a little school girl about it patching a dll can stop whinging.
43. 
    YinCh

    Reviewing 5.02b Update (Aug 23, 2001)

    everytime I try to make a multisession CD, I can't delete any content of it, It will say ... "the file is locked .... bla bla" any idea?
44. 
    d93mjo

    Reviewing 5.02b Update (Aug 23, 2001)

    This program was the best when it was an Adaptec product, but who are these boys at Roxio. Can't get the update to work and has paid mony for the program. Got the message "No qualifing Roxio software found".
45. 
    golbex

    Reviewing 5.02b Update (Aug 22, 2001)

    I think the program is great... when it works. It's SoundStream program crashes sometimes, though, leaving only EasyCD useable. Roxio's apps also take a while to load and are processor intensive (but visually good), so beware.
46. 
    jinno

    Reviewing 5.01s Update (May 12, 2001)

    1. ecdc5.01s.exe--This is not really update. It will spit out the message "no qualifing Roxio software found"
    2: Valid update is still update.exe.
    Why ?
    If you installed this program as custom, you did not select
    Take Two which is now known to everyone that kills Windows 2000. No fool uses default install...(come to think of it,
    Roxio should have fired all people who made this default install in this program.) So if you did not intall Take Two,
    ecdc5.01s.exe will say " no qualifing Roxio software found"
    3: What is Roxio thinking ? People who had installed Take Two as compulsory default setup...already corrupted Windows 2000..(of course it is safe until one reboots....)..then, this small update might save OS.
    Anyway, once the good software now ....the worst software...
    and if still this programmer is working at Roxio, ............
47. 
    brad1369

    Reviewing 5.01s Update (May 9, 2001)

    Same problems happening, error "no qualifing Roxio software found". after following Roxio's directions with no luck, tried different methods including registry key removal. still a no go. hopefully Roxio/Adaptec will finally get this product working, or maybe Congress will finally pass a consumer protection lemon law against software companies.
48. 
    quoderat

    Reviewing 5.01s Update (May 8, 2001)

    Followed the direction on the Roxio website exactly. Tried to install the update, got the message, "No qualifying Roxio product can be detected." Repeated. Same thing. Tried putting the update in the same directory as EZ CD Creator. Same error. Tried rebooting, then installing, against the direction. Same error. Now using anything but EZ CD Creator 5.
49. 
    PappaDj

    Reviewing 4.03a (Feb 6, 2001)

    NTI-CDMAKER BABY! Tried em all. Love this prog. Zero... count them... Zero coasters so far and I've used it for about a year. EZCD 1 out of 5 were coasters. Nero is great but often shot off a coaster or two. Nero may have more features over all than NTI but stability is superior to me. My clan of burners find it to be the best of em all. EZCD is not even on our shelves anymore. They joined the likes of my AOL cds. Have you ever nuked them in the mic for 2 minutes?
50. 
    jofin

    Reviewing 4.03a (Feb 6, 2001)

    Disappointing results and the program is not Freeware it is Adware!
51. 
    esheesle

    Reviewing 4.03a (Feb 6, 2001)

    I am currently using Norton Antivirus 2001 as part of Norton Systemworks 2001. As far as I know it is a full release. What is the deal?
    
    Eric
52. 
    Old_Pink

    Reviewing 4.03a (Feb 6, 2001)

    It works. It's also VERY bloated. CDRwin, Nero, and fireburner are just as functional and they aren't nearly as bloated. I currently use linux for all my burning. The way I look at it is if it's worth putting on CD, it's worth doing with right. I've coasted atleast one cd with all these windows packages, cdrecord and eclipt roaster will always be my app of choice, not one coaster yet. Even the finest app can fall pray to a buggy OS. Windows has a role on my system, but I'd rather not trust anything important to an OS best suited as a gaming console. You guys can debate which app is the best. I know already. I don't need a cheerful dot telling me how to burn a CD. If it suits your mentality, more power to you. Just remember... You're paying for these programs shouldn't they all work? While we're at it, what are you guys burning anyway? I hope it's nothing you should be paying for ;o) Now stop reading this and go read a book or talk to your spouse/significant other. You're wasting your life away while stuffing money into someone's pocket who could care less about you.
53. 
    AaronRudd

    Reviewing 4.03a (Feb 6, 2001)

    I don't think very highly of Easy CD Creator. It's what I got with my burner, and I find it's a pain in the ass. Takes lots of space installed, slow to load, etc. Then my friend heard about Nero, and recommended I try it out, so I did, and that's all I use now. I've tried other software, but nothing comes close to Nero :) Nero rules all.
54. 
    soundgard

    Reviewing 4.03a (Feb 6, 2001)

    I love easy cd creator. But i found that 4.03a gave me some problems. I am running Win2k sp1 and after i patched from 4.03 to 4.03a i couldn't burn any cd's. This was probably just some problem on my box, but i thought i would share it.
55. 
    nova897

    Reviewing 4.02E (Oct 24, 2000)

    I'd give it a 5 stars... but...er... i can;t.
    it sux. i mean it's easy to use, that's what i give my customers, but as myself i use nero and wincdr. nero rocks i just wish they had an update for it to recognise my HP9500I 12x8x32 burner.
    does anyone kknow where i can get such a thing?
    pelase e-mail me. nova897@hotmail.com
56. 
    chandru

    Reviewing 4.02 Update (Jun 22, 2000)

    LUDDY: as i said b4, an Easy CD creator 4.02 update was released b4 but that contained a bug for NT and this update that is just released fixes that bug for NT users, so if dont use NT, dont download if you've downloaded the 4.02 update which was released b4!
57. 
    luddy

    Reviewing 4.02 Update (Jun 22, 2000)

    Hasn't this update been out since April 17, 2000? I wouldn't consider it new...BTW, program is great tool!
58. 
    sbearden

    Reviewing 4.02 Update (Jun 21, 2000)

    I personally like both Nero and Easy Cd Creator. But I have to ask why this is being posted today when it came out on April 17th?
59. 
    KrzySk8ter

    Reviewing 4.02 Update (Jun 21, 2000)

    I've been using eazy ed creator for a while now. It is extreemly easy and straightforward to use. I also use many of the competing programs such as Nero and CdrWin. I agree that adaptec should encorporate the use of bin/que files. The individuals who are completely trashing this program should give some support for their views; i'd like to see what substance they can come up with ;)
60. 
    hclarkjr

    Reviewing 4.02 Update (Jun 21, 2000)

    i have been using version 4 since it was released with a mitsumi 4802te 4x2x8.have not had no trouble at all with it burning cd's,be they mp3 to audio cd or just data cd's.the only complaint i have is that this version is a big memory hog and will sometimes lock your system up if you try doing anything else while using it.it is very well laid out and easy to use.plus adaptec has list bot setup for people that are having trouble and it is maintained real well by their staff.
61. 
    reverend

    Reviewing 4.02a Patch (Mar 30, 2000)

    It needs BIN/CUE support badly, but it's really a good program, any idiot could use the program. I like Nero better, but this is conveniant and easy to work with.
62. 
    bratko

    Reviewing 4.02a Patch (Mar 30, 2000)

    This soft really sux. Did you ever tried much better proggies like Nero (www.ahead.de) and www.fireburner.com ?
63. 
    jinno

    Reviewing 4.02a Patch (Mar 30, 2000)

    Beta is a beta. But this beta is pretty bad in terms of usability. Note I am writing this from Netscape. Type is too tiny.
    1: Bookmark is now Bookmarks. Bookmarks does not show all of my listings. (Testers uses maybe 2~3 entries, I bet.)
    2: To make the matters worse, I used explorer to drag and drop url from Favorite Folder. Usually it works. Then, this version of Netscape shows (x). I.e. It does not workl.
    3: Back (
64. 
    f0xmuld3r

    Reviewing 4.02a Patch (Mar 30, 2000)

    Gave it a 2 too :(
65. 
    icqangels

    Reviewing 4.02a Patch (Mar 30, 2000)

    I would have thought that Netscape learned their lesson by now, but I guess not, there was a time when they were the best browser on the market, unfortunately it is impossible to dessign good webpages for this Browser nowadays, so I rate this 2 just because their name is Netscape and I know they can do it better than this,
    
    Brian Larsen
    icqangels.dk
66. 
    jmelli

    Reviewing 4.02a Patch (Mar 30, 2000)

    about 8 megs of it is for java 2 alone...which you dont have to install if you dont want, but you still have to download.
67. 
    xwtx

    Reviewing 4.02a Patch (Mar 29, 2000)

    for a pre beta, this isnt bad at all. pretty much a mozilla nightly build w/ netscape branding, but like i said, very nice. can't wait for skin switching to be put into the UI!!!
68. 
    jkane

    Reviewing 4.02a Patch (Mar 29, 2000)

    I've been downloading and testing the Mozilla engine for weeks now, and it has consistently been 5 megs. I downloaded the 16 Megabyte Netscape 6 Preview, and I was shocked to find that the extra 11 megs only consisted of a spell checker and Netscape branded AIM. I expected that most of the increased file size was due to the Netscape interface being glued to the Mozilla engine, but nope, not a bit different. Sad. Mozilla was looking good, Netscape has turned it big and slow. Oh well, here's to IE 5.5 still having the edge!
69. 
    diabolique

    Reviewing 4.02a Patch (Mar 29, 2000)

    I _would_ run ie5.5 I like it ..but at the moment it has too many flaws. When it is final I will download it straight away.
70. 
    pluralsingularity

    Reviewing 4.02a Patch (Mar 29, 2000)

    first off...what's with all the multi-posts...Lelu Dallas Multi-pass. Secondly, even if a browser like Netscape using the Mozilla core can't really do what it was intended, ie., render html correctly, it's better than IE cuz it's open source, NOT! And how many Netscape bashers are Linux users? I'll bet a lot. Have you guys forgotten your blind devotion to all things open source? Netscape Mozilla...it's great! Can't do anything, but it's great...it's open source after all, hehe.
71. 
    f0rg3

    Reviewing 4.01 Patch (Feb 19, 2000)

    Hey the program is great, it gets what you want done with no hassal. My complaint is does it work on Athlon systems. Ever since I upgraded to my athlon system, my previously working CD-R now burns correctly in ez cd creator, but no cd-rom can read the cd....
72. 
    L0sts0ul

    Reviewing 4.01 Patch (Feb 14, 2000)

    I have been usind this program for 2 years now, and have been more than happy with it. Out of approximately 500 CD's I have had 2 coasters(they hang on my wall). I believe most of this ranting about others being better is nothing but loyalty to another brand. Get over it. This is good software, and it does makes a wonderful CD.
73. 
    GuANu

    Reviewing 4.01 Patch (Dec 20, 1999)

    I've been using Easy CD Creator since ver 3 when it came w/ my 2x8 Mistumi 2801TE, its a good program for making cd's, its only drawback is not capable of burning BIN/CUE files. Even though they are created with CDRWIN, it would be nice not having to use BinChunker, and winimage to burn em. For BIN/CUE files, I reccommend using FireBurner.
74. 
    TheCure

    Reviewing 4.01 Patch (Dec 14, 1999)

    I think this program is great (and I am not a beginner). I especially like the fact that you can burn directly from mp3. I've had no problems burning with a SCSI HP9200 under Win98SE. However, even with this patch I'm still having a problem under Win2000. It seems to record some 'static' noise on the first track of every audio disc. Anybody else having this problem?
75. 
    superelvis

    Reviewing 4.01 Patch (Dec 6, 1999)

    This program is LAME.... it is for the beginner. It takes forever to load, craps out a lot, and you have to reinstall it like every other month or it will just stop working. I have used it on 2 of my computers and have had the same problems. I am now just using NERO. It is great, but geared towards a more advanced user.
76. 
    stp

    Reviewing 4.01 Patch (Nov 30, 1999)

    Nasser, it does say patch.
77. 
    jrleduc

    Reviewing 4.01 Patch (Nov 25, 1999)

    Definitely not a Demo! This is an Update to CD Creator Deluxe Version 4.0. It is intended as a fix for some of the bugs that 4.0 has.(It does have quite a few.)Unless you are running Creator 4.0 It is useless to Download this Update!!!
    
    JrLeduc
78. 
    nasser

    Reviewing 4.01 Patch (Nov 24, 1999)

    What? Is this a patch or a demo? Rating of 1 for bad discription. (although EZCD Creator 4 gets 4/5 stars from me)

Discuss Easy CD & DVD Creator Platinum Update

No comments yet