Reviews of EverNote

1. 
   dhry

   Reviewing 3.5.0.437 Beta (Sep 30, 2009)

   I too agree with Diam0nd. The previous version of Evernote ran faster and was far better. The program has become bloatware like so much other stuff out there these days - and mandating that you create an account on their site to use the program is a reason to avoid IMO.
   
   Damn hilarious - I just did a Google search for Evernote v2 and all I got back were a stack of torrent links to pirate versions. Note even Filehippo has the previous version.
2. 
   DaComboMan

   Reviewing 3.5.0.437 Beta (Sep 30, 2009)

   I agree with DiamOnd (except the f part).
3. 
   ajua

   Reviewing 3.5.0.437 Beta (Sep 29, 2009)

   Excellent note taking application. Together with their free online service, they are both extremely well designed and useful.
   
   They also have portable installtion and Windows Mobile support.
   
   I guess this is where Microsoft One Note should start for their next revision.
4. 
   Diam0nd

   Reviewing 3.5.0.437 Beta (Sep 29, 2009)

   Complete crap.
   
   Written on a .NET language (great language for any lazy programmer) and thus:
   1) fonts look blurry and ugly
   2) very slow on my dual-core windows 7 pro x64 system
   3) unresponsive and duplicating actions
   
   And this is the end of the list basically, because all the points above make this program unusable.
   
   They say it's great on macs, but on windows it SUCKS. Guys, wake the f up: .net languages SUCK. They are good (easy to write programs) ONLY for programmers writing in them, NOT for the end-users. Evernote Corp, be a man: go native! (C++ > *)
   
   P.S. Again, I am NOT talking about the concept of Evernote, I'm talking ONLY about it's realisation for windows platform.
5. 
   dagl

   Reviewing 3.1.0.1212 (Jul 17, 2009)

   Couldn't create a note - option was greyed out. Bummer...

Discuss EverNote

No comments yet