File Details |
|
| File Size | 23.5 MB |
|---|---|
| License | Shareware, $39.99 |
| Operating System | Windows (All) |
| Date Added | October 6, 2022 |
| Total Downloads | 6,598 |
| Publisher | Emurasoft, Inc. |
| Homepage | EmEditor |
Publisher's Description
EmEditor is a text editor for Windows that supports JavaScript or VBScript macros, Unicode, plug-ins, syntax highlighting (including embedded scripts in HTML, ASP, and PHP files), drag-and-drop, and menu and keyboard customizations. This release supports not only JavaScript and VBScript for the text editing macros, but also PerlScript, PHPScript, Python, Ruby, and other languages as long as script engines you want to use are installed.
Supports macros and advanced features.
Latest Reviews
cyberguy reviewed v17.1.0 Beta 4 on Aug 10, 2017
This editor does everything I need a text editor to do and ranks at the top of my favorites list. And before the trolls start, I have used notepad++ (32 and 64-bit), PSPad, EditPad (lite and pro), UltraEdit and CodeWrite. I particularly like the way it handled rectangular blocks of text and macros - it is far more streamlined and logical than most of the others.
Of them all this sits at the top of my favorites regardless of price.
guti reviewed v16.1.0 on Jul 3, 2016
Very fast, compact and supporting huge files.
A pitty we do not have a lite free version.
Karol Mily reviewed v15.3.1 on Sep 17, 2015
Very fast.
For large Text and HTML files I prefer it over PSPad editor.
balanceinmotion reviewed v14.5.3 on Sep 24, 2014
excellent!
mikebratley reviewed v14.3.1 on Mar 11, 2014
4 stars
chrispaul reviewed v14.0.1 on Feb 17, 2014
excellent
barrytbutler reviewed v14.0.1 on Jan 29, 2014
5 stars. really good.
-1 reviewed v14.0.1 on Jan 20, 2014
Hilarious. Notepad++. Compared to EmEditor Professional.
That person must not know that Notepad++ is strictly 32-bit. They must also not have tried it with 100-MB+ files, or else they'd know that EmEditor is drastically faster.
I tested search/replace operations under Windows 8.1 on a 146-MB file with EmEditor (64-bit) and Notepad++. The repeatable results: What EmEditor was able to do in 4 seconds or less, Notepad++ took over 6 MINUTES to do!
But hey, it's free, so let's rate it highly, right?
Calling Notepad++ an "alternative" to EmEditor Professional is like calling a bucket an alternative to a firehose.
And BTW, if paying for an application is the biggest mistake you've ever made, you're doing pretty well. Although I have to think that's hyperbole.
PetePat reviewed v14.0.1 on Dec 19, 2013
Maybe expensive for someone but certainly not garbage, actually imho best editor. Notepad++ or Akelpad are great free alternatives.
RitoSwan reviewed v14.0.1 on Dec 17, 2013
Notepad++, while completely free, has a ton of better features than this expensive garbage. Buying this crap (for just 1 year) was the biggest mistake i made in life.
cyberguy reviewed v17.1.0 Beta 4 on Aug 10, 2017
Pros: Native 64-bit
Handles huge files
Excellent column/irregular block editing support
Cons: No freeware version.
Bottom Line: This editor does everything I need a text editor to do and ranks at the top of my favorites list. And before the trolls start, I have used notepad++ (32 and 64-bit), PSPad, EditPad (lite and pro), UltraEdit and CodeWrite. I particularly like the way it handled rectangular blocks of text and macros - it is far more streamlined and logical than most of the others.
Of them all this sits at the top of my favorites regardless of price.
guti reviewed v16.1.0 on Jul 3, 2016
Very fast, compact and supporting huge files.
A pitty we do not have a lite free version.
Karol Mily reviewed v15.3.1 on Sep 17, 2015
Very fast.
For large Text and HTML files I prefer it over PSPad editor.
balanceinmotion reviewed v14.5.3 on Sep 24, 2014
excellent!
mikebratley reviewed v14.3.1 on Mar 11, 2014
4 stars
chrispaul reviewed v14.0.1 on Feb 17, 2014
excellent
barrytbutler reviewed v14.0.1 on Jan 29, 2014
5 stars. really good.
-1 reviewed v14.0.1 on Jan 20, 2014
Hilarious. Notepad++. Compared to EmEditor Professional.
That person must not know that Notepad++ is strictly 32-bit. They must also not have tried it with 100-MB+ files, or else they'd know that EmEditor is drastically faster.
I tested search/replace operations under Windows 8.1 on a 146-MB file with EmEditor (64-bit) and Notepad++. The repeatable results: What EmEditor was able to do in 4 seconds or less, Notepad++ took over 6 MINUTES to do!
But hey, it's free, so let's rate it highly, right?
Calling Notepad++ an "alternative" to EmEditor Professional is like calling a bucket an alternative to a firehose.
And BTW, if paying for an application is the biggest mistake you've ever made, you're doing pretty well. Although I have to think that's hyperbole.
PetePat reviewed v14.0.1 on Dec 19, 2013
Maybe expensive for someone but certainly not garbage, actually imho best editor. Notepad++ or Akelpad are great free alternatives.
RitoSwan reviewed v14.0.1 on Dec 17, 2013
Notepad++, while completely free, has a ton of better features than this expensive garbage. Buying this crap (for just 1 year) was the biggest mistake i made in life.
olivergiving reviewed v13.0.5 on Sep 25, 2013
great stuff
pjafrombbay reviewed v13.0.5 on Sep 21, 2013
Still a great text editor.
Hallway reviewed v13.0.0 on Jun 18, 2013
As a paying customer, I expected much more from a "major upgrade" for a shareware text editor. The free Notepad++ does so many things way more properly and easy.
Thumb down, I will not pay again for such a poor overall "upgrade".