RSSBrowse Fileforum
Windows 7/2000/Vista/XP / Open Source / 505,713 downloads
Google Chrome is a browser that combines a minimal design with sophisticated technology to make the web faster, safer, and easier. It has one box for everything: Type in the address bar and get suggestions for both search and web pages. Will give you thumbnails of your top sites; Access your favorite pages instantly with lightning speed from any new tab.
- Publisher
- Homepage
- Other Versions
Reviews of Google Chrome for Windows
-
uberflyReviewing 26.0.1410.64 (Apr 10, 2013)
They calmly walk the internet with you, clipboard in hand recording your every interest. Enjoy your brave new world.
-
-
Aegis69
Reviewing 25.0.1364.160 (Mar 11, 2013)
Chrome is a violent piece of rapeware that will steal your girlfriend, poop on your mom, marry your dog, empty your bank accounts and then blow up the earth.
-
LoneStar64Reviewing 26.0.1410.28 Beta (Mar 8, 2013)
Chrome needs to fix the double space issue with the menu and bookmarks. It needs to be a setting change, don't worry about tablets so much.
-
Zootopia3001Reviewing 25.0.1364.152 (Mar 5, 2013)
@alalec
The bookmarks are far from ergonomic, which is why the bookmark 'functionality' is by far the number one complaint about Google Chrome.
And what's with the 'Web Store' icon? Sure does mess up a theme. Heaven forbid if it should be placed on a toolbar instead. -
alalecReviewing 25.0.1364.152 (Mar 5, 2013)
Each time I think about an ergonomic or functional feature I find it implemented in Chrome. Excellent and very nice design of the position/superposition of Tab Pages, the Extension functionality, the Address Box, the Bookmarks, and the whole UI. One multifunctional box for address and search entries. The design of the other browsers is not only ugly but it lacks ergonomy. The other browsers occupy your screen using huge or misplaced UI components and ugly toolbars which invade the security and the ergonomy of Internet browsing. Their UI components may jump from one place to another each time you start your browser.
Behind the curtains, the Chrome's engine is fast and safe. Google provides an excellent synch. service which allows you to find your Chrome browser configuration available on all your PCs. The practical features of Chrome are well thought and well implemented. In order to discover the newest innovations of Chrome I use since the beginning the Dev. version which presents good stability. I would like to say THANK YOU to GOOGLE and CHROME Team. -
bruno.
Reviewing 25.0.1364.97 (Feb 25, 2013)
Windows 25 is too far away, they should concentrate on Windows 7 and 8 first....
-
-
-Lord-
Reviewing 26.0.1410.5 Dev (Feb 15, 2013)
Decent, but not enough configuration options, especially when it comes to privacy.
-
Terumo
Reviewing 26.0.1410.3 Dev (Feb 14, 2013)
Best browser there is out there.
Norweigan.. beste nettleser som er der ute. -
tafugate
Reviewing 26.0.1403.0 Dev (Feb 5, 2013)
i haven't been able to run canary or betas since december. it worked fine, then one day canary wouldn't load pages anymore. i've read a lot of forums, some peeps have the same problem, some don't. perplexing.
-
-
-
Zootopia3001
Reviewing 24.0.1312.57 (Jan 31, 2013)
Why is not Betanews offering the full standalone installer like FileHippo? What they offer here is just a calling device by Google to get the latest stable version. Same could be said for other software offered up here.
3 stars for Chrome, 3 stars for Betanews -
-
-
jogygeorge
Reviewing 25.0.1364.58 Beta (Jan 31, 2013)
Would have loved Chrome, but some extensions work so much smoother on FF than Chrome!
Tab Mix Plus ... don't see an alt in Chrome - I need my tabs at the bottom.
X-notifier - Chrome has it, but by no means is it the same as on FF. No pop-up notifications, no way to click the icon and get all mails opened.
All-in-One-Gestures - Gesture extensions on Chrome may or may not work. It depends a lot on luck.
All-in-One-Sidebar - don't see an alternative.
Easy Drag-to-Go - nothing that has all the features as the one in FF.
If someone can suggest similar extensions for all of the above, I'd move! FF is slow, but I'd rather remain in my comfort zone. -
Uriel
Reviewing 24.0.1312.57 (Jan 30, 2013)
Spyware. Why is it that spyware cleaners don't quarantine it is what I don't understand. I guess Google pays them off.
-
some guy
Reviewing 25.0.1364.58 Beta (Jan 30, 2013)
if I want to track my child's internet habits I will ask google
-
DKDude
Reviewing 25.0.1364.45 Beta (Jan 24, 2013)
I LOVE this browser.
It is fast, stable and secure. -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 24.0.1312.56 (Jan 23, 2013)
I've been using Google Chrome since it came out, and I'll tell you I've never looked back ever since. It is without any doubt the best and most fast browser anyone can get, no waiting on pages to load it's just quick and sleek. So folks, you can't get anything better, I've tried them all and they just can't live up to Chrome, believe me.
and Chrome is in my opinion beyond rating, but anyway as allways, FIVE THUMBS UP!!!! -
-
Aegis69
Reviewing 24.0.1312.56 (Jan 22, 2013)
This piece of rapeware stole my dog, killed my family, gave herpes to my AIDS and then stole all the money from my orphanage.
-
Terumo
Reviewing 26.0.1386.0 Dev (Jan 19, 2013)
Eng. language (best there is.) Norwegian language ( beste som er.)
Work fine for me, love it. -
Ryusennin
Reviewing 26.0.1386.0 Dev (Jan 18, 2013)
Sven, you sound like a broken record. And I'm polite.
-
-
-
Music4Ever
Reviewing 25.0.1364.29 Beta (Jan 16, 2013)
@Enlightenment:
Offline (full) setup - http://www.filehippo.com/download_google_chrome/ -
Enlightenment
Reviewing 25.0.1364.29 Beta (Jan 15, 2013)
Please link to the full 30MB+ download. It's available from multiple downloading sites, but not BetaNews, WTF???
Chrome is the best! -
eviljolly
Reviewing 24.0.1312.52 (Jan 14, 2013)
@Music4Ever. My problem isn't someone criticizing a program, it's when they say stuff like "Google spyware", which is simply not true. It's sensationalist, and scares people away from even trying something that they could potentially like.
I'll agree to disagree as far as features and performance goes, but the word "spyware" is being tossed around way too freely. -
eviljolly
Reviewing 25.0.1364.29 Beta (Jan 14, 2013)
I keep several browsers installed. Chrome, Firefox, Opera, Safari, and IE (meh). I use them to test websites I design, and to check and see if it's something browser specific when I run into a problem on a website.
Chrome is my go-to browser though, and my default. I love the available extensions, the speed, the reliability, and the security. It rates highly in reviews, and comes out on top in most tests I see. -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 24.0.1312.52 (Jan 12, 2013)
@eviljolly/DKDude - You have made your points as have I - I'm not going to comment again on Chrome as it really amounts to forum trolling & I don't agree with myself or anyone doing that or continually slating a program although this is being typed on Chrome 24.0.1312.52 ~
It is possible to disagree with some aspects or functions of a program & use it at the same time without being hypocritical ~ (Windows? / MS Office etc.) + I always install all programs I comment on, how could I do anything else?
http://img195.imageshack...img195/8531/chromek.jpg
But recent reviews on Chrome are getting a bit silly so I will desist :-) -
DKDude
Reviewing 25.0.1364.29 Dev (Jan 12, 2013)
You want a secure browser, get this.
You want a fast browser, get this.
you want a reliable browser, get this.
In short, this is the BEST browser out there. -
DKDude
Reviewing 24.0.1312.52 (Jan 12, 2013)
Absolutely the best and most secure browser available ATM.
-
-
Ryusennin
Reviewing 25.0.1364.29 Dev (Jan 11, 2013)
Not bad.
This version supports VP9 and Ogg Opus. -
-
-
-
wangsw
Reviewing 23.0.1271.97 (Jan 9, 2013)
Mr. & Mrs. Smith is a romantic comedy disguised as an action movie. Also, it is a fun, summer popcorn movie that actually manages to get in a few humorous but truthful bits on relationships and marriage, being suitable to watch at your home with your lovers. So, that you need to have the movie DVD box set collection.
-
wangsw
Reviewing 24.0.1312.52 Beta (Jan 9, 2013)
"The Others" is a suspense/supernatural thriller set in stately manor in post WWII England where devoted wife and mother Grace (Nicole Kidman) awaits the return of her husband who was called off to the war. She has two children with a rather unique condition, as they cannot be exposed, even in moderation, to bright light of any kind. Especially lethal is sunlight, which is blocked out by large draperies hanging in the dozens of rooms throughout the mansion.
If you want to have the movieDVD box set collection, you can visit the dvd-usa.com to get more info. -
Aegis69
Reviewing 24.0.1312.52 Beta (Jan 8, 2013)
This "rapeware" killed my family and gave my AIDS, herpes.
-
eviljolly
Reviewing 23.0.1271.97 (Dec 25, 2012)
Music4Ever
Chrome itself is not mining your data, and this is my point.
The functionality of instant search requires keystrokes to be sent to Google. This is just the nature of the beast, and if you don't like it, it's easily disabled. Also, the only keystrokes it logs are the ones you are typing into the omnibar, and you can also use a different search engine entirely if you don't like it. It's a matter of convenience.
Also, any browser with search suggestions enabled is sending data to search engines. So Firefox, IE, Opera, etc are all doing the same thing. I don't see what makes Chrome the bad guy here. They even make a "do not track" option, and clearly state that "omnibox input may be logged" in options. They're not trying to hide this.
Google is the largest search engine in the world, and of course they will be under fire constantly, just as Apple, Microsoft, and other large companies are all the time. It doesn't mean they're evil, that they're tracking your every move, or that they ever intend to invade your privacy beyond providing relevant advertising content. They make mistakes like any other company, and they'll suffer the consequences, but these articles are nothing less than sensationalist.
I've skimmed all of your links, and other than the instant search functionality (which I've already discussed) they're all just talking about Google itself. They're a huge company, and just because they're under attack doesn't mean they're intentionally doing anything wrong, or that their Chrome browser is a security risk.
Chrome has proven itself as the most secure browser out there in many comparisons. Sure, exploits are found, but that goes for any popular software out there, including other top browsers. Performance-wise, it's leader of the pack in most tests. I see no reason not to rate it 5 stars.
I find it interesting that in an earlier comment you said that Pale Moon is your browser of choice. Even at the time you posted that, the most current version of Pale Moon was using a version of Firefox with known exploits.
You posted on Aug 24, 2012
"My favorite: http://www.palemoon.org/";
Compare with: http://www.mozilla.org/s...rabilities/firefox.html
I can hardly take you seriously, using a 3rd party browser modification, which doesn't keep itself on the forefront of security. You're worried about Google seeing what you type in the omnibox, but overlook something like this. Ridiculous... -
Sven123456789
Reviewing 23.0.1271.97 (Dec 21, 2012)
1 of the worse browsers out on the web. No features. Can't stop ads. Its a basic childs browser if thats what your looking for.
-
egg83
Reviewing 25.0.1364.5 Dev (Dec 20, 2012)
In fairness, I can say that I have had only one crash of consequence with Chrome. However, am concerned with privacy issues using this browser. I guess no browser is totally safe. With this branded version of Chromium, I guess Google has their tracking mechanisms live and ready in this browser.
-
DKDude
Reviewing 25.0.1364.5 Dev (Dec 20, 2012)
Best browser there is, love it, it's fast it's secure and it's reliable.
@egg83.
If you like this browser, but feel unsafe about your privacy, then take a look at this.
http://www.comodo.com/ho...rs-toolbars/browser.php
Same browser, but the so called "privacy problem" has been removed. -
some guy
Reviewing 25.0.1364.5 Dev (Dec 20, 2012)
no matter how much you try to spam your browser on a daily basis it will never be installed
-
DKDude
Reviewing 23.0.1271.97 (Dec 12, 2012)
Absolutely the best, most secure and fastest browser available.
Don't listen to the Tinfoilhatloonies. -
gatorfan95
Reviewing 23.0.1271.97 (Dec 12, 2012)
If this browser is so good, why do they have to pay other software developers hide the installer in their installers to trick people into using it? I have read several of the articles music listed below, in fact I linked the BBC article in an earlier review of this trash. Use it at your own peril.
-
Music4Ever
Reviewing 23.0.1271.97 (Dec 12, 2012)
Jolly Thank you for your extensive article written regarding myself, it is appreciated greatly.
The question is: Does Chrome collect data?
The answer is quite simply is yes, the problem is not everyone is informed that this does occur, this need not happen because if you like the layout of Chrome there are alternatives that look the same, & do not Data Mine.
Google has also been in trouble recently with the way that this is done by the EU, & the USA among other places & fined for their behavior - Why do you think that is? Jolly I suggest you read the info in the links with an open mind & see for yourself the differences between Chrome & Chromium/ Iron etc.
I have a very fast fibre internet connection, used the net since just about day one & spend most working days in server rooms - I was not born yesterday nor do I believe in conspiracy theories. I also believe foolish people share far to much data on the likes of Facebook but that's another story.
Of course each & every site we visit on the internet requires our IP, this alone gives a fair amount of info including your ISP, area & more that is & always has been the case - However I & many others do object to the amount of info Google & others are mining, if you are happy with that & are aware of the facts that your choice ~
BTW It's unfortunate you find my occasional reviews intolerable but you are just going to have to live with them. If it gets to much for you to deal with may I suggest you visit a medical specialist or avoid 'FileForum' or other sites where I may make my feelings known as where I live it's a free world.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17216464 (BBC reputable enough? If not I will easily find (many) alternatives)
http://www.sci-tech-toda...l?story_id=022000014F6W
http://www.csmonitor.com...-for-violating-FTC-deal
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-17737528
http://royal.pingdom.com...ut-you-and-the-internet/
http://lifehacker.com/57...send-to-google-about-me
http://www.dailymail.co....competition-abuses.html -
some guy
Reviewing 23.0.1271.97 (Dec 12, 2012)
Google admits Chrome tracks web addresses
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/n...me-tracks-web-addresses -
eviljolly
Reviewing 23.0.1271.95 (Dec 11, 2012)
@Music4Ever
You sure like taking things out of context and making straw man arguments. Wait, do you work for Fox News? It's really weird that some of you care so much about trying to destroy Google's reputation that you show up so often after a new version is released to spring these scare tactics on everyone. If I was half the conspiracy theorist you are, I'd probably have some crazy idea about you working for a competing browser company.
Chrome is a very secure browser. If you're afraid of tracking cookies, then you either need to use extensions/settings to prevent their function, or just get off the internet and go live in a cabin in the woods. Chrome isn't some magical evil portal that Google uses to document every facet of your online presence. Their #1 goal is providing relevant advertising, just as many other sites do. Hell, the browser isn't even what does this, it's the websites you visit. Change your search engine and call it a day. When I installed Chrome recently, it popped up and asked me what search engine I preferred, so I didn't even have to use Google if I didn't want to.
All of this scary stuff you think they're doing will happen in Firefox. It will happen in Opera. It will happen in Internet Explorer. This will happen in any common modern day browser without it being specifically set up to block it. Chrome doesn't do anything "worse" than other available browsers that makes it less secure, and it doesn't invade your privacy any more using another browser. If someone has evidence to the contrary from REPUTABLE sources, please cite it.
If Chrome is "spyware" like many of you claim, prove it. How is the browser itself spying on anyone? If you dislike the Google websites and their practices, and think other companies providing similar services aren't doing the exact same things, you're delusional. They just happen to be the biggest, and therefore come under the most scrutiny. -
shrekorfiona
Reviewing 25.0.1354.0 Dev (Dec 11, 2012)
@krgood
There is a version 25.0.1354.0 dev. I've bee running it the past 12 hrs. You can download the installer here.
http://dl.google.com/chr....0_chrome_installer.exe -
krgood
Reviewing 25.0.1354.0 Dev (Dec 10, 2012)
There is no version 25...Downloaded this several times and each time it comes up as V23....???
Just re downloaded the link provided by Shrekor*, removed my V23 in total, including data, installed the downloaded file and when completed, checked the "about Chrome" and it shows Version 23.0.1271.95 m....??? -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 24.0.1312.32 Beta (Dec 5, 2012)
DK Dude: - I see you have moved? The only thing I'm laughing at you - The reason? It seems you believe what Google tell you instead of those who are informed - AKA - the rest of the world - What a sucker...
-
DKDude
Reviewing 24.0.1312.32 Beta (Dec 4, 2012)
Absolutely the best browser out there.
While we wait for a new and great update - Look, point and laugh at the tinfoilbeanieparade.
Here's a little something for the loonytoons.
http://zapatopi.net/afdb/testimonials.html -
eviljolly
Reviewing 24.0.1312.27 Beta (Nov 30, 2012)
My favorite browser by far. Don't let the uninformed conspiracy theorist people here scare you off. Google even has an option under advanced settings for "Send a ‘Do Not Track’ request with your browsing traffic."
If you're concerned about privacy, quit listening to random tin-foil hat people on the internet and read the privacy policy yourself.
http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/privacy.html
As for speed, Chrome is mostly on top here as well, despite other users saying Firefox "wipes the floor" with it.
http://www.tomshardware....3-opera-12,3228-16.html -
dwight_stegall
Reviewing 24.0.1312.27 Beta (Nov 30, 2012)
Google Chrome is not a browser you want to install if you don't like being tracked everywhere you go on the internet. It has a function that is supposed to allow you to block or allow individual cookies. But this function has never worked in Chrome.
Both Firefox and Internet Explorer have this function and it works great in both of them. But they won't do this by default. You have to set them up to do that.
I only allow cookies from sites here I have login accounts. But some of these sites use several cookies to make their pages interactive and to allow you to login. If you don't know this blocking cookies will drive you crazy trying to figure out why certain parts of pages don't function or won't load.
An example: At CNN.com you have to type in these two cookie URLs http://cnn.com and http://audience.cnn.com -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 24.0.1312.27 Beta (Nov 29, 2012)
DKDude has used Chrome for so long now he has no idea how good other browsers are - Get a grip DKDude & look out the window.
If you really want a fast secure browser use Pale Moon or Firefox - Wipes the floor with Chrome on 32 & 64 BIT OS's -
(what is a periode ?) -
Andem
Reviewing 24.0.1312.25 Beta (Nov 27, 2012)
I feel uncomfortable about using this browser because of potential privacy issues. There are other projects which use Chromium code and take all the benefits of speed yet don't track you.
But it is extremely fast and very standards-compliant! -
j0seant
Reviewing 23.0.1271.91 (Nov 27, 2012)
Massive GDI Leaks from versión 19 to 23:
http://code.google.com/p...issues/detail?id=134837 -
shamas
Reviewing 24.0.1312.2 Dev (Nov 2, 2012)
I have heard rumors of Chrome being intrusive, but nothing has happened to me personally, or to anyone I've spoken with. If you feel unsafe using it, just grab some extensions to block tracking, or configure your firewall and such appropriately. I will always use Google Chrome~
-
DKDude
Reviewing 24.0.1312.2 Dev (Nov 1, 2012)
The best browser out there, I've used many different browsers, FF for a very long periode, but then GC was releast, I've never looked back.
Don't mind the tools/trolls who obviously don't use this browser, but think they need to badmouth it. All I can say to them, use your tinfoilhats, and get a life. -
Steve1209
Reviewing 23.0.1271.60 Beta (Nov 1, 2012)
Still the fastest, most updated, has most extensions & best browser around, tops all other browsers http://internet-browser-review.toptenreviews.com/
-
Aegis69
Reviewing 24.0.1312.2 Dev (Nov 1, 2012)
this is essentially crimeware, instal if you like being criminalized.
-
-
-
Music4Ever
Reviewing 23.0.1271.40 Beta (Oct 17, 2012)
16 October 2012 -
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19959306
'Google told to fix privacy policy by EU data regulators' - 'Now CNIL has issued a critical report on the policy, and called for changes, with a warning that there could be litigation if Google does not respond'
See also: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19953241
'Auke Haagsma, a director for the Initiative for a Competitive Online Marketplace (Icomp), told the BBC that Google should have anticipated the EU's stance.
"The EU was very clear, even before Google introduced its changes, it almost certainly violated EU law'
Interesting ? -
Steve1209
Reviewing 22.0.1229.94 (Oct 12, 2012)
This Browser is Constantly updated, it's the best, it has extension support better than any other, it's FAST, I get a new update about weekly/bi-weekly with improvements!
-
DKDude
Reviewing 23.0.1271.17 Beta (Oct 8, 2012)
The Best! no other browser comes even close.
Wonder what people do on the net, since they are so paranoid. -
-
johnwilliams0333
Reviewing 23.0.1271.17 Beta (Oct 5, 2012)
Chrome is a browser I think the best because the only browser which gives instant translation new jersey dentist http://www.caliberdental.com/
-
Terumo
Reviewing 24.0.1284.2 Dev (Oct 3, 2012)
Works good for me, and it will works good for you. :)
-
Music4Ever
Reviewing 23.0.1271.10 Beta (Oct 3, 2012)
wholemkt8 is selling counterfeit goods - Do not attempt to open the link ~
-
-
FatBastard
Reviewing 22.0.1229.79 (Sep 26, 2012)
Still the best but I hate the downloadmanager.
If it wasn't for the downloadmanager I would give it 5/5 -
-
CapZap
Reviewing 22.0.1229.79 (Sep 25, 2012)
I used Netscape until 1998 when I switched to Opera ($30 or so at the time) and used Opera until 2011 when I switched to Chrome. I find the extensions replace everything I ever used in Opera and then some. They're great. Firefox doesn't has adequate add-ons and neither does Opera which leaves Chrome as having the most functionality. It's fast, easy (although there is a learning curve and requires time to try extensions) and clean. It does not spy on you so forget that concern. What it does do is save your bookmarks and configuration so you can move from one computer to another or to Android and be completely set up. I love it.
-
-
Music4Ever
Reviewing 22.0.1229.56 Beta (Sep 15, 2012)
@eviljolly -
'Let's get something straight' - I prefer to look at the the facts -
'Google is collecting your data' – Yes they are & that is a factual statement - Just read the Google T&C's -
'Some Google employee has easy access to it' – Unknown but someone must have access -
'I'll continue to use Chrome, and I think it's the best browser available at the moment' – It's a free world & you do that though I feel differently -
'Microsoft 'also' mines your search results with the Bing bar, so they're not one to talk' – An admittance that Google does data mine which is in direct conflict with your earlier statement ('Lots of people here would like you to believe that Google is collecting your data') & you are the first one to mention Microsoft BTW -
'You guys are all way too paranoid' – That is your opinion & others may feel differently -
Not very bright are you? - -
eviljolly
Reviewing 22.0.1229.56 Beta (Sep 14, 2012)
Let's get something straight. Lots of people here would like you to believe that Google is collecting your data and some Google employee has easy access to it where they could find out all about your personal life. This is simply not true, although competing browser makers would love you to believe this
I'll continue to use Chrome, and I think it's the best browser available at the moment, with Firefox a close second, and Opera my third favorite. I keep them all installed.
Instant search requires keystrokes to be sent. There's just no way for this to work without it, so if you don't like the feature, turn it off. Microsoft also mines your search results with the Bing bar, so they're not one to talk.
You guys are all way too paranoid. -
-
some guy
Reviewing 22.0.1229.36 Beta (Sep 7, 2012)
Chrome has become to much like AOL or MSN or windows live all tied into their little network, I will always use Firefox. If I want to trace the surfing habits of my daughter then I will install Chrome on her PC
-
-
DKDude
Reviewing 22.0.1229.26 Beta (Aug 30, 2012)
Used Chrome about a year, and it's getting better and better.
-
macetas
Reviewing 22.0.1229.26 Beta (Aug 30, 2012)
I use google chrome and incognito and never had an issue, recommeded+
-
Music4Ever
Reviewing 22.0.1229.14 Beta (Aug 24, 2012)
DKDude are you reviewing the Comodo Dragon browser or Google Chrome 22 Beta as it's not clear - If it is Chrome are you saying actually you 'like' or even prefer (enjoy) the data-collection system ‘you’ say Google uses? - If so why is that?
There are open source versions of this browser that don't have the Google 'data-collection' integrated within, so why not use them?
I've installed the Chrome, Iron & Comodo (browsers) this week so I'm making a valid review - In your own words you tried Chrome & never looked back' - Do you mean you haven't installed other browsers recently? if so perhaps you have little or no point of reference? I haven't seen any other recent browser reviews on fileforum by you anyway.
Iron does not have the Google alleged spy features nor does it have the Comodo branding either - Ask yourself: Why have Comodo 'a known and trusted company' released a Chrome look alike?
Either Comodo as PC security experts have similar concerns as I RE: Google Chrome privacy 'or' are they paranoid also - You tell me.
My favorite: http://www.palemoon.org/
I've made my points & won't review Chrome again for a while ~ -
DKDude
Reviewing 22.0.1229.14 Beta (Aug 23, 2012)
Like it a lot.
If you feel unsafe about googles datacollecting, but would like to have what else Chrome has to offer, then Comodo Dragon is the next best. Personally I prefer and use Googles Chrome.
http://www.comodo.com/ho...rs-toolbars/browser.php
Comodo is a known and trusted company. -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 22.0.1229.12 Dev (Aug 22, 2012)
Google spyware - if you like the Chrome interface use Iron - Chrome is ideal for the uneducated among us though ~
Advantages of the Iron browser :- http://www.srware.net/en...iron_chrome_vs_iron.php -
Terumo
Reviewing 22.0.1229.12 Dev (Aug 22, 2012)
Nice I love it like allways.
Bra jeg liker den som alltid -
DKDude
Reviewing 22.0.1229.12 Dev (Aug 22, 2012)
Thank you for making this browser better and better.
...
Forum-trolls should get a life. -
Blaxima
Reviewing 22.0.1229.8 Dev (Aug 18, 2012)
Good browser, horrible privacy policies
4.5* for the browser itself but minus 2.5 for the data collection
Use SRWare Iron instead -
mizkitty
Reviewing 22.0.1229.8 Dev (Aug 17, 2012)
Now that Chrome has switched to web-installers and autoupdate...all these installers are the same file.
One version each for each channel...Dev...Beta...and Release channels.
No need to grab the latest...because the web-installer grabs it anyways. -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 22.0.1229.6 Dev (Aug 16, 2012)
It should be noted that DKDude was a user of 'TOR for Windows' until he/she deleted it from his/her 'Favorite Files' two days ago after I noted on this site on why he/she was using TOR yet commenting on other reviewers overt apparent paranoia RE: Chrome - No reply was forthcoming from DKDude regarding this U turn -
> 'DKDude
Reviewing 21.0.1180.77 (Aug 14, 2012)
Yet a good update for the best browser ever.
Tinfoil fools, go use another browser, and stop spamming you paranoide (sic) crap<
TOR actually gives a fake IP & different country of origin therefore I conclude DKDude is a hypocrite. https://www.torproject.org/
I have just & legitimate privacy concerns regarding Chrome as do the EU & United States Government among others.
http://www.t3.com/news/g...r-safari-privacy-breach
http://thehill.com/blogs...cy-concerns-with-google
http://www.smartertechno...UK-and-Privacy-Concerns/
http://www.ghacks.net/20...hrome-privacy-protector/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17076670
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-16720406
As for anti-tracking there is the excellent Ghostery which is free, superb & works on all major browsers: http://www.ghostery.com/
Ghostery stops just about all tracking but unfortunately when installed In Chrome any cleaner such as CCleaner etc is used this removes all Ghostery settings.
Another good anti-Tracker is DoNotTrack+: http://www.abine.com/dntdetail.php - I haven't tested this with the latest version of Chrome so I'm not sure if it works after basic cleaning.
Both these anti-trackers work fine in Firefox / Pale Moon / Safari & Ghostery partially in Opera & are well worth installing, some sites have up to 9 separate trackers, Google tracks on just about every site there is & often twice. Both Google+1 & Google Analytics track on this site.
I'm not paranoid & have worked in the IT industry for over 17 years & do have legitimate concerns regarding Google & esp Chrome (As I type this I am in a server room) - First have a read at Google's own privacy policy for the Chrome browser then ask do I really want to accept these terms & conditions?
http://www.google.com/policies/privacy/
Chrome has an excellent interface & looks superb, but looks are not everything ~ I have no axe to grind with Google but users should be aware of the facts of a matter regarding privacy & make personal informed choices ~
If you want a lean fast browser Pale Moon is the number one choice ~
Paul
EDIT: Within the last 5 minutes DKDude has changed his/her last review from 'those who dare not use Chrome' - to - 'datacollecting is a concern' (sic) - More sarcasm from someone who can’t put their cards on the table for all to see. -
DKDude
Reviewing 22.0.1229.6 Dev (Aug 16, 2012)
Getting better and better, keep up the good work.
If google datacollecting is a concern, take a look at http://www.comodo.com/ho...rs-toolbars/browser.php
A browser based on Chrome but without Google data-mining. -
DKDude
Reviewing 22.0.1229.2 Dev (Aug 15, 2012)
The absolute best browser on the marked, used to use FF, but after switching to Chrome, I've never looked back.
-
Music4Ever
Reviewing 21.0.1180.79 (Aug 14, 2012)
@DKDude - No I don't like the smell of spyware, that's why I post my opinion which as just as valid as yours - Maybe more actually, as I don't post RE: paranoia then use a privacy system that hides your true IP & country of origin ~ Now why would you be using TOR & pontificating against those with fully legitimate privacy concerns? (Hypocrite)
@DKDude - I see in the last hour you have removed 'Tor For Windows' from your software list - Now that is funny ! ROFLAO ~ And changed latest review totally !
As for no bloat the true download size of Chrome is much larger (almost double) than Firefox - (Chrome - 30.50 Meg) (Firefox - 16.0 Meg)
Edit: This is an excellent anti-tracker for most browsers: http://www.ghostery.com/
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19200279
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-17892288 -
DKDude
Reviewing 21.0.1180.79 (Aug 14, 2012)
Great browser, used FF for years, took Chrome for a testspin, and never looked back.
No bloat in the gui of this browser, it's fast, stable and secure, sandbox for every tab, pure awesomeness. -
Zootopia3001
Reviewing 21.0.1180.77 (Aug 14, 2012)
Given the amount of updates this browser has had in such a short time there must be a 100 update installation file folders tucked away somewhere in the Documents and Settings folder, if not more, with each folder taking up a 100Mb's or so. Hahahahahaha. To me it shows that the folks at Google could care less about you and your PC.
-
Music4Ever
Reviewing 21.0.1180.77 (Aug 14, 2012)
@The_Unknown - Your assertion that as you get spied on when using the net anyway so why bother at all is not so clever, you don't have to be tracked by everyone & his grandad, there are ways of preventing a fair amount of it actually & if you were one quarter as bright as you think you are you would know that & the advantages of spending a little time & effort in doing that are well worth it.
Keep using Chrome if that's what suits you but I know there are as good or better alternatives & I've used just about every browser on Earth in the last 17 years of using the net & Chrome is most defiantly not the best, it was very good two years ago now it's not. If you really find Chrome much better than FF you have issues elsewhere either in your install or connection.
I also use Firefox in Linux & on that platform too Firefox is a far better experience than Chrome.
The iPhone analogy:
The reason the iPhone is popular is because people bought it by choice, as in they actually wanted an iPhone & made an effort (Euros?) to acquire the device in the first place. Part (most) of the reason Chrome is popular is that it's bundled with just about every piece of software on Earth - if you go by the recommended' install or default on heaps of software as the uneducated among us do they get Chrome installed whether they wanted it or not, then to make a really bad situation even worse they foolishly use it to browse the internet. You have to have pretty good observational skills these days not to get a Chrome install.
Some people don't know any better - I do ~
@DKDude - I will ignore your moronic & infantile comments regarding tin hats, if that's the best defence you can come up with I have no problems - Your other cracking informative review on 21.0.1180.75 (Aug 9, 2012) Stated:
'Still the best browser' - A most compelling argument - Chrome here I come! -
BTW I notice you use 'Tor for Windows', why is that? Maybe a little paranoia creeping in :-) -
The_Unknown
Reviewing 21.0.1180.77 (Aug 14, 2012)
blablablablabla spyware blablablal evil Google
The first second you are online you are vulnerable to being spied, even your ISP can do it. Drop the tin foil hat talk, it stinks.
Matter of fact: Chrome is an awesome browser, simple and fast as hell. After years of using Firefox I gave in to Chrome and haven't looked back. Once in a while I peek in Firefox and still consider it a solid browser, but the interface, the speed, chrome's sandbox on flash... I know the interface can be modded, speed is me being a bit picky but it is slower than Chrome and one can always say Flash has auto-update nowadays, but Chrome does it by its own.
Once you start using Chrome you give in to its simplicity, to the smoothness of tab movement, to being able to CTRL+Shift+N and opening a new privacy window alongside the normal mode (like Opera) instead of Firefox's stupid "only one mode at a time". Adblock in Chrome is almost on par with Firefox's one... what else is left in Firefox?
It's like the iPhone, why does it sell so well? Not only because of its looks, but because of the ease of use. People want that, that's why these ratings of Chrome here are really statistically meaningless. -
gatorfan95
Reviewing 21.0.1180.77 (Aug 14, 2012)
It's not the best browser out there, the only reason it gets any usage at all is because the Spymasters at Google pay other developers to plant it as "sneakware" in other installation routines. The "ostriches" who bury their heads in the sand about what this browser does can defend it all they want to, I wont have this spyware on my machines and after showing anyone I know who uses it what it does, they remove it immediately.
-
DKDude
Reviewing 21.0.1180.77 (Aug 14, 2012)
Yet a good update for the best browser ever.
Tinfoil fools, go use another browser, and stop spamming you paranoide crap. -
Aegis69
Reviewing 21.0.1180.77 (Aug 13, 2012)
Why does anyone use the google crapware/spyware/crimeware version of this and not just the chromium project its based on?
http://fileforum.betanew...um-Updater/1238140092/1 -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 22.0.1229.2 Dev (Aug 11, 2012)
The simple fact that Chrome is now bundled with just about every piece of software on planet earth & how it often installs surreptitiously says a lot about Google, & once again they have been caught up to no good with the Safari fiasco & fined for it - Do you really trust these people?
There are still ongoing issues with Google '''accidentally''' collecting wi-fi info while photographing G-Maps. Avoid - It was a good browser once but now it is not.
You have to search now for a proper installer, most of the time Google now use a web installer & you have little or no control over what happens during install.
If you do want the fastest browser there is use Pale Moon.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19200279 -
jogygeorge
Reviewing 22.0.1229.2 Dev (Aug 10, 2012)
Two gripes I have had with Google Chrome is:
a) It does not allow me to place the tabs at the bottom AND does not have an extension that allows it.
b) I happen to be working in the Middle East and Google just thrusts Arabic in my face!!! I have no clue of Arabic and its sometimes so difficult to set the language or go through setups if the interface is in a language one does not understand. I wonder why Google bases languages on the region. -
-
pjb
Reviewing 22.0.1229.2 Dev (Aug 10, 2012)
A nice browser to use.
In My Opinion the dev versions have recently become more stable than Firefox nightly versions.
Good to use for browsing both older websites and websites that have started to implement HTML5. -
gatorfan95
Reviewing 21.0.1180.75 (Aug 9, 2012)
All you Google Chrome users/defenders should read this link. If they did it to a competitor, what are they doing to you?
http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-19200279
I wont have this piece of spyware crap on my machines -
-
gatorfan95
Reviewing 22.0.1229.0 Dev (Aug 8, 2012)
Junk, spammed to unsuspecting consumers hidden in other program's install routines. Nothing nice about it.
-
nilst2006
Reviewing 21.0.1180.60 (Aug 1, 2012)
Read on a site that it starts Your webcam and microphone ! Hackers will love this "feature".
-
FatBastard
Reviewing 21.0.1180.60 (Aug 1, 2012)
Still the best browser but the downloadmanager sucks!
-
-
Uriel
Reviewing 21.0.1180.57 Beta (Jul 29, 2012)
Software comes bundled with Chrome and it tries to sneak it's way onto computers. No wonder the browser keeps growing in market share.
Funny thing is that I use JV16 to search the registry and files for Google and delete them only to have the disease reappear thanks to every software company integrating Google into their product for quick cash. -
Steve1209
Reviewing 21.0.1180.55 Beta (Jul 26, 2012)
Still the very best browser around, updated at least once a month if not more often, lots of great extensions, still very fast, wins the browser battle hands down!!
-
gatorfan95
Reviewing 21.0.1180.41 Beta (Jul 13, 2012)
bleh, it's junk. The only reason it's user numbers are up is because Google is either paying or forcing other software developers to add it to thier install routines. Intrusive and invasive.
-
caihongxu
Reviewing 20.0.1132.57 (Jul 11, 2012)
fileforum is so easy to be spammed. Looking at Chrome's rating: full of Music4Ever's comments!
Why do we even allow one user to comment on a software multiple times? -
bodean
Reviewing 21.0.1180.15 Beta (Jul 11, 2012)
All my youtube videos stutter pretty bad with this latest release. Went back to v20.0.1132.47 stable and the issue is gone.
-
-
Music4Ever
Reviewing 20.0.1132.47 (Jun 29, 2012)
What is this site Chrome update daily?
The number one browser now it seems mainly due to the fact as with IE you really have not work hard to to have it installed for you. Getting more intrusive & as most end up with it auto-installed it's out of control.
Pale Moon in Windows & Firefox 13 in Linux if you do any comparison with a decent connection.
Better than IE is it's most redeeming point ~ -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 21.0.1180.15 Dev (Jun 29, 2012)
@MikeTechno - As Facebook has 1 billion users it's not good that Chrome ever had problems with it.
The number one browser now it seems mainly due to the fact as with IE you really have not work hard to to have it installed for you. Getting more intrusive & as most end up with it auto-installed it's out of control.
Pale Moon in Windows & Firefox 13 in Linux if you do any comparison with a decent connection.
Better than IE is it's most redeeming point ~ -
FatBastard
Reviewing 20.0.1132.43 (Jun 27, 2012)
Still the best browser but the downloadmanager sucks!
-
Music4Ever
Reviewing 20.0.1132.43 (Jun 27, 2012)
The Chrome/Firefox numbering system worry is irrelevant, there are many numbers left above 20 so we are unlikely to run out in the near future.
Chrome is getting more intrusive with each release, the market share must be partly due to the the auto Chrome install that comes with more & more software & maybe eventually with ALL software ;-)
If you really want a none intrusive fast browser try Pale Moon, it wipes the floor with Chrome, in Linux Firefox 13x. -
roj
Reviewing 20.0.1132.39 Beta (Jun 21, 2012)
Not for my machine or any machine I build - period.
It insinuates itself into your OS and is impossible to remove short of a re-format.
It's also quite limited compared to the plethora of plugins available for Firefox.
To the speed monkeys, er, junkies:
Get out of your mother's basement. it's a browser. it displays pages. You can't drift in it. I'm also quite reticent to trust Google as a company for ANY reason.
THREE neutral stars based on the quality of the browser regardless of the unwarranted hype, downgraded to TWO because it's insidious and from Google. -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 20.0.1132.39 Beta (Jun 21, 2012)
Grows more intrusive with each release, bordering on Spy-ware now ~ If you are running Windoze use Pale Moon, in Linux Firefox 13 works well ~
-
MikeTechno
Reviewing 21.0.1180.0 Dev (Jun 20, 2012)
Very nice. Good to see that they got Facebook rendering properly again in this update. Glad to see it.
-
Ryusennin
Reviewing 19.0.1084.56 (Jun 16, 2012)
http://google.com/intl/en/chrome/business/browser/
Will install in Program Files. -
kshithijsharma
Reviewing 19.0.1084.52 (Jun 11, 2012)
I want to select my download location to a specific folder, not to some stupid location like username/appdata folder. Can't they at least make it to download to a decent folder like program files or program files (x86). I wont install chrome in any random location.Its a Shame that while 2MB softwares allow users to select download location, the 100MB chrome doesn't.
-
MikeTechno
Reviewing 21.0.1155.2 Alpha (May 30, 2012)
Wow, I know this is a Alpha, but this v21 release won't render Facebook pages properly. How funny is that? Remember the old saying from the early 80's that came out of Microsoft: "Windows isn't done until Lotus won't run"? This sort of reminds me of that.
-
Vimes
Reviewing 20.0.1132.17 Beta (May 25, 2012)
Excellent browser which simply works, unlike the mess that they keep making with Opera.
It is both light and easy on resources along with some useful extensions.
I tend to prefer to keep to the beta channel as there are less potential issues than found with the dev one.
Google sync works great with my backups. -
-Lord-
Reviewing 20.0.1132.17 Beta (May 25, 2012)
NOT safer. Had to wipe a machine clean and start over because this "safe" browser caught the google redirect virus and could not be cleaned.
Has some nice features, but ridiculously under powered when it comes to changing settings in the background.
Skip it. Opera beats it, and Firefox is still the powerhouse. -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 20.0.1132.3 Dev (May 12, 2012)
I used to use Chrome until I discovered Pale Moon which wipes the floor with Chrome is just about every way. I also dislike the new Google privacy policy or the old one for that matter.
-
MikeTechno
Reviewing 20.0.1123.1 Dev (May 3, 2012)
Sadly, this browser still has major memory leak issues. Open 10 to 15 separate tabs and the entire system will bog down to a crawl. Close those tabs and the system still drags. Close the whole browser down and the system STILL drags! That's a memory leak, and when you claim to be at v20 of a modern, advanced web browser from one of the largest, most powerful software companies in the world, there is absolutely no excuse for that to still be occurring, especially on a 64-bit Windows 7 system with 4GB of RAM. Come on Google, you guys HAVE to know how to better manage how your apps utilize memory (and subsequently relinquish it back to the system when tabs and applications are closed) than this by now. I love this browser but shouldn't we be long past resolving memory leak issues now? This is May of 2012 now after all, right?
-
Uriel
Reviewing 20.0.1123.1 Dev (May 2, 2012)
The Pedo bear of browsers that lure silly unsuspecting people into the Google van with free apps.
-
eviljolly
Reviewing 20.0.1123.1 Dev (May 2, 2012)
@MikeTechno I've been thinking the same thing. It's kind of like what Intel and AMD do, but since new Chrome builds come much more often it's going to be ridiculous pretty soon. I have a feeling the product name will change at some point. Google didn't seem to have a problem renaming their Android Market, so the same will likely happen. It'll probably be called something like "Google Browse."
Great browser though. I keep Firefox and Opera both installed just to compare things from time to time, but this is what I'm using 99% of the time. -
Terumo
Reviewing 20.0.1123.1 Dev (May 2, 2012)
Den beste nettleser som er å få tak i, punktum.
The best browser ther is . -
johnk119
Reviewing 18.0.1025.168 (May 1, 2012)
I don't think their numbering system should be used against them. It's different, but does not affect software. Instead of changing in 1/th they're changing the ones place to indicate different versions it seems
-
Mirrebex
Reviewing 18.0.1025.168 (Apr 30, 2012)
I don't usually participate on silly Browser wars but I have to say. Opera owns them all right now. It's got features none of the other browsers dream of right now.
Chrome is aight though.
Justsayn' -
MikeTechno
Reviewing 20.0.1115.1 Dev (Apr 26, 2012)
I love this browser, but please Google, call it what it REALLY is: v2.0, not v20.0. This childish race to ramp up the version numbers ridiculously fast so as to appear more substantial, significant and established, relative to the competition which has been around a lot longer, is just plain laughable. (You do realize that at this insane rate, this browser will be at around v55 by Christmas, right?) This is a terrific browser, no question about it. But it has no business being at v20 right now and absolutely everyone knows it. Please Google, stop embarrassing yourself and dial the version number back to v2.0, where it actually belongs. You can relax, I promise no one will think any less of you for being honest with your version numbering.
-
Uriel
Reviewing 19.0.1084.30 Beta (Apr 19, 2012)
Google is like Pedo Bear. Pedo Bear lures kids into his van with free candy.
-
-
Sven123456789
Reviewing 19.0.1084.24 Beta (Apr 16, 2012)
Still a useless browser with no features. Good browser for grammar school kids I guess.
-
-
-
-
Zootopia3001
Reviewing 18.0.1025.152 (Apr 11, 2012)
Dumped it after version 8 and have retried it a couple times since(one forced by Avast). Maybe it'll be ready for primetime with version 99.9.9999.999 and it won't have to update so frequently either.
-
-
Music4Ever
Reviewing 19.0.1084.15 Beta (Apr 10, 2012)
Why I do not use either Chrome or any or Google's search facilities on any browser:
Google Chrome Privacy Notice:
Last modified: March 20, 2012 ~
http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/privacy.html -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 18.0.1025.152 (Apr 10, 2012)
Why I do not use either Chrome or any or Google's search facilities on any browser:
Google Chrome Privacy Notice:
Last modified: March 20, 2012 ~
http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/privacy.html -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 19.0.1084.15 Dev (Apr 7, 2012)
'no other browser out there that can deal with the speed of google chrome.' -
Yes there is it's called 'Pale Moon' & it's slicker & faster than Chrome & I've tried them all many times also but I keep an open mind as things change.
But the best way to view the web faster is to use a fast Internet connection because no browser or OS can make up for a slow connection.
It gets 4 stars because although Chrome is very good there is IMHO (for now) a faster browser.
You need this brilliant free add on for either Chrome, FF, or even IE-
http://www.abine.com/dntdetail.php (it does NOT use the 'opt out' system) It just blocks. -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 19.0.1084.15 Dev (Apr 6, 2012)
I still don't care what version we came to, as longs as there is no other, believe me, no other browser out there that can deal with the speed of google chrome. I've tried them all old as new, beta and whatever browser you can name, I've tried them all and I allways turn back to google chrome because all the other are too slow and I don't wanna use my life waiting for websites to load, so therefore I stick to Google Chrome and I don't understand why Geo88 give it four stars????
when he complains about the version numbers. But anyway five thumbs up allthough Chrome is beyond rating for me. -
FatBastard
Reviewing 18.0.1025.151 (Apr 6, 2012)
I really like Chrome.
But the downloadmanager makes my head expload. It sucks!
FF11 has a much better downloadmanager! -
jcollake
Reviewing 19.0.1084.1 Alpha (Apr 1, 2012)
The relentless march forward ;). Nice addition of new GPU acceleration in v18 though. Google's 'end game' is to make the browser your OS, essentially. Thus, their attention is appropriately focused here. I have identified a slow memory leak, documented and reported, that has not been fixed yet (can be seen with Google Analytics Real Time View), so will give 4/5 stars until that issue is resolved.
-
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 19.0.1084.1 Alpha (Apr 1, 2012)
@geo888 LOL
20.0.1087.0 (Developer Build 130029 Windows) is already out! -
Terumo
Reviewing 19.0.1081.2 Dev (Mar 29, 2012)
Perhaps geo 888 should stick to a different browser, and do not test the chrome at all.
-
johnk119
Reviewing 19.0.1081.2 Dev (Mar 28, 2012)
You guys need to get over their version numbering... Each number is just an improved version... Unlike IE which uses 9.1 .2 .3 .4 etc.. They're just changing the whole number. It does feel odd though, doesn't it?
-
gatorfan95
Reviewing 18.0.1025.140 Beta (Mar 27, 2012)
Figured after all the hoopla I'd finally give this a try. Now I know why I used Firefox and now use Pale moon. This thing is a disorganized piece of crap. Forget the fact that google uses it to track your surfing habits. If you want speed use Pale Moon.
-
Uriel
Reviewing 18.0.1025.137 Beta (Mar 24, 2012)
It's like the time when some kid was given a free slick computer from school and it was discovered that the school principal was unknowingly watching her through the web cam.
-
-
Steve1209
Reviewing 18.0.1025.58 Beta (Mar 14, 2012)
Best damn browser available, add some extensions and it's even better, no browser matches it in speed or even comes close!!
-
-
Terumo
Reviewing 19.0.1068.0 Alpha (Mar 14, 2012)
Way is the Babylon Serarch in this versjon, and how to get is away.?
Can any one help me whit that.
I give it a 4 becuse of that search that i cant move, i use to give it 5 -
-
Blaxima
Reviewing 17.0.963.66 (Mar 7, 2012)
Thanks Music4Ever,
Opera 12 has this built in BUT it's a little bit of placebo for now because it is completely voluntary on company's part, they do not have to honour the request to not track.
As for Chrome, I've only used the SRWIron version as a secondary browser and it works well. Only ever had one crash but Chrome is just too vanilla for me and having to search through countless plugins to get some basic functionality is tedious and still doesn't give me enough control over the browser.
Like all things, it performs better than fire fox but the privacy concerns with this browser should not be overlooked -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 17.0.963.66 (Mar 6, 2012)
Google actually know when I want coffee or even tea & make it for me, I notice the shower comes on each morning at 6am - They also know I've stopped taking sugar.
If you like Chrome & I do give this a try if you have concerns about the new privacy policy.- http://www.abine.com/dntdetail.php
On this PC In just under 2 weeks it's blocked 11,348 tracking attempts using Firefox but I also works on Chrome, Safari.& the even IE.
Blaxima, No it does not use the 'Opt Out' system it blocks trackers whether they like it or not & does a very good job of it too. -
Uriel
Reviewing 17.0.963.66 (Mar 6, 2012)
I set my cup of coffee in front of my monitor this morning and the CEO of Google extended his hand through the screen and stirred my coffee for me. So I had no choice but to blacklist the google.com domain in my Maxa Cookie Manager.
-
Hallway
Reviewing 17.0.963.65 (Mar 6, 2012)
These new privacy issues are perfect for me. I've been trying to get a woman for all my life without succes, and I'm sure after using Chrome for 2 weeks the woman will fight to be the first at my front door.
Horray ! -
Music4Ever
Reviewing 18.0.1025.45 Beta (Mar 1, 2012)
Uriel If you really do not want to be tracked try this:
http://www.abine.com/dntdetail.php
Works on FF, Chrome & IE. -
Uriel
Reviewing 18.0.1025.39 Beta (Feb 23, 2012)
Lulz at end users who are happily brain washed with targeted marketing ads proclaiming that Chrome isn't spyware in the least.
-
-
-
-
VelvetElvis
Reviewing 18.0.1025.11 Beta (Feb 12, 2012)
Doesn't mark "visited" links. Breaks a critical tool I use.
-
-
nilst2006
Reviewing 18.0.1025.11 Beta (Feb 10, 2012)
From the 1st of March i boycott all Google services due to invasion of my privacy. There are alternatives online.
-
-
-
-
ChipChop
Reviewing 18.0.1025.3 Dev (Feb 6, 2012)
It's userbase has overgrown Firefox, and will do the same with IE in a couple of weeks, and that all without any force, great going Chrome !
-
nilst2006
Reviewing 18.0.1025.3 Dev (Feb 6, 2012)
A good piece of spyware now when Google combine all their services of user tracking in to one big piece March the 1st 2012.....boycott Google !
-
Britewood
Reviewing 17.0.963.46 Beta (Jan 31, 2012)
I like Google Chrome but until they fix the issue with Symantec Endpoint Protection and having to turn off the Sandbox. I cant give it a high review.
-
-
Uriel
Reviewing 17.0.963.44 Beta (Jan 26, 2012)
For all of you privacy advocates, check out this article.
http://www.dailymail.co....giant-know-partner.html -
Trixxie
Reviewing 18.0.1010.1 Dev (Jan 23, 2012)
I love Chrome. I made the switch about 3 years ago now and won't look back. I always had issues with FF and have pretty much none with Chrome. I did have to uninstall and reinstall once because I couldn't get the browser to open but that is the only issue I had.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 17.0.963.38 Beta (Jan 19, 2012)
I loved Chrome since it's first appearance, now I use Pale Moon, as fast if not faster than Chrome & is optimised for Windows.
Take note that when Chrome auto updates you need to delete manually the old version or you end up with wasted space, not difficult to do.
Chrome is still great but I have now removed it & use PM exclusively & love it. -
egg83
Reviewing 17.0.963.38 Beta (Jan 19, 2012)
A good browser with minimal distractions to get in your way. Has a bit of learning curve (to figure out where certain features are), but very manageable. Using this more than IE currently.
-
some guy
Reviewing 18.0.1010.1 Dev (Jan 18, 2012)
version 18 you here that Firefox ,,, waits fore FF beta 256
-
elfsun
Reviewing 18.0.1003.1 Dev (Jan 13, 2012)
Like chrome's speed fast but don't like the too simplest UI. Adress bar doesn't have drop down lost, no redo button. These are the ones I use very often.So,most of them time, I use chrome engine in Avant browser which has the fast speed of chrome and the buttons/features I like. Very good combination
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 18.0.1003.1 Dev (Jan 11, 2012)
Having been an avid Chrome user since about it's start I have ditched it for a Firefox clone 'Pale Moon' - It is brilliant.
Sorry Chrome but i don't do loyalty, PM although a FF clone sorts all the issues I had with Firefox - Give it a try at least.
(just hoping Uriel doesn't see this)
http://www.palemoon.org/ -
Terumo
Reviewing 18.0.1003.1 Dev (Jan 11, 2012)
Nice brower, fast, and easy to use.
Flott nettleser, rsak og enkel å bruke. -
cltx99
Reviewing 16.0.912.75 (Jan 9, 2012)
After the last few years using Google as my default browser and happily doing so, I've recently switched to Firefox. Why? Although I love google, recently, page rendering has become slow on certain sites ', such as Beta News. At other sites the same thing along with "jittery" pages. I simply got fed up and don't have these problems with FF. FF is not as fast, but is rock solid and after years of being away, I'm really beginning to like FF.
I don't know if other have experienced this problem, but it's the same on all three of my computers. Maybe someone else can fill me in concerning my Google problem. -
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 16.0.912.75 (Jan 7, 2012)
Chrome is still I think the best browser.
Opera is also excellent but fails to render too many sites correctly, if you want bells whistles & billions of extensions use Firefox.
@cltx99 - How fast is your internet connection & what is you memory load with all AV's etc running after boot? As my recent flirtation with FF gives a different outcome - Not saying you are wrong, but I am interested.
Also a good idea to untick (uncheck?) 'Continue running background apps when Google Chrome is closed' - In Options/Under The Hood. -
Terumo
Reviewing 17.0.963.2 Dev (Dec 9, 2011)
Som jeg har sakt før, dette er den beste browsen der ute.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 16.0.912.63 Beta (Dec 9, 2011)
There is nothing inadvertent about my Chrome installation, the bottom line is most people I have introduced to Chrome like it & stay with it. Defending Chrome is not needed, it’s Firefox that’s now on the run. Chrome is the best by far. Let’s see what the future brings.
It is a brilliant browser & I've tried them all, many times.
Note:- 84% of the revenue that Firefox relied on was from Google, interestingly this was attained by bundling Google as Firefox's default search engine, it seems this agreement may not continue.
I find it intriguing regrading the rise in Chrome is the amount of corporate users that are moving over, these users want stability & speed, fancy themes and icons are not needed.
@Uriel - Read up on using grammar, the proper use of the English language, punctuation, the use of paragraphs etc. Your block of text testifies to your lack of intelligence thereby rendering your review somewhat invalid.
The fact that you actually still use Adobe PDF reader(s) speaks volumes.
http://www.zdnet.com/blo...al-apparently-ends/4241
http://www.washingtonpos...5/gIQAtZX3WO_story.html -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 15.0.874.121 (Nov 17, 2011)
I don't understand how some people have the audacity to write "pertinent" opinions on a matter they are so far from understanding it.
For instance, It's hilarious how people with no background in programming, nor web publishing for that matter, are keep trying to tarnish this because they simply cannot download chrome_code.zip file, which they presume is available in the www.google.com site itself (LOL)
@TROLL have you tried using Google TiSP? http://www.google.com/onceuponatime/tisp/
Seriously now, let me en-light you on this:
1. the sources and all extrass are >1GB and you need 10+GB to compile them ;)
2. there are code comits every few minutes and new buils made almost for every commit: you need a system for managing this ... is called SVN - look it up.
3. You don't simply download a version from SVN like a file from FTP - you do SVN checkout - look it up as well
4. The source code is avaialbe, for free, for everyone, wiith instructions on how to download & compile for yourself. Just learn how to do a proper Google search.
I don't think you're serious about the source code, but just in case here's what I've find for you:
http://dev.chromium.org/...e-source-for-a-specific
please stop making a fool of yourself... -
Input Overload
Reviewing 17.0.938.0 Dev (Nov 15, 2011)
There comes a point in any project that adding further to it starts to take usability from it. I think Chrome got to that point in version 15. Stabilise that version, consolidate it & give the betas a rest.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 15.0.874.120 (Nov 11, 2011)
Brilliant.... The best by far & the gap is getting bigger.
If you really want to get rid of ad's get 'Ad Muncher', it's not free but it is great. -
TROLL
Reviewing 15.0.874.120 (Nov 10, 2011)
Watch this how many million results for opensource http://www.google.com/se...l21l0l0l148l148l0.1l1l0
-
Uriel
Reviewing 16.0.912.21 Beta (Nov 5, 2011)
I am always reading blogs from bloggers at Betanews telling us how the almighty Google Chrome is closing the gap on Firefox in popularity. What these Betanews bloggers fail to tell us is how most people (especially the end user) end up installing the Google Chrome browser inadvertently. For example, when I go to update Adobe Acrobat or adobe Reader, I have to look at the screen carefully because somewhere, usually in an upper corner is a checked box ready to install Google Chrome. I then angrily have to waste my valuable time uninstalling it from my machine with Revo Uninstaller if I do miss unchecking the check box. I use Revo Uninstaller because Google likes to leave traces. Most poeple are end users. They usually and always end up keeping Google Chrome browser because it's free and due to the fact that it's persistence of repopulating your computer at the next update of Adobe is pretty much a losing battle unless you watch for it. Google knows this and markets their browser in such a negative fashion. Firefox doesn't have the money to market it's browser like Google does and doesn't rely on unwanted sneaky installs like Google. Google pays their affiliates good money to include it in their installers. Google has lured many affiliates who want to include Google Chrome in their installation wrappers for the payout. WinZip is another one of them who has taken the bait for a payout. For this reason Google Chrome is popping up on more and more computers. The lure of a payout by including it in installation wrappers is why Google Chrome market share is getting bigger. Not because of popularity. Money talks and affiliates are naturally going to want to make an extra buck IMHO. Google does have a decent product, but the way they distribute it does not truly convey it's popularity.
-
krgood
Reviewing 17.0.928.0 Dev (Nov 4, 2011)
V17 beta would not run but would create 10+ occurances of the progam in the task manager. Went back to v16 which works ok...
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 16.0.912.21 Beta (Nov 3, 2011)
Chrome & Opera are my choice of browsers after trying them all on many occasions. Chrome has matured into # 1 in front of FF - 2012. (I don’t count IE regardless of version)
-
scophi
Reviewing 16.0.912.12 Beta (Oct 27, 2011)
I use Chrome whenever I can. My only gripe with them is that you can't send HTML code to an external editor, like Notepad. Not sure why not. Every browser available lets you do that.
This is important to me as a website developer. Sure I can view source code in Chrome, but I can't edit.
To be clear, I don't want Chrome to become an editor. But please allow us to open source code in a program of our choosing. That's the only thing missing.
I can't even find a extension that will do that. "View Source With..." used to work perfectly, but it doesn't work with recent versions.
Other than that, Chrome is great. -
sQin
Reviewing 15.0.874.102 Beta (Oct 22, 2011)
still no bookmark keyboard shortcuts; slow multitab browsing with adblock/adblock+.
-
astovidiu
Reviewing 16.0.912.4 Beta (Oct 21, 2011)
Google Chrome user for several years now. Tried Firefox 7. Guess what? Loved it! Faster then Chrome. Trouble free. They maybe onto something there.
-
Terumo
Reviewing 16.0.912.0 Beta (Oct 19, 2011)
Chrome will at the end be the topp browser, over Firefox and Opera.
Digging that. yyyeeesss -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 16.0.904.0 Beta (Oct 13, 2011)
They keep coming and it's fine for me. So far Google Chrome has been my first choice when it comes to browsers. I can only say that I have never had any trouble with Chrome ever, which I cannot say when we talk about all the other browser I have tried in my time. Now a days I only use Chrome because it's fast, good looking and last but not least, TROUBLEFREE. I think It's the only browser you can fall in love with. Chrome is the worlds best no nonsens browser.
Verdens bedste, hurtigste, bedst udseende browser. -
bodean
Reviewing 16.0.904.0 Beta (Oct 12, 2011)
Scrolling on twitter works FINE. No issues. Solid release.
-
DKDude
Reviewing 15.0.874.83 Beta (Oct 9, 2011)
Tried allot of browsers, used FF for years, but changed to Chrome approx 1.5 years ago, and never looked back.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 15.0.874.83 Beta (Oct 9, 2011)
Expected to overtake FF next year as the most popular browser next to IE which I don't consider mentioning. The genie is out of the bottle & it's not going back.
All the drivel written by the 'idiot' does not change that Chrome will be the most popular as it is without question the best.
Put that in your pipe & smoke it. -
jcollake
Reviewing 15.0.874.83 Beta (Oct 9, 2011)
3 stars (average)? Really? No matter your political opinion of Google, I think their browser has been innovative enough, works well enough, and is robust enough to deserve a 5.
-
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 15.0.874.83 Beta (Oct 7, 2011)
still curious on what is going on with the development? Follow it up here:
http://build.chromium.org/p/chromium/console
get latest nighly for Chromium here:
http://commondatastorage...r-continuous/index.html -
-
TheZodiac2
Reviewing 16.0.899.0 Beta (Oct 4, 2011)
Everything works great except for twitter, can't seem to scroll
-
Tallpaultn
Reviewing 16.0.891.0 Beta (Oct 1, 2011)
Google Chrome is ok, but SRWare Iron, which is similar to Google Chrome is clearly superior in many respects--give it a trial run & experience the difference. I love SRWare Iron & use it as my main browser. Happy SRWare Iron browsing!!
-
some guy
Reviewing 15.0.874.51 Beta (Sep 28, 2011)
what ever you say programmer
UrieI
Reviewing 15.0.874.24 Beta (Sep 25, 2011)
Best browser ever.
way behind Fire-fox- Opera -
RXDOC73
Reviewing 16.0.889.0 Beta (Sep 26, 2011)
Performs smooth as silk....no problems and continued improvements via auto updates. I would rather see continued development and some stupid number system than stagnant programs updated infrequently while errors persist.
Uriel wears hats of tinfoil and must be going to sites he is ashamed of to worry about spyware. -
-
Terumo
Reviewing 16.0.889.0 Beta (Sep 25, 2011)
Best ther is
Den beste der ute til å bruke på nettet -
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 16.0.889.0 Beta (Sep 24, 2011)
Brilliant browser, no issues with this release. Use of Chrome continues to increase. I run Opera with it which I also like. Good to see a change-log.
-
DKDude
Reviewing 16.0.889.0 Beta (Sep 24, 2011)
I love this browser, I've changed from FF to Chrome and never looked back.
-
Uriel
Reviewing 16.0.889.0 Beta (Sep 24, 2011)
Holy crow! Another spyware update. Better get Input Overload to give this crap another five star review. Google needs to keep hyping that their spyware is greater than God.
See you girls tomorrow when Google releases yet another update.
http://myvpnreviews.com/ -
Inray
Reviewing 16.0.889.0 Beta (Sep 23, 2011)
Yet another "nothing-new" major version number increase...
-
DKDude
Reviewing 15.0.874.24 Beta (Sep 23, 2011)
Thank you google for updating this good browser.
Wow, what a temper the little girl has. -
Vimes
Reviewing 15.0.874.24 Beta (Sep 23, 2011)
It is a very good browser and I really tried to like using it. However the biggest problem for me is how much I have enjoyed using FF and its extensions.
If it wasn't for the customization, which is possible with FF, and those superb extensions then I would be very tempted to use Chrome. -
Uriel
Reviewing 15.0.874.24 Beta (Sep 23, 2011)
LOL and ROTFL! My tinfoil hat must be working. Am I a male or a female? You lame Google eunuchs!
http://www.strongvpn.com/ -
DKDude
Reviewing 15.0.874.21 Beta (Sep 22, 2011)
What can I say, light, fast, stable and secure, keywords for this browser, I can highly recommend it.
I wonder what kind of nasty stuff, some people are searching for, since they are so concerned about who knows about it, must be some pretty nasty stuff, that's for sure.
BTW.
Uriel seems like a frustrated women, I hope she will find a man, it must be that she is missing in her life. -
Uriel
Reviewing 15.0.874.21 Beta (Sep 21, 2011)
I'm gonna have to get rid of my spyware blocker. It doesn't block this Google crapware.
I go to update Ccleaner and it wants me to install this crapware. I go to update Skype and it also wants me to install this crapware.
(By the way) My tinfoil hat has just been triple stitched and reinforced. The retard with his thumb up his arse that goes by the user name of Input Overload will never catch me now. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 15.0.874.21 Beta (Sep 21, 2011)
@Blaxima, you can use what you ruddy well wont to. Just don't take away my right of choice & the right to say what I think of a browser.
I agree totally with the smoking ban as it affects none smokers almost as bad as smoking yourself. Hint:- Look it up.
How about me spraying 'Carbon Monoxide' in your face every 10 mins.. Stopping me would take away my rights? That's what you are saying exactly....You Pillock.
What this has to do with Chrome & my review totally eludes me...
i like & always have liked for some time Google, I can't see that changing. You & I have many choices of browser. Use that choice just as I do & don't come on here crying about it.
Paranoid of Google, you're doing something very illegal, yes you are.
(Passive smoking is the inhalation of smoke, called secondhand smoke or environmental tobacco smoke from tobacco products used by others. It occurs when tobacco smoke permeates any environment, causing its inhalation by people within that environment. Exposure to secondhand tobacco smoke causes disease, disability, and death) :- From Wikipedia -
Blaxima
Reviewing 15.0.874.21 Beta (Sep 21, 2011)
I really have nothing new to say about this browser, it's good buy not my first choice. The version number is silly as I haven't really noticed any differences in all the versions they have released. Google is also responsible for that useless Mozilla team following suit
This is more of a response @ Input Overload,
Your comment is a case of not seeing the trees for the forest and I will give you an example. When they banned smoking in bars, as a non-smoker, it shouldn't matter to me right? Wrong. Because if you allow the precedent to be set where one group of people can have their rights violated, then it is only a matter of time before they come and take away some of yours.
It's not a question of legal or illegal, it's about your right to privacy
That's why I use SRWare Iron as my backup (to Opera) instead -
DKDude
Reviewing 14.0.835.186 (Sep 21, 2011)
So far no problems, just getting better and better.
I wonder what kind of nasty stuff, some people are searching for, since they are so concerned about who knows about it, must be some pretty nasty stuff, that's for sure. -
Tallpaultn
Reviewing 14.0.835.186 (Sep 21, 2011)
Guess I'll never know how great it is since it will not load properly on my computer, not to mention it screws up the other browsers on my computer when it is loaded. But no big deal--using SRWare Iron browser which is similar to Google Chrome, but a much smaller program, works much better & is more secure than Google Chrome since the snooping garbage in Google Chrome has been removed from SRWare Iron Browser & the extensions, etc. for Google Chrome also work for SRWare Iron Browser...
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 14.0.835.163 Final (Sep 18, 2011)
My browser of choice, if you don't like : Hey, here is a new idea you might not of thought of:- Don't use it!
I know that might be difficult to take on board for some of you trolls but maybe, just maybe, with a psychiatrists help it' is possible - Use Fireflop or Safari, Seamonkey, Opera. Whatever spins your wheels.
When I go away for a few days without a PC I send Google a post card just so they can keep my records up to date.
I hope the spy's at Google have enjoyed sifting through my 25k+ sites I’ve visited in the last two months, what a profile I must have!
A good final, no problems whatsoever. -
-
-
DKDude
Reviewing 14.0.835.163 Beta (Sep 15, 2011)
Google updates and fix bugs in their browser, even on a daily basis, thats great IMHO.
Now I know whats wrong with Uriel.
She is looking for a man, she just don't know how to approach the opposite sex. -
Uriel
Reviewing 14.0.835.163 Beta (Sep 15, 2011)
My tinfoil hat is made of space age tinfoil given to me by aliens from a far away planet. Google can't spy on me now.
Don't mind eviljolly and his boyfriend Input Overload. They share a Skooby Doo lunch kit at work.
When you search with Startingpage, they remove all identifying information from your query and submit it anonymously to Google themselves. They get the results and return them to you in total privacy.
Your IP address is never recorded, your visit is not logged, and no tracking cookies are placed on your browser. When it comes to protecting your privacy, Startpage runs the tightest ship on the Internet. Their outstanding privacy policy and thoughtful engineering give you great search results in total anonymity. -
some guy
Reviewing 14.0.835.163 Beta (Sep 14, 2011)
google Chrome release a beta on a daily basis or is this just spam !
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 15.0.874.12 Beta (Sep 14, 2011)
My browser of choice, if you don't like : Hey, here is a new idea you might not of thought of:- Don't use it!
I know that might be difficult to take on board but maybe with a psychiatrists help it' is possible - Use Fireflop or Safari, Seamonkey, Opera. Whatever spins your wheels.
When I go away for a few days without a PC I send Google a post card just so they can keep my records up to date.
I hope the spy's at Google have enjoyed sifting through my 25k+ sites I’ve visited in the last two months, what a profile I must have!
Paranoid of Google, you’re doing something very illegal, I can only wonder what... But illegal it is... -
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 14.0.835.162 Beta (Sep 13, 2011)
My browser of choice, if you don't like : Hey, here is a new idea you might not of thought of:- Don't use it!
I know that might be difficult to take on board but maybe with a psychiatrists help it' is possible - Use Fireflop or Safari, Seamonkey, Opera. Whatever spins your wheels.
When I go away for a few days without a PC I send Google a post card just so they can keep my records up to date.
I hope the spy's at Google have enjoyed sifting through my 25k+ sites I’ve visited in the last two months, what a profile I must have!
Paranoid of Google, you’re doing something very illegal, I can only wonder what... But illegal it is... -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 15.0.874.5 Beta (Sep 13, 2011)
Well, seems on getting more and more adepts, and unfortunately, from FF users I recon:
http://gs.statcounter.com/
Let's see how it goes by the winter... -
Uriel
Reviewing 15.0.874.5 Beta (Sep 12, 2011)
What a piece of garbage. I wish spyware blockers would have the balls to admit that Google is just as much spyware as DoubleClickCom is and give users the ability to eradicate it.
Input Overload is retarded because it works in the com rooms.
eviljolly. Am I uberfly too? LOL! -
-
-
eviljolly
Reviewing 14.0.835.159 Beta (Sep 9, 2011)
@Uriel
Didn't you hear? Google bought out the largest producer of high quality tinfoil. They're now embedding circuitry inside of it, which can log passwords as you think about them. -
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 14.0.835.159 Beta (Sep 9, 2011)
Urine, so you pay for Firefop then?
And how would you like a good smack in the face & ten minutes good kicking, both arms broken & rendered sterile you stupid moronic man. It makes me wonder what you paranoid people get up-to on the net, something illegal no doubt about that.
Underage pron for a guess. There is a good reason you have severe paranoia....
The best browser along with Opera. -
uberfly
Reviewing 15.0.874.0 Beta (Sep 8, 2011)
Just using Google as a search engine is the equivalent of the librarian following you around the library with his clipboard. Using Google Chrome as your browser is asking him to come live with you on a comfy cot you just set up in your bedroom.
-
uberfly
Reviewing 14.0.835.159 Beta (Sep 8, 2011)
Just using Google as a search engine is the equivalent of the librarian following you around the library with his clipboard. Using Google Chrome as your browser is asking him to come live with you on a comfy cot you just set up in your bedroom.
-
Uriel
Reviewing 13.0.782.220 (Sep 8, 2011)
eviljolly could you please email me my private information? LOL!
This spyware is so crappy, everyone who makes a living off of it smells the same way. -
Uriel
Reviewing 14.0.835.159 Beta (Sep 8, 2011)
eviljolly
My tinfoil hat is on. It's made of the best tinfoil that money can buy and reinforced. Google can't spy on me now. But they know who you are and everything about you.
http://fileforum.betanew...oogleClean/1312409860/1 -
Blaxima
Reviewing 15.0.874.0 Beta (Sep 8, 2011)
@MikeTechno - I agree, this is something that has bothered me and it clearly is the same shameless route that Firefox is responding to with their own brand of sillyness.
This browser is just too vanilla for me but aside from that I really can't complain because I've encountered no issues with it's performance.
But I am from this point on docking it another star for it's disillusioned version numbering -
Terumo
Reviewing 15.0.874.0 Beta (Sep 8, 2011)
Well the best browser out there.
Det er ikke mere å si om den saken, den beste nettleseren der ute er Chome. -
-
Uriel
Reviewing 14.0.835.157 Beta (Sep 6, 2011)
WOW! What a bunch of spyware. The stupid idiot by the user name of Input Overload and his retarded comrades must get paid by Google to troll you and suck you folks into thinking this is the greatest browser ever. Think about it common folks! It's free! Why the hell would Google create a browser for free? Maybe to serve you adds according to you preferences so as to make the company money?
Maybe Input overload really believes this browser is the best. The stupid bloke is delusional and screwed up in the head big time. I therefore conclude that Input Overload is definitely retarded. Poor guy. The poor poor guy cannot comprehend reality!
WOW! -
-
DKDude
Reviewing 14.0.835.157 Beta (Sep 6, 2011)
Yet another good update, thanks Google.
@A very special person in here.
This is what you need for daily protection.
http://zapatopi.net/afdb/afdbdiagram.pdf -
-
eviljolly
Reviewing 13.0.782.218 (Sep 4, 2011)
Chrome is awesome. I keep the latest versions of Firefox installed as well, but Chrome is what I primarily use.
Thanks Google.
p.s. I've e-mailed you all of Uriel's private information. Feel free to pay him a visit while he's sleeping. -
eviljolly
Reviewing 15.0.865.0 Beta (Sep 4, 2011)
Wow, Uriel (Output Overload) is using new names now. Cute.
Chrome rocks. If you think it has security issues, you're obviously a nubcake. Go back to 4chan and brush up on those trolling skills Uriel. -
eviljolly
Reviewing 14.0.835.126 Beta (Sep 4, 2011)
Uriel, you could really work on your trolling skills. That, or you're like the crazy uncle who will believe any conspiracy theory someone tells them about. Go put on your tinfoil hat and use a different browser already.
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
He defines this, as he seems to review every version of Chrome that comes out. -
Uriel
Reviewing 14.0.835.126 Beta (Sep 3, 2011)
Spyware. Everyone who makes a living on the internet will want you to get this app including those who get their pay paycheck from Facebook Connect and NetShelter. I am surprised that Adaware doesn't delete this kind of spyware.
Don't mind Imput Overload. He's somewhat retarded. Give him a cookie and a glass of milk and he will calm down.
What? Me a troll? LOL! Just because I see the truth and report it as it really is? I don't think so.
Just because I tell it as it really is, I am a troll to you who get paid to give false reviews for Google? LOL!
You folks are pathetic. -
DKDude
Reviewing 14.0.835.126 Beta (Sep 2, 2011)
I love this browser, it's getting better and better.
-
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.782.218 (Aug 31, 2011)
No problems, fast, stable, a pleasure to use. A good final release.
-
DKDude
Reviewing 13.0.782.218 (Aug 30, 2011)
Yet a good update, simply the best browser available IMHO.
There is a few extensions I miss from the good old FF days, but I hope they will be made at some point.
@Input O.
Ignore him, works far better than giving him the attention he craves for. -
Output Overboard
Reviewing 15.0.865.0 Beta (Aug 30, 2011)
Input Overload, you are a racist and a putrid pussbag. lol!!!
Your sole purpose in life is to spam Chrome on this board and diss anyone who may disagree. Get a life.
@eviljolly - BUZZZZ wrong guess. loser. -
MikeTechno
Reviewing 15.0.865.0 Beta (Aug 30, 2011)
I absolutely love Google Chrome, I really do. But their version numbering is one of the biggest jokes in the computer software industry today. Version 15? Hardly. Try version 1.5 to be more realistic and honest. At this rate Chrome will be at Version 79 by Christmas of this year. Come on guys, you guys know better than this. You are embarrassing yourselves in front of the entire software development community by racing your version numbers up so high so fast to try and artificially create credibility. Move the decimal point back over to the left one space, where we all know it belongs, and focus on your product winning in the marketplace based on it's actual merits of design...not its laughable, artificially high, entirely premature version numbering. Please.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 15.0.865.0 Beta (Aug 30, 2011)
Output Overboard, you are a d*** head, grade one.
I will 'support' Chrome as long as it is the best browser out there. I did install FF 5.x & found it clunky & a memory hog. I simply did not want to use it & replaced it with Opera which I feel is on a par with Chrome.
If you like FF then you use it. I don't make stupid false names up regarding you because I don't have the IQ of a seven year old.
Facts are as time goes on more people are turning to Chrome.. And your stupid remarks are not going to change this you moronic pathetic redneck. - You better get that in your head.
Go troll elsewhere. -
Output Overboard
Reviewing 15.0.861.0 Beta (Aug 29, 2011)
A web browser to some, a religion to others.
How much faster is Chrome to Firefox? Does it open web pages 27 ms faster?
Do you know how fast a millisecond is?
Keep supporting this spyware! -
Input Overload
Reviewing 15.0.861.0 Beta (Aug 26, 2011)
As the less features & extensions speed up use of Um browser Chrome is the best. I tried FF 5.x last week and removed after a few days I was hoping it might have improved, it hasn't.
Chrome has all the feature's I want from a browser. i have a 100 Megabit fibre connection & pages open before I've clicked on them. :-)
These people who have heaps of extensions etc don't realise each & every one slows your browser down a little. I run Opera along with Chrome which IMHO is also brilliant. 10 Stars. -
Inray
Reviewing 15.0.861.0 Beta (Aug 25, 2011)
The Google way: Fix some bugs, change an icon, increase major version number.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.782.215 (Aug 25, 2011)
The strange thing, well far more than strange is that Uriel actually uses Chrome, I repeat Uriel uses Chrome. I suggest he sees a good Psychologist.
He is a quarter wit. And a grade one Troll. He has some major vendetta against Chrome, a major mental aberration.
Whatever browser I try, & I've been through them all again I find myself going back to Chrome always. Nuff said! -
Input Overload
Reviewing 14.0.835.109 Beta (Aug 25, 2011)
The strange thing, well far more than strange is that Uriel actually uses Chrome, I repeat Uriel uses Chrome. I suggest he sees a good Psychologist.
He is a quarter wit. And a grade one Troll. He has some major vendetta against Chrome, a major mental aberration.
Whatever browser I try, & I've been through them all again I find myself going back to Chrome always. Nuff said! -
jessicabrown
Reviewing 10.0.648.134 (Aug 24, 2011)
Chrome seems faster and more powerful than other browsers. I tried IE, firefox and Opera. It's professional.
-
-
Uriel
Reviewing 14.0.835.109 Beta (Aug 24, 2011)
LOL! TheDevilHimself is drinking Lysol again. His brain is kookoo with Google.
-
UrieI
Reviewing 13.0.782.215 (Aug 24, 2011)
This is the BEST browser I have ever used.
There is no better browser, if you ask me. -
DKDude
Reviewing 13.0.782.215 (Aug 24, 2011)
Google Chrome is by far the best browser today, I've used FF for years, but the last 1.5 year, I've use Chrome, and I've never looked back.
Fast, reliable and good, 5 starts, -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 14.0.835.109 Beta (Aug 24, 2011)
Five bucks an hour, yearh yearh yearh, I can tell you one thing, my income is so low, that you, Uriel, would starve to death if you should try living with my income.
Anyway, Google Chrome Rocks your balls to the wall.
Beyond rating -
elfsun
Reviewing 15.0.854.0 Beta (Aug 19, 2011)
Chrome is really fast, but there isn't much build-in features there, I don't want to use plug-ins which will slow my computer. Hope Chrome add some new build-in features in the futher.
I'm now using Avant browser and chrome, if you can do what I have said I will use chrome as my default browser.LOL. -
Nischi
Reviewing 15.0.854.0 Beta (Aug 18, 2011)
Seems to have lost the function of pinning pages on the speed dial, anyone with similar experience ?
-
Uriel
Reviewing 14.0.835.94 Beta (Aug 17, 2011)
dreadlox and TheDevilHimself are drunk. Don't listen to them fools. I doubt that they make more than five bucks an hour on part time with their stupidity.
Why the "H" "E" double hockey sticks would one use Google's spyware?
use https://startingpage.com/ to do you searches if you value your privacy. -
dreadlox
Reviewing 14.0.835.35 Beta (Aug 15, 2011)
Best browser by far! 5 stars!
And finally Uriel wrote something that's true: "don't listen to me ... I am a troll" :) -
Uriel
Reviewing 14.0.835.35 Beta (Aug 13, 2011)
What a bunch of spyware garbage. But what would those who work hard on SEO do without Google spying I wonder?
People at this site are claiming that extensions to block Google spying are free at Googles web site, but these extensions do not cover Google Desktop, Google Picasa, Google Earth and the Google Toolbar. What a shame. I guess Google knows how to get around these Chrome extensions.
I only paid ten bucks for GoogleClean through one of their promotions. What a deal!
http://fileforum.betanew...oogleClean/1312409860/1
But don't listen to me. I read here that if you check my profile, you can easily see that I am a troll. -
Blaxima
Reviewing 14.0.835.35 Beta (Aug 12, 2011)
Why are FF users such trolls
This browser continues to perform well, it really is just that simple. But for me it's a little vanilla and I don't just mean in appearance. Much like apple software, things are where they are and user customization is non existent outside of plugins that also have limited freedom.
I still prefer Opera(not the latest builds tough) but if I had to choose between firefox and Chrome, it would be this browser hands down -
Input Overload
Reviewing 14.0.835.35 Beta (Aug 11, 2011)
The best browser. Uriel you are a grade one idiot & we are fed up with your moronic stupid posts. BTW I have FF5.012 on & Chrome. Guess which i like using the most: - Chrome.
Check out Uriels profile, he only posts to make mindless comments RE: Chrome. -
Terumo
Reviewing 14.0.835.18 Beta (Aug 7, 2011)
Den beste og enkleste browseren der ute.
The best browser out there. -
eviljolly
Reviewing 14.0.835.18 Beta (Aug 5, 2011)
@Uriel
An excellent example of ignorance at it's finest. First of all, if you want to avoid your searches being tracked by Google there's no need to spend $15 on a program to do it.
Google provides their *own* opt-out extensions, freely available here:
https://chrome.google.co...bstore/search?q=opt+out
Initially there were privacy concerns with Chrome, but those were quickly addressed a long time ago. Google makes money by providing relevant ads that users will click on. They can't do everything they do for free. All competing search engines do this, and their browser isn't directly responsible for this behavior. The same thing would happen in Firefox, IE, Opera, or any browser supporting cookies. If you don't want to be "tracked" then don't stay signed into your Google account, install an opt-out plugin, and keep your cookies cleaned out. Just quit it with your propaganda. Learn 2 internet. -
Uriel
Reviewing 13.782.109 Beta (Aug 5, 2011)
WOW! What a bunch of losers who get paid to rate Google five stars at this site to suck innocent people into using a spyware browser.
http://www.abelssoft.net/gc.php -
dreadlox
Reviewing 13.782.109 Beta (Aug 4, 2011)
Wow - version 130 of Chrome! :) Now this is going a bit too fast...
-
-
Uriel
Reviewing 13.0.782.107 (Aug 3, 2011)
Boy oh boy! If you people are going to get sucked in to using a free spyware browser promoted by marketers, at least check out GoogleClean.
http://www.abelssoft.net/gc.php -
Uriel
Reviewing 14.0.835.15 Beta (Aug 2, 2011)
Boy oh boy! If you people are going to get sucked in to using a free spyware browser promoted by marketers, at least check out GoogleClean.
http://fileforum.betanew...oogleClean/1312409860/1 -
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.782.107 (Aug 2, 2011)
I've gone on to the stable channel as with family commitments have little time. This release is rock solid & I've had no problems.
The browser files with my new Virgin Fibre to cabinet 100 MegBit connection. as does FF as my alternative browser FF 5. Not a lot to choose between browsers they are all good with the exception IMHO of Safari.
You really are a grade one ejit Urine. why don't you piss off & do us all a favour you moron. Have a nice day. -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 14.0.835.15 Beta (Aug 2, 2011)
Works perfect as always, I've been using it for 10 hours without any problems. This browser beat all the other browsers on the market, that's my opinion.
beyond rating. -
smarterthanyou
Reviewing 14.0.835.15 Beta (Aug 2, 2011)
@helenpierce - Google Chrome has a feature that blocks spam and malware sites. Blocking the website you mention was very likely intentional. It's too bad that Microsoft doesn't have this kind of feature. Maybe for IE 10?
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 14.0.835.8 Beta (Jul 29, 2011)
Used it for the past few hours & been on 100s of sites on 'Stumble' without issue.
-
andrewbmoore
Reviewing 13.0.782.99 Beta (Jul 26, 2011)
I've been using this as my main browser for over a year now instead of Firefox (mainly due to startup lag and resource usage on Firefox, which I hear is being corrected soon). Chrome has been very stable and responsive for me. The updates are automatic and very transparent (Every so often, I need to manually check the version I am running). Highly recommended.
-
-
dreadlox
Reviewing 14.0.814.0 Beta (Jul 18, 2011)
I love Chrome! Very fast, very stable.
The only thing I'd like to see improved is printing... -
PaulWilliams
Reviewing 12.0.742.122 (Jul 16, 2011)
Despite what some people say, Google Chrome is an very good browser. I've tried all the major browsers and they each have their problems.
Chrome is based on the Chromium browser which is open source and is constantly being updated. It's accurate and extremely fast.
It's not without serious problems, (No Print Preview, No Live Bookmarks, No Password Exporting, Pop-Up Blocking Needs Improving, Can't Open File Types by Default and Can't Turn Off Favicons).
If you don't like Google as a company just use Chromium instead, it's almost exactly the same. -
Reviewing 14.0.814.0 Beta (Jul 14, 2011)
Chrome remains young even if their versioning suggests otherwise, it has done a great job innovating, and the competition has breathed fresh life into Firefox. There are things each does better and I'm expecting great things from both. I use both every day, and I can't see either replacing the other anytime soon, although they're slowly growing closer.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0.742.122 (Jul 13, 2011)
I believe this is the stable, I have it on a PC & problem free. Hey I'm a poet. ooooo
Uriel is a troll BTW have a look at his profile.
We just ignore him/her now. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.782.55 Beta (Jul 13, 2011)
Getting better & better.
Uriel is a troll BTW have a look at his profile.
We just ignore him/her now. -
-
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 14.0.814.0 Beta (Jul 12, 2011)
better stick with the previous version, this one crashes a lot.
For instance stumbleupon.com -
Uriel
Reviewing 13.0.782.41 Beta (Jul 1, 2011)
Worst browser for spyware ever.
http://www.abelssoft.net/gc.php -
zxlotusxz
Reviewing 13.0.782.41 Beta (Jun 30, 2011)
Uriel .... you do realize chrome is built from the open source browser chromium.
Besides I use Rockmelt chrome + social stuff. -
robmanic44
Reviewing 13.0.782.41 Beta (Jun 30, 2011)
The speed of this browser is a non-issue for me as I have tons of RAM and I use a solid state drive for my main drive. That mean that everything launches fast. I see no a real improvement with Google Chrome. It's still an improvement over Firefox, which has seems to have lost direction.
-
Uriel
Reviewing 12.0.742.112 (Jun 29, 2011)
Worst spyware laded browser ever.
http://www.abelssoft.net/gc.php -
QQFarmer
Reviewing 14.0.803.0 Beta (Jun 28, 2011)
I hate overly emotional statements at a place like this....
-
nilst2006
Reviewing 14.0.803.0 Beta (Jun 28, 2011)
Still not changed the tabs to be UNDER the addressfield....and when closing last tab all chrome close...Only a ONE due to that Google still don't listen to their users ! Will celebrate when Google stop to exist !!! :)
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 14.0.803.0 Beta (Jun 28, 2011)
I've just looked at my stats & I've visited 21,000 + pages with the various incarnations of Chrome without a single crash or any other issue over the last 6 weeks.
Without going in to great depth as there is no need, I think that’s pretty good for ANY browser.
Most of the time I've been running the latest dev's or budgerigar releases. (mainly dev's) I also run Opera which to be honest on a fast connection runs smoother & is now my default browser.
I think when testing browsers they should be tried at say, 8 MegBit, 20 MegBit, 50 MegBit 100 MegBit as this shows up huge differences not shown when used on a single slow/fast bandwidth line.
Uriel you are an idiot. -
Uriel
Reviewing 14.0.803.0 Beta (Jun 28, 2011)
Worst browser for spyware. But if you must use, checkout GoogleClean!
http://www.abelssoft.net/gc.php
P.S. Hi Input Overload. Wanna go for a coffee sometime buddy? -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 14.0.797.0 Beta (Jun 24, 2011)
@halc: thank you for your honest review. I've planned on writing something more detailed about Chrome myself, but lack of inspiration and time (laziness) prevented me to do so.
The open issues you presented stand still tough for a long time now... but:
not everyone is a technical, picky person so I believe in the end it all break down to the "general feeling" of it – aka biased user experience on the speed interface etc., that has little to do with the technical stuff. This is why there are so many people in love with this browser and also why so many also hate it with vengeance.
Most of the comments here are pointless because of that. This browser obviously moves on its own pace, ignoring the software development standards – but this is something Google is known for. I’ve come to ignore that in time.
Chrome never worked flawless for me, but I like it so far and I’ve always willing to forgive the stuff they never seems to case to fix (the installer is by far beyond any comment – and there is no need to fire them because there is no installer team it seems). On the other hand, they constantly provide fixes on other areas – I can tell that because I’m using it daily and updating it with every release.
This V14 version seems to work better with flash (there was a recent Adobe update as well) so I'm back to Chrome. I still keep Opera, Maxthon and FF are still there just in case tough. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.782.32 Beta (Jun 24, 2011)
Never had any issues, installing or using. If I had issues I would say, running FF 5 at the moment for comparison. I prefer Chrome as it's faster and slicker. Urine you are an imbecile.
-
-
halc
Reviewing 14.0.797.0 Beta (Jun 22, 2011)
v. 14.0.797.0 Beta
Reviewing this not as a pre-alpha beta, but as a functional software for everyday use:
- crashes on HTTP post page reload is a MAJOR bug.
People, if you are a normal user the version I'm reviewing is NOT ready for daily use, unless you are a masochist and never use HTTP POST pages ever.
Also, I have 15+ years of experience in software projects (incl FOSS) and the Chrome version numbering logic is just silly. They up a major version number every time they add some lowly new features.
Other than that (applies to all versions so far):
1. No selections of install location (breaks OS UI/UX converntions). Bad
2. No easy selection for multiople profile
3. No easy selection (other than command line hacks) for cache/profile directory placement or size (esp. bad for SSD users)
4. Missing really basic browser UI features like selection of link/style rendering
5. Still calls home by default and doesn't openly say so (hidden in legalese and setting in chrome:flags)
6. No granular control over JavaScript security or what is allowed to run
7. No true UI customization (esp. for small screens like netbooks)
8. No granular privacy control for history/visited URLs/cache/cookies/etc
9. Automatic update checking is constantly broken on many builds
10. Some really basic features have to be built by adding tons of add-ons, most of which are 3rd party supported (like getting a decent bookmarks menu and changing hidden flag/startup command line features)
Otherwise fast, secure and swiftly improving browser from a great browser team.
But people have made a gospel out of Chrome, while it's still miles behind of other browser (esp. Firefox and Opera) on so many areas it's not even funny.
I just wish their marketing team and installer team would be fired. They are morons. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 14.0.797.0 Beta (Jun 21, 2011)
Installed without any problems. runs with out any issues. Running it along side of Firefox 5, Opera 11.11, & IE9.
Chrome is fast, but Opera is the fastest & most responsive & the one I find myself using the most.
@halc, What's normal user? I suppose you think you are above that - No, surely not a 'Power User' are you? I humble myself before thee. Who do you think you bloody well are? Yoda maybe?
I too have 17 years in working in IT. Chrome works fine on everything from a 22" wide-screen to a humble DELL 610 lappy. Still like Chrome & this version is actually a dev BTW.
Your talking out of the wrong end, metaphorically speaking, & 99% of your review is bulls***.
Live long & prosper. -
niknetpc
Reviewing 14.0.797.0 Beta (Jun 21, 2011)
Firefox is much better choice for me. How long is in betas? Up to 100? )
-
-
DKDude
Reviewing 13.0.782.24 Beta (Jun 18, 2011)
I once was a FF fanboy, but after I've got used to Chrome, I won't go back to FF, Chrome simply whup FFs but in every aspect.
Worlds best browser. -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 14.0.794.0 Beta (Jun 18, 2011)
Ok guys, cool down a bit... I see the biggest issue right now with this browser is the version numbering. I mean, this pops out on every single (negative) review.
All right then, let me give you a pice a puzzle: Google Chrome (SRWare Iron and all other flavors) and Google Chrome OS shares the same common sources.
Every time there is a fix/feature added in the browser or the OS the build counts up. So, yes, there may be not too many changes from 13 to 14 in the Google Chrome, but internal release counts up.
If you/someone/one has just a bit of knowledge/experience on how a source repository works then you know what I mean...
An while on this subject: I'm current running on my computer Mozilla Firefox version 7.0a1 (that is SEVEN as opposed to FIVE that is still in the beta - do you see me trolling the Firefox reviews?!) -
AlphaRoman
Reviewing 14.0.794.0 Beta (Jun 17, 2011)
He guys in stead of throwing mud to each other why not try and give some real review overhere? I Understand Input Overload you are a fan but I read the same reviews over and over. Can you for once tell the difference between 12, 13 and 14?
Google is updating so fast I lost track. I use Chrome myself but I am getting confused. I like the look and feel, the speed and I know the are security issues. For one I disable webgl and I block ads with ADblock.
Uriel why even bother to write a review you have not and will not ever install Chrome because every time your computer crashed just because of your latest review allone. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 14.0.794.0 Beta (Jun 17, 2011)
Installed without issue. runs well. a great browser, gets faster & more responsive as time goes on & I love the simplistic interface. Its how for me a browser should function.
Change log:- http://www.filehippo.com...google_chrome/changelog/
Open source link:- http://code.google.com/intl/en-US/chromium/
Go & troll elsewhere Uriel as you are an imbecile.
Urel:- The beginning of the end:- http://fileforum.betanew...r-Windows/1032985422/19 -
Uriel
Reviewing 14.0.794.0 Beta (Jun 17, 2011)
Looking into a unique mindset of Internet users that either are too trusting, too naive, too lazy or simply just don't know any better about the spyware abilities of Google Chrome. It's just mind boggling.
Another Friday and another Google update to sit here on the front page until Monday. I hope Fileforum is charging premium for Friday listings.
LOL! "if men is still alive"? -
Uriel
Reviewing 13.0.782.24 Beta (Jun 17, 2011)
It amazing how a deer can look into a set of headlights stupidly before it gets run over. It's equally amazing how some people can take Google's free bait so that Google can spy on them. Hey there suckers, wanna free browser? LOL!
Google's free browser is controlled by Google who have their own agenda for it. Firefox is also free and open source that is built by volunteers in the community with a completely different agenda. -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 13.0.782.24 Beta (Jun 16, 2011)
Just installed it. Runs perfect as always. I've never had any major troubles with Chrome wich I cannot say when it comes to other browsers, this is a beta browser but it works like a pro, and I think we have a winner here it´s just a matter of short time maybe a year or two and Google Chrome will be the first choice of browser for most people.
Beyond rating. ha en god dag, or in english have a nice day -
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.782.24 Beta (Jun 16, 2011)
Chrome did an Auto update today. No problems with the new version which is actually a dev not a beta. Takes around 15 seconds on my connection to update.
No problems, no issues, no deluge of spy-ware erupting from my PC and filling the dining room and kitchen with devils.
It just gets better & better. I also run it with Opera which I must say is the only other browser as fast or maybe a little faster than Chrome. Chrome is superb browser which one day will be the market leader.
I don't use extensions as many are very poorly written & slow your browser down. Even one.
Uriel it's you that's the joke. So you pay for your browser then, very odd?
Go & troll elsewhere as you are an imbecile - Grade one. :-)
Info on Google speed up:- http://www.theregister.c...1/06/16/google_and_spdy/ -
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.782.20 Beta (Jun 14, 2011)
Installed early this morning (GMT). It's run all day without problem or issue. If you are having re-directs/spy-ware etc get a decent Anti-Malware program such as Prevx or Malwarebytes.
I have never had re-directs or spy-ware issues with any release of Chrome. A great browser along with Opera. Chrome runs like greased lightening!
Uriel has made many, many negative posts RE: Chrome including he/she says at least 3 full re-installs, plus many major spy-ware outbreaks & lock-ups that it seems he/she feels are totally attributed to Chrome. I can only wonder why Uriel persist in using it. If any application did that to me I would buy a barge pole.
Uriel we have all had enough, go troll elsewhere. -
anandee
Reviewing 13.0.782.14 Beta (Jun 13, 2011)
More convincing than previous releases. Still feels like "something" is missing but overall a good, no-frills web browser.
-
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 13.0.782.14 Beta (Jun 12, 2011)
What gives, Uriel? Well, if you really want to transform a browser into a bloatware by installing all kind of crap on it (extensions for instance) here you go
https://chrome.google.co...mcimdanpfcibgafeknkgpia -
Ockhamite
Reviewing 13.0.782.14 Beta (Jun 11, 2011)
I'm not a pedophile and I don't have herpes. So I can use Google Chrome. FF also cool.
-1 becasue there is no new interesting features for a long time... -
Uriel
Reviewing 13.0.782.14 Beta (Jun 10, 2011)
Simply awful and the interface is ugly and outdated. I would like to install the following search engines into the Google Spyware browser, but Google Spyware browser doesn't support them. What gives?
https://duckduckgo.com/about.html
http://donttrack.us/
https://us2.startingpage.com/eng/aboutstartingpage/
https://www.startingpage...ng/protect-privacy.html
https://www.startingpage...tartingpage-plugin.html
(By the way...These are NOT extensions! These are plugins that get installed along with the default search engines included with Firefox.) -
-
Uriel
Reviewing 13.0.782.13 Beta (Jun 10, 2011)
Google Chrome is so full of spying properties, I'm thinking that the only way to rid of it is to burn my house down. Thank God I also use Firefox. It is open source and lightening fast.
Good thing Firefox has an extension called "GOOGLE SHARING". Google it and see what it does. LOL! -
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.782.13 Beta (Jun 9, 2011)
No problems ever, no issues ever. Excellent browser that is a joy to use & continues to run faster with each release. If you don't l; like beta's or devs go to the Chrome home page & install 12 stable. 100 stars.
For Firefox users:-
http://www.theinquirer.n...guises-microsoft-update
Scanning... 'Forum Moron Detector 3.0 Beta'. (Faster scanning speed. Better moron detection & more accurate name)
Two Morons Found:- 14 seconds:-
http://www.betanews.com/profile/Uriel
http://www.betanews.com/profile/Output%20Overboard -
Ockhamite
Reviewing 13.0.782.13 Beta (Jun 9, 2011)
Google Chrome is used mainly on Micosoft Windows.
Windows-machine check for dns.msftncsi.com every time to establish internet connection. If you are not using linux, your decision to use Google Chrome or abstain - doesn'n affect your privacy, because it is already breached. -
Uriel
Reviewing 13.0.782.11 Beta (Jun 8, 2011)
WHAT A PIECE OF GARBAGE THIS SPYWARE IS! It will make the computer hang.
-
Output Overboard
Reviewing 13.0.782.11 Beta (Jun 8, 2011)
Far, far better than version 13.0.782.10 .
I can't wait for version 13.0.782.12!
Better than anything created by God or man.
Life is boring for 51 year-old eurolosers so they have to have something.
LMAO! lol!!! -
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.782.11 Beta (Jun 8, 2011)
@ Aegis69, and your review & point is?....
No problems with this release, I'm getting a bit fed up of typing this as I never have issues with Chrome. The next issue with be the first.
Scanning 'Forum Idiot Detector 2.08'
Three objects found:-
http://www.betanews.com/profile/Uriel
http://www.betanews.com/profile/Output%20Overboard
http://www.betanews.com/profile/roj -
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0.742.91 (Jun 8, 2011)
Best browser ever.
Canuck, I often wondered why you were so stupid, now I know. And BTW I can sort you out any day sunshine – No problem, you don’t know everything about me & never will.
And why is reviewing & giving an opinion based on empirical evidence as in use of ALL the other major browsers RECENTLY on different machines & massively differently available bandwidth having a 'chip on your shoulder'. Fact is I know what I am talking about, it my job to.
Your problem & issue in life is you can't deal as so many on here also someone who don’t agree with Chrome being a better browser than Firefox - Otherwise known as 'The Holy Grail'. Thou shalt not speak against Firefox. Or disagree on any subject they hold so close to their hearts & have a breakdown when someone thinks differently.
I stand by my opinions & the fact that you don't agree & destroy your dolls house when people do disagree with you & stand up for what they think despite going against the you & your ‘herd instinct’ is not my issue.
I think it's you who are the bully in life, lets face it you are to stupid to do anything else! The next item I buy that says 'Made In Canada' will be my first.
Go see a Psychologist - You could certainly use one.
And compensating, I don’t think so. What's your IQ in the low 20s I think.
And I see from your profile you are a music & probably a software pirate too. interesting... -
QQFarmer
Reviewing 12.0.742.91 (Jun 8, 2011)
Has always been and will always be my favorite browser. Keep up the good work, Google!
-
Uriel
Reviewing 12.0.742.91 (Jun 7, 2011)
WHAT? Another update to fix Google Spyware? They just can't seem to fix the bugs and security holes.
-
roj
Reviewing 12.0.742.91 (Jun 7, 2011)
"And Output Underload this 51 year old is 6 feet 5 ins, 230 pounds & can beak a person’s arm in two seconds. I hope you’re listening at the back... Oh, & I'm a Brit."
LOL. So you're a big, middle-aged Brit bar brawler with an attitude and a chip on his shoulder. Makes TOTAL sense to me now. Compensating for something? This 5'9" 180Lb. 50 year old Canuck of Jamaican extraction finally sees the big picture. Brawn over brains every time, EH?
Standard security community disclaimers about all things Google and this browser in particular apply.
TWO stars. -
Sven123456789
Reviewing 12.0.742.91 (Jun 7, 2011)
No idea why people like this browser. No features at all. Sorta like a training browser. IE is pretty bad, but I have to put this at the top of the list for bad browsers.
-
Aegis69
Reviewing 13.0.782.10 Beta (Jun 7, 2011)
Version 13??? Do they just arbitrarily increase the version number at the beginning of each month?
-
Uriel
Reviewing 13.0.782.10 Beta (Jun 7, 2011)
Google chrome seems to inject code into your other apps so that it can spy on you there too. No wonder it's free to use.
-
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 13.0.782.10 Beta (Jun 6, 2011)
Gasp, gasp, gasp I cannot stand listen to you two morons once again. Output Overboard are you taking acid or what? I don't believe that you've tried google chrome at all so I presume that you don't know what you are talking about at all, so in the future I think I will ignore you like the other wellknown imbecile in this forum. Google Chrome the best browser ever especially the beta versions.
Beyond rating -
Output Overboard
Reviewing 13.0.782.10 Beta (Jun 6, 2011)
Now you can view websites that don't even exist yet, that's fast!
Not just a web browser but a lifestyle choice and the sole purpose for living (see review below and above).
So important that 51 year old monkey-boy eurotrash diss and threaten anyone who disagrees.
Spyware junk.
SWARE Iron is Chrome without all the garbage. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.782.10 Beta (Jun 6, 2011)
Installed without issue in 20 seconds. runs well, just keeps getting better. I've removed Opera as I was using Chrome most of the time The best.by far.
Scanning 'Auto Idiot Detector 2.07'
Two objects found:-
http://www.betanews.com/profile/Uriel
http://www.betanews.com/profile/Output%20Overboard -
Uriel
Reviewing 13.0.782.1 Beta (Jun 2, 2011)
I imput a search query and got overloaded with spyware. What a shame.
Don't take your laptop into the washroom. I heard a rumor that the java script in Google's spyware browser will activate your camera and post pictures of you taking a number 2 in Google Streets. This is just a rumor though. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.782.1 Beta (Jun 2, 2011)
Installed & running without issue on 5 PC's today. An excellent browser that will be the default in the near future as it’s leaving Firefox in the weeds.
Note: this is a ‘Beta’ – I hope you are listening at the back... If you have issues which I haven’t had go to the Chrome homepage & install the stable.
@Urinal - it sounds like you have a Boot Sector Virus \ Root kit. You probably got this from using 'keygens' to get a serial for programs instead of actually buying them. 'Mil Shield’ perhaps?
Norton do an excellent free Malware removal tool that should sort it. This is the only logical conclusion to your many spyware outbreaks as you will be redirected to crap if you have such Malware on your PC. I would also recommend you buying the full version of ‘Malwarebytes’ or ‘Prevx’ which should prevent re-infection.
One of your many (5 as I know of) clean installs will not help as the Virus will survive by hiding in the boot sector & will resist a format. This answer is free, unfortunately I'm going to have to charge you for more advice @ £350 GBP per day (Or part of).
BTW you are too stupid & moronic to take seriously, so this is my final post to you. Your profile is below & speaks volumes about your total & absolute crass stupidity.
http://www.betanews.com/profile/Uriel -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 13.0.772.0 Beta (May 27, 2011)
I too have never had any trouble installing Google Chrome whatever version you may come up with. And I agree with IO that apparently there is a h... lot of people who don't know anything about Beta versions and why and what they are used at. But anyway this new beta version works fine as allways I haven't noticed any problems at all, and I don't expect that I will. Google Chrome is king of browsers whatever you want it or not.
Beyond rating -
Input Overload
Reviewing 13.0.772.0 Beta (May 25, 2011)
II'm beginning to wonder if people who post on here know the site is called: Wait for it 'Beta News'.
Also some other staggering revelation they may not be aware of is ‘Beta’ software sometimes has minor (little) bugs, & even major (big) ones.
if you find this concept hard to understand. go to the main software site & download the latest 'Stable' (OK) version. This still might have bugs in it but they should be few unless it's made by Microsoft, or it's the 'Firefox' browser.
For my second point: I have had no problems installing this or any other version of Chrome EVER, thats never ever. I go on 1000s of sites a week without issue. Therefore my conclusion is... You don't want to know I assure you. -
Phat Esther
Reviewing 13.0.772.0 Beta (May 24, 2011)
The world first installer that not install anything to PC just exit immediatelly and leave the previous version as is. Perhaps the version 2978.55492.61100 beta
-
Zero-Point
Reviewing 13.0.772.0 Beta (May 24, 2011)
I just love when I run the installer and it appears to not do anything--who knows what's being installed.
-
PaulWilliams
Reviewing 11.0.696.68 Final (May 22, 2011)
Google Chrome is a Good Internet Browser, I used it for a few months, but ultimately I had to go back to Firefox. I'm not one of the die-hards for or against Google Chrome or Firefox. They typically leave 5/5 stars for one product and 1/1 stars for the other without giving any reasons. Neither browser deserves 5/5 stars, but neither deserves 1/1 star. At least both are free and they work, that deserves an unbiased review.
Weaknesses:
(1) No working Print Preview feature. I tried enabling the beta in about:flags, not only did I not get a preview, but afterward I could no longer print anything.
(2) Complete lack of customization. Can't add icons without installing add-ons. Wrench icon for all the options is way to simplistic. Can't switch search engines without going into the menu. Able to install themes (Backgrounds and Colors), but lacks Visual Styles (Buttons and Menus).
(3) No Live Bookmarks. Extremely Helpful if it did.
(4) Pop-up Blocker Needs an Overhaul. Even with AdBlock installed and Pop-ups disallowed in the options, it's always opening new tabs full of advertisements.
(5) Lacks NoScript Add-on. Most useful add-on ever created.
Strengths:
(1) Extremely Fast.
(2) Almost Crash Proof. Add-ons are run outside the browser in their own process.
(3) Automatic translation is the best I've ever seen from a browser.
(4) Lots of Add-ons. Doesn't require you to restart for the add-on to be installed. -
DaComboMan
Reviewing 12.0.742.60 Beta (May 21, 2011)
Don't like Google Chrome. They don't listen to end users.
-
Uriel
Reviewing 12.0.742.60 Beta (May 20, 2011)
This froze my system to a halt. If Google took the spyware out of it, this might not be a half bad browser. And even more, Google won't allow the "Google Sharing" extension. Why is that?
-
elfsun
Reviewing 13.0.767.1 Beta (May 20, 2011)
Still beta version,keep waiting for stable versions ,same to Avant browser
-
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 13.0.767.1 Beta (May 20, 2011)
To my experience this has some issue. Avoid this and stick with v12 for now.
-
Uriel
Reviewing 13.0.767.1 Beta (May 20, 2011)
This spyware is sooo buggy, they had to update it three times this week.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0.742.60 Beta (May 20, 2011)
I find it amusing to see some moronic ape like creature from has gone to all the trouble of creating a parody of me. Keep it up, i like it.
Fame at last.
No problems with this build. Still my default browser, which is getting better & increasing market share. Lots of informed users moving from the piece of junk called Firefox, several I know & work with.
Urinal, I've been on 14,000 sites alone this last three weeks messing with 'Stumble' using Chrome, not one problem. (And yes it is possible with my very fast fibre connection).
I therefore conclude the following:-
1. You are an idiot.
2. Have not a clue about PC's.
3. You have not installed Chrome - This is a fact.
So you didn't have to do the 15th clean re-install this week then. I was hoping you would.... Dam.
You are without doubt a grade one Moron, & are really are too foolish to take seriously, you are a total joke.ROFLMAO.
And Output Underload this 51 year old is 6 feet 5 ins, 230 pounds & can beak a person’s arm in two seconds. I hope you’re listening at the back... Oh, & I'm a Brit. -
Output Overboard
Reviewing 12.0.742.60 Beta (May 19, 2011)
A new micro-update - oh joy! Life is good! My world revolves around Chrome!
I'm a 51 year old loser dissing people over a web browser. Nuff said! LMAO
Nope, no Uriel here. I suppose you're not Gandhi either.
I have a dream... - Martin Luther King
And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. - John 8:32
And you will know my name is The Lord when I lay my vengeance upon you. - Samuel L. Jackson -
-
Uriel
Reviewing 12.0.742.53 Beta (May 16, 2011)
Stay away from this spyware. I had to do a clean install. The most annoying thing about this was the countless hours re registering the licenses for all software I previously paid for. In a couple of cases, I had to phone customer service to get software re activated. And not to count the endless hours updating the system and third party software.
-
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 12.0.742.53 Beta (May 16, 2011)
Clean install my a.. You're just impracticable so I can only have myself a quiet laugh hedr hedr hedr hedr I knew it, no brain at all.
Google Chrome is solid as a rock, my first choice allways.
Beyond rating but anyway five thumbs up -
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0.742.53 Beta (May 16, 2011)
Brilliant along with my other favourite browser Opera, gets better as time goes on & with me total stability.
Imitation is the most sincere form of flattery! - Mohandas 'Mahatma' Gandhi.
Thank You!
Playground tactics, typical of an 8 year old who dropped her dolly.. - You idiot, grow up.
I did a single install that lasted 2 years with Vista & the same will be the case with 7. Anyone who has to do a full reinstall is total 100% cretinous pond life.
Uriel or now Output Overboard has done 5 that I know of. He is wearing his Windows 3.0 disks out. Fear not I have a set upstairs still.
P.S. Uriel has done yet another clean install, I can't keep track.You are an total idiot & don't seem to have the concept of understanding anything. You are in the top 5 of the thickest people I have had dealings with,.maybe number 1. -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 11.0.696.68 Final (May 13, 2011)
@Uriel: for some reason that I cannot explain (yes, it is not backed up by technical reasons but rather personal user experience) I don't like Firefox but I don't post non-sense flaming "reviews" each time they release a new version... and we all know that they have a lot of issues, but good things also (~24% of the internet user are using it, almost the same percent as Chrome users).
What browser are you using by the way?
I am installing almost every nightly builds of Chromium but don't write reviews daily on it ; how come someone like you, who obviously doe's not use this program and proves little understanding on how computer works (Browser interaction with OS for instance and OS re-installation) have the guts on reviewing it. Posting articles retrieved through "Chrome is spam" Internet search... are you serious?!
I have looked to your recent reviews on BetaNews and they are on the same recipe.
Your spam is unjustified and does not honor you as obviously you're not rating it based on personal experience but rather superficial information gathered from internet and frustrated opinions of other inexperienced users.
Kindly stop!
To the rest of user coming here for reading pertinent reviews: I apologies for having to read this.
5 stars for a continuing improving browser that raises the standard for other browsers as well, in the same way Opera did (still does) in the last decade! -
Uriel
Reviewing 11.0.696.68 Final (May 13, 2011)
And yet another bug! Sheesh! This is pure spyware. Why isn't it classified so? Because of Google's bucks?
http://threatpost.com/en...utm_campaign=Position+2 -
Output Overboard
Reviewing 12.0.742.30 Beta (May 12, 2011)
This is so fast that it loads pages before I turn on my computer!
-
Output Overboard
Reviewing 11.0.696.68 Final (May 12, 2011)
Oh JOY! Talley ho!
Chrome is so great that I'm going to review every single update and diss anyone who dares to oppose me! -
eviljolly
Reviewing 11.0.696.68 Final (May 12, 2011)
@CyberDoc999 Benchmarks and my own experiences prove otherwise.
Chrome is the most solid browser out there, capable of passing acid2 and acid3 with flying colors for the past 3 versions. Who else can say that? Maybe Opera...maybe? -
Input Overload
Reviewing 11.0.696.68 Final (May 12, 2011)
Brilliant.
For Uriel/Output Overboard:- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-13374048
(Facebook exposed in Google smear campaign It has been revealed that Facebook embarked on a smear campaign against rival Google.)
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life.- Winston Churchill
Output Overboard - Member since May 12, 2011 Hmmmmmm
Nuff said! LMAO -
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 11.0.696.68 Final (May 12, 2011)
version 10 was the last good and fast version
now it is crap -
-
xanax
Reviewing 12.0.742.30 Beta (May 9, 2011)
Uriel, learn how to use a PC then we'll talk about software reviews. Chrome isn't perfect but your reviews are so pointless and misguiding. Did you really spend TWO DAYS reinstalling and you blame Chrome for this? hahaha
Yes, I could just ignore your comment and go on with life. But since you are allowed to post such crap, I'll make myself at home. -
Uriel
Reviewing 12.0.742.21 Beta (May 7, 2011)
They need to fix this spyware. I just spent two days doing a clean install on my laptop. That was lots of fun!
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0.742.21 Beta (May 7, 2011)
Best browser out there. This is a fact not just an opinion.
The paranoids should be aware there is help, go see a decent psychologist.
Edjits!
Uriel:- ANOTHER clean install, this must be at least the fourth. If I were you I would stop posting as you are looking more cretinous as the weeks go by. What a plonker. lol -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 12.0.742.16 Beta (May 4, 2011)
I wonder why in h.. you even bother to try Google Chrome at all, are you just stupid or what? (I think I don't have to put a name to my question, you know who I mean) And now you're starting to call me funny names, I think I'll ignore that, but one thing remains to say: " Uriel, it has been better for the world and the forum here, that you were remained as a spot on the sheet.
I can only say Google Chrome's getting better and better.
Beyond rating. -
lypxzm
Reviewing 12.0.742.16 Beta (May 3, 2011)
Good release, it is much faster then firefox on my PC, will continue to use it.
-
Uriel
Reviewing 12.0.742.16 Beta (May 3, 2011)
Piece of crap spyware. And the Devilhimself, you are one of those demons whom my parents and myself would wear protection bundles because of your wickedness. "Dork face"
-
Terumo
Reviewing 12.0.742.16 Beta (May 3, 2011)
bare en ting å si, chrome er best
only one ting to say chrome is best -
Uriel
Reviewing 11.0.696.60 (May 2, 2011)
Holy crap! Another weekly bug update? Die already! Put this spyware out of misery!
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0.742.12 Beta (May 2, 2011)
The best browser by far. Simply the best, better than all the rest.
I'm not even going to address the super-paranoids who should get out more. it's not with the effort.of typing. Never argue with an idiot, and there are lots on this forum. -
alcvanamelsvoort
Reviewing 11.0.696.60 (May 2, 2011)
The boffins responsible for this release of Google Chrome have lost their way. Chrome was snappy and fast but no longer. It is totally unresponsive and no longer adjusts to my screen. This morning, I removed this irritation from my PC and laptop and installed Firefox 4.0.1, and that's a sheer delight compared to Chrome.
-
TC17
Reviewing 12.0.742.12 Beta (May 2, 2011)
It takes Chrome up to version 12 to even attempt to add "print preview"? Yet from what I read on forums, that still doesn't work. What a joke.
If your going to use Chrome, at least dump this spyware ridden software and use one of the versions put out by other people who have removed most of the spyware... such as Chromeplus. The latest Firefox is faster on webpage scrolling than Chrome is. -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 12.0.742.12 Beta (May 2, 2011)
Another perfect Beta update and it works like a dream as always. And Uriel you are one of those people my forefathers used to drown just after birth, but anyway, I don't think I would like to stand near you, you must have a bad bad breath.
And as always beyond rating. -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 12.0.742.9 Beta (Apr 27, 2011)
Roj: thank you for sharring with us the Ghostery extention - I didn't knew about it. It's awesome. Ofcourse, I have install it on my last Chrome release and guess what: it works. Moreover, the blocked content is the same (see below)
In addition, you claim the following:
"Load the two plugins I mentioned in FF and see what happens on the vast majority of sites (including this one: Google Adsense and Google Analytics are spying on you here)."
I am deeply sorry but, to quote lord Vader "I find your lack of knowledge on the internet mechanics disturbing", especially since you adertize yourself as an "professional". You seems to not get how the internet works these days: it is not the Browser (software you use to get the page) but the Site (or page itself to be exact) that uses Google Adsence and Google Analitics. They have embeded code to report to Google and is is the way they advertize themselfs so you, me, anyone, get better results when using Google Search.
I understand you have a problemt with that, but do not dispare: there are plenty of of good browsers out there, there is the Bing search engine, Yahoo etc. Use them and be happy.
Me, I'll stick with Chromium.
Just my 2 cents, apologies for being a bit ironic, but understand that we all get sick&tires of this spyware paranoia. -
Uriel
Reviewing 12.0.742.9 Beta (Apr 26, 2011)
Another weekly bug update? This browser is pure cow manure. Uninstall it from your system folks because it is spyware. It's free because they monitor you and record your activities. And then they serve you adds based upon your records stored for infinity on their servers.
I wiped my butt the other day and it looked like TheDevilHimself. NASTY! It took me three quarters of a roll. WTF?
roj: Imput overload is an idiot who like to threaten you like a queer bully. Ignore the idiot. -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 12.0.742.9 Beta (Apr 26, 2011)
It's funny with all those who apparantly love to hate google chrome. They talk about google spyin' on us all. I have used Google Chrome (mostly the beta versions) and before that it was Firefox mostly, but the first time I was trying Google Chrome I was addicted to this sleak, neat and mean browser. And about all this spyware crap talk I can only say, Come on now! the whole world is spying on each other, I can't take it seriously anymore if you take a look around you, you will see cameras everywhere buildings, roofs, traficlights and street corners etc. So don't give me that bull.... about Google and spyware me here and spyware me there. Google Chrome is pure Rock 'n' Roll and Uriel bores me, Roj too. Still beyond rating
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0.742.9 Beta (Apr 26, 2011)
roj, I don't play games either on or off the PC. I have a very fast fibre connection & have been building/repairing PC's for 16 years +. You make assumptions based on your limited sphere of knowledge which it seems is quite small. Oh & I'm no boy I'm 51.
I've forgotten more about IT than you will ever know. (Joke of the week):- You an ‘IT Pro’, ROFLMAO.
Chrome is the best & if Google wish to track my every site I visit I really, really don't care. There are dozens of companies know much more about me, also my bank, credit card companies, shops, the government, my neighbours, the police cameras, etc.
I still don’t see your big worries & I never will. Anyone following me around the net will soon get very bored, very, very quickly.
I would be happy to publish each & every site I visit on a daily basis for the world to see.
Perhaps this isn't true with yourself & maybe that's your problem, what are you so worried about roj?
Only you know the answer to that. I can only guess!
And why the bloody hell do you keep installing & reviewing a program you hate with a vengeance? - Truth is you don't install it; you just come out with the same paranoid canuck crap week after week. Bugger off roj. And try to get out more.
Uriel = Mindless cretinous moron & more! -
roj
Reviewing 12.0.742.9 Beta (Apr 26, 2011)
Input Overload:
We know you don't care about privacy. Clearly your IT experience isn't mature enough for you to warrant caring about anything in the profession beyond your latest video game. Fortunately, there are IT Professionals who do care and who continue to practice due diligence to protect those unaware of the issues from naive viewpoints like yours and who also hold companies like Google accountable for their poor and possibly sinister practices.
As to "none fiction", you might wish to consider a writing course.
Your posts contain no facts, only shrill conjecture and fanboi-isms - as a general rule. I presented my (actually our - I'm part of the Active Defense Team in my organization and our job includes in part reviewing software and evaluating inherent security risks - yes, we analyzed Chrome and IE and FF and the other side of our shop did TRAs on them - the latter two browsers are approved for use and Chrome didn't pass) findings along with ways for any user to verify them (the aforementioned plugins are a quick example) as well as references to events in the media that even you can read (well, maybe not - after all, you claim to read "none fiction").
You on the other hand (where reside four fingers and a thumb), have no facts.
Similarly (and not surprisingly, given the lack of facts) you have no evidence.
You do have a surfeit of schoolboy slurs, beliefs with nothing to back them and a severe case of head-in-the-sand-ostrich-itis regarding security and Google.
That's a great foundation upon which to build advice and constructive comment.
The purpose of these reviews is to critique software - not win a popularity contest. That means raising awareness of potential issues, regardless of whether the inexperienced consider them relevant or not. Building on the premise:
ONE star for a browser from a company that I wouldn't trust with YOUR browsing data.
Edit:
SuzzyWoozy:
No problem. I'm a security geek and I'm SUPPOSED to be paranoid. :) Furthermore, I'm a Canuck and we take the privacy of individuals extremely seriously here (and have enacted the appropriate legislation to back that mindset up and protect them). -
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0.742.5 Beta (Apr 26, 2011)
I've tried all the browsers & Chrome is the best by far. I also have Firefox 4 which is slow to start, clunky & no where near as slick as Chrome.
As for privacy I don't give a pigs burp roj. Sorry but I only read half of your post as I prefer none fiction in reading materiel.
I do wonder what the paranoids who post on every dev/beta/final Chrome release do or have to hide?
Just don't use it, instead of complaining about it week after week without probably ever installing it. Edjits! -
roj
Reviewing 12.0.742.5 Beta (Apr 25, 2011)
Google the company is a privacy violation. They have insidiously worked their way into the public psyche, track anything and everything they canj 9run Ghostery and Google Sharing in FF to see the tip of the iceberg) and everything they do and say should be suspect and scrutinized. As a security analyst, I cannot recommend their products - and sadly that not only includes their search engine and this browser but Android as well.
My formal professional recommendation (which mirrors the one I have passed to the company I work for, an organization of some 14,000 employees coast to coast) is to avoid Google products if an alternative exists and to practice stringent security analysis on any product used in the event of no alternative.
Anyone who values their privacy, especially in the corporate free-for-all that the web has become, should avoid this browser.
I'm sure the fanboiz and fangurlz will slither out of the woodwork to defend their pet, but in a world where Google privacy violations reach the press on a regular basis, they hardly have a leg to stand on. The old hackneyed rubbish of "if you have nothing to hide, you shouldn't be concerned" is an outdated, criminally naive platitude in a world where authority is abused mercilessly every day, by corporations, by governments, by law enforcement.
In the end, it doesn't matter what I say; the truth speaks for itself. Load the two plugins I mentioned in FF and see what happens on the vast majority of sites (including this one: Google Adsense and Google Analytics are spying on you here). Google's malign presence is everywhere - you can see for yourself. Now thing what an advantage you're giving them by running a browser designed by them. Look around you and think twice, people - times have changed and the company no longer has "Do No Harm" as its motto..
ONE star. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0.742.0 Beta (Apr 22, 2011)
Uriel your not even worth an reply. You are the most stupid person that inhabits these forums. Look Beta up in a dictionary you cretin.
-
zillion167
Reviewing 12.0.742.0 Beta (Apr 22, 2011)
Still a long way to go before it's on par with Opera.
-
zillion167
Reviewing 10.0.648.134 (Apr 22, 2011)
Has the potential to be better than the Opera browser some day.
-
Uriel
Reviewing 12.0.742.0 Beta (Apr 22, 2011)
This has got be a crappy browser. It's so buggy the developers had to post another weekly bug update to fix security holes.
http://www.theregister.c...rd_javascript_benchmark/
http://www.theregister.c...ndroid_privacy_concerns/
RE: CyberDoc999 - I suspect it may have allot to do with the built in spy tools for them to market and monitor you as you surf the web. -
-
Mr Swiffer
Reviewing 12.0.742.0 Beta (Apr 21, 2011)
Anyone that has to do a clean install because of Google Chrome must be an idiot and should never be allowed to use a computer. Installing any malware free 3rd party browser like Google Chrome, Firefox or Opera will never, ever hose a Windows install. Don't blame a major software company for your lack of computer knowledge. That's your problem.
Google Chrome is the gold standard. Heck, Google is the gold standard for just about every product they make. Now if Google could just add support for bookmark sync with the stock Android web browser on phones that would be totally awesome. -
Uriel
Reviewing 12.0733.0 Beta (Apr 14, 2011)
Another weekly bug update to fix this spyware? WTF? Get Firefox people.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0733.0 Beta (Apr 13, 2011)
Uriel, what about your image backup system, that only takes 5 mins to restore an image. That alone shows what an idiot you are, not using imaging software. All people with a brain use it. Nuff Said.
No problems with this build, still the most responsive & slick browser out there. I also like Opera esp the latest final too.
This version runs OK on my ancient DELL lappy too so I have to disagree with the Doc. Sorry old chap.
Uriel, be thankful I don't know your address yet as you would be waking up in critical care, if you are lucky that is. -
Blaxima
Reviewing 12.0.725.0 Beta (Apr 7, 2011)
You'll have to excuse uriel, it's a firefox user. What else could you expect from someone who's browser, in all independent tests, scores slightly better than IE 9, while Chrome and Opera battle it out for best performers.
I prefer Opera but when I need a back up, Chrome(SRW Iron) is what I go to because it just works. -
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 12.0.725.0 Beta (Apr 7, 2011)
this is getting too bloated
and not made for older computers
soaks up lots of CPU -
Uriel
Reviewing 12.0.725.0 Beta (Apr 7, 2011)
I had to do a clean install because of this browser. Go with Mozilla instead.
-
KSzostek
Reviewing 12.0.725.0 Beta (Apr 6, 2011)
Chrome has potential but it is NO where near being a browser of choice for the masses yet.
I too have to agree Googles versioning is VERY misleading.
A major problem with Google is, it will start a project and then let it sit with the exception of Chrome where there are very minor updates way to often.
Smells like a rose! -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 12.0.725.0 Beta (Apr 6, 2011)
Uriel you don't understand anything at all. And you even don't understand what google are doing about security leaks and stuff like that. I followed your link and has been reading this article and I think you only has seen the headline which says as follow: Google Fixes Six High-Risk Bugs in New Chrome Release. In this article you can read that google have a very high security policy, you see, they even pay money to people if they find security leaks, can you tell me which other company are doing that? I'll bet, that they are the only ones who are doing that. It shows that Google are taking their security very very seriously. That's what this article's about. I've said it before and I'll say it again: "Against stupidity, even gods are fighting in vain", think about that Uriel or dont, I don't care.
-
Mr Swiffer
Reviewing 12.0.725.0 Beta (Apr 6, 2011)
It's made by Google. Nobody can make a better product in any category than Google can. Google knows how to do everything right. Nobody else seems to know how to do much of anything right.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0.725.0 Beta (Apr 6, 2011)
What bloody difference to the performance of the browser does the version number make. I evaluate the software not the version, whether it's Chrome 12 or 350.500.0.9.01 the performance would be the same.
(A Rose by any other name would still smell as sweet)
This is without doubt the best browser there is & that idiot Uriel does not realise that Beta versions are released to fix bugs. if you don't want the risks of that get the stable.
When he will finally realise what a Dev/Beta is for is anyone's guess.From his past record of reviews, I suspect never!
The man is a total cretin, big time.
Oh & BTW regarding market share, give Google a year & I predict world use will be greater than Firefox which I also have on this PC. -
JamesSmith2
Reviewing 10.0.648.134 (Mar 28, 2011)
I haven't been a huge fan of Google Chrome, but it seems like version 10 is the fastest internet browser on the planet. I love that it has almost as many extensions as Firefox, but it still has far to go in allowing you to customize its appearance. Still exceptional improvement over the last version.
-
Zero-Point
Reviewing 12.0.712.0 Beta (Mar 28, 2011)
Inflation:
Version Release d(days)
9.0.597 2011-02-03 -
10.0.648 2011-03-08 33
11.0.696.16 (beta) 2011-03-23 15
12.0.712.0 (dev) 2011-03-23 0
I understand it's Google's choice for versioning, but the pace of incrementing versions this fast appears to be a false expectation of its development (marketing?). With most, major versions are released every 2 months; 6 per year?! This just makes it more difficult to manage for the user. I don't prefer Chrome as my main browser, so I don't pay attention to changes that closely, but when I see a new "major" version, I really have to ask myself what has changed? Is it a vast improvement that will make me want to switch...no, even though it jumped 4 major versions, it's still pretty much the same. Thanks for wasting my time to have another look at it.
As mentioned earlier, the real version is "712"--so I don't understand why they don't call it version 712? We'll be there soon enough, anyways. -
Uriel
Reviewing 12.0.712.0 Beta (Mar 26, 2011)
Six bugs this Friday. WTF? Every week and sometime twice a week. Piece of crap spyware.
http://threatpost.com/en...w-chrome-release-032511 -
RXDOC73
Reviewing 12.0.712.0 Beta (Mar 26, 2011)
Yet another great series of improvements.
Who cares what release #'s they use...if it works as well as it does they can call it V1000 -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 12.0.712.0 Beta (Mar 26, 2011)
@Ryusennin: guys, the real version is xx.x.712.x as opposed to the previous xx.x.697.x
so here is the real progress is you plan on counting that.
Now the first numbers is obviously for marketing or other stuff... call it as you like.
12 one: better and better -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 12.0.712.0 Beta (Mar 25, 2011)
It's getting better and better. this one is beautiful much better looking than version 11. I also think it's a little faster too. THIS IS MY BROWSER! ! Hats Of. and of course five of the big ones too.
-
Ryusennin
Reviewing 12.0.712.0 Beta (Mar 25, 2011)
Quick Batman, let's release a new version number before Explorer catches up!
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 12.0.712.0 Beta (Mar 25, 2011)
This is a dev release. I've had no problems with it, it seems faster all the fiddling with Java might have paid off. An excellent browser.Although FF version 4 is also excellent too but not as slick. Chrome starts faster too.
It's coming down to personal preferences rather than speed as both browsers are very good. I have them both on. BTW I don't care if this is release 205.011 as the only thing I'm interested in is performance & ease of use. They can call it what they wish, it's their program.
Ryusennin - :-)
P.S. after using FF & Chrome 12 side by side for a couple of days I am inclined to think Chrome is somewhat faster than FF & certainly more responsive. Both have their strength & weaknesses but for fast browsing Chrome is for me the better choice.
i also have FF 4 on too which is more comparable than Chrome, so I can't lose!
I have not had one pop-up ad in all the time I have used Chrome & the spyware garbage is the work of paranoid minds who don't get out of the house enough.
Urial will be posting soon RE: Chrome are now auto putting peoples web cams on so you can see inside the house as well as Google's street maps.
if you don't do anything illegal on the net you have nothing to fear. If you are (whatever) no browser will save you. You at the back I hope your listening :-)
Uriel, You are a total idiot, this is a dev build, not a Beta, & certyainly not a final. It's released with the specific intention of FINDING BUGS. that's what it's that's what the bloody DEV & Beta releases are for, get that in your head!. At least Google sort their bugs, MS take months to sort even critical ones, there are critical bugs now waiting to be fixed. FF hope no one will notice bugs in that program.
What gets me about you is your crass foolishness which shows quite plainly you have not got a clue about any form of IT. Words fail me to explain your stupidity.
You really make a total fool of yourself with your moronic posts, despite what anyone says you never seem to lean. I don't think you have the needed skills to change. You are a true d***head if ever their was one. -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 11.0.696.16 Beta (Mar 25, 2011)
@Uriel: so what does that mean really? The rough percentage is nothing if you don't look to the trend as well. Google for "web browsers market share" and look to the graphs: they will all tell you only two browsers have an ascendend trend (Chrome & Safary) while the others, IE and the "mighty" FF loose ground.
Not saying that this is the future, but there may be a reason why more and more ppl start using Chrome.
My only regret is Opera, that I really like but somehow doesn't find the top spot in my preferences.
And yes, I really like what M$ did with the IE9 engine (not the browser itself tough).
I'm using Chrome for the past years now (both beta and even the nightly builds) and I have no serious complains). -
Input Overload
Reviewing 11.0.696.16 Beta (Mar 24, 2011)
Simply the best, better than all the rest.
I can't make the next piece rhyme so leaving it at that. :-) -
-
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 11.0.696.14 Beta (Mar 21, 2011)
Still the best.
Fashion police: This version brings a new application icon, nice touch guys! -
ilev
Reviewing 11.0.696.14 Beta (Mar 20, 2011)
@Uriel,
You really are an idiot.
There is no other browser that matches Chrome for fixing bugs. The MHTML bug in IE/Windows is known for 3 months and still isn't fixed. The zero-day flash bug has been fix in chrome, just the next day while Windows /iIE/Firefox... users will wait for Adobe to issue a fix. -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 11.0.696.14 Beta (Mar 19, 2011)
Ignore that moron and his spyware paranoia. And yes, maybe there was a seurity leak in some of Google Chromes updates, but hey, at least, compared to many others, the people behind Google Chrome immediately fixing that problem in the next version, that's just normal when one runs beta versions (write that behind your ears Uriel). And also can I see that you don't read your own linked articles properly, I can tell you I did, you only spell yourself through a few lines where some minor problems are mentioned, so in the future read the whole article and you'll get the whole picture. And still and maybe for ever beyond rating.
-
CyberHobo
Reviewing 11.0.696.14 Beta (Mar 19, 2011)
Over rated and buggy. Browser plugins make it really bite the big one! IE9 is king!
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 11.0.696.14 Beta (Mar 19, 2011)
Another utterly moronic weekly review by that half-wit Uriel that tells you nowt at all, I really don't believe he even installs Chrome at all which makes his 'reviews' invalid.
Chrome is the best browser. Uriel keeps saying it's buggy, I run the latest dev's & have no issues.
I'm not a politician I'm an Electronic Engineer & seem to live in comms rooms.
BTW:- Uriel, these are actually dev builds, you can get issues etc.. In dev's it's normal, they are released specifically for bug fixing, that's the general idea of them. I know you will find this concept hard to take on-board but it's true, it is honestly. You can look it up!
Try version 9 stable. Doh.
Give me some issues from a Chrome stable that YOU have had & how it/they affected YOUR use of Chrome. Go on do it! Or can't you more like.
DOWNDATE:-
('Slows my system to a halt') - What utter total crap, what rig you running a 286 with 2 MEG RAM?) - Complete & total lies & more lies. You don't expect to be taken seriously do you?...
I do make person attacks to idiots like you Uriel . What do you expect:-
I'm British.
http://www.tomshardware....rome-opera,2558-10.html - A well respected site, get your head round this. -
Uriel
Reviewing 11.0.696.14 Beta (Mar 18, 2011)
Another weekly update to fix this buggy spyware browser. It is a bare boned browser that will only support chosen extensions by the board members so as to systematically help out with their analysis about you. Yawn!
(UPDATE)
As requested by some others who like to take out personal attacks (Must be a politician), please read and check out the date of the news article provided by Kaspersky concerning this buggy spyware. The link is provided below for your convenience including another hilarious and entertaining story from Time Magazine.
http://threatpost.com/en...targeted-attacks-031711
http://www.time.com/time...-yahoo-full-mostpopular
And regardes to TheDevilHimself
A security update every Friday? This browser seems vulnerable to me. It even slows my system to a halt. By the way, I don't use Google, I use http://www.startingpage.com/ to do my searches. -
periklo
Reviewing 11.0.696.14 Beta (Mar 18, 2011)
@JeremyP Why would you need Google Toolbar, Chrome already has all the spyware abilities from it and much more!
-
JeremyP
Reviewing 11.0.696.14 Beta (Mar 18, 2011)
They got a google toolbar yet? When they do, I'll use it. Made by Google is it? Well why no search toolbar?! Bonkers.
-
DudeBoyz
Reviewing 10.0.648.134 (Mar 17, 2011)
I'm really trying to put this thing through its paces, but Firefox 3.6.x is just so much more mature and the extensions / addons / plugins for Firefox are far more numerous, far more mature and far more useful.
I simply cannot find a reason in Chrome that leads me to want to replace Firefox with it.
BUT, I'll keep looking and experimenting with it. Maybe I'm missing things. -
RXDOC73
Reviewing 11.0.696.12 Beta (Mar 17, 2011)
Reviewing 11.0.696.12 Beta (Mar 16, 2011)
Hey Uriel I think your brain are so little that It's a miracle you can see and walk at the same time. Google Chrome is pure Rock 'n' Roll and the safest browser you can get, and at the same time it is ligtning fast and smooth, and as it is now, I don't need any other browser because no one can keep up with Chrome. Det er den bedst kneppende browser jeg kender, sorry I forgot, you'll get it in english, It is the best f...... browser I know. And as always beyond rating. A billion thumbs up. -
Blaxima
Reviewing 11.0.696.12 Beta (Mar 16, 2011)
Opera is my main browser but the times still come where I need something else and this (SWR Iron more specifically) is what I turn to and it doesn't disappoint.
What I don't like is the lack of control, it's a very Applelinian way of doing things. Customization is not just for aesthetics but improved work flow. Also I don't like the lack of privacy but Iron remedies that.
Those complaints aside, I really have nothing bad to say. It's certainly much better than IE and firefox -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 11.0.696.12 Beta (Mar 16, 2011)
Hey Uriel I think your brain are so little that It's a miracle you can see and walk at the same time. Google Chrome is pure Rock 'n' Roll and the safest browser you can get, and at the same time it is ligtning fast and smooth, and as it is now, I don't need any other browser because no one can keep up with Chrome. Det er den bedst kneppende browser jeg kender, sorry I forgot, you'll get it in english, It is the best f...... browser I know. And as always beyond rating. A billion thumbs up.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 11.0.696.12 Beta (Mar 16, 2011)
Wow! Another weekly moronicical review from Uriel.
I believe Uriel has never had Chrome on his PC as from his posts he lacks the needed intelligence to install it?
No problems with this version of Chrome had it on most of the day & no issues. The best along with Opera stable. -
Uriel
Reviewing 11.0.696.3 Beta (Mar 14, 2011)
Wow! Another weekly bug update to fix this vulnerable spyware laden browser.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 11.0.696.3 Beta (Mar 14, 2011)
Brilliant & getting better. Blows Fireflop into the dust.
DudeBoyz, it took 7 seconds to download, what connection are you using 'Dial-Up' with wet string? -
TheItalianChef
Reviewing 11.0.696.3 Beta (Mar 14, 2011)
A really excellent browser, complete, fast and reliable. Very lightweight, this is his true strength.
Mozilla is not even able to Stay with the back.
p.s: someone wants a recipe quickie? hehehehe -
mytake4this
Reviewing 10.0.648.127 (Mar 13, 2011)
FF4 is an improvement, but Chrome, now with enough good extensions, great speed and a nice viewing area is my #1 browser. CHROME has finally done it! After using many browsers, I have found this one solid, lean looking, cool is style and easy to live with. Has an easy setup and the layout for options is user friendly. Have found all sites so far to work well with Chrome.
The new Chrome 9 and 10 are simply the best. This is not to say some extensions are a tad better in Firefox and that the fox is not a great browser as well. Just seems like from the quick starting of Chrome to its nice tight look and feel, Chrome has jumped over the Fox this time. FF4 is a solid 4 but the Chrome I would say is indeed a solid 5 start. Opera still has issues. Some sites do not work with Opera. It doesn't seem to remember resized pages and the bookmarks are harder to deal with -- sorry, Opera, as cool as it is in some ways is a 2 or 3 star ratings. SeaMonkey is a solid 3.5 or a 4 star ;) -
DudeBoyz
Reviewing 11.0.696.0 Beta (Mar 9, 2011)
I still don't understand why this browser is SO BIG compared to Firefox 3.6.x and Opera. That said, it is NOT a bad browser, but it does not have the established library of 3rd party addons and extensions that Firefox has, the scripting seems slower than Opera and it seems to have a lot of trouble with some banking and ecommerce sites that I frequent. Chrome handles them MUCH better than Safari for me, but Opera and Firefox handle them better.
It is a fairly young browser and I expect it to get better as time goes on, but I still would prefer to use Firefox 3.6.x over this, in part because I'm not happy with the interface differences from what I'm used to, as well as some of the odd functional quirks that it has. I would prefer this to be as strictly HTML compliant as some of the alternatives, with less of the google special support stuff included.
I look forward to seeing where this product heads in the near future, especially as HTML 5 becomes more established. I'm not sure how the lack of H.264 is going to affect things. -
KSzostek
Reviewing 10.0.648.127 (Mar 9, 2011)
Chrome has potentail but it has a long ways to go, still just too buggy for me!
-
RXDOC73
Reviewing 11.0.696.0 Beta (Mar 9, 2011)
The best and quickest browser out their. Don't listen to Ureil...he is jsut a hater.
-
RXDOC73
Reviewing 10.0.648.127 (Mar 9, 2011)
Small, slick and smooth.
Forget about posters claiming bug fixes. At least Google is continuously fixing and improving its software instead of letting it be exposed for weeks on end! -
Input Overload
Reviewing 10.0.648.127 (Mar 8, 2011)
The best along with Opera,so I run them both. I'm not going to argue with the morons below as it's not worth the typing effort. Excellent browser and others can disagree if they wish.
I just wonder how many that 'review' Chrome actually install it it?
More likely they just come out with the same drivel when they see the word CHROME.
(Uriel is obsessed with The RIAA I wonder why that is?)
500 Stars. -
Uriel
Reviewing 10.0.648.127 (Mar 8, 2011)
Yikes! Three bug updates in one week? If Google rebuilt the browser from the ground up and without the spyware, they wouldn't have this problem. But why give the public a free browser if Google can't use it to spy on its clients to gather personal info for the purposes of targeted adds amongst other purposes right? Besides, this is one of the most featureless browsers on the market IMHO. It's no wonder that those who depend on Google's services would religiously defend a second rate browser with five stars here at this site. They need your info.
http://surferzworld.com/...e-chrome-browser-spying/ -
DudeBoyz
Reviewing 10.0.648.127 (Mar 8, 2011)
Why the heck is this so HUGE compared to Firefox?
Also, even though it is pretty fast, Firefox has a much more established array of addon/plugins that seem to cover the ground that I'm concerned with. Plus, Firefox 3.6.x still retains the standard interface configuration, and I'm having some difficulty adjusting to the unique interface modifications that Chrome has put in place.
I'm concerned about the H.264 situation, but I think plugins/addons will get around that, and there is no way on this planet I'm going to use IE as my primary browser, so I'm not quite sure what will end up happening.
To me, chrome is interesting, but I like Firefox 3.6.x better, and I think maybe even Opera a bit better, at least so far. -
Uriel
Reviewing 11.0.686.3 Beta (Mar 8, 2011)
And yet another weekly bug update for this bare bones browser. Must be the built in spyware that makes it so buggy.
-
dreadlox
Reviewing 11.0.686.3 Beta (Mar 8, 2011)
Hehe, no I don't think Uriel even has a computer - at least not connected to the Internet, and definitely not surfing the web! The sites he would be visiting could get his IP and track what webpages he want to view! Now we can't have that! :)
On topic: Google Chrome is the best and fastest browser in my opinion. No other is even close. 5 stars! -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 11.0.686.3 Beta (Mar 7, 2011)
"Do you have a Computer at all Uriel?" To me it seems like you don't have one or if you have, it must be a crappy one. I have never had any trouble with Chrome and it seems like a lot of others in this forum can say the same. I think you must be the type that messes everything up, since you can't run Chrome on your Computer. And again all this spyware s...talk You're one Hell of a paranoid who apparently see spyware overall, and to your knowing if there is some software that messes up systems it definately is Ccleaner and the other one Bleach bit. I get really tired everytime I read your reviews. But anyway Google Chrome is still Beyond rating. Hil Valhalla.
-
zapatero
Reviewing 11.0.686.3 Beta (Mar 7, 2011)
11.0.686.0/1/2/3 - all have the same problem: configuration options do not operate, can´t be changed.
-
-
Uriel
Reviewing 11.0.686.1 Beta (Mar 4, 2011)
ANOTHER WEEKLY BUG UPDATE? WTF?
Worst browser on earth.This browser is pure garbage. In fairness, I downloaded Google Chrome and it slowed my system to a crawl. It must be all the spyware crap that Google depends on to make a living built right into their bare bones browser
I then downloaded Firefox, and it runs way faster if you install the privacy extensions called "Google Sharing", "Better Privacy", and "Ghostery" along side it .
If you already have Google Chrome installed, you already know that your computer is slow. Avoid Google Chrome and install FireFox together with "Ccleaner" and/or "BleachBit" . These three apps work together flawlessly to clean the spy cookies that Google and other add revenue companies have place on your computer on a regular basis. They do this to make revenue. You will see a huge jump in your system speed if you follow my advise I promise. Try my advise if your system is slow. You will not be disappointing.
Google doesn't do nothing for free. So get Firefox the open Source browser if you value your privacy and don't want targeted adds popping up and slowing your system to a crawl. Google only cares about making revenue. If you bite their bait (adds) then good for them. Google Chrome is only free because they use it to monitor you and then to serve you with targeted adds. They also keep your record and connect it to Facebook to record a permanent detailed record about you, your interests, and who you are affiliated with. So if you made some bad choices in your youth and you want to erase your past, BEWARE!!!
Google will collect all they can about you and especially if you choose their browser. Do you really want that? It's all in the small print -
Input Overload
Reviewing 11.0.686.1 Beta (Mar 4, 2011)
Review:- 11.0.686.3 Dev
Best browser on earth. Out of fairness I loaded the latest version of FF yesterday. I gave it a day's trial. My personal conclusion was it's not a patch on Chrome or Opera for that matter.
FF is clunky & feels dated & to me ugly. Also I don't want 100s of useless crappy badly written extensions to slow my PC down that some on here rave about. Every extension slows your browser down. Some use a significant amount of memory as they were written by idiots.
I've used a PC since the 286 & built dozens. I've also tried just about every browser there is several times.and still have to in my line of work.
RE: Privacy - Your ISP has a full record of sites visited, downloads etc should the spooks ever require such information.
I can only conclude that all those who have unwarranted fears of being spied on are doing illegal activities on the net?
Viewing illegal images?
Or downloading, warez, copyrighted material, the list goes on? And running FF won't save you if you are doing such things, I assure you.
That's why these paranoid morons have fear, the fear of being bloody well caught!
http://www.betanews.com/...acy-cost-you/1299298649
_______________________________________________________________
It looks like Uriel: is a pirate! Read one of his/her reviews below. The others are interesting too!
'Review µTorrent (v2.2) from Uriel:-
'Spyware. Be VERY VERY paranoid. The makers of uTorrent could sell your information for the right price. The RIAA could collect your information and use it against you. They will lock you up and throw away the keys to make you an example in the media for their own selfish purposes. Use Tixati instead. It is better and more secure. Tixati has everything uTorrent has for privacy minus the spyware'.
BTW, 'slow your system down', are you mad/insane, or running an Atari 600? It doesn't slow your system down one jot, as well as being a liar, Uriel: is also a grade one idiot.
In use CPU with NIS, Malwarebytes, Super AS Pro, Pro Lasso, WinPatrol, etc. running between 1-15%.+ quick spikes (4 Core Intel) Chrome using around 35-45 meg memory use. Total memory use 889 - 920 meg, with Win 7 SP1. 4 GIG matched fast memory, 50 Meg Bit fiber net connection. (Soon 100Meg Bit). This PC runs as fast as lightening, it's me that needs speeding up if anything!
And NEVER had a pop-up with Chrome. I think you have malware on your PC probably from the torrents you use.
More crap from Uriel::-
''I then downloaded Firefox, and it runs way faster if you install the privacy extensions called "Google Sharing", "Better Privacy", and "Ghostery" along side it '
According to your recent reviews you were ALREADY RUNNING FIREFOX. You do tell porkies. Not the sharpest knife in the drawer.
Nuff said.... -
RXDOC73
Reviewing 11.0.686.1 Beta (Mar 4, 2011)
Haters here are just upset that they didn't get CR-48's to test on.
Simple and easy to use.
If you think this is spyware you better get off the internet and make yourself a tinfoil hat. Everything, everywhere collects data on you if you know it or not. -
kstev99
Reviewing 11.0.686.1 Beta (Mar 3, 2011)
I'm surprised that the screenshot doesn't show it with the Google Toolbar installed, since they try to sneak that POS into nearly every Shareware / Freeware application that you install nowdays. I get tired of uninstalling it on other peoples computers. Pop-up blocker is a joke in Chrome. Do you think the ones that get through are Goggle's paid sponsors?
Google is a Great Search Engine!!! I wouldn't use any other, but for browsing, stick with Open Source Firefox. -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 11.0.686.1 Beta (Mar 3, 2011)
I have a hard disk with 500 GB storage so I believe 24 MB is a huge file and I maybe get some trouble installing google chrome because of the 24 MB, come on, life too short for that and Uriel's still blabbering about google and browser spyware that gathers all sort of information and firefox that does not depend on adds because it's open source and not freeware like google chrome and and and I don't care a rats ass, Google Chrome runs perfectly on my system better than all the rest and that's what I care about. Still beyond rating.
-
SineWave
Reviewing 11.0.686.0 Beta (Mar 2, 2011)
24MB for such a minimalist design can only be considered a shame.
... and I think everything exactly as Uriel. I wouldn't trust Google to take out my garbage, lest be my main browser. It could be the speediest browser in the Universe for all I care. But it's not even that.
However, as any competition is good I give it 3 stars. -
Uriel
Reviewing 11.0.686.0 Beta (Mar 1, 2011)
Another weekly bug update.
Lets see. Google Chrome is owned by a company who depends on add revenue. So it is understandable that they would build into the browser spyware that gathers all sorts of information about you. It is also understandable that those who have a relationship with Google will give it rave reviews as if Google Chrome is a superior browser.
On the other hand, Firefox is an open source project that does not depend on add revenue in the same way as Google Chrome does. There are all sorts of extensions for Firefox that will protect your privacy. Firefox even runs faster on all four of my computers for some reason or another.
I'm sticking with Firefox and Google's affiliates can have Google's inferior browser if they seem happy to do so. -
-
roj
Reviewing 11.0.686.0 Beta (Mar 1, 2011)
Input Overload:
I read what you wrote and all I could imagine is a really shrill schoolboy shouting in the schoolyard. It must be really tough for you in public school over on that side of the Pond.
So, to the matter at hand:
While I will certainly concede that not every FF plugin is worth it, I would be hard pressed to be gauche enough to claim that the majority of them are crappy or badly written.
I personally like having full control over what causes tabs to open and the conditions under which they do so (Tab Mix Pro). I like arraying my tabs and choosing which one to use (FoxTab) or simply mousing over a tab and seeing what it contains (TabScope). ColorTabs helps me differentiate them instead of being, well, bland white and nondescript - that's why color cues are so often used in presentations. I appreciate the ability to fully configure and automate my download options, right down to how many threads are employed (DownThemAll / DownloadStatusbar). I often save web pages locally since the "net is anything but permanent (Mozilla Archive Format) and thanks to GoogleSharing, the new Evil Empire is not able to see where I am or what interests me to target me with self-serving ads (as a Security professional, such details matter to me). I don't believe in "living with it"; that inherent acquiescence is the epitome of "Give them an inch and they'll take an ell". The implication of "illegal activities" when objections to the violation of privacy is also so typical of the smarmy smugness used so often to justify an often questionable if not downright illegal invasion of said privacy.
Google Chrome, for all its winsome charms, can't do that. It's limited, bare bones and while it's undeniably fast and has some worthwhile plugins, the depth simply isn't there. One may find that speed is actually irrelevant when using a browser for what it's designed for: surfing information. Convenience and ease rules the day there.
You can set Chrome up to suit your needs in five minutes: quite laudable. Once I've setup FF, MozBackup lets me do the same in roughly 15 seconds. Also, it's pretty clear from your discourse that your tastes are fairly simple; mine and those of many others are, shall we say, more esoteric.
I don't need the sportscar. I don't need to be known as using the latest darling of the NetSet. The best browser is what suits your needs. Mine are configurability, privacy and versatility. Chrome is for those who don't hold those traits with the same degree of importance and you know something? That's OK too.
And the best part is that I can express that view and not come across as a sadly stereoypical Overblown Overpompous Brit.
Yelling in the schoolyard.
A neutral THREE stars for a browser that IMNSHO is somewhat overhyped and not my Cup Of Tea. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 11.0.686.0 Beta (Mar 1, 2011)
Still the best by far. Full stop.
And I don't want heaps of badly written crappy, useless extensions. Every extension you install slows your browser a little BTW.
You can set Chrome up to your/my liking in less than 5 minutes. And with me, with very, very few extensions.
I used to use Firefox until it became a piece of Junk or is that Trash to you over the pond? (Either will do)
I also like Opera, which at the moment is a whisker behind Firefox.
As for targeted ads, I don't give a pigs burp!
And if Google want to follow me around the net, that's fine by me, You cant walk or drive anywhere without info being stored regarding you.... Live with it.
(Unless you are up to illegal activities?)
For the reviewers above:-
Roj, you have been shown to be and still are a moron! Secondly yes I can set up Chrome in a few mins (On a clean install) I use imaging software for my PC's.
I only got half way through your rant then i moved on, as I can't abide idiots.
I stand by what I wrote if you disagree that fine by me. The fact that you are not so bright is not your fault. I think you should seek the help of a good Psychologist pronto.
And don't play in big boys forums when you know bugger all, as it shows what a typical stupid canuck you are.
Along as usual with an IQ as high as a bag of hammers. I met lots of your fellow d***heads (canuck's) while I was working in TX a few years ago all fleeing the cold.
I remember the only thing that worked on them was the mouth. You were all objects of derision by the Texans. And for the record I can't stand canuck's all 136 of you.
Oh, almost forgot, & I work in comms rooms, I've forgot more than you will ever know about IT. Got that? - Pillock.head!
And that goes for too you Uriel who your realms of total absolute unmitigated stupidity go beyond the parameters of any reason known to man or indeed woman either. You are truly one total complete absolute cretin.
Interestingly, you are.both stupid beyond comprehension, both canuck''s, there is a pattern here?.
Hey, both, do yourself a favour and buy 'The d***heads Guide To PC's'. (Maybe you could share one copy)
BTW you can't help not being British, look on your stamps & tell me what you see!. ROFLA. Hey, have a nice day. Paul
10 Stars. -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 11.0.672.2 Beta (Feb 20, 2011)
Google Chrome is the best browser anyone can get, and compared to Firefox (whatever version) Google Chrome is much much faster and more nice looking. And I really don't care about I have to make my bookmarks visible I don't see that as a problem. And about tracking my browsing I really can't see a problem, we live in a world with security cameras on every streetcorner and every traficlight you see so if Firefox or Chrome are tracking our browsing, I don't care as long as they don't put a camera or microphone in my home. But anyway this world is filled up with paranoid people who see ghosts everywhere. I give five thumbs up for Chrome but still I think it's beyond rating.
-
kstev99
Reviewing 11.0.672.2 Beta (Feb 19, 2011)
Tried this, still prefer Firefox 4
1. Firefox has the best extensions available, and is the most customizable browser ever, PERIOD.
2. As far as lean interface, FF4 interface is actually leaner with the right theme and bookmarks toolbar hidden. With chrome, you have to make bookmarks toolbar visible to see your bookmarks button, you can't place your bookmarks button on the navigation toolbar.
3. In full screen mode (Firefox), the forward,back,bookmarks use autohide and are available by moving the mouse to the top of screen. With chrome, navigation is unavailable unless you exit full screen.
4. I feel fairly confident that Mozilla organization isn't tracking my browsing to send targeted ads my way. I'm not saying that google does this, but they are supported by advertisers.
Just my opinion, but I'll stick with Firefox. -
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 11.0.672.2 Beta (Feb 19, 2011)
Excellent browser.Runs like lightening, it seems to be the fastest browser I have ever used including IE9 RC.
Uriel, I am in no doubt that you have not installed this version of Chrome & therefore your 'review' is an outdated opinion & is an totally irrelevant posting.
if you don't like Chrome fair enough. But only comment on software you have used thoroughly, that's the only fair way. -
ghostrider951
Reviewing 11.0.672.2 Beta (Feb 18, 2011)
Read the article in betanews front page, might help explain what they are doing. Still the top browser, as far as I'm concerned.
-
Erock123
Reviewing 11.0.672.2 Beta (Feb 18, 2011)
Getting confused...I like Chrome, but the version number change all the time...now it is 11? I do not see much difference between any of the number changes...I not even sure what official number of current supported release is. In short time Chrome has been out, it is up to version 11 and one of the earliest browsers (IE) is currently on 8 and soon to be 9....please explain.
-
Terumo
Reviewing 11.0.672.2 Beta (Feb 18, 2011)
I like this browser, I only using this browser, I love this browser, its the best out there.
-
roj
Reviewing 10.0.648.82 Beta (Feb 17, 2011)
Input Overload:
Not a heck of a lot of difference between IE and FF...
Right.
With that one statement, you have just destroyed any chance you had at being taken seriously in this context.
The plugin architecture of FF, as flawed as it is, guarantees its extensibility FAR beyond anything remotely possible by IE. The ONLY way to make the facile statement that the two are even near par is to bury one's head deeply in the sand and pretend that the plethora of extensions don't exist. That's a big stretch but you seem to have pulled it off.
Chrome too has extensions.
They're greazy kidz stuff by comparison and unless something incredibly stupid (you know, akin to saying that FF and IE are on par) is done by the FF devs, they will never achieve the breadth, depth, variety and maturity of the FF community, if only because FF was there First.
I ain't no fanboi.
Also and not to put too fine a point on it, unless I compiled the source code myself, I don't trust Chrome to not phone home. ANY binary from Google is suspect IMNSHO.
'nuff said.
A neutral THREE stars. -
ghostrider951
Reviewing 10.0.648.82 Beta (Feb 17, 2011)
I second that..........................what is NOT serious about this browser??I have jockeyed between version 9 and version 10, having NO complaints about either. I stuck with version 10 as I like the option layout better. And while the "clear Browser data" is more compact and easier to use in version 9 I like 10 best.
-
Terumo
Reviewing 10.0.648.82 Beta (Feb 17, 2011)
I tink the same as xanax whay do Phat Esther even try Chome.
I tink that this brower gettng better and better if thats possible.
Anyway the best out ther
And to KSzostek you wrote "I like alot of google products but chrome has a long long ways to go to be a serious contender as a browser"
What is not serious aboat Chome.?? -
xanax
Reviewing 10.0.648.82 Beta (Feb 17, 2011)
Phat Esther, you shouldn't be allowed to "review" anything. I'm still wondering how you manage to turn on your computer.
-
Phat Esther
Reviewing 10.0.648.45 Beta (Feb 16, 2011)
Chrome went to same way like Opera, more and more new bugs.
In google images not show only the firts 3 raw. why?
And 1111 more bugs. -
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 9.0.597.98 (Feb 13, 2011)
Best of the best !!!!!
Better get out the tin foil hats google is reading your mind.....
which you have lost -
Uriel
Reviewing 9.0.597.98 (Feb 11, 2011)
Spyware! Google is recording your every move. Beware! They are bigger than Double Click and yet your spyware cleaners delete Double Click cookies without touching Google cookies. Whats up with that?
-
asaenz
Reviewing 9.0.597.98 (Feb 11, 2011)
I do remember a time when Opera was a program you either paid for or it would have ads in the space in the upper portion of the screen. Eventually after a few years they changed back to a totally free version I suppose due to public complaints. (look in history section of Wikipedia if in doubt) I used it before that time (since 1998) and liked its speed because it was the fastest and has always been a leader with regard to speed but since then they've experimented with some features that don't always function properly and can be considered added bloat to people that are looking for a mean lean browsing machine. Hence the popularity of Chrome which I'm trying and have little to say about it other than it seems to work well most of the time. The only thing I don't like about it is that it seems to set aside more memory for itself than I think is necessary and sometimes I can't get it to work well with GeSwall under LUA but everything else seems okay ... it is what it claims to be.
-
some guy
Reviewing 9.0.597.98 (Feb 11, 2011)
Input Overload you crack me up Opera was never Nag or add-ware, that makes me believe you did not download it from a legit site and my guess your knowledge also follows that same level of intelligence. I have been in the field for 19 years. My guess you where not even born yet.
-
roj
Reviewing 9.0.597.98 (Feb 11, 2011)
Can't hold a candle to FF in terms of versatility because of the plethora of plugins and the strong dev community that FF has. Furthermore, from a security perspective, Google's privacy record in general leaves me permanently leery of this product.
I'll give it a neutral THREE stars. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 9.0.597.98 (Feb 11, 2011)
Thanks ghammer.
Yes 'some guy' Opera was either an Ad based application or you paid beer tokens for it not so long ago. I hope you're listening at the back.
Chrome is an excellent browser & my default.
Opera is improving yet still has many rendering issues..
I really wonder how many people actuality install & use the software on this site or just come out with the same moronic rubbish every-time.
I think many are the latter.
some guy, for the final time Opera had a large ad in the top right corner if you bought it the ads which were region based went. You are making a fool of yourself.
Go to the Opera forums and ask!
5.0 Dec. 2000 Final release of 5.0. Introduction of ad-supported free version. Increased standards support.
Then say you are sorry & are are total moron. I work in comm rooms for a living & as one other poster has testified it had sponsored annoying ads. It shows how deep in IT you have been if you don't know that.
I have also been to Opera in Oslo Norway, not so far from the UK you idiot. i was born in 1959 & have been in IT/Electronics longer than I care to remember
Look here you stupid know nothing:-
http://www.opera.com/privacy/ads/
Quote: .'Note: The following information only applies to Opera versions prior to 8.5. Opera version 8.5 no longer contains advertisement sponsorship.
Since Opera 5, Opera Software has added an advertising function to the browser. This decision was made so that we can offer the Opera browser for free - while still allowing us to receive some form of revenue (from the advertising) in order to help pay our bills and to continue to develop the renowned high-quality Opera products.
All of the code in the Opera browser was written by the developers of Opera Software ASA. This includes the code written to implement the specific banner-serving functionality in the browser. Much care was taken with this development so that user privacy and security would not be compromised.' Read more from the link fool. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 10.0.648.45 Beta (Feb 10, 2011)
Chrome is a serious browser, & anyone who uses it for any length of time soon realises how good it really is.
In the last month I have evaluated (not for the first time) Safari, Firefox, Chrome, & Opera.
Chrome is the & fastest with Opera just a whisker behind. Opera still has a few rendering issues to sort but I still like it & it's improving again with each release.
Safari seems to attempt to take over your PC & when uninstalled it left almost 600 registry entries behind. Not a problem as I imaged back after each test. But it could be if you don't use imaging software & you like a lean registry.
It seems to me there isn't unfortunately a lot of difference now between IE8 & Firefox, which is a pity as Firefox was an excellent browser but not now. But with version 4 in the wings who knows?
IMHO the conclusion is that Chrome is still the best all round browser at the moment & is gaining market share exponentially. But Opera is also an excellent browser.
I'm not interested in version numbers as they are totally irrelevant, if anyone can show me how Chrome's version numbering system affects the efficiency of the browser I am willing to listen?
At the moment I don't give a pigs burp what they call it.
cltx99, have you tried totally removing Chrome & all folders & registry entries rebooting & doing a fresh install? As you have been a member since 2004 I have no doubt you have, it was just a suggestion. :-) -
KSzostek
Reviewing 10.0.648.45 Beta (Feb 9, 2011)
I like alot of google products but chrome has a long long ways to go to be a serious contender as a browser.
-
ghammer
Reviewing 9.0.597.94 (Feb 9, 2011)
Pretty good browser. No download managers though. None worth the name anyway.
@some guy
Yes, Opera was a paid app as recently as 2005, I have keys for it.
When being a fanboi, at least get your facts straight so your stories are more believable. -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 9.0.597.84 (Feb 8, 2011)
@some guy: in what respect?
because from what I see it has already all the functionality of these browsers; will be very helpful to point them out, please. -
some guy
Reviewing 9.0.597.84 (Feb 7, 2011)
still far behind Opera and FireFox
SuzzyWoozy I could right a book, especially Opera is the most advanced and secure browser on the market today, yes they both lack the 3rd party support of Mozilla.
Inputoverload
"qoute"I even bought Opera many moons ago"
you paid for it? where are you going to get it? Opera has always been freeware. -
cltx99
Reviewing 10.0.648.18 Beta (Feb 7, 2011)
Normally, I'd give Chrome a 5 star rating. However, after using Chrome for many months and enjoying it very much, it began to slow down severely in page rendering. I tried everything I could think of to solve the problem to no avail.
I'm now using FF 4.10 and found it to be very good, but I miss Chrome and the way it used to be for me. Did anyone out there have the same problem? -
Input Overload
Reviewing 10.0.648.18 Beta (Feb 7, 2011)
ZoNi, may your armpits be infested with fleas from a thousand camels. :-)
-
ZoNi
Reviewing 10.0.648.18 Beta (Feb 7, 2011)
I use Chromium 11 last 10 days. It is very nice and fast, but Chrome/Chromium still miss some important things:
- no good Print Preview
- no Print button (?)
- no option to customize print (like: no URL print etc)
- no option to autohide download bar
- no option to open file from Net (only Save, not Open) -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 10.0.648.18 Beta (Feb 5, 2011)
This is definately the best browser ever. I've been using Internet Explorer, Netscape Navigator, Mozilla Firefox, Opera, Maxton, World Browser and and and, or should I say, name a browser I haven't tried yet? but no one can beat Chrome and that's a fact. Compared to Chrome all the other browsers are limping pitiful after Chrome there's no discussion about that what so ever and don't give me Bull.... like spyware and s*** in Chrome, as some wellknown boring person here has talked about. Google Chrome Sparker Røv eehhh sorry once again in english, Google Chrome KICKS a** YYyyiiihhaaaa.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 10.0.648.6 Beta (Jan 27, 2011)
Chanleog shows a lot of erm changes & fixes. I've never had any issues with the Dev releases. Still the best bar none. BTW Opera catching up.
-
-
dreadlox
Reviewing 10.0.642.2 Beta (Jan 24, 2011)
Can't sync with latest version 10.0.642.2 :(
But otherwise the best browser ever! -
Input Overload
Reviewing 10.0.642.2 Beta (Jan 21, 2011)
This isn't a Beta it's a 'Dev' release BTW. Still excellent, I use the 'Dev' releases all the time & I can't remember any lockups or issues apart from the scrolling problem a few weeks ago which was sorted the same day.. Brilliant browser. I don't care if in march we are on release 1.000.000.00023.987.01. :-)
It overtook FF months ago in speed & stability & security, FF is one step away from IE. Opera is second & with a bit of work on rendering issues could be on a par with Chrome.
I think people with Chrome problems should look elsewhere on their PC & do some maintenance & housekeeping as I have none of the problems people babble on about neither on this PC or my laptops or other PC's I care for.
Remember every extension you install slows your browser down slightly, & can cause instability (Not Chromes fault) that's why I have only one, AdBlockPlus.
Neanderthal66, Make your mind up. You posted:-
'Finally thinking about leaving that crap Firefox, it offered 1 single feature why users stuck to it, and it wasn't even from the developers themselves, AdBlockPlus'.
Doh :-)
Den beste nettleseren der ute - Nuff said! -
Terumo
Reviewing 10.0.642.2 Beta (Jan 21, 2011)
Blir bedre og bedre ved hver ny beta, og jeg gleder meg til den er ferdig.
Getting beder and beder for every new beta, and looking forward to the final versjon.
PS. Ja jeg vet at det ikke er beta og jeg vet ikke hvorfor jeg skrev det heller.
Men som sakt før, det er den beste nettleseren der ute, -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 9.0.597.67 Beta (Jan 20, 2011)
I've said it before, (and this is for Phat Esther), and I'll say it once again: "Against stupidity even gods are fighting in vain". Like Input Overload I don't care what version of Chrome I'm running because it works perfectly either you're running Chrome 'dis or 'dat that's my point, and I'm getting very tired each time I have been reading a review from PE, who should get his schoolmoney back as we say here in Denmark. Today there is only one browser you can trust and that is Chrome, the fastest, best looking, and most user friendly internet browser you can get thats a fact either you like it or not.
I give it five but I think Chrome is beyond rating. -
Phat Esther
Reviewing 9.0.597.67 Beta (Jan 19, 2011)
First: This software not opensource.
Second: Watch version numbers
Chrome 10 - dec 2010
Chrome 9 - nov 2010
Chrome 8 - okt 2010
Chrome 7 - sept 2010
Chrome 6 - may 2010
Chrome 4 - jan 2010
This tell all from this software what is. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 9.0.597.67 Beta (Jan 19, 2011)
I too have run Opera side by side, I even bought Opera many moons ago. Opera needs to work on stability instead of adding bells and whistles, then it might be as good as Chrome.
Maybe the reason Chrome on this PC runs so well is I have only one extension - AdBlock.
Remember every extension whatever browser you use slows it down slightly, keep it lean and mean. If I could Chrome would get more than 5 stars.
Tip:- keep the amount of extensions (Most of which are unneeded junk) down & Chrome beats the pants off all the rest as it's the best, by far.
Phat Esther:- you are a moron, I don't give a pigs burp what the version number is, & I never will.
i concentrate on the operation of the aforesaid software & regardless of your moronic post this does not change the fact that Chrome is by far the best.
BTW Get a spell checker, your supposed to speak English as your from across the pond. Explain please how the version numbers affect the software?....
Code URL:- http://dev.chromium.org/...rs/how-tos/get-the-code -
u3912974
Reviewing 9.0.597.67 Beta (Jan 19, 2011)
I really love Google Chrome. It's better than Internet Explorer. Though it's not 64 bit. I am a bit confused why someone would want this version 9 when there is a version 10 out already of 10.0.634.0 . I feel that that this browser is safer than Internet Explorer because there lots of exploits written for Internet Explorer. I also feel that Opera, Firefox and Safari lack adequate development. I could be wrong though/ What do you think?
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 10.0.634.0 Beta (Jan 12, 2011)
I think this is a 'Dev Channel' release not Beta? I've had no problems, the options now uses the browser - Nice touch. No stability or crashes & it's had some work today. Very nice.
-
charlesbrean
Reviewing 9.0.597.42 Dev (Jan 11, 2011)
Updated Advanced Chrome to version 10.0.630.0
This version has the ability to open downloads ( when OPEN is selected the download is automatically saved to a custom temp folder with autocleaning ) plus minor tweaks related to download interface, without this feature chrome makes your download folder a big mess of downloads when you just wanted to open and not SAVE.
To know more about it go to:
http://www.google.com/su...2d45bd1c43274&hl=en
Download URL:
http://descargas.casasyd...com/advanced_chrome.zip -
DoHickey
Reviewing 10.0.628.0 Beta (Jan 8, 2011)
So far no problems. It transfered my extensions just fine.
As far as pages getting stuck. The so called stable current version release was doing that already on my machine.
This one seems to be doing better for me. -
Neanderthal66
Reviewing 10.0.628.0 Beta (Jan 7, 2011)
I hope to use version 36, when it has matured enough to replace FF.
-
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 10.0.628.0 Beta (Jan 6, 2011)
@MikeTechno: the guys at Google do NOT made fools of themselves by jumping from v1.0 to v10.0 faster than any other browser in history. Unfortunately this applies to the guys that don't understand software numbering conventions. Guess what: there is none, each company can number the releases as they want and usually there is a good reason for that although is internal and not available for large public.
For version 10 of Chrome tough I have to take a few stars:
1. The page gets stuck until all the tabs resulted from "open link in a new tab" span on are fully loaded (open some links and then try to scroll the original page.
2. There are serious rendering issues interpreting the tags: this results in content not fully displayed.
3. What's the meaning of the blue number left to the "View background apps" (it is sometimes displayed upper right to the wrench menu). It it not the number of tabs, nor the extensions...
4. When a tab crashes with the 'Ouch..." blue error (not a good color for error IMHO), there is a high change the all the tabs will crash as well EVEN if they are already loaded and properly rendered! What happen with the process isolation?
I'm pretty sure there is a lot of code rewrite between ver9 and 10, but it is not necessarily a s good progress, or at least not completed at this time.
Looking forward for these to get stabilized, but since you made me switch to Opera for now, you'll get only 3* for this release. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 10.0.628.0 Beta (Jan 6, 2011)
Why on earth does the version number make any difference to the product, I don't give a toss what they call it as long as it runs like a well oiled machine, which it does.
Looking forward to 'Chrome 3000.325.01' in March.
Brilliant browser & pulling ahead all the time.
Suzzy I can't replicate any of these issues, rather than move to Opera why not install a stable version of Chrome. I used Opera for years, but it's not as fast on this desktop as Chrome & is a pain to setup, it puts folders all over your C\: drive & has no pre-caching. I do have a very fast fiber connection that might be helping.
BTW I respect your review & I'm not saying you don't have these issues. :-) -
Zoroaster
Reviewing 9.0.597.42 Dev (Jan 6, 2011)
It's not that I've tried them all, it's that I use them all : Chrome is a good browser but far from being the best, it is excessively advantaged by a fashion, by a name. Opera is far ahead. Chrome runs fine, naked, out of the box, but once several extensions and scripts added, it takes it time to start and to display pages, when Opera excells. Good browser, curious, a 3 star is IMO generous.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 9.0.597.42 Dev (Jan 5, 2011)
Nothing to touch it. The best browser there is. (And I've tried them all)
I'll put it in Yorkshire a county in the UK:- Best brazser tha ris, nowt to touch it, if tha's gor any sense atall thar'l gerit,. na then. Eeeeee by gum. bugger it, naa me ferrits av gor aat. -
MikeTechno
Reviewing 10.0.612.3 Beta (Dec 23, 2010)
I love Chrome, I really do, but the guys at Google made fools of themselves by jumping from v1.0 to v10.0 faster than any other browser in history. This isn't version 10.0 at all, at best it's really version 2.0 at best. It's funny how software developers think they can fool people into thinking their product is somehow more complete, substantial or advanced simply by racing to get up to a higher version number. Are they just stupid, or do they think we are really that dumb?
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 10.0.612.3 Beta (Dec 22, 2010)
Still the best bar none. No problems with this 'Dev' build so far.
-
dreadlox
Reviewing 10.0.612.3 Beta (Dec 21, 2010)
New dev build makes Chrome freeze in all TinyMCE-editors after typiong a few words :( I guess the newjavascript engine is buggy... 3 stars until fixed.
-
ChipChop
Reviewing 10.0.612.3 Beta (Dec 21, 2010)
If they add a serious ad blocking option, I'll happily switch from that crappy abandoned Firefox.
-
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 10.0.612.3 Beta (Dec 21, 2010)
Yyiiihaaa They keep coming and coming but I don't care anymore as long as things are working well and they certainly do. And as said before Opera, Firefox and all the others can't deal with Chrome, it is by far the best browser, because they understand what we the users want. Hats of for Chrome the users browser. Merry Christmas. In Danish: Glædelig Jul
-
Terumo
Reviewing 10.0.612.3 Beta (Dec 21, 2010)
ENG...The best browser out ther
NOR...Den beste nettleseren der ute.
I have use it for a long time now, so way dont you giv it a try to.? -
Input Overload
Reviewing 10.0.612.1 Beta (Dec 18, 2010)
No issues with this 'Dev' build. i don't care what release versions they call Chrome, as long as it performs well. It does this & extremely goody, goody, too.
It is by far the best browser there is, it's true!
I cant wait for release 250,000.876 in Feb 2011. -
thartist
Reviewing 10.0.612.1 Beta (Dec 17, 2010)
One more and you'll be with Opera and its more than 15 years of existence!
-
pjb
Reviewing 10.0.612.1 Beta (Dec 17, 2010)
So far so good.
Auto update did not initialise from v9 to v10, but going via: http://www.google.com/ch...a.html?extra=devchannel worked well. :)
BTW this is DEV not Beta!
http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/
Dev Channel Update
Thursday, December 16, 2010 | 15:14
Labels: Dev updates
The Dev channel has been updated to 10.0.612.1 for Mac, Windows and Linux -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 9.0.597.19 Beta (Dec 15, 2010)
Rocketfast, sleek and the number one browser on the market today, no more and no less can do it. All the other browsers are limping way behind Chrome. And to Input Overload, I haven't had any troubles with flash videos at all but there was a very tiny little problem with the scrolling in version (v9) 9.0.597.15 I believe it was, but it seems to be solved now so no problemo.
I'll end my little review by saying the same as Terumo but in danish instead:
Chrome den bedste netlæser der er derude. Prøv den which means in english:
Chrome the best browser out there. Try it -
Terumo
Reviewing 9.0.597.19 Beta (Dec 14, 2010)
The best browser out there.
Den beste nettleseren der ute. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 9.0.597.16 Beta (Dec 13, 2010)
It seems to have overcome problems with flash vids. Has anyone else had problems with flash or is it just me? (Probably me)
Runs well now the scrolling works, best browser in town. -
ghostrider951
Reviewing 9.0.597.15 Beta (Dec 10, 2010)
Agreed......................scrolling is broken in .15, but is fixed in .16. Still the best browser out there in my opinion.
-
lakso
Reviewing 9.0.597.15 Beta (Dec 10, 2010)
Scrolling is broken in 9.0.597.15
it is fixed in .16 Get it at
http://dev.chromium.org/...ng-involved/dev-channel -
mlazzaro
Reviewing 9.0.597.10 Beta (Dec 8, 2010)
The feature, Print preview, is don't work yet to me. I don't try all features, but now this version is more stable.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 9.0.597.10 Beta (Dec 8, 2010)
I've had a few problems with Flash playing on this release, I've had it on a while as it was on Dev. Hopefully this will be sorted. Still the best by far.
-
betabettabest
Reviewing 9.0.597.0 Beta (Dec 3, 2010)
If you like your aero peek feature enabled for individual tabs (Win7 taskbar), fuggetit. This build crashes 100% with that command switch enabled. I hope this is just a short-term glitch.
-
Bonobi
Reviewing 9.0.597.0 Beta (Dec 3, 2010)
Super fast browser, but this latest and last version won't load Flash on Nico Nico Douga, sometimes during the live broadcasts.
-
mlazzaro
Reviewing 9.0.597.0 Beta (Dec 2, 2010)
unfortunately, this version is crashing when I try enable some features... I think is better return to the my stable version.
-
zapatero
Reviewing 9.0.597.0 Beta (Dec 2, 2010)
Very good. about:flags "Print preview" option does not work yet.
-
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 9.0.595.0 Beta (Dec 1, 2010)
(v9) 9.0.595.0 Beta and still counting. I don't count them anymore, this browser is getting better and better. It's a simple and user friendly no nonsens browser and I like it this way. But the best thing about Chrome is the speed, no other browser comes close to Chrome, believe me, I've nearly tried every browser you can name and they all are slow compared to our little friend here.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 9.0.595.0 Beta (Dec 1, 2010)
I don't get this, it's a later build than on the dev channel. Just checked & it's correct. Still best browser west of the Mississippi.
P.S. Dev now updated to build 597, no problems. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 9.0.587.0 Beta (Nov 20, 2010)
Installed this a few days ago off the 'dev channel' & have had no problems with it.
-
Neanderthal66
Reviewing 9.0.587.0 Beta (Nov 19, 2010)
Finally thinking about leaving that crap Firefox, it offered 1 single feature why users stuck to it, and it wasn't even from the developers themselves, AdBlockPlus.
Opera is out of the option because it's a boring thing, Hello Chrome !!!! -
azazel666
Reviewing 9.0.576.0 Beta (Nov 10, 2010)
I agree with "thedevilhimself" as long it's a smooth operating app it brings pleasure to users.
-
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 9.0.576.0 Beta (Nov 10, 2010)
I say like Input Overload, I don't care what version or build or whatever as long as it runs like a dream and it certainly does. I love this browser (Jeg elsker denne browser)
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 9.0.576.0 Beta (Nov 10, 2010)
Never had Chrome crash as long as I can remember.
Phat Esther, I'm beginning to think it's you that are not a valid application, all your reviews are moronic. -
Phat Esther
Reviewing 9.0.576.0 Beta (Nov 10, 2010)
installer not working
chrome_installer.exe is not a valid Win32 application -
Terumo
Reviewing 9.0.576.0 Beta (Nov 10, 2010)
Love this browser ( elsker denne browseren ) best there is ( beste som er.)
-
elfsun
Reviewing 9.0.570.1 Beta (Nov 9, 2010)
Although everything about this browser is great i abandoned the use of it just for the simple reason of it CRASHING too OFTEN.Back to Avant which I used to use.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 9.0.570.1 Beta (Nov 9, 2010)
I've had this build on for a few days now from the 'dev' channel without any issues at all. I have 1800 bookmarks & a fast fibre connection & I have yet to have a crash, those experiencing issues maybe should look elsewhere on their OS.
What does it matter what the version number is, that can call it Chrome 1 million for all I care as long as it still runs like a dream.. it's the best browser by far. -
zapatero
Reviewing 9.0.570.1 Beta (Nov 8, 2010)
I have used it for several days with hardware acceleration enabled. It has worked perfectly.
-
madmike
Reviewing 9.0.570.0 Beta (Nov 8, 2010)
Well its another 2 non-money maker" for Google, I tried it out and it just doesn't deliver. OK, so the performance is pretty much ok (better than F/Fox0 but the crashing and inconvenience make this hard to recommend.
-
hariskar
Reviewing 9.0.570.0 Beta (Nov 8, 2010)
Phat Esther, what is this then, is it not a source code?
http://dev.chromium.org/...rs/how-tos/get-the-code -
elfsun
Reviewing 7.0.548.0 Beta (Nov 8, 2010)
Chrome is good and fast, but it keeps crashing and closing down by itself for some reason, so that I have to switch to Avant Browser frequently. Latest Avant never crashes, no memory leak, runs table. Please fixed the strange self-closing problem.
-
-
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 9.0.570.0 Beta (Nov 6, 2010)
pretty soon they will have version #1000
then the world will need to take notice
I can see the chrome programers
"we must have a higher version number than IE !!!" -
DoctorPuter
Reviewing 9.0.570.0 Beta (Nov 5, 2010)
disappointing. auto erase of history .. none. records pages visited in the thumbnails whether you want or not. cannot select which to delete when cleaning history ... thumbs that is. annoying "remembered password" in gmail for example ... have to type in first letter when multiple users.
.
preferences way to thin .. back to the crash dummy... firefox -
elfsun
Reviewing 9.0.570.0 Beta (Nov 5, 2010)
Any version of chrome I use most of the time it displays the HTML coding of the website I want to use. I have tried version 4 stable, 5 stable and also 6 beta. When will this problem get solved?I will stay using Avant browser which in my second chioce.
-
elfsun
Reviewing 8.0.559.0 Beta (Nov 5, 2010)
I've tried Google Chrome four times and am ready to remove it again. It crashes and simply isn't stable enough for me. I'll stick with Avant and IE8.
-
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 9.0.570.0 Beta (Nov 4, 2010)
I installed it yesterday evening, late. It works perfect like always but I think it loads webpages a little faster now. And of course it's the fastest browser no talking Opera or whatever they are not half as fast as Chrome. So forget all the other browsers, if you wanna surf fast Google Chrome beta whatever version gives them backwheel.
-
DoHickey
Reviewing 9.0.570.0 Beta (Nov 4, 2010)
So far so good.
The only thing I have an issue with is the silent install.
After clicking the installer and choosing run. I get nothing on the screen at all.
When you already have a previous version installed, you don't even know when it's finished installing. Of course a new install would show the new icon on the desktop, but I already have one from the previous version.
We should at least get a little pop up saying upgrade complete, or asking if we want to run it after the install is finished. -
Yours Truly
Reviewing 9.0.570.0 Beta (Nov 3, 2010)
Google Chrome 9 beta feels fleet of foot, super quick at loading the browser and also loads web pages faster than a number of browsers. And Chrome has plenty of extensions to choose from, if one wants to enhance its functionality. Chrome also uses a minimalist UI (which I personally like). Thus far I have had no issues with either stability or performance, and neither any security issues to date (that I am aware of at least!).
-
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 9.0.570.0 Beta (Nov 3, 2010)
Installed it this morning, used all day no stability or other issues, great browser, the best.
'Some Guy' can you elaborate on why you feel Chrome is 'still is way behind Opera & Firefox', I assume you have installed all 3 browsers & used them for some time recently to gain a decent perspective of all 3? My thoughts are the opposite but based on recent use of the 3 browsers mentioned. -
Blaxima
Reviewing 7.0.548.0 Beta (Oct 30, 2010)
To further Input Overload's point
Paranoia - Extreme, irrational distrust of others.
oh wait, http://www.networkworld....treet-view-driving.html
the fact is chrome does alot of collecting behind the scenes as singled out by the differences between SRW Iron and chrome
http://www.srware.net/en...iron_chrome_vs_iron.php
Distrust of google is not paranoia because they have been caught too many times with their hand in our cookie jars -
FixXxeR
Reviewing 8.0.559.0 Beta (Oct 22, 2010)
PhatEsther: http://chromium-browser-source.commondatastorage.googleapis.com/chromium_tarball.html
A simple web search turned that up. Less than 1 minute from initial search to code de-tarred/gzipped on my system. Perhaps a little effort instead of your constant trolling? -
Phat Esther
Reviewing 8.0.559.0 Beta (Oct 22, 2010)
If Chrome is opensource, must be there somewhere download the sorce code.
If no downlod link for source code that means not opensource project.
Where is the source code download link ?
FIXXXER thank you for the source code for Chrome 6 congratulation.
Google Chrome (v8) 8.0.559.0 Beta source code ?
I seen many opensource program on internet the last 10 years
below all run binaries was the second link, the program source code
not the past 2 years, the actually.
Go to sourceforge.net and watch it your eyes.
homehomehomeboy -
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 8.0.559.0 Beta (Oct 22, 2010)
did you ever think that they are just trying to increase the version numbers so that it sounds like they have been around as long as the other browsers
they are the new kid on the block and a good kid but still a kid....
Firefox better get busy and make a Firefox version 8
Chrome is good but sucks with the crappy shell and the crappy tool bar (or lack of) Chrome will always be my number 2 -
Input Overload
Reviewing 8.0.559.0 Beta (Oct 21, 2010)
TC17:- I've done full scans done with full versions of 'Prevx', Malwarebytes, 'Eset', 'Super Anti-Spyware', and no problems found whatsoever.
Can you specify please what program apart from the one in your dreams that detected Chrome as Spyware? I will then obtain & run the program, i think that's a fair deal.
BTW there is a version 7 which is stable & recommended for most users.
The extension ad-blocker works fine for me at least as good as on Firefox, another browser which it seems you are none too happy with?
I judge programs on empirical evidence rather than hearsay & not what is fashionable or what others pontificate.
Firefox need to cut the bloat and get the speed up, actually Opera is about the fastest browser this side of the Trent river, then Chrome leaving FF almost on a par with IE9 Beta (Eeeeeeekkkkk) . Remember every extension you install slows your browser down slightly. I like Chrome as it's lean. -
mlazzaro
Reviewing 8.0.559.0 Beta (Oct 21, 2010)
No, there is no spyware here. What the program that this people is using to find a spyware? What the name of the spyware that they found?
Firefox keep improving and is a great browser. But, if you don't like Chrome, just... DON'T USE!
About the number of this version... if you don't no why... try read the changelogs.
Ok, now for enable GPU acceleration and others features, you have to write about:flags in adress bar. -
TC17
Reviewing 8.0.559.0 Beta (Oct 21, 2010)
Spyware whether you want to believe it or not. Funny they are already up to version 8, and I don't think they even released version 7. Firefox is still better, things like Adblock work in Firefox, where in Chrome it is unable to block everything due to how Chrome is designed (I'm sure intentionally).
**I do consider people who think its NOT spyware, not to be the brightest people around** Fools.
I should add there are a few custom versions of Chrome (not made by Google) that are designed to be spyware free. -
boganbill
Reviewing 8.0.552.5 Beta (Oct 19, 2010)
Still the one I use, however other instances of chrome.exe still run after closing- this now prevents CCleaner deleting cache, unlike previous versions.
-
hariskar
Reviewing 8.0.552.0 Beta (Oct 15, 2010)
The best browser. I have been using firefox for about 10 years, but after i tried Chrome uninstalled firefox immediately.
"I do consider people who type 'Spyware' to be not the brightest stars in the sky."
lol -
sheppe
Reviewing 8.0.552.0 Beta (Oct 14, 2010)
Chrome is the best browser available. Anyone who calls Chrome spyware is an ignoramus in terms of how modern browsers work.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 8.0.552.0 Beta (Oct 14, 2010)
No problems, nice new features but remember it is a new version & may have bugs although I haven't found any.
I don't consider Chrome to be Spyware & never have. it's the best browser there is. I wonder if these people who just type 'Spyware' have ever used this browser. I do consider people who type 'Spyware' to be not the brightest stars in the sky. -
-
-
-
Briantist
Reviewing 8.0.552.0 Beta (Oct 13, 2010)
Need to visit about:labs first to enable features
Google Instant AND awesome bar together - very nice.
2D accelleration - improved performance at http://ie.microsoft.com/testdrive/ ... -
mlazzaro
Reviewing 7.0.548.0 Beta (Oct 12, 2010)
Faster to open and browsing, with lots of a good extensions. But I can't enable the gpu accelerating. Hope the developers improve this feature. Firefox 4 beta 6 still going faster to me.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 7.0.548.0 Beta (Oct 12, 2010)
Google can follow me around the internet any time they wish. I do wonder what some people feel they have to hide, I think that is the problem.
Great browser, gets better all the time.
BTW:- Paranoia - A psychological disorder characterized by delusions of persecution or grandeur. -
uberfly
Reviewing 7.0.548.0 Beta (Oct 12, 2010)
Great, as long as you're cool with the guy with the clipboard following you around the library jotting down every item you pick up. Here he is, except this time he's in the form of a full-blown browser from our friends at Google.
-
FixXxeR
Reviewing 7.0.548.0 Beta (Oct 11, 2010)
Hey guys, check this out... I googled "Uriel spyware" and look what came up!
http://www.google.com/se...al&client=firefox-a
Apparently Uriel is spyware! Avoid him at all costs!
My point here is to not believe everything you search for. In this day and age, it is not hard to get conspiracy theories spread. Just posting an idea on the internet will start a flock for people who agreed but never spoke up. Just because they speak up does not mean there is proof. None of the "results" show me any proof of Google doing anything wrong with chrome. -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 7.0.544.0 Beta (Oct 9, 2010)
@uriel: do you have any proof for this? or is just something you've heard and appeals to your conspiracy theory addiction.
Know this before making any allegations: Google Chrome is an OPEN SOURCE software. Why this is important? Well, you can can freely check the code and see if there are some lines there supporting your allegation. Looking forward to see them here...
You don;t know where you can grab the sources or the last nighly build, try here:
http://www.chromium.org/
http://build.chromium.or...apshots/chromium-rel-xp/
I have all major browsers installed on my computer Firefox 4.0b6, Internet Explorer 9Beta, Opera 10.70, Chromium 8.0.550 and using all of them fervently. I can definitely say that Chromium is the most pleasant experience, ...others can disagree of course. -
Uriel
Reviewing 7.0.544.0 Beta (Oct 9, 2010)
Spyware folks. Don't let all the great reviews from the Google Chrome team fool you. Do a search for "Google spyware" and see what I mean. Ditch it if you value your privacy.
-
tontito
Reviewing 7.0.544.0 Beta (Oct 8, 2010)
They are almost catching Microsoft on version numbers, it is strange because they started like 20 years after :P
Still a good app -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 7.0.544.0 Beta (Oct 8, 2010)
There's no more to be said, Google Rocks, the fastest browser on the market today and I love it.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 7.0.544.0 Beta (Oct 7, 2010)
Still my fave browser. The others seems clunky & sloooooow in comparison. Never have any issues, installs in about 5 seconds. Great stuff
-
pjb
Reviewing 7.0.544.0 Beta (Oct 7, 2010)
Google Chrome just keeps appealing to me. Each release seems to get better.
The way extensions can be enabled/disabled on the fly without a browser restart is really good. Sometimes a few page pages seem to fail in loading first time, however with a refresh they seem to load fully. -
Terumo
Reviewing 7.0.544.0 Beta (Oct 7, 2010)
Jeg bruker Chrome som min faste browser, og vil vel alltid komme til og gjøre det.
Så godt liker jeg Chrome. OK. -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 7.0.536.2 Beta (Oct 5, 2010)
default browser.
However, I'm following almost daily the nightly builds of Chromium (from which both Chrome and Chrome OS forks) and I've notice an issue with the download manager which spans for like 1 month now, including this release: it works extremely slow. It is a shame that I have to copy&paste the download link to other browsers, like FF, IE or Opera to get the file.
Google: can you please be good mate and the be the first to implement a serious download manager (aka: that supports resume, multi threading, etc); you will definitely need it for the Chrome OS at least... -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 7.0.536.2 Beta (Oct 4, 2010)
Some seing ghosts everywhere and he said it himself, it's harmless spyware, so what is the problem when it's harmless?. Google Chrome Rocks and I'd said it before, like we say here in Denmark: "Against stupidity, even Gods are fighting in vain". I often try new browsers but I allways keep coming back to my good old Chrome, nothing even comes close to the speed this browser work with and life is to short for waiting for a slow browser, that's one of the reasons why I use Chrome. There is not enough stars in the universe for this browser.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 7.0.536.2 Beta (Oct 4, 2010)
Brilliant! A Billion stars.
anomoly, so from your comments you haven't actually reviewed it, so how on earth are you in any position to determine how good Chrome is? Just another Chrome knocker as it's fashionable.
Or where & when do you want to be shot? -
FixXxeR
Reviewing 7.0.536.2 Beta (Oct 4, 2010)
All of the same "It's spyware", "Google is evil", "It's bloated" comments to arrive in 3.....2.....1.....NOW
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 7.0.517.24 Beta (Sep 30, 2010)
Seems a little faster, more responsive. Google can follow me round the net any-time. They will soon get bored. Tried Opera again for a week or so but was pleased to get back to Chrome.
Apparently Google are still not sure what colour underpants I wear, this will be corrected in the next Chrome release. -
Blaxima
Reviewing 7.0.517.24 Beta (Sep 29, 2010)
The browser itself is coming along. It has decent speed and renders most pages well but it is quite bare bones and even with extensions does not allow me to have it look or function the way I want it to.
Look, google makes it's money from advertising and if logged into your gmail account it will track your search habbits to target ads that they feel would be suited to you. If you don't have a gmail account chrome is the other way they can track your habits. Now while it is just to target you for advertising and not any end of days conspiracy theories, that IS still spying -
anomoly
Reviewing 7.0.517.24 Beta (Sep 29, 2010)
Spyware eh? If you look around the net and see how much google has embedded itself into websites, I'd bet real money that's exactly what this is; harmless spyware to be sure.
The day I need google to check my desktop, browse the web for me and operate my cell phone please shoot me. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 7.0.517.17 Beta (Sep 27, 2010)
The best browser, there are many extensions available such as 'Ad Block'.
-
kb3grz
Reviewing 7.0.517.17 Beta (Sep 27, 2010)
The PopUp blocker is awful in this GET your act together Google
-
FixXxeR
Reviewing 7.0.517.8 Beta (Sep 23, 2010)
http://lifehacker.com/56...2Ffull+%28Lifehacker%29
Almost 40K votes and it shows chrome is overtaking firefox. I feel that is a fairly decent sampling of users, much better than any performed at this website. Chrome usage will likely surpass firefox since it can do what firefox cannot, stay light on resource usage, remain quick and snappy, and operate fluidly. -
rstat1
Reviewing 7.0.517.8 Beta (Sep 19, 2010)
These folks claiming Chrome is spyware, really need to read up on how the internet works. If Chrome is spyware then so is every other browser in existence, since they all do the same things.
-
sturgess
Reviewing 7.0.517.8 Beta (Sep 19, 2010)
I like Google Chrome, not sure it's the safest as some are suggesting. I have been using it since it arrived on the scene, and have recently started to use it for my banking as a result of reports that at the latest big hacking competition it was the only one not hacked. Now I read it was not the only browser not hacked, Opera was also not hacked, and the reason they were not hacked I now discover is because the hackers involved did not even try to hack them. Just a final comment, I came here to read a review on this beta browser, but what I appear to have arrived in is a chat room where all that is discussed are the views of others, not a single post just reviewing the bloomin' browser. So if you want a good argument hit the discussion button, if you want to review something, review it, and not get into some silly argument with a guy you've never met.
-
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 7.0.517.8 Beta (Sep 19, 2010)
What are you afraid of Uriel? there is no spyware in Chrome. And in the same time you are calling everyone else unintelligent. I think you are seing ghosts at every corner. Chrome is the best browser ever, and no one else comes closer. And you are talking spyware. Everytime you install a Microsoft product you get spyware inside your computer, why does it always take so long time installing/uninstalling a Microsoft Product compared to other programs/software whatever? have you ever thought about that? I'm shure that it's because they collecting information, or am I seing ghosts right now. But anyway, there are no browser out there which comes close to Google Chrome. These days I only use Chrome, the only time I use other browsers, is when I have to check about my website works in other browsers too.
-
shallot
Reviewing 7.0.517.8 Beta (Sep 18, 2010)
This is the most popular "Bewareware"....!!!
Only Google can make a spyware so successful that people don't even realize that when using it.
People who don't understand this like @Input Overload, should read about how Google is under investigation by many states in the US and other countries for spying on people.
Just remember one thing...there is no such thing called "free lunch"...so when google gives so many stuff for free...its simple. They want to know you and understand you. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 7.0.517.8 Beta (Sep 18, 2010)
Uriel, it's not 'Spyware' it's the safest browser bar none, as you reviewed the browser I assume you installed it, No? So you are just a cretin-like 'Chrome ' knocker.
I would add to the list of those who use 'Chrome' are ‘’The Intelligent’ which it seems certainly does not include you. And I can only wonder what you have to hide anyway?
Looking at your profile I see you are a 'Pirate Bay' fan, I understand your worries now!
You also say in one post you buy custom made PC's & in another you build them. I suspect you tell porkies too.
shallot, You oaf, it's not the 'Google Browser' that's upset people it's copying wireless connections that are unsecured that is the issue while 'Google cars are photographing the planet Earth (You ever been there?) I agree that is not good, but you are tracked on every site you go on the web, if you use a proxy server, they will have this info instead.
I have nothing to hide & my wireless is protected by a 64 character code. Are you an illegal downloader too? BTW Get a book on PC security & try to read it.
Every site you go on knows where you are whatever browser (& which browser) you use or you could not connect. I don't give a monkeys uncle who follows me around the net. They will soon get bored.
Every-time you use your credit card, bank card, go shopping, fill up your car with petrol, buy a lawn mower, fart etc. info is being gathered & used to target you with appropriate junk mail.
Get used to it or keep off the net & join an Amish community. Get rid of all your cards & keep your money under the bed.
I spend my working life in comms rooms I assure you whether you use, Opera, IE, Google, Fireflop etc. the end result is the same - Got it yet?
Google is by far the safest browser, I assure you. The problem with the world now is any idiot can get a PC, read ''Cosmopolitan' & then post moronic comments.
sturgess, I agree things have got a bit carried away on this review, but I enjoy arguing . :-) -
Uriel
Reviewing 7.0.517.8 Beta (Sep 17, 2010)
Spyware! People who rate this app five stars include, marketers, law agencies, Google, and the naive.
LOL! See folks. The above post proves my point. Stay away from Google spyware or else we who use more superior browsers are unintelligent!
And yes! The majority of society agrees that The Pirate Bay "rocks" but are afraid to admit it because of what the RIAA might do to them by the power of their moneys! -
Input Overload
Reviewing 7.0.517.5 Beta (Sep 15, 2010)
Best browser in town, and getting better & faster.
tranglos, BTW, Opera does have 'Paste & Go'. The rest of your review I am unable to comprehend? I assume the language you have used is English but me being English & speaking English are unable to decipher your ramblings.
Just give it 5 stars you know it's the best. :-) -
Alexander-GG
Reviewing 7.0.517.0 Dev (Sep 12, 2010)
The new interface is even better. Fast, nice features, good development cycles. Deserves 5 stars.
-
Virtual_ManPL
Reviewing 7.0.517.0 Dev (Sep 10, 2010)
Getting better and better, but still not real AdBlock and DownThemAll!
-
-
tranglos
Reviewing 7.0.517.0 Dev (Sep 9, 2010)
Boring! Just because it was made by Google doesn't make it holy. It has exactly two things going for it: it's pretty darn fast indeed, and some merciful coder at Google finally figured out that when you paste a URL in the address bar, 99% of the time you want to navigate to it, so they put in the "Paste and Go" command, which in Firefox requires a plugin that's not being updated anymore. So thanks for that, and I can't believe other browser don't have that out of the box (don't know about Opera).
Other than that - what's the big deal?
And... tabs on top, really? You guys just broke the fundamental concept of tabbed UI, the whole point of which is to clearly connect the tab "handle" with the content it is attached to. Bravo, you've just failed Usability 101.
(And of course the greatest sin of Chrome is that Firefox will now have tabs on top too. I don't care how "cool" it's supposed to be, it's a provably wrong UI design. Yuck!.) -
ilev
Reviewing 7.0.517.0 Dev (Sep 9, 2010)
And|
You are dumb as a door-knob.
There are 3 versions : Stable, Bata, Dev.
Chrome is the most secure browser and hasn't been hacked yet. -
And|
Reviewing 7.0.517.0 Dev (Sep 9, 2010)
The most insecure browser I read somewhere. I do not like it, never have, never will.
And I can not understand why the version is ALWAYS tagged as "Beta", "Alpha" or now "Dev". For 6 version they have never been able to be satisfied with their product. For once, grow a pair Google. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 7.0.517.0 Dev (Sep 9, 2010)
No problems with 7.0.517.0 Dev, or any other build for months now. Just gets better. (Maybe I'm not a 'Power User' like some on this forum) Ha ha.
And|:- in this month’s ‘PC Advisor’ (The UK's bestselling PC mag) they tested Firefox, Safari, Chrome, IE & Opera. Chrome won all categories including speed & ease of use except one which was the amount of extensions available, which Firefox won. Overall esp. on security Chrome won best browser. Nuff said.
marek, have you ever visited the planet Earth? -
Ryusennin
Reviewing 7.0.503.0 Dev (Aug 30, 2010)
Chrome 6 Acid3 Test: 99% (strange...)
Chrome 7 Acid3 Test: PAGE_FAULT BSoD (ooooookay)
Looks like Google are eager to rush the revision numbers out and should instead focus on, you know, making the browser work. -
debkeglerifeaj
Reviewing 7.0.503.0 Dev (Aug 27, 2010)
Google chrome has what it takes to be the best browser in the world. It is faster and safe as well.
-
Vimes
Reviewing 7.0.503.0 Dev (Aug 27, 2010)
I am getting more impressed all the time with this browser, what is helping is the development of the extensions that I'm now using. Firefox has some great addons and I hope that Chrome will also enjoy the likes of Tab Mix Plus etc to enhance my browsing experience even more, when using Chrome.
-
cltx99
Reviewing 7.0.503.0 Dev (Aug 27, 2010)
Your three star rating is utterly ridiculous. Chrome is far better than Opera and FF. I've used them all for long periods of time. Are you being paid to keep the star rating down?
-
Eric20
Reviewing 7.0.503.0 Dev (Aug 26, 2010)
Best browser ive ever used. Fast, lightweight and just fantastic.
Everyone should use this. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 7.0.503.0 Dev (Aug 26, 2010)
Blisteringly fast, the best browser ever. No problems with v7 DEV.
-
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 6.0.495.0 Beta (Aug 19, 2010)
The more I use it the more I love it. great browser! 2000 stars!
Goodbye Opera & Fireflop. -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 6.0.495.0 Beta (Aug 18, 2010)
There is Google Chrome and no one else. This browser is the worlds best browser it's getting better and better I don't use any other browser anymore, only when I check about my webpage works well in other browsers, I test it in some other browsers, that's the only time I use other browsers these days. If I could rate a thousand I would do it too.
-
Terumo
Reviewing 6.0.495.0 Beta (Aug 18, 2010)
Samme som Input Overload så er det min faste browser også.
-
arossetti
Reviewing 6.0.495.0 Beta (Aug 18, 2010)
Nice, but this version breaks the LastPass extension... LastPass and Google are aware of the issue and working to resolve...
-
-
-
-
-
Terumo
Reviewing 6.0.472.25 Beta (Aug 9, 2010)
Dette er den beste browseren ute på markede,
det er blitt mitt hovedvalg helt klart.
Jeg kan anbefale alle å prøve den ut, og du kommer ikke til å bli skuffet, for den er rasket og sikrest.
Så last ned da vel.... -
ilev
Reviewing 6.0.472.22 Beta (Aug 6, 2010)
Stop calling the DEV version as BETA. Last BETA version is 5.0.375.125 beta
-
Richardky
Reviewing 6.0.472.22 Beta (Aug 5, 2010)
good job google i didnt think there would ever be a browser that could compete with firefox much less out do it .. its a great browser my default for sure.
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 6.0.472.22 Beta (Aug 5, 2010)
CyberDoc999, IMHO Chrome is probably the least bloated browser released in the last 3000 years. My favourite browser, bar none.
Calm down ilev you'll have a coronary, OK its a DEV, everyone it's a DEV. -
-
AutoBot
Reviewing 6.0.472.11 Beta (Jul 29, 2010)
Why are the dev build and the beta build revision numbers the same, this is unlikely as development is different for each channel. Strange.
Chrome for personal browsing, Opera for work. Firefox is so bloated and heavy now, I will not use it so I can't say how good it actually is now.
If you don't want privacy issues but still want the speed of Chrome I suggest using Iron or ChromePlus..ChromePlus is the best variation of Chrome but was behind in development last I checked
I am currently running 6.0.472.11 dev and have not had any issues, fast and stable. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 6.0.472.11 Beta (Jul 29, 2010)
Beats Opera, Firefox, Safari, & of course IE8. Brilliant browser that just gets better. There is no such thing as privacy on the net, if you think there is you are dreaming. Browser of choice.
-
roj
Reviewing 6.0.472.11 Beta (Jul 29, 2010)
This is a product from a company that has repeatedly demonstrated that it has less than no regard for privacy. I can never countenance a product from such a company.
ONE star. -
JeremyP
Reviewing 6.0.472.0 Beta (Jul 25, 2010)
Does it support the Google toolbar yet? If not, it's still a nono for me, as I use the toolbar all the time. Can't understand what they are up to, given that all the other major browsers support it. I want to choose where I search, I want the ability to do easy site searches, and to search images, and to have autofill.
-
Racerbob
Reviewing 6.0.472.0 Beta (Jul 22, 2010)
Chrome is fastter than Firefox and all, but I dislike the fact that I cannot customize the browser as much as I can customize Firefox. And I also want a left side bookmarks menu that stays docked and open all the time like in Internet Explorer and Firefox. The bookmark manager in Chrome is definitely not to my liking since I have something like 1600 well organized bookmarks in Firefox...
-
arossetti
Reviewing 6.0.472.0 Beta (Jul 22, 2010)
I must say, while I generally loathe everything Google, and have been an avid Firefox user for years, I really like Google Chrome. It does lack a few features I'd like, such as a quick send-link option, but the overall speed of the browser offsets those issues for me.
-
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 6.0.466.0 Beta (Jul 18, 2010)
I simply love Google Chrome and I update it everytime there is a new update of this beta version. I think it's fast and has a good design not all this fancy stuff like many of the other browsers use I can only say that it's time to schratch IE and Firefox, you name them, they can't follow Chrome. A couple of weeks ago I tried Mozilla Firefox new beta version, and OK I was a little exited, but the funny thing is, that no matter what other browser I try, I always turn back to my good old Google Chrome beta version. So to the Google Chrome Crew, Keep on Rocking you are doing a d... (uups sorry) good work.
-
rstat1
Reviewing 6.0.466.0 Beta (Jul 18, 2010)
@artisanicview No the spyware cleaners don't erradicate it because its not spyware.
Love google chrome, wouldn't use anything else. -
-
Reviewing 6.0.466.0 Beta (Jul 17, 2010)
I know it's only a beta, but after using it for a month I had to go back to Firefox. My many complaints are: 1. No way to change configuration options. 2. No menu bar or toolbar icons. 3. It won't open file extensions by default. 4. Every time I open a .pdf file I get an error. 5. No way to switch search engines without going into the options. 6. Downloads bar on bottom doesn't auto hide. 7. No Live Bookmarks. 8. Lacks extensions like NoScript. 9. Questionable privacy and data collections methods (example: Unique ID Number submitted to Google on Install).
With some work it could be the dominant browser on the market, but currently it's not in the same league as firefox. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 6.0.466.0 Beta (Jul 17, 2010)
I agree 100% with CyberDoc999, it's the fastest slickest & best browser since sliced bread came out. Brilliant program.100 stars.
-
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 6.0.466.0 Beta (Jul 17, 2010)
notice to all Trolls....
this is NOT spyware
grow a brain....
it is the fastest safest browser on earth -
artisanicview
Reviewing 6.0.466.0 Beta (Jul 16, 2010)
Agree with the next review. Stay away from this s***y thing because have spyware that commerce endorses big time. This is why your spyware cleaners don't eradicate it.
-
Uriel
Reviewing 6.0.458.1 Beta (Jul 13, 2010)
This is spyware that commerce endorses big time. This is why your spyware cleaners don't eradicate it. Stick with Firefox people!
-
Steve1209
Reviewing 6.0.458.1 Beta (Jul 9, 2010)
I really like this browser, the thing I like most is the extensions, the speed. I guess the complaint some have about extension space on the toolbar is valid, I like the extensions but only use about 15 of them currently, so the toolbar isn't that important to me yet, I'm sure Google will figure it out later!
-
wyzwyk
Reviewing 6.0.458.1 Beta (Jul 9, 2010)
While Google Chrome has come a long way in a relatively short period of time this browser still doesn't do it for me. Its speed. security, stability, and adherence to web standards are all wonderful but the quality of its extensions and minimalist GUI are a real turn off. What would work for me is for Google to have an option to add another toolbar to house extensions. The area assigned to do this now fills quickly if you are prone, as I am, to adding many extensions. Thousands of addons have been developed but there really isn't room for more than a handful. This makes no sense. Listen Google Devs ..... SOME USERS NEED MORE ROOM!
-
Input Overload
Reviewing 6.0.458.1 Beta (Jul 9, 2010)
As below v6 does seem faster. The more I use this browser the more I like it. I've removed Firefox & use Chrome exclusively now without issues. It just keeps getting better. Great browser, the best I've ever used.
-
eviljolly
Reviewing 6.0.447.0 Beta (Jun 28, 2010)
I've been using the Chromium dev builds a lot lately. They're significantly faster than Chrome 5.x.
The only reason I still use Firefox is for the plugins. -
Input Overload
Reviewing 6.0.447.0 Beta (Jun 26, 2010)
Having been an Opera user for many years I switched to Firefox a few months ago. I tried Chrome but found no advantages. That has changed however, Chrome beats now Firefox for speed which is instantly noticeable & the sheer slickness of the browser is a breath of fresh air. My new default browser is Chrome. Great program.
-
-
cltx99
Reviewing 6.0.447.0 Beta (Jun 26, 2010)
For many months Chrome has been my default browser. It does everything faster and better than Opera or FF. It baffles me that it continuously gets a three star rating.
-
dgtlchlk
Reviewing 6.0.447.0 Beta (Jun 25, 2010)
I don't know why Betanews has the 6.x line labeled as Beta. It is not. The 6.x line is still considered the dev channel. Its even listed as such in the About window.
Disregarding that I'm liking the 6.x line more and more on both Windows and OS X. Its finally folding in features like a full bookmarks manager and _robust_ extensions support. Now if only 1Password had an extension for it. -
Slipped it in
Reviewing 6.0.447.0 Beta (Jun 25, 2010)
Google screwed up. Chrome 6.x Beta is supposed to be available for Mac OS X 10.6 as well but clicking on the download link for the beta version on Google's website downloads Chrome 5.0.375.86 instead.
-
Reviewing 6.0.447.0 Beta (Jun 25, 2010)
I'm surprised that this gets such low scores. I've tried it for a month now and found it to be very good, but now perfect. For one it scores 100/100 on the ACID3 test, which means that it supports all the web standards. Firefox gets 94, Opera 100 and Internet Explorer only 24. It's EXTREMELY FAST and it's only crashed on me one on a certain site. My only complaints are that it's less customizable than Firefox, they have done away with the Menu Bar that most browsers still have an option for, which makes it harder to use and it has fewer extensions than Firefox. For extensions I use AdBlock, ChromeAccess, Downloads, LastPass, Search Preview, Tabs to the Front, SmoothScroll, Web of Trust and RSS Live Links, I highly recommend all of them. Anyway I still prefer Firefox, but it's been letting me down for a long time. Chrome has come very far very quickly and I'm encouraged.
-
Artem S. Tashkinov
Reviewing 6.0.447.0 Beta (Jun 25, 2010)
AdBlock isn't really working, ads are being downloaded anyway, they are being hidden.
Smooth scrolling is still not in the core. -
wbmuster
Reviewing 6.0.437.3 Beta (Jun 25, 2010)
My default webbrowser, well-designed layout, fast websurfing.
-
itsgpgo
Reviewing 6.0.437.3 Beta (Jun 21, 2010)
This Beta version caused my computer to crash over and over again, so I had to uninstall and re-install Google...the older beta ending .1
-
boganbill
Reviewing 6.0.437.1 Beta (Jun 20, 2010)
Reviewing 6.0.437.1 Beta
This version causes crashes on my computer, everything OK now that its been restored to the last version.(rating for 6.0.437.1 Beta is 0 rating for previous versions 6 ) -
ilev
Reviewing 6.0.437.1 Beta (Jun 20, 2010)
This version has a PDF reader build-in so no need for extension.
-
Sammo
Reviewing 6.0.437.1 Beta (Jun 18, 2010)
Continually improving, but I still prefer ChromePlus because it has a lot of functionality already built in (gestures, tab control, etc) - http://www.chromeplus.org
-
Aegis69
Reviewing 6.0.437.1 Beta (Jun 18, 2010)
For those who prefer a non branded version that allows you to control the updates instead of forcing them on you through an invisible background process, try Chromium for Windows.
http://mulder.dummwiedeu...?page=projects#chromium
The addition of extensions for Chromium is a huge step in the right direction, a lot of them do not work as well yet as they do on Firefox, but just having them there is nice. Also, C supports greasemonkey scripts by default so you do not have to install a greasmonkey addon for C in oder to use scripts.
All in all this is a nice effort, webkit is very fast for loading and rendering, a lot of bugs still remain. I have C on my machine as a backup browser, Firefox is for the moment far more stable and still my primary. -
charlesbrean
Reviewing 6.0.427.0 Beta (Jun 12, 2010)
Seems that the "advanced chrome" version is now updated to 6.0.431.0 ( it allows to open files instead of downloading like IE and firefox )
File still located here:
http://descargas.casasyd...com/advanced_chrome.zip
Thanks to the guy that posted it, works great! -
martyc26
Reviewing 6.0.422.0 Beta (Jun 6, 2010)
more and more stable now, doesn't crash me at all since version 5. extensions are plenty also.
-
robmanic44
Reviewing 6.0.422.0 Beta (Jun 6, 2010)
Privacy isn't the issue, it's configuration. I can't print from it and downloads are a pain in the butt. It was once very fast, but has slowed considerably. As of now, there's really not a good browser available for Windows. I'm using Firefox beta and it's not the answer.
-
Alexander-GG
Reviewing 6.0.422.0 Beta (Jun 6, 2010)
It's time to stop writing about the privacy issues. If you concern about your privacy too much - do not use internet at all!
In reality, it doesn't matter at all which browser do you use. All of the browsers give the ability to collect the data (if you consider yourself so important person that someone is spending a lot of their money to collect information about you). Is your privacy more safer when you use Firefox or Opera? The answer is - NO. And this is the truth. Every time you click on a web button or trying to search something this data is sent to the different search engine providers including Google as just one of them. Otherwise, web pages will not be included in SEO and it will be simply impossible to find them in the net.
Chrome is fast and well balanced with the options browser. It's very actively developing and improving browser. Now you are able even to disable the Chromes' update.exe (as any other plugin) from the options pane. So, rate it as it deserves and stop the paranoia about your privacy and your worldwide importance. -
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 6.0.422.0 Beta (Jun 5, 2010)
if you are paronoid don't use it ..... it is far better than IE
it is also safer -
nukefixer
Reviewing 6.0.422.0 Beta (Jun 4, 2010)
Great alternative to Explorer, as far as security concerns, well that's all relative if you are on the internet, isn't it?
-
sweathog
Reviewing 6.0.422.0 Beta (Jun 4, 2010)
If you like rose colored glasses use this software. If you care about your privacy, please know that a class action lawsuit filed against Google in Oregon has now made the allegation that Google willfully collected personal data with its Street View cars, rather than doing so accidentally, as it claims.
http://online.wsj.com/ar...mod=WSJ_latestheadlines -
RXDOC73
Reviewing 6.0.422.0 Beta (Jun 4, 2010)
For those that are not paranoid about spying by Google and MBL, this is a great quick browser.
-
pabdul
Reviewing 6.0.408.1 Beta (Jun 3, 2010)
Previously I tried many of internet browser, and this is my favourite now because of speed and stability! Like that it's open-source and extendable.
-
TC17
Reviewing 6.0.408.1 Beta (Jun 1, 2010)
Why use software from a company who's whole business revolves around spying on customers? They save that information forever also (proof that its purpose is not as they claim).
Google apparently is even trying to prevent their own employees from using Windows. Doesn't that make them out to be hypocrites? Writing software for Windows.
http://www.computerworld...s_is_bogus_say_analysts -
charlesbrean
Reviewing 6.0.408.1 Beta (May 24, 2010)
Thanks! You are right, the custom compiled version works excelent, now I can open files instead of downloading! Link is still alive:
http://descargas.casasyd...com/advanced_chrome.zip -
Meeky
Reviewing 6.0.408.1 Beta (May 23, 2010)
Lacking in some of features (can be mitigated somewhat by extensions) but speedy and has an uncluttered interface. Ridiculous and obvious attempt to bump version numbers to catch up to competitors. Here's to Google Chrome 20 this same time next year.
-
dolcesculacciare
Reviewing 6.0.408.1 Beta (May 22, 2010)
what "features"... chrome doesn't have any and the extensions are fourth rate... pitiful... just pitiful !
-
dhry
Reviewing 6.0.408.1 Beta (May 21, 2010)
Farmilo, quit whining and just get this recompiled version - http://descargas.casasyd...com/advanced_chrome.zip - allows you to save/open/discard when clicking on a file from a site. Sigh.
-
mfarmilo
Reviewing 6.0.408.1 Beta (May 21, 2010)
I tried this a fews days ago, and gave up on it after just a few hours. I download a lot of various types of files (zip files from here for example). Would you believe that if you're downloading say a zip file, there's no way of asking to open it directly ? You have to save it somewhere first, open it, then delete it if you didn't want to keep it. The facility for a an Open / Save / Cancel prompt is one of the most requested features for this program. It is, after all, a feature most of us take for granted with other browsers. After looking through the request lists, I've seen questions for clarification from google developers that make them sound like they've never used a browser before. They also often 'talk down' to the requesters, making out programming such a feature would be difficult - also implying that people think the 'run' option is somehow magically different from 'save', while in fact we all know it does the same thing as 'save' except it saves the file to a temp location and then runs it on completion.
I'd heard good things about chrome before trying it, but obviously the above deficiency means I could never consider making it my default browser, until this is fixed. Sadly, the developers seem to have no intention of doing so - and as I said above, many of them seem baffled by the request, often misinterpreting it. The rest is probably ok, but such a glaring ommission means I have to give it a 2. -
Raton
Reviewing 6.0.408.1 Beta (May 21, 2010)
Not nearly as fast as when Chrome hardly had any features. Now -with it's greatly enhanced functionality- it isn't any quicker than other Web browsers !
Chrome is ok. Just little to differentiate it from the rest.
The PC Rat -
Richardky
Reviewing 6.0.401.1 Beta (May 18, 2010)
I love it .. it has come along way in a short amount of time .. i been a strict firefox supporter and user for ever .. but this is my default browser for now .. loads up fast renders pages lightning fast .. uses way less memory doesn't crash often .. and it doesn't choke when using heavy flash oriented pages they run really smooth .. very pleased.
-
madmike
Reviewing 6.0.401.1 Beta (May 17, 2010)
Like i have said, Google needs to do what they do best..search and stay away from browsers
-
TwistydMorticia
Reviewing 5.0.396.0 Beta (May 12, 2010)
It is an amazing browser! I love it -- and I never ever thought I would as I was a complete moz fan!! When I first started using it - it was a bit weird as I had been using a gecko based browser for a long while but I persevered with it as it was so much faster and crashed a heck of a lot less plus despite it being about 4 times the MBs installed - it used much much less RAM. I have had to roll back to version 5.0.375.38 on my very low spec desktop and use this version on my laptop. Oh yeah plus when I am working on once pc and I go on my other I just open browser and all bookmarks, settings and themes are synced. Perfect!
-
madmike
Reviewing 5.0.396.0 Beta (May 10, 2010)
Not a great browser, but fast. The layout takes some getting used to but IMO its not ready for prime time. Opera is my choice and Firefox.
Like the CEO of Yahoo! said recently, that (in so many words) Gogole is a 1 trick pony " I second this and they should stick to search stuff. -
robmanic44
Reviewing 5.0.396.0 Beta (May 8, 2010)
This is not a great browser, but it beats all the other browsers available. There is currently not a great browser for Windows. This is the best of a bad lot.
-
cltx99
Reviewing 5.0.396.0 Beta (May 7, 2010)
I've been using Chrome 5 for some time now. I've tried them all and can't go back to FF or Opera and Explorer, well, it's just there. It does everything I want and does it quickly, with a minimum of problems. I can't remember the last problem. Actually, i don't think i had any problems. A great browser.
-
-
Virtual_ManPL
Reviewing 5.0.375.29 Beta (May 5, 2010)
@ Blaxima - funny, when ppl say this using google search ;)
also you can get crap free version like Chromium or Iron -
Blaxima
Reviewing 5.0.375.29 Beta (May 5, 2010)
Copies the innovation of other browsers an is very problematic for me. I can never get it to connect on first start up, this is the only browser that does that.
Google are becoming a bigger brother than the government. With the info sharing Chrome does and phone verification to get a bloody free email account where will the impeding on our privacy end -
-
Virtual_ManPL
Reviewing 5.0.375.17 Beta (Apr 24, 2010)
4,5/5
Superior browser... nice speed and responsiveness...
but still I missing some features from Firefox like DTA ;p -
dreadlox
Reviewing 5.0.375.17 Beta (Apr 23, 2010)
Best browser. Period.
@Uriel: make a tin foil hat and you'll be all right ;) -
rstat1
Reviewing 5.0.375.17 Beta (Apr 23, 2010)
Firstly all the idiots that say chrome is spyware are wrong. If you actually put more time into using the browser and looked at its settings instead of thinking up some useless google bashing comments, you would know all the features that could be some bogus privacy issue can actually be turned off. Whoa what a concept.
I don't use anything else but the official Google builds of Chrome, and the unofficial official dev builds. -
Uriel
Reviewing 5.0.375.17 Beta (Apr 23, 2010)
This is spyware that is owned by Google. The only reason spyware cleaners don't take it out is because Google is a powerful giant that is backed by the marketers who feast on their analytics and therefore dismiss this fact. If you forgot your girlfriend's birthday, Google didn't. Google knows more about her then you do. Stay away!
GOOGLE THE WORDS "Google Spyware " and read all the articles in the search result to verify what I am warning you about. -
coover
Reviewing 5.0.375.17 Beta (Apr 23, 2010)
I sometimes use this browser, but they still have lots and lots of work to do to make this my default browser. I really dislike the "silent" installer installer and hope that they someday decide not to include it.
But the reason I am writing this review is to ask why they have had to make so many revisions to version 5.0.375? At this point, they have evidently revised the original version 17 times to 5.0.375.17. Have they added a bug they cannot remove? -
sweathog
Reviewing 5.0.375.17 Beta (Apr 23, 2010)
It is fast but not very customizable or as feature-complete as some other browsers. But it, and the company that makes it, spews personal information like no other.
http://www.priv.gc.ca/me...c/2010/let_100420_e.cfm
Better alternative is:
http://www.srware.net/en/software_srware_iron.php -
ilev
Reviewing 5.0.375.17 Beta (Apr 23, 2010)
Why keep writing BETA when this is DEV ?
Chrome for Windows, best browser yet. -
mjm01010101
Reviewing 5.0.375.9 Beta (Apr 19, 2010)
So you have a sandbox to prevent security exploits, but exploit writers worked around that sandbox (quite easily) and it's still insecure.
You have a development browser that is crashy and therefor you scare away quite a few hardcore geeks. The browser claims only a single tab will drop, but in reality NO TABS should drop, ever. Firefox doesn't crash, ever, unless you have some untested plug-in.
The plug-ins that do exist, well, they just aren't as polished or as functional as Firefox. For example element hiding happens after the pages have loaded already. Plug-ins also slow the browser down quite a bit more than Firefox+Plug-ins.
An update system that at first glance seems convenient: I don't have to ever update this, it happens automatically. The downside is people use a browser for critical work, and what happens when Google force pushes an update that breaks your page? Hasn't happened yet? It may one day. Users (but more importantly businesses) need the option to stay insecure and test before just getting a push of a browser.
All in all I like the speed and UI, but there are too many rough edges for me to use day-to-day. -
naosuke
Reviewing 5.0.375.3 Beta (Apr 15, 2010)
Crashes like every 30 minutes. I think it's just this version though, but it's very annoying.
-
FixXxeR
Reviewing 5.0.375.3 Beta (Apr 15, 2010)
It is true. Roboform now supports chrome, in alpha form. It has some issues (it does not recognize various submit buttons on other sites).
http://www.roboform.com/chrome.html -
ghammer
Reviewing 5.0.375.3 Beta (Apr 13, 2010)
As of 4 Apr Roboform claims to have a functioning toolbar for Chrome.
http://www.roboform.com/dist/roboform-chrome.crx
Just might be able to switch browsers. -
anonymouscowturd
Reviewing 5.0.375.3 Beta (Apr 13, 2010)
This version won't start. Crashes straight away.
-
tangentlin
Reviewing 5.0.371.0 Beta (Apr 12, 2010)
Chrome has been my default browser and I am loving it everyday of my life. I launches faster than Firefox, browses faster than IE/FF, and its minimalistic approach saves more precious pixels for contents.
However, the latest version 5.0.137.0 crashes a lot on sites such as news.com, smashingmagazine.com, while the rest of Chrome deserves 5 stars, the crash sets it back 2 ponies. -
Earwicker
Reviewing 5.0.371.0 Beta (Apr 10, 2010)
I've just been checking this out. Firefox has been my no 1 for some time now, but I've just checked out the latest offerings from Opera and MS. It has to be said that this is extremely fine, nice uncluttered interface, very fast, well thought out... works a treat, basically, give it a try!
-
FixXxeR
Reviewing 5.0.366.2 Beta (Apr 3, 2010)
I absolutely love chrome and like others simply am waiting for the roboform toolbar extension to be developed. I rate chrome a 5/5 in functionality as it is fast, lightweight and works in a very nice manner.
To those requesting roboform support in the form of a toolbar, I do not know how long we will be waiting simply because siber systems seems more focused on their online version of the software.
The online version of RF, and the associated bookmarklet, is not very quick and actually slows me down (a similar reason I do not use lastpass). I am able to fill in a complete form manually quicker rather than waiting for the bookmarklet to A. Log me in, B. pull down passcards and C. actually submit the form. I blame siber systems for not providing any updates to it's users regarding the status of its toolbar version. Likewise, I despise the fact that they simply refer any support requests inquiring about the toolbar version to their chrome page which has not been updated for the toolbar version since chromium 4.0 and is very outdated. See: http://www.roboform.com/chrome.html
Chrome itself gets a 5/5 and will be my browser of choice once, if ever, the toolbar version of RF is completed. -
coover
Reviewing 5.0.366.2 Beta (Apr 2, 2010)
While, I'm sure, the developers of the Chrome Browser application believe that their "quiet" or "silent" installer is a wonderful feature, I will tell you that I HATE IT. Other installers at least tell you when the installation is done. The Chrome Installer does not. You click the installer and wait for something to happen. and then you wait some more ... and some more ... and some more. Nothing appears on the screen. NOTHING!!!! That is wrong.
-
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 5.0.366.2 Beta (Apr 2, 2010)
@ghammer: have you checked this extensions
https://chrome.google.co...mp;hl=en&q=roboform -
ghammer
Reviewing 5.0.366.2 Beta (Apr 2, 2010)
If it supported Roboform, it'd be great.
@SuzzyWoozy- That is an online script that accesses the Roboform server. Doesn't work well, and does not provide full function when it does work. -
cltx99
Reviewing 5.0.360.4 Beta (Mar 31, 2010)
I'm in the Chrome 5 stage and have been using Chrome as default for months now. With its speed, simplicity and extensions that don't bloat it or slow it down, it surely deserves better than a three star rating.
I've tried all of the major browsers for extended periods of time and for me nothing out there can touch Chrome, at least for now. -
Jammerdelray
Reviewing 5.0.360.4 Beta (Mar 30, 2010)
Chrome is Secure, Stable, Fast and has a lot of great extensions (Lastpass, Xmarks, Forecastfox, Adblock Plus etc.) Searching is super easy and painless,. Switched from Firefos and love it.
-
animex360
Reviewing 5.0.360.0 Beta (Mar 30, 2010)
this browser is very fast activeX flash/shockwave & java runs fast no page ripping not activex buggs
-
beelzebub360
Reviewing 5.0.356.2 Beta (Mar 27, 2010)
One of the BEST Browser
Fast
Bloat Free
Up there With Firefox, Opera ND Safari -
maxkit
Reviewing 5.0.356.2 Beta (Mar 23, 2010)
Switched to it in Windows and Linux. For Mac Safari is still the best since it's native there and based on the same WebKit as Chrome is. Google Chrome works great for me - very fast and has everything I need.
-
the_hammer
Reviewing 5.0.356.2 Beta (Mar 22, 2010)
It is fast now because it is sooooo basic.
Still has a lot of issues.
It has a long long ways to go to become any kind of a serious competitor. -
robmanic44
Reviewing 5.0.356.0 Beta (Mar 22, 2010)
The problem with Chrome is that it's superfluous. It doesn't do anything I can't already do and without all the messing around. That said, it's better than Firefox 3.6.
-
madmike
Reviewing 5.0.356.0 Beta (Mar 21, 2010)
Simply no where near as refined as Opera, layout annoying, telex to Google reads: PLEASE, PLEASE, PLEASE. STOP"
-
maddy143ded
Reviewing 5.0.356.0 Beta (Mar 21, 2010)
Google Chrome is fast.... and stable..
but due the competion it created other browsers are neck to neck with Chrome i terms of speed...
why, my latest opera 10.51 build even came as a winner in the Futremark Peacekeeper benchmarks.. scores are below.
i am very happy for google as they are leading the pack with innovation and forcing other companies to play catchup...
but the latest opera build will lead to more intense browser war....
I will keep using Opera for my browsing needs and keep Chrome/Firefox for my Mafiawars needs. for now.
Your fastest score for Opera 10.51
8310 Points
Suite
Result
Rendering
13991
Social networking
7998
Complex graphics
3655
Data
6207
DOM operations
5458
Text parsing
10458
ps: my system is powered by Phenom II X2 555 CPu on a gigabyte motherboard, having 2GB ddr2 667 Ram. and a 9600 GSO EVGA card. so its basically a medium range pc, not some uber hot and expensive system.. -
dreadlox
Reviewing 5.0.356.0 Beta (Mar 20, 2010)
I'm using Chrome on Win 7 on three machines.
It's VERY fast (a lot faster than FF 3.6)...
But I used to have performance problem with Chrome when using Nod32 (every page was having some 0.5 second delay while rendering). But after uninstalling Nod32 it's the fastest browser I've ever used (I use only MS Security Essentials now). -
Alexander-GG
Reviewing 5.0.356.0 Beta (Mar 20, 2010)
I use Chrome's "stable" realize on Win 7 Ult x32. Have no idea what kind of benchmarks are "proving" that Chrome is one of the fastest browsers, but on my PC Chrome, even with disabled DNS prefetching, is slower than Firefox 3.6. At first I thought it was my PC specs fault, but when I asked other people which are running Win 7, 80% of them said that Chrome is slow at their machines as well. So, maybe benchmarks and tests highly depend just on Google's finances?
-
DaComboMan
Reviewing 5.0.356.0 Beta (Mar 20, 2010)
I was expecting more from Google.
Opera 10.50 has surpassed them by a mile. -
-
netrace
Reviewing 5.0.356.0 Beta (Mar 19, 2010)
Still no option to remove link underlines? They make pages look very sloppy. Ever tried to read a book with a bunch of underlined words? No thanks!
This is a standard option in every browser I've ever used. -
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 5.0.342.2 Beta (Mar 14, 2010)
I've been using Google Chrome since they started with this browser, and it's one of the fastest I've ever tried. In the same I'm also running Firefox, Opera, IE8, Maxton and a couple of other browsers too and none of them comes close to the speed of Google Chrome.
-
-
bobad
Reviewing 5.0.342.1 Beta (Mar 11, 2010)
I would love to get away from an IE8-based browser, but I'm not willing to give up anything just to poke Microsoft in the eye. There are 3 considerations for my personal choice of browsers: 1. Speed-convenience features. 2. Compatibility. 3. Security. Chrome fails miserably on features and security. Per the latest NSS Labs tests, IE8 is the most secure of the the top 5. Maxthon (IE8 shell) has far more speed and convenience features, so I have no compelling reason to switch. Unless Chrome really packs in the features and works on security, I will never switch. Ever.
-
robmanic44
Reviewing 5.0.342.1 Beta (Mar 9, 2010)
This is certainly better than the previous offering. Handles images much better and seems to play better with others. As to the privacy issue, my NOD32 takes care of that with its strict privacy setting.
-
KSzostek
Reviewing 5.0.342.1 Beta (Mar 8, 2010)
Just sooooo basic and still has a lot of issues that need attention.
Sorry still a long ways to go to become a viable contender.
One thing Google does well is it gets it's version numbers up there really fast.
LOL Chrome is really a big joke! -
grinch89
Reviewing 5.0.342.1 Beta (Mar 8, 2010)
budzis
Reviewing 5.0.342.1 Beta (Mar 8, 2010)
Sweathog, what kind of personal data? I'm not shure that you know, what's mean "personal data"
budzis: Google records almost everything you do with their browser,where you go,what pages you look at. Exactly what they are going to do with this data is as yet not fully understood,but beware Big Brother is watching. -
madmike
Reviewing 5.0.342.1 Beta (Mar 8, 2010)
2 points for effort, not good to use. Sticking with Opera
-
budzis
Reviewing 5.0.342.1 Beta (Mar 8, 2010)
Sweathog, what kind of personal data? I'm not shure that you know, what's mean "personal data"
-
BelgianWaffle
Reviewing 5.0.335.1 Beta (Mar 3, 2010)
Tried it... Uninstalled and going back to Opera 10.5 after half hour.
-
lksd
Reviewing 5.0.335.1 Beta (Mar 2, 2010)
Fast javascript and fast execution for plugins (well I'm using Netbook mostly so differences in flash performance are quite drastic between browsers on this slow machine)
But slow page loading and slow DNS resolution ?!? -
jotte_ct
Reviewing 5.0.335.1 Beta (Mar 1, 2010)
I am using Open Source Chromium 5.0.336.0 and that it is a nice browser once I set it up (cache on ram drive). It is very fast, renders pages quick and properly, nice extensions (though I'm using just a few) and it's almost portable; I say "almost" because I ported to another of my computers, and all the passwords become invalid - this may be a good (security) thing. I have used Opera and Firefox a lot, still today, if I have to pick one from these 3, it will be Chromium.
-
Kelson64
Reviewing 5.0.335.1 Beta (Feb 26, 2010)
This is their answer to Opera's beta? Google sends us a broken browser? Can't wait to see the Beta News benchmarks on THIS one! lol
-
sweathog
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 26, 2010)
It will be interesting to read reviews on Google products 10 years from now from people who currently embrace everything Google because the product is "convenient," "faster," or has "great features." Google's cache of personal data ought to be sufficiently deep in another decade to prevent a whole lot of people from running for public office. Then again, maybe that's a good thing.
-
-
robmanic44
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 26, 2010)
This version is FUBAR. First I get a broken link message, then it proceeds to take out my other browsers.
-
anonymouscowturd
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 25, 2010)
Complete and utter privacy nightmare.
I've just been trying to go through some of the files within the application profile to remove history etc (a few of the files are simply sql lite databases). But one that absolutely refuses to be removed is the recently closed tab section. You can hide it, but you can't delete it. Where the hell it stores the data is anybody's guess.
Screw you Google... -
bobad
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 25, 2010)
Getting better, but still has no advanced tabbed browsing. That's a deal killer. There's nothing at all that entices me away from IE8.
-
Kelson64
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 24, 2010)
Let me preface this review by pointing out two things. First, I don't use addons/extensions that much. Sure, I use themes, and I use one add-on specifically for Firefox - but that's about it. Second, I don't put faith in benchmarks. Every computer is different, whether it's the system itself or the ISP.
I like Chrome, and I use it as my backup browser. I've used this new beta release quite intently since its release, and it is very stable and fast. In fact, Chrome is the most stable out of all the beta browsers I have used. It's not, however, the fastest . . .but it's not so far off that it's a problem.
My biggest issue with Chrome is the way it renders pages. Simply put, I view the internet at 1680x1050 . . so I want a browser that displays sites clear and sharp. Chrome doesn't come close to Safari and Opera when it comes to this. It just seems that text on sites are blurry in Chrome.
I run a website with a forum. I type quite a bit every day, updating news items and the like. I've found that my eyes become very tired when using chrome. This isn't only on my own site, but something I've personally noticed at other sites as well.
But Chrome handles everything else quite well. But in my opinion, Opera is much more suited to my style of use on an every day basis. Chrome is improving - I just wish it was "smoother". As it is, it is good (great for watching embedded vids etc) . . but noticeably inferior in rendering . . at least for me. -
-
Gus_Valentine
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 24, 2010)
Dev Channel Updates, Release Notes, etc.
http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/ -
mjm01010101
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 24, 2010)
Not bad. Extensions are coming along. adthwart actually isn't showing me ads for a split second like it used to.
greasemonkey scripts not here (yet., but some of the extensions provide similar support (Craigslist preview being my most important.)
This is a browser that has come amazingly far amazingly fast. There is no denying that Google is kicking a** here and it will easily have 10-20% share in a few years.
Score is 4.4 right now. :) -
thartist
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 24, 2010)
Does anyone have the URL of wherever they officially post each of this dev builds with the changelog?
-
jcollake
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 24, 2010)
Long awaited (polished) extension support, whohoo! I have to say Google has done a great job with this browser. Replacing the window title bar with the tab toolbar was a great innovation, and really improved the look and consistency of the look across platforms. Of course, it also optimized the vertical space, which is more valuable than horizontal space on wide screens. Anyway, the new plug-in support allows for the pet features of users to be integrated in.
For me, this proper plug-in support was the straw that broke the camel's back on the case of Firefox. Firefox may have many more extensions and a more robust plug-in framework, but that is of no concern to my needs.
I'm now content with Chrome in every way. I especially like the unique (for Windows applications anyway) way it forks its process, making each tab a separate Windows process. It then lowers the priority class of processes hosting background tabs, and raises them when they are restored to the foreground -- much like the ProBalance feature of Process Lasso (shameless plug) --. This helps give the CPU scheduler 'hints' as to which process is the most important. Of course, for single process browsers like Firefox and IE, they probably lower the thread priority of background tabs as well.. so, same difference *except* when multiple Windows (re: not tabs) are open causing multiple instances of Firefox or IE, then they aren't quite as 'smart' in the dynamic priority adjustments. Naturally, it is also innovative for the simple reason that each tab is completely isolated, allowing a single tab to crash without affecting the others.
Lastly, general usability is just smooth and simple.
Thumbs up from me. They had an early launch and have since made incremental improvements to bring this browser up to #1 in my book.
As for privacy discussions -- to me, that's another subject. Its more inherent with the entire web itself than any particular browser. For that reason, I am ok with Chrome. If I ever see egregious privacy violations not ALSO found in other web browsers, then I would have some concerns. That said, its no different (for me) than IE would be, since I'm persistently logged into Google, allowing them to track every search I make. Someone could anyway, no matter what search engine. If I went to inconveniences, I could hide my searches, but who has the time? I do keep in mind, for every search, that is is permanently recorded somewhere. Normally, I just 'don't care'. That's me, searching for whatever. If someone doesn't like it, screw them. If your country is ever a tyranny, then maybe you have reason to worry. Mine (the USA) isn't.. at least not yet. I sure hope it isn't anyway, lol. .... Also, there is the 'private browsing mode' that should negate any concerns of Google Chrome tracking your activities, but still leaves you vulnerable to the inherent privacy concerns of the web as a whole. Either way, ONLINE PRIVACY DEBATES are NOT CHROME .
Also consider, IE + third-party toolbars (commonly distributed in totally unrelated applications) are perhaps the MOST egregious privacy violation out there. -
boelectronic
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 24, 2010)
This is what a browser must be, better than what I expected.
-
softapo7
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 24, 2010)
Google is quickly gaining access to every bit of personal information in the universe- this will help them do it quicker. It might be a fast browser- but YOU might be on the path to being absorbed by the Gorg.
-
pjb
Reviewing 5.0.335.0 Beta (Feb 24, 2010)
Moved over to it full time one week ago, and have not had any major issues with it. I have so far only come across wilders forums that have a slight issue with the drop down menu 'forum tools' other than that no problems.
I would give it a rating of 4, however due to some negative feedback from people that have not used it, I am upping it one star to compensate. -
-
karlo
Reviewing 5.0.322.2 Beta (Feb 15, 2010)
A wonderful browser! I totally love it. It's extensions were awesome! They're a lot better than Firefox's extensions. Also, I loved the feature that when you installed a new extension or a new theme, you don't need to restart the browser. It's just, well, there! Ready to use.
-
Stevefarrell
Reviewing 5.0.322.2 Beta (Feb 15, 2010)
I have a big memory leak with the latest version of crome I havent tried this beta yet though.
EDIT: Ive just installed this and its not V5beta I downloaded from this site. -
MikeTechno
Reviewing 5.0.317.2 Beta (Feb 11, 2010)
Major memory leak problem with this version of the program! Open up the app, open a few tabs and let your computer sit for a while, when you come back, take a look at your memory usage. My system went from 45% memory utilization to 88% utilization....while I wasn't even using the computer! This program should not be eating up that much memory, while it is just sitting there doing nothing and memory usage shouldn't grow without any new tabs being opened. This is a significant problem that needs to be addressed in this version of the app.
-
DKDude
Reviewing 5.0.317.2 Beta (Feb 9, 2010)
@clh
There is an extension named Autozoom, that will fix the problem.
I'm a hardcore Firefox user, but after the last release of Chrome, I'm about to switch browser.
4 stars - Not there yet, but it's really close. -
clh
Reviewing 5.0.317.2 Beta (Feb 9, 2010)
I found it odd that there are users who prefers Google Chrome or Opera to Firefox as an IE-alternative.
My PC runs on XP. Didn't u need to zoom in to have a better viewing experience every time you visit your favorite sites when u use Chrome or Opera? Or its just only me who need to zoom in to get the page extends from side to side to see clearly with bigger font every time I open the browser or a new tab.
With firefox, I only have to do this (zoom in) once in a life time for every url as firefox remembers this setting. (I'm sorry. I just realized that the latest release of Chrome 5.0.317.2 Beta actually came with this feature of remembering zoom level of individual sites.)
And didn't u need to set page setup for printing sometimes, say margins or scale (enlarge/reduce) which is not available in Chrome or its just only happened to me?
And didn't u need to revisit the sites u last visited sometimes? With firefox u only need to click twice from the History menu at the top whereas with Chrome or Opera, I'm sure it's more than two clicks. -
corb
Reviewing 5.0.317.2 Beta (Feb 9, 2010)
I have used, Explorer, Firefox, Maxthon and Avant Browser before Chrome. Even tested the new Opera. But I must say, Avant Browser was really good, i loved the idea of being able to save bookmarks, and passwords in an account, that you can access anywhere.
However, I switched to Chrome last year and Im never going back to any of the above. Chrome is so fast and simple that its unbelievable that noone came up with this idea before. It meets all my daily needs and works perfect with all my favorite sites. -
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 5.0.317.2 Beta (Feb 9, 2010)
I like the speed but I hate the shell and toolbar
-
KSzostek
Reviewing 5.0.317.2 Beta (Feb 8, 2010)
Duh fast because it is so basic.
Still way to many issues to even look at it seriosly.
People kill me let's give up all kinds of functionality
for a fraction of a second speed increase LOL. -
Diam0nd
Reviewing 5.0.317.2 Beta (Feb 8, 2010)
Take around 4secs+ to open any link on my PC. Still has barely any built-in options for customisation. And ofc the big brother factor.
It's an OK brower, but I don't see what all the hype is about. -
eblade
Reviewing 5.0.307.1 Beta (Feb 4, 2010)
It's not anywhere near the speed and memory conservativeness of Opera, but it does make a good backup browser for those rare things that don't work in Opera.
-
TheDevilHimself
Reviewing 5.0.307.1 Beta (Feb 2, 2010)
I dont see anything stupid about google chrome. The look is sleek, simple and very easy to understand, at the same time its very fast too. If they keep continuing the good work I will shurely drop my firefox completely.
-
DoHickey
Reviewing 5.0.307.1 Beta (Feb 2, 2010)
It's still a very stupid looking interface in my view.
I don't care for having to have the bookmark bar in order to get to my bookmarks.
So what if it's a little faster, I went to a few sites that took forever to load. Like NBC.com & clicking on (shows) and choosing a show & Chrome just sat there trying to load for so long that I just said (forget it) and closed the browser.
But if you like it, go for it.
It's visually unpleasing for me. And the themes are not something I could live with.
I don't like the silent install either.
No thanks Google. I can't live with using your product on a daily basis.
I want a toolbar and fast access to my bookmarks. -
cltx99
Reviewing 5.0.307.1 Beta (Feb 2, 2010)
Google has been my default browser before extensions came along. I went from FF to Opera and then Google Chrome. As far as I'm concerned neither FF or Opera come close to Chrome in speed or page rendering. The extensions are excellent and doesn't slow it down a bit. How people out there can rate Chrome as a three or less is beyond my comprehension. What are they smoking?
-
menting
Reviewing 5.0.307.1 Beta (Feb 1, 2010)
meh..had high hopes for Chrome, but they keep adding new stuff they think that they want, instead of looking at the biggest user complaints and requests and fixing those.
Starting to not pay attention to it anymore. I guess still Firefox (at work) and Maxthon (at home) for me for the forseeable future. -
coover
Reviewing 5.0.307.1 Beta (Feb 1, 2010)
Very fast browser. Seems to render accurately.
I hate the "quiet" or "silent" installation. At least let me know when the installation is complete! As it is, I start the installation and wait for ... well, evidently nothing.
What did they do to this browser to get to version 5? I see virtually no difference with previous versions. You'd think that going from version 4.something to version 5.something would mean major changes. If they are there, I don't see them.
And there is still the problem with the Bookmarks Bar. Unless you hack the shortcut, you have to have the Bar in order to get to your Bookmarks. And even if you have hacked the shortcut (as I have), if you open the browser in some other way than using the shortcut (such as through an email link), the Bookmarks are only available by opening up the Bookmarks Bar.
Regarding downloading using Chrome ... Chrome does not give you the option to change the name of the file prior to download. For example ... the chrome installer, itself, is called "chrome_installer.exe". I want to change it to "Chrome_5.0.307.1.exe" and wish to do it prior to download. The Chrome Browser will not allow the change at that time. It must be done after the file is downloaded. That is inconvenient as it means that I must wait for the download to finish when I may not even be at the computer when it finishes. -
-
war593122
Reviewing 4.0.302.3 Beta (Jan 26, 2010)
DEP (Data Execution Protection) keeps killing it.
This is on Vista SP2, no such problem on Win7 32bit. -
mdmower
Reviewing 4.0.302.2 Beta (Jan 25, 2010)
Very fast to load, and quickly renders web pages. Extensions need time to mature, but are off to a good start. Not very configurable (I miss the about:config page in firefox). No way to disable alternate streams being attached to downloads.
To everyone claiming spyware: THIS IS OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE! Go review the code for yourself and realize that if you opt out of sharing information with google, it really does opt out! (Look in the Under the Hood section of options) -
Uriel
Reviewing 4.0.302.2 Beta (Jan 24, 2010)
Google is a business who collects info about you and your interests. They sell this info to advertisers for big bucks. They also keep it in storage and share it with Uncle Sam when needed. This is why privacy advocates call Chrome spyware. They know more about you then you yourself.
-
rstat1
Reviewing 4.0.302.2 Beta (Jan 24, 2010)
I'd love to see some proof that chrome is in fact spyware. Any app that has an auto update function is going to call home so you idiots that call chrome spyware should call every other auto updating app spyware as well.
Also, I wouldn't use anything but chrome, since the others are either to vulnerable (IE) or too slow to launch (firefox) -
tangentlin
Reviewing 4.0.302.2 Beta (Jan 23, 2010)
I have been using Chrome since its initial public appearance, and decided I would obtain Chrome through dev channel.
Chrome is blazingly fast, after using Chrome for a while, I noticed that IE crawls in many web apps while Firefox would take forever to launch.
For those who bash Chrome's privacy invasion, turn Wireshark on, and see the network traffic yourself before you posting hoax and rumors of all the concerns. -
-
uberfly
Reviewing 4.0.302.2 Beta (Jan 22, 2010)
Despite what the google sheep claim, it's finely polished spyware.
-
roj
Reviewing 4.0.302.2 Beta (Jan 22, 2010)
I wouldn't run this or any product from this company on YOUR machine. They have a finely crafted PR veneer but given their stance on international affairs and their record on privacy (this product, Maps and Desktop), it's pretty obvious that they're just another opportunistic corp. despite the pretty image.
Their business practices indicate that they're far more predatory than Microsoft ever was and I simply won't trust a product that phones home every hour on the hour (have a look at your firewall or HIDS logs), regardless what their pious platitudes are.
ONE star. -
coover
Reviewing 4.0.302.2 Beta (Jan 22, 2010)
Excellent browser in most ways... but has some areas needing improvement.
I very much dislike the way this browser downloads files. It does not give the user a way to rename the files prior to the download finishing ... and other than a modification to a shortcut, there is no way to eliminate the bookmarks bar and still have direct one click access to bookmarks. And the modification to the shortcut will not work if you start the browser in some other way directly (such as going through an email link or entering a URL directly or through a shortcut). -
Mirrebex
Reviewing 4.0.295.0 Beta (Jan 17, 2010)
Light, fast and functional.. All you could expect from a browser.
-
zeeZee
Reviewing 4.0.295.0 Beta (Jan 16, 2010)
Fast for Facebook Farmville. Smoothest of all the browsers at running Farmville.
-
cltx99
Reviewing 4.0.295.0 Beta (Jan 16, 2010)
Simply a great no-nonsense browser. It has been my default browser for months.
-
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 4.0.295.0 Beta (Jan 16, 2010)
please make it look like firefox.... the google skin sucks
-
-
menting
Reviewing 4.0.295.0 Beta (Jan 15, 2010)
Google has come a long way ever since it started supporting extensions.
I would give it a 5 star rating AND use it as my primary browser were it not for the fact that for "security purposes", they disable extensions on blank tabs, a lot of https pages, and other pages that I can't remember off the top of my head. That alone makes me go back to Maxthon and Firefox, since if I can't use an extension consistently across all web pages, I'm not going to use it at all. -
-
summoner
Reviewing 4.0.266.0 Beta (Dec 18, 2009)
Wow, what a difference. Last time I tried Chrome I praised it for it's responsiveness, but decided not to use it for the lack of a plugin engine (extensions).
Now I have Xmarks and ADBlock working on it, there really isn't much of a reason to go back to Firefox.
It is amazing just how responsive Chrome is, when working in multiple tabs, compared to Firefox. The Mozilla Devs have some serious catching up to do when it comes to performance (need to divide the various tasks into independent threads, so they don't hinder each other).
I give if 4 out 5 because even for a Beta it is very usable. Of course there is always room for improvement, so keep it up and surprise me with more innovations! -
-
anonymouscowturd
Reviewing 4.0.266.0 Beta (Dec 14, 2009)
Excellent. I've been using it for a few days now (Fileforum seems a bit laggy recently) and have no major problems.
Still niggles persist. Popups are still always non-incognito even if the parent window is.
When using Incognito all the extensions are disabled, which is pretty lame.
Other ones more obvious include being unable to "lock" the quick dial thumbnails even when pinned. They will update to the latest screenshot if you use it regardless of being pinned. You can't update individual thumbnails either.
Last but not least you can't remove cache, history etc without zapping the pinned thumbnails. So again, a bit naff.
Regarding spyware, Chrome does indeed "Spy" on your browsing but it is not spyware per se. If you want to stop Google logging sites and searches, then either use Incognito mode, or use Iron from SRWare.
Still it is good. Currently for me Opera > Chrome > Firefox > IE. -
-
budzis
Reviewing 4.0.249.30 Beta (Dec 9, 2009)
gav21, you are funny kid. Where are facts that Chrome installs spyware?
Or it is your paranoic only? -
sturgess
Reviewing 4.0.249.30 Beta (Dec 8, 2009)
It's fast, but no faster than Opera, it may also be the safest browser available, or so I'm told. I like it, and on my XP machine it's the default, on my Windows 7 machine my default is IE8, on that machine it's the one I enjoy using most. But this beta is worth a 4 in my book, excellent browser.
-
mjm01010101
Reviewing 4.0.249.30 Beta (Dec 8, 2009)
Extensions are here, and this now is my primary browser. Adblocking is working great. Speed is fantastic.
-
gawd21
Reviewing 4.0.249.30 Beta (Dec 8, 2009)
@budzis
I don't believe FF reports back. Prove it! You are a loser fanboy of a crappy program and want to make up lies about other programs to make yourself feel better about using a program that is sad and installs spyware on your computer. -
jcollake
Reviewing 4.0.249.25 Beta (Dec 6, 2009)
To those that have a concern with Chrome creating multiple instances of itself (multiple processes): These do not consume as much RAM as you might think. Each instance shares memory with other instances. Therefore, each new process requires only a small bit more private memory that isn't already shared by an existing instance of Chrome. Of course, you can then make the private usage of any new Chrome instance grow by doing things exclusive to that instance - such as browsing a new web site. Either way, the net memory requirements are almost exactly what they would be if Chrome kept all tabs in a single process instance.
From a technical stand-point, Chrome is essentially forking itself every time you open a new tab or window. This not common to see for Windows applications, but is very common for *nix applications. There are advantages and disadvantages to doing it this way. One advantage is that each tab is then isolated into a single process, so a single tab can't crash all of Chrome.
Chrome also handles its forking wisely, dynamically adjusting the process priorities as necessary. When you go to a new tab, the stuff going on in the older, non-visible tabs gets lowered in priority. This is similar to what Process Lasso's ProBalance algorithm would do for you, except its not done to rescue you from an unresponsive system - its simply done to give the CPU scheduler a better indication of which process's threads should take precedence -- in case if there's contention for CPU time slices.
Hope this helps. -
anonymouscowturd
Reviewing 4.0.249.25 Beta (Dec 5, 2009)
Nice. I use it more and more. Less than Opera but more than FFx.
One thing i did notice though was that for every.single.extension that you add to Chrome you get a separate process. Whilst this is probably fine when you have one or two, if/when this hits the big time and we all start adding 10s of extensions to make it more functional the process tree is going to be a real clutter (if you concern yourself with such stuff).
Browser wise though i can't fault this thing. It's obviously the diametric opposite of what Opera is supposed to be. But it is excellent in it's own way. -
budzis
Reviewing 4.0.249.25 Beta (Dec 5, 2009)
gawd21, you are stupid if you think that you are not reported from FF, Opera or IE....
-
gawd21
Reviewing 4.0.249.25 Beta (Dec 4, 2009)
@RSMurphy
You shouldn't be stupid. Google installs several items with Chrome, and they do report back to Google. Stop being an ignorant fan boy! -
Virtual_ManPL
Reviewing 4.0.249.25 Beta (Dec 4, 2009)
@ DaComboMan - look on this sites
http://www.downloadsquad...oogle-chrome-extensions/
http://www.chromeextensions.org/
have good AdBlock and gestures, I only miss DownThemAll! from Firefox -
DaComboMan
Reviewing 4.0.249.25 Beta (Dec 4, 2009)
Support for advertised extensions is rather limited.
No mouse gestures, no effective adblocking add-ons... hum!
It's going to be hard to beat Opera or Firefox in that area!
Speed isn't everything.
BTW, i've posted on discussions section in response to add-ons suggestions.
First of all, that Adblock+ didn't do a single thing for me.
The other one, AdblockSweep doesn't do as good a job as Adblock does for Firefox (nor url filters for Opera).
Secondly, the mouse gestures one is very poor in options compared to Firegestures for Firefox or Opera's incorporated gestures. -
RSMurphy
Reviewing 4.0.249.25 Beta (Dec 4, 2009)
For everyone concerned with Google having your information as a result of installing Chrome . . . don't be so stupid! Your local grocery store has more personal information about you than Google does if you've ever truthfully filled out a form to get a "savings" card for that store.
More importantly, the purpose of these ratings and reviews is whether or not the product works as advertised. Chrome does and does it well. It's not perfect but then I'm not holding out for the first piece of software that is. -
mjm01010101
Reviewing 4.0.249.22 Beta (Dec 3, 2009)
"It astounds me that people want to use applications, sharing their personal information and habits, from the largest on-line advertising company.
C'mon people, open your eyes to what Google actually are nowadays!"
Kind've a double edge'd sword there. Were they to allow sensitive information get into the wrong hands, they would be sued into oblivion. -
cockney
Reviewing 4.0.249.11 Beta (Nov 30, 2009)
Far and away the best. Fast to load, fast to render, clean on screen. I cannot fault it. Of course it has a few bugs and limitations but its a beta and getting better all the time.
-
aruprc
Reviewing 4.0.249.11 Beta (Nov 27, 2009)
I generally use Opera and lets say, after hearing all the hype, I tried it out, except for few sites, in general Opera is faster, specially when viewing cached pages and image heavy pages. The lack of other important conveniences compared to Opera and the fact that Chrome's speed didn't actually wipe out Opera as the hype declares goes to show that this browser still has a long way before it becomes a worthy contender. On Google owned sites, it was lightning quick compared to Opera, sites like Orkut, Google Picasa etc. is where Chrome excelled and thats not surprising considering who owns them. Its quicker than FF and IE8 though. So for those not interested in Opera, this makes a fine alternative.
-
AnthonyB
Reviewing 4.0.249.11 Beta (Nov 26, 2009)
It astounds me that people want to use applications, sharing their personal information and habits, from the largest on-line advertising company.
C'mon people, open your eyes to what Google actually are nowadays! -
us3r
Reviewing 4.0.249.11 Beta (Nov 26, 2009)
Yes, I'm concerned about privacy with this browser as well.
-
Virtual_ManPL
Reviewing 4.0.249.11 Beta (Nov 25, 2009)
More and more awesome !!!
Waiting for extension like Session Saver and DownThemAll! like in Firefox xD -
-
five
Reviewing 4.0.249.0 Beta (Nov 18, 2009)
I'm using Chrome from the start and I must say it is much faster than any other browser. I can not understand why somebody says "Firefox is faster" and gives chrome 1 star... get a life
-
periklo
Reviewing 4.0.249.0 Beta (Nov 18, 2009)
Chrome is new Firefox: I hate it, but it is my default browser.
Hopefully new Firefox versions will catch up in speed department, and then it is bye bye Google Chrome for me... -
anonymouscowturd
Reviewing 4.0.249.0 Beta (Nov 17, 2009)
Gotta say, it's really grown on me especially now that there are extensions, I've currently got mouse gesture, adblock, flashblock, smoothscroll and status bar clock.
With just these limited extensions it seems faster than the equivalent Firefox with the same kind of addons, especially when it comes to start up times.
That said there are still a few annoying things such as not being able to use those extensions in incongnito mode and popups are always in normal mode even if the parent window was incognito.
I'm conflicted, i'm still in love with Opera but both Firefox and Chrome are starting to eat away at the functionality that Opera provides out of the box via extensions etc. None of them quite approach Opera in terms of usability though. But still... that day of reckoning is drawing close I fear..... -
robmanic44
Reviewing 4.0.245.0 Beta (Nov 17, 2009)
I can't understand how anyone can justify rating Firefox so highly. The load times I've experienced are extremely slow. Chrome is not ideal, but it loads instantly and is more secure than Firefox.
-
Sativarg
Reviewing 4.0.245.0 Beta (Nov 17, 2009)
I have been using Google Chrome as my default browser for about a month now. I made it default because it loads fast and some programs that access a browser on occasion would open Firefox. My Firefox is full of plugins and thus takes quite a while to load. Google Chrome opens much quicker and often will open pages Firefox has trouble with.
Firefox is the tool I use most of the time for posting in forums and researching because of the many useful addons I have installed. I am looking forward to the inclusion of this type of functionality in Chrome some day. -
bittermann
Reviewing 4.0.245.0 Beta (Nov 16, 2009)
@CyberDoc999 "Fire fox 3.6 is faster than chrome"
Thanks for the laugh! -
-
mdmower
Reviewing 4.0.223.16 Beta (Nov 7, 2009)
Chrome bug fix 355 (http://code.google.com/p...um/issues/detail?id=355) has finally been incorporated in version 4.0.237.0, hoverable bookmark menus! This brings us to a 4 star browser. The final star will come from two things: finalization and widespread adoption of chrome extensions, and more options for users in terms of customization of theme and under the hood changes. The performance of the browser in terms of overall rendering speed (from the moment you attempt to access a web page to the time it finishes displaying) is unparalleled (see BetaNews' comprehensive test).
-
Eric20
Reviewing 4.0.223.16 Beta (Nov 7, 2009)
Best browser ive used.
I will never use Firefox or IE again. -
KayNine
Reviewing 4.0.223.16 Beta (Nov 6, 2009)
"minimal design with sophisticated technology", yes, that's right. I admit, I was sceptical, but it really IS a very fast browser. But the user interface and usability I do not like at all! And the themes are simply a joke, LMAO!!!
There are some really impressive showcases, but do they have any relevance to the real world? I don't think so...
Furthermore: I don't get the rush through versions... v4 already? Do they really need to get to Vwhatever soon? Sure v4 is higher than FF's v3.5, on par with Safari, still below IE8 or O10 *lol*
Honestly: I want to rate it fair, speed deserves 5 stars, but for style and usability I can only give 1 star (since there's no 0), which results in 2 stars. -
Virtual_ManPL
Reviewing 4.0.223.16 Beta (Nov 5, 2009)
4,5/5 - older review was 4/5, because of no AdBlock ;p
but I find it now ;D
http://www.downloadsquad...oogle-chrome-extensions/
when I find DTA! extension I will probably switch from Firefox, because of top1 speed ;) -
netean
Reviewing 4.0.223.16 Beta (Nov 3, 2009)
i do like chrome it starts in a sec, runs super quickly.
Still got the most annoying Gmail bug though, I load Gmail and it instantly logs me out, log back in and instantly logged back out again.
Very frustrating
If it only had mouse gestures and was less memory hungry it would be virtually perfect -
tafugate
Reviewing 4.0.223.16 Beta (Nov 3, 2009)
long time opera user and not too much of a fan of google chrome because of issues in the past with imbedded multimedia. but i'll admit, chrome rocks on javascript heavy sites. then yesterday, chrome crashed, may have been a zonealarm issue (8, but it was only one tab! my other 13 tabs were still humming along. still an opera fanboy, but chrome is infinitely better than it used to be.
-
Sven123456789
Reviewing 4.0.223.16 Beta (Nov 3, 2009)
Most featureless browser i've tried. Not sure what the big hub bub is about this. For what, a half a second quicker response time for most websites.
-
mjm01010101
Reviewing 4.0.223.16 Beta (Nov 3, 2009)
Anyone using Zonealarm "Pro" pretty much can't be trusted to review software. How many times had zonealarm broken the OS it has been running on? I've lost count.
-
L4zy1
Reviewing 4.0.223.11 Beta (Nov 3, 2009)
I was thinking about google chrome, and decided to check it out, so I went to
http://www.google.com/chrome/
and pressed the download button, then install, and a few seconds later the computer did a hard and fast shutdown I wasn't prepared for that had zonealarm pro completely freaking out after restart which had me freaking out.
for me my Google Chrome experience was frightening at best, so for that experience I hate Google Chrome. -
-
erycP
Reviewing 4.0.223.11 Beta (Oct 27, 2009)
dear zeltus,
your CSS line: font-family: "CATANEO.TTF", "Times New Roman", Times, serif;
is NOT chrome fail, but fail of your CSS skills ;) try search on web for correct CSS font declaration.
and 5 stars for chrome, for sure -
zeltus
Reviewing 4.0.223.11 Beta (Oct 27, 2009)
Oops, I really should check for typos.
FWIW, my link should be to http://zeltus.eu/rococo.html
IF font-face works OK, the poem should appear in a cursive Cataneo BT font. If it doesn't, it'll look like a serif'd Times Roman font.
HTH!
---------------------------
ref. erycP
I'm not sure how but you seem to be looking at an old version of the page I set up to use True Font Family (http://www.truefontfamily.com/)
the correct CSS as used by my test page is
@font-face { font-family: 'Cataneo BT';
src: url(fonts/CATANEO.eot);
src: local('Cataneo BT'),
url(fonts/CATANEO.TTF) format('truetype');
div#rococo p { font-family: "Cataneo BT", "Times New Roman", Times, serif; }
which allows for IE Embedded OpenType as well as the admittedly unlikely scenario of this font being available locally.
Until Chrome handles @font-face by default and font-size-adjust (it doesn't at all, only Firefox seems to) then Firefox still has my vote. But it is becoming a close-run thing... -
zeltus
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 25, 2009)
a) I always seem to have trouble upgrading Chrome - I usually end up uninstalling the old version before installign afresh the new version (WinXP)
b) Sadly, Chrome STILL does not handle @font-face properly (at least, not by default) - it can be forced to work OK by appending --enable-remote-fonts on the shortcut. (a test page is at http://zeltus.eu/rococo.htnml if anyone wants to see a before and after of the effect I am talking about)
Other than these quibbles, it's all good news - Firefox is still my default but only just... -
bls2k5
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 25, 2009)
Chrome has come a long way in a short time. I am currently running chrome 4.0.223.9 with adblock plus 1.1.9.9. With adblock and the speed of chrome it can't be beat.
-
Terumo
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 24, 2009)
Dette er nå blitt min faste browser, ja ikke bare min men hele familien.
Gleder meg til videre utvikling av chrome
Så jeg kan og vil anbefale den til alle.
Den har et enkelt gransesnitt, og det er det enkle som jeg liker ved den. -
mjm01010101
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 23, 2009)
Switched from Firefox. The speed advantage is too fast to ignore now.
-
tangentlin
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 23, 2009)
After I first got my hands on Chrome in the pre-1.0 days, I suddenly noticed Firefox took forever to load (trust me, my Firefox is not laden with any add-ons); and IE is too slow to render or execute anything. Chrome's minimal list UI and the integrate search have instantly convinced me that it should be my default browser.
Version 2, 3 and 4 of Chrome have never failed me from their speed and stability. I am glad the last two beta's of Chrome have got rid of theme from the blank page as the themes are utterly terrible.
For those who complain about Google big bro -- well, what's the proof? Have you ever turned on Wire Shark, Fiddler or any http proxy and see how much Chrome has big brothered your usage? -
laray
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 23, 2009)
ChromePlus is a nice alternative without the bigbro functionality and few extra usability features already included- may want to try-
http://www.chromeplus.org/ -
-
cltx99
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 23, 2009)
i've been using chrome as my default browser for quite some time. It's fast, stable and to the point. Now, it even looks better. No way, concerning going back to gimmicky FF, with all of it's do-dads. My second choice browser is Opera, but I seldom use it. I'm quite happy with Chrome's speed in page rendering and its beautiful simplicity.
-
rstat1
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 22, 2009)
Wouldn't use anything else. Especially not slow as hell firefox.
-
-
Eric20
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 22, 2009)
Best browser out there period.
Dont listen to the elitist Firefox peddlers.
This is the fastest one and now with extensions! -
cmotdibbler
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 22, 2009)
Have a care with this version if you run extensions. Only way to run this is to disable extensions (or at least four extensions I run). Usually they make a fix pretty quick.
-
pjb
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 22, 2009)
Continues to get better with each release.
2 extensions that work nicely in this are xmarks and lastpass. -
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 4.0.223.9 Beta (Oct 22, 2009)
Why worry about who is the fastest browser......
the race should be who is the most secure....
Fire Fox with "no script" wins hands down ! -
mjm01010101
Reviewing 4.0.222.12 Beta (Oct 19, 2009)
I find myself switching to this browser a lot more than Firefox lately. the performance really is impressive, and yes it adds up. I spend ~7 hours a day at least browsing online.
-
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 4.0.222.12 Beta (Oct 18, 2009)
I hate the whole interface !!!!!!!!
also firefox with extensions rules ! -
cmotdibbler
Reviewing 4.0.222.12 Beta (Oct 16, 2009)
Runs well and I use this as my default browser with the following mods;
Bfilter proxy to block out ads
Adblock + to hide the remainders
StrokeIt to give me some mouse gestures.
I used Firefox back when it was called Phoenix (v0.7) and I like chrome better.
Demerits for the installer which desperately needs a progressbar. -
madmike
Reviewing 4.0.222.12 Beta (Oct 16, 2009)
Keep trying this and to be honest, its as useful as a chocklate fireguard, slow and not upto Firefox or Opera .. Google should dump it and concentrate on Search and making millions instead
-
dreadlox
Reviewing 4.0.221.6 Beta (Oct 8, 2009)
Hmmm - seems that my previous very slow performance loading/rendering images in Chrome was related to Nod32 antivirus + Vista 64-bit. After uninstalling Nod32 (64-bit version), Crome is very speedy again!!
-
bobad
Reviewing 4.0.221.6 Beta (Oct 8, 2009)
Tried it 3 times, and it's "just OK". Very bland, short on features, but competent.
Chrome Plus, however it much better. WIth a few more improvements in tab features, it could be as powerful as Maxthon2. Chrome rates a 3, ChromePlus gets a 4. -
alshawwa
Reviewing 4.0.221.6 Beta (Oct 7, 2009)
im going to give it five because its a web browser and it does what "browsing is"
its a catch up game , now chrome is a bit faster ( you wont even notice it) than firefox or opera or safari and IE
part of the developments for all Browsers are
1.catch up or overtake with the current best browser ( speed, rendering , footprints etc..)
2.implement new technologies and tools to force people to move to a certain browser
3.offer better security.
now all of the browsers are going in cycles , one creates an option and sits on the throne for a couple of weeks then the other browsers catch it and one of the other browsers is going to sit on that throne because it implement a new option/technology then the other browsers will catch up and at least one will do a new option and kicks the current one and sits on the throne ... etc.. finish it if you can.
the main point is why do you use the browser for ? ( its all about what you need it for)
some people they will say i use that browser because the applications that they run/use are only compatible or fully compatible it , and others say i love that browsers because of the extensions which gives me more joy in browsing , some say oh this one opens betanews.com in a second less than the rest --> (now those need to be beheaded lol)
some of them they use all of them at once because they are scattered or they are trying to find a way to fill their desktops with icons and temp data.
i'm a big fan of Internet Explorer X , FIreFox X , Seamonkey X , Netscape X , Opera X , Safari X , Chrome X , Maxthon X and X X (not XXX lol ) -
YoungOldies
Reviewing 4.0.221.6 Beta (Oct 7, 2009)
In a month or 2 they're at version 14, but that doesn't mean a great browser.....
-
dreadlox
Reviewing 4.0.220.1 Beta (Oct 6, 2009)
Finally! Chrome's performance is back again after many versions of very poor image loading/rendering performance on Vista 64-bit. Performance is now top-notch again - good work!
-
sn0wy82
Reviewing 4.0.220.1 Beta (Oct 5, 2009)
I really find it difficult to understand the point of this browser! Firefox, Opera and even IE8 have their advantages, this has none!
-
smarterthanyou
Reviewing 4.0.220.1 Beta (Oct 5, 2009)
This is the greatest web browser ever! Because it's made by Google.
-
ninjeratu
Reviewing 4.0.220.1 Beta (Oct 4, 2009)
This browser is not faster than Opera, IE8 or FF on any of the pages I regulary visit. Yes, I've timed them. Problem is ads and flash crap. Chrome feels cramped and simple, and I can't really understand who it's aimed at. It' sjust a lot of hype. Do we really need another browser? One that has absolutely no advantage over the existing ones? Yes, some people say it's fast. But it's not for me on any of my 3 computers. But YMMV.
Since Chrome doesn't have a proper AdBlock (the adblocking extensions either don't work at all, or work poorly) it's completely useless on my netbook. When loading a news site ads can use as much as 2/3 of the downloaded content. When I pay by MiB downloded I prefer not to pay for ads, thank you.
Memory footprint is equal to FF.
This is not a browser for me. I rely on exentions like NoScript, AdBlock, TabMix too much. IF you like it, by all means use it. -
Eric20
Reviewing 4.0.220.1 Beta (Oct 3, 2009)
My browser of choice. It just gets better with every new dev release.
I wont be going back to Firefox. -
umi81
Reviewing 4.0.220.1 Beta (Oct 3, 2009)
Chrome has still to smooth some rough edges and grow up here and there, but overall it is an impressive and promising browser.
-
DrTeeth
Reviewing 4.0.220.1 Beta (Oct 2, 2009)
I use the basic Chrome (ie non-Google version) and it is very nice. There is a branch called 'ChromePlus' that has mouse gestures amongst other things.
4* as I miss a permanent bookmark side bar.
DrT -
netean
Reviewing 4.0.213.1 Beta (Sep 28, 2009)
I've been switching back and forth between Chrome and Opera (using Windows and linux versions)
I like Opera, but the speed of startup and speed of browsing in Chrome just win overall. I do find several pages that don't work with 4.0 and am finding a lot of AJAX related things just don't work properly.
Beyond that though, I love the new themes (currently using the Earth theme in both linux and windows)
Flash support is well... still a bit iffy at times, flash video e.g. Youtube is pretty dire, frame rate is noticeably poor (particularly in linux where flash video is unwatchable) in windows, it's just generally slow.
memory usage is creeping up and up though.
If it supported mouse gestures and more ajax enabled sites (Flickr for example) I'd be delighted. Otherwise, I think it's pretty damned good already -
cltx99
Reviewing 4.0.213.1 Beta (Sep 28, 2009)
I bounced back and forth with FF and Opera for quite some time, with Opera finally being the winner. Because, Opera does what I need best and that is getting to a website and rendering quickly. Doo-dads and add-ons are secondary for me, but other folks love them.
Getting to the point, Chrome took over about 2 months ago, doing what a browser does best for me, as explained above. It's my default browser on all of my computers. It's stable, fast and to the point, with no fuss. For me, simplicity and speed are the most important aspects of a good browser. -
-
Eric20
Reviewing 4.0.213.1 Beta (Sep 25, 2009)
Love it! I can finally use extensions. Glad i upgraded to the Dev channel.
Chrome just keeps getting better and better. -
embers
Reviewing 4.0.213.1 Beta (Sep 25, 2009)
I love its speed and clean interface.
I dislike its lack of options and customizations.
I use it periodically, but Firefox is still my primary. -
MikeTechno
Reviewing 4.0.213.1 Beta (Sep 25, 2009)
As much as I hate to admit this, Chrome has become my browser of choice now due to its sheer speed. It's the fastest browser out there and that outweighs any shortcomings it might have. I just wish Chrome, Firefox, Safari, Avant and Orcha would finally all add in the same Screen Capture tool that is built into Maxthon 2.x. That is the single most useful feature that I have ever seen added into a browser. You can get that same functionality with external tools, but why bother when Maxthon has it built in and right there on the Tools menu? Until the other browsers catch up on this key feature, Maxthon will stay right there at the top of my list of preferred browsers.
-
pjb
Reviewing 4.0.213.1 Beta (Sep 25, 2009)
It's getting better. Am starting to use it more and more. Much faster than Firefox that I have used for many years. Nice once it can be customised a little more, but good as it currently is :-)
-
CyberDoc999
Reviewing 4.0.211.7 Beta (Sep 23, 2009)
I wish they could make it look and act like Fire Fox !
-
malirene
Reviewing 4.0.211.7 Beta (Sep 23, 2009)
ninjeratu how old are you? you should really try before you write another word here. You mas be one of same group of people with comment "nothing new in Win 7". Anyhow, Chrome is doing extremely good. Getting more and more features and washing bugs out in every version. Bookmark sync is killer feature. Still, there is a lot to do but far better then any other browser out there. 6/5 stars from me...
-
ninjeratu
Reviewing 4.0.211.4 Beta (Sep 21, 2009)
Nothing special, really.
If extensions are properly implemented I'll have a go again. Other than that there's nothing better with this compared to any other browser without addons/extensions. -
Virtual_ManPL
Reviewing 3.0.195.21 Final (Sep 18, 2009)
Awww great and fast developing !!!
Only when I will get some identical or better extensions like:
-DownThemAll!
-Adblock Plus
-Mouse Gestures Redox
-Session Manager (when browser crashed even restore all data and wroted posts on forum etc...)
-BossKey (is not that needed but, will be fine when I can minimize to tray ;))
and I can probably swap form Firefox ;p -
Prospero424
Reviewing 3.0.195.21 Final (Sep 16, 2009)
Great stuff. It's quick, it's secure, it's clean/simple, and it's free.
I, for one, like the silent updates simply because I've gotten so very frustrated with friends and family whom I have to support not keeping up with their browser updates. They just click through and/or close all the update notifications for their various apps, and this DOES come back to bite them in the butt. So now whenever I reload one of their PCs I give them Chrome as their default browser and I can forget about it.
But I agree that they should offer at least the option at or even after installation to have Chrome prompt/notify the user when an update is available/installed. This is one of the reasons I still use Firefox, personally. Still, I believe that silent updates should remain the default setting.
Anyway, the add-on selection is a bit anemic right now. But at least they're there. I'm sure it will expand rapidly.
Weird thing is that when this "final" version was released, all of my clients were already at 3.0.197.11 -
mjm01010101
Reviewing 3.0.195.21 Final (Sep 16, 2009)
This is a much better browser/experience than when I first tried Chrome a year ago.
- It is definitely faster than Firefox. Rending, tab switching are noticably faster.
- The interface is KISS. I love KISS and prefer it over everything. So Chrome > Opera
- Even with ads it loads faster than Firefox without.
- I do not like Google Auto-updating in the background, that is eventually going to bite google in the a** if anyone hax.
So right now Firefox> Chrome > Opera
When Chrome gets decent ad-blocking I'll swap. :)
I don't consider IE or Safari real mainstream browsers. -
KSzostek
Reviewing 3.0.195.21 Final (Sep 16, 2009)
Sure is going up in version numbers awfully fast without seeing much improvement.
-
sturgess
Reviewing 3.0.195.21 Final (Sep 16, 2009)
Fast and safe, it's my default. I'll give it a five, tried all the rest but I just keep coming back to Chrome.
-
olirosee
Reviewing 3.0.195.21 Final (Sep 15, 2009)
Huh? The "Final" is revision 3.0.x and the "Beta" is revision 4.0.x? That's a pretty large gap between an official release and a beta. Working with the 4.0 beta, the browser is okay but I'm not sure where the advantages are over the competitors, i.e. Firefox, Safari, IE, Maxthon, ... like ice cream flavours, everyone seems to have his/her favourite and the rest is "worse" for various reasons.
-
ceaufres
Reviewing 3.0.195.21 Final (Sep 15, 2009)
Srs BETANEWS
Why don't you show the diagrams of bars of browsers performance?
Their statistical diagrams are very very interesting. -
Phat Esther
Reviewing 3.0.195.21 Final (Sep 15, 2009)
After start exe microsoft malware protection stopped it
haha
deleted after 1 sec from my comp
bye -
glenlipka
Reviewing 4.0.206.1 Beta (Sep 8, 2009)
I really like Firefox, but I can't help myself. Chrome is faster and more elegant. I love the omnibar. I use it as my default. Speed is really important and they are winning the race. I have no idea why this browser is rated 3/5 stars.
The only thing I don't like is their version numbers. The beta is really 1.0. Why are they acting stupid with 3.0, 4.0. Its almost worth knocking off a star. Don't tempt me! -
Orbiting235
Reviewing 4.0.203.2 Beta (Aug 31, 2009)
Best lightweight browser on the planet. Keeps getting better and better!
coover,
The installer works just fine on this program! It merrily pops up a completion notification the very first time you install Chrome. All subsequent runs of updated installers just update Chrome so no notification is necessary as you've already setup your options! Think next time! -
Eric20
Reviewing 4.0.203.2 Beta (Aug 31, 2009)
I love Chrome. I was using Firefox for along time. But ive switched to the beta of Chrome and its just more to my taste.
Very quick and i love the UI. -
PAEzz
Reviewing 4.0.202.0 Beta (Aug 21, 2009)
Really like this browser and watching it develop into something great.
coover:
Looks like one of your wish's is coming true.
If your using this version then add this to the Target of the shortcut you use to start it...
--bookmark-menu
..so it looks something like...
"C:\Documents and Settings\Admin\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe" --enable-extensions --bookmark-menu
...and youll get a bookmark button next to the address bar...wish the Other Bookmar folder was at the top and it would theme, but this is the dev version and atleast its on the way -
coover
Reviewing 4.0.202.0 Beta (Aug 20, 2009)
Deda - Version 4 in less than a year? Heck, it'll be version 11 by Christmas ... doesn't make it any better or worse, but at least they are trying to improve it (except in the areas that I continue to complain ... see below)
Phat Esther - Chrome, a 32 bit browser, runs fine on my 64 bit computer, running the 64 bit version of Windows 7.
I start the review by saying that Chrome is a very good browser and is worth, at the very least, a look. You may find other browsers you prefer for one reason or another, but it is certainly not a bad browser.
My complaints ...
(1.) The installer works quietly. Click on the installer, and nothing, NOTHING, seems to happen. You can sit for hours expecting a request for input, or at least a notice that something will be done, is being done, has been done, or a message that the browser has been installed, but you'll get nothing. If you hold up dinner to finish the task, you'll starve to death because there is no notification of any kind. Don't hold your breath! You'll asphyxiate yourself. I deduct 1 point for Googles failure to notify.
(2.) In order to access Bookmarks, the user must have the "Bookmarks Bar" showing within the browser. The "Bookmarks Bar" takes up good space on the monitor which could and would be better utilized by the webpage the user is viewing. A better solution would be to offer the "Bookmarks Bar" to those who wish to use it, but to also offer an optional "Bookmarks Button" adjacent to the "Address Bar". This would shorten the "Address Bar" a little, certainly not a major change, and one that most people wouldn't mind, and, more importantly, add a line or two to the webpage. Again, I deduct 1 point for Googles failure to make this very important change. -
deda
Reviewing 4.0.202.0 Beta (Aug 20, 2009)
English isn't my native idiom.
Version 4 and not a year? There's something wrong. -
pjb
Reviewing 4.0.202.0 Beta (Aug 20, 2009)
Works well for me on Windows 7, both 64 bit and 32 bit.
@Phat Esther must be something else you have not configured... -
Phat Esther
Reviewing 4.0.201.1 Beta (Aug 19, 2009)
not running on windows 7
just googlecrashandler.exe
not able install on full fresh clean latest windows 7 RTM system
thats it
1 one STAR cause none 0 or -1 -
Vimes
Reviewing 4.0.201.1 Beta (Aug 19, 2009)
@CobraPL - thanks for posting what you have done. Whether there is any implementation of what is possible to do in the browser itself it is good to make an informed choice when you are using a browser.
I like Chrome but I would like to use the Google toolbar as I use a few German forums where on the fly translation is really helpful. To find that Googles own toolbar will not work with Google's own browser and redirects me to use FF is rather amusing.
When the themes and plugins have the chance to develop and mature maybe it will be as useful for me as FF has become. -
sweathog
Reviewing 4.0.201.1 Beta (Aug 18, 2009)
@CobraPL
Thanks for recommending SRWare's Iron. I liked Chrome's speed but not the data tracking. Iron's just as fast without Big Brother sitting behind my keyboard. -
coover
Reviewing 4.0.201.1 Beta (Aug 18, 2009)
I'm not sure why this application version number was changed from 3.0 ... to 4.0 ..., perhaps a change log should be shown, but I perceive NO difference.
The installer still installs silently, not informing the user that an installation is actually taking place, or even signalling that the installation is at end. This is totally unacceptable, but I deduct 1 point here for a generally excellent browser.
I also deduct a point because there appears no way to use bookmarks without having the bookmark bar exposed. Thsi, of course, takes space that would be better used by showing more webpage. A simple button next to the address bar would allow bookmarks to be accessed without taking the space.
Ryusennin ... I think the request to not give one star ratings without offering an adequate reason is fair. If you do give a one star rating, you must explain it, as I have explained my 3 star rating above. -
LakotaElf
Reviewing 4.0.201.1 Beta (Aug 18, 2009)
I tried this for the third time, does not load pages well at least for me, I do not like the layout at all, seems not complete to me. I removed it, until which time it works correctly.
-
Ryusennin
Reviewing 4.0.201.1 Beta (Aug 18, 2009)
"Please stop with the 1-star spam reviews."
Please stop with the 5-star marketing hype. -
embers
Reviewing 4.0.201.1 Beta (Aug 18, 2009)
dotnet and ChromePL, there are ways of forcibly turning this off. Sans the ID, you can also turn off "anonymous" reporting and address bar suggestions.
Please stop with the 1-star spam reviews.
That said. Besides a lack of customization features, and the annoying way tabs open (next to current tab, I prefer at the end of tabs like Firefox, personal preference). I love Chrome.
I will admit, I still juggle between Firefox for some things, and Chrome for others. I hope to someday be able to convert, but for now, it just doesn't offer everything I need. -
CobraPL
Reviewing 4.0.201.1 Beta (Aug 18, 2009)
"Chrome creates a unique ID through which a user can be theoretically identified. Chrome remembers up to the second exactly when the software was installed. Depending on the configuration, each time you put something in the address line,this information is sent to Google to provide suggestions. Depending on the configuration, if you have typed a false address in the adress bar, this is sent to Google and you get an error message from Google's servers. Depending on the configuration, details about crashes or failures are sent Google's servers. RLZ-Tracking Chrome-function transmits information in encoded form to Google, for example, when and where Chrome has been downloaded. Chrome installs a updater, which loads at every Windows in background. URL-Tracker calls depending on the configuration five seconds after launch the Google homepage opens in background. This is the worlds largest tracking and privacy cookie in the history of spyware wrapped into an innovative and feature rich package. Use SRWare's Iron browser, all the next generation features and absolutely non of the privacy/tracking garbage. It even features an updated webkit and java engine making it faster than Chrome!!"
I agree ! -
H2O_lover
Reviewing 4.0.201.1 Beta (Aug 18, 2009)
Paranoics can just run UnChrome once, and it's done. No need to run any Iron. I'd rather benefit from Chrome's auto-aupdate feature.
-
dotnetnightmare
Reviewing 3.0.197.11 Beta (Aug 16, 2009)
Chrome creates a unique ID through which a user can be theoretically identified. Chrome remembers up to the second exactly when the software was installed. Depending on the configuration, each time you put something in the address line,this information is sent to Google to provide suggestions. Depending on the configuration, if you have typed a false address in the adress bar, this is sent to Google and you get an error message from Google's servers. Depending on the configuration, details about crashes or failures are sent Google's servers. RLZ-Tracking Chrome-function transmits information in encoded form to Google, for example, when and where Chrome has been downloaded. Chrome installs a updater, which loads at every Windows in background. URL-Tracker calls depending on the configuration five seconds after launch the Google homepage opens in background. This is the worlds largest tracking and privacy cookie in the history of spyware wrapped into an innovative and feature rich package. Use SRWare's Iron browser, all the next generation features and absolutely non of the privacy/tracking garbage. It even features an updated webkit and java engine making it faster than Chrome!!
-
jzamoras
Reviewing 3.0.197.11 Beta (Aug 13, 2009)
It's damn fast. I'm looking forward adblock support!!
-
PAEzz
Reviewing 3.0.197.11 Beta (Aug 11, 2009)
Really like this browser and watching it develop into something great.
coover:
Looks like one of your wish's is coming true.
If your using this version then add this to the Target of the shortcut you use to start it...
--bookmark-menu
..so it looks something like...
"C:\Documents and Settings\Admin\Local Settings\Application Data\Google\Chrome\Application\chrome.exe" --enable-extensions --bookmark-menu
...and youll get a bookmark button next to the address bar...wish the Other Bookmar folder was at the top and it would theme, but this is the dev version and atleast its on the way -
coover
Reviewing 3.0.197.11 Beta (Aug 10, 2009)
Good browser with some needed fixes ...
"Quiet" or "Silent" installer needs to let the user know, at the very minimum, that the installation is finished. Now when you click on the install button, nothing seems to happen. Installation is, of course actually taking place, but with no notification (-1)
Bookmarks Bar is required to access bookmarks. I would prefer to have the space. Put a Bookmarks Button adjacent to the Address Bar in it's place. (-1) -
Vimes
Reviewing 3.0.196.0 Beta (Aug 3, 2009)
This browser continues to develop nicely and, for me, has worked very well. I look forward to the up and coming theses and hopefully extensions. Well done with the light responsive browsing which it offers.
-
us3r
Reviewing 3.0.196.0 Beta (Aug 2, 2009)
It needs lots of bug fixing. I've just lost all of my settings and bookmarks, after hard reset of the PC. What a joke... I'm back to Firefox at least until there would be some better alternative which is not only faster but also reliable.
-
FreeSpeech
Reviewing 3.0.196.0 Beta (Aug 1, 2009)
Another turd from a company that wants to know everything about you and tries to get you to do things that makes them money.
-
coover
Reviewing 3.0.195.4 Beta (Jul 30, 2009)
Good browser with some needed fixes ...
"Quiet" or "Silent" installer needs to let the user know, at the very minimum, that the installation is finished. Now when you click on the install button, nothing seems to happen. Installation is, of course actually taking place, but with no notification (-1)
Bookmarks Bar is required to access bookmarks. I would prefer to have the space. Put a Bookmarks Button adjacent to the Address Bar in it's place. (-1) -
H3KTIK
Reviewing 3.0.195.3 Beta (Jul 29, 2009)
1. Installs and runs fine on Windows 7 7600 (64 bit)
2. The adblock in Chrome seems better than the Firefox one so far (I have yet to have a proper play with it but my first impression was excellent)
I signed up just to defend Chrome LOL! I don't mind people giving crap software bad reviews but Chrome is most certainly better than the one or two stars some people give it! :) -
us3r
Reviewing 3.0.195.3 Beta (Jul 29, 2009)
Chrome 3 is quite good. It still needs a lot of bug fixing and at least a few features to completely switch from Firefox to it, but it really takes the lead lately. It's fast, has basic features (apart from some ad-blocking plugin), and has fresh, cleaver and fancy interface.
-
coover
Reviewing 3.0.195.1 Beta (Jul 23, 2009)
Good browser with some needed fixes ...
"Quiet" or "Silent" installer needs to let the user know, at the very minimum, that the installation is finished. Now when you click on the install button, nothing seems to happen. (-1)
Bookmarks Bar is required to access bookmarks. I would prefer to have the space. Put a Bookmarks Button adjacent to the Address Bar in it's place. (-1) -
-
Alexander-GG
Reviewing 3.0.193.1 Beta (Jul 21, 2009)
Hey, people for Google, where is adblock?
"Money makes the world go round". (Cabaret) -
Qrio
Reviewing 3.0.193.1 Beta (Jul 18, 2009)
You can install Chrome on Windows 7 perfectly fine, I haven't had a single problem with it for 2 months
-
Phat Esther
Reviewing 3.0.193.1 Beta (Jul 17, 2009)
Ghrome not install on windows 7?
hahahaha
Its really browser?
I dont believe.
hahahahahaha -
enrom
Reviewing 3.0.193.1 Beta (Jul 16, 2009)
Me gusta. Me resulta estable. La única pega, que no es menor, faltan muchas opciones para configurarlo como los navegadores más conocidos. Ah, también me resulta rápido. Saludos.
-
malirene
Reviewing 3.0.193.0 Beta (Jul 13, 2009)
Nothing to complain, everything is looking better and better. Maybe a little slow but but this is very "young" browser.On end this will be "The One" browser :o)
-
jzamoras
Reviewing 3.0.193.0 Beta (Jul 13, 2009)
I'll be sold when adblock and rtm extension are available.
-
alanpalmer
Reviewing 3.0.192.1 Beta (Jul 9, 2009)
I don't have the same issues with the bookmark bar that some others appear to have. I prefer to have my most frequently-visited sites available with one click. I use the same system in my other browsers. The great thing is the 'secret' installer. Too much like malware. It is fast, though, I'll give it that; around 30s on my machine. I'd just updated to the latest release of Opera and that installation took 2-3 minutes.
-
coover
Reviewing 3.0.192.1 Beta (Jul 9, 2009)
Chrome still has the worst installer available for a major application. Click on the executable and nothing much happens. You sit and wait for some kind of dialougue to appear, but nothing. No message that the installation is taking place, no message that the application has been installed, no request to open the application, absolutely nothing. However, if you open Chrome and check the version number, you'll see that the installation (evidently) was sucessful. (-1)
A bookmark bar is necessary in order to access bookmarks. This is totally unnecessary and wastes browser space. A bookmark button adjacent to the address bar would be much, much better. (-1)
This is a good browser, certainly as good as some others, but the two areas mentioned above are glaring problems. Unfortunately, I believe the developers of Chrome think the "quiet" installer is, for some unfathomable reason, good, and that Google wants that horrid "Bookmark" bar to be there because they think they may be able to use that space for profit. I don't mind Google making a profit, but they need a different business (and browser) model. -
cstaley416
Reviewing 3.0.191.3 Beta (Jul 7, 2009)
I agree that the installer should report back when the new program is installed.
I also have an unusual occurrence on this web page: http://chuckstaleygallery.com
There are large, blank areas just before two different slide shows midway down.
I report it with each new upgrade, but I see it is still not fixed. -
DACWILSOL
Reviewing 3.0.191.3 Beta (Jul 7, 2009)
Still can't view secure website to pay bills. Error for not rendering states that Chrome shares code with Safari. I don't use Safari, so I imagine I wont use Chrome until the problem is fix. Have sent numerous feedback repors about this problem.
-
coover
Reviewing 3.0.191.3 Beta (Jul 7, 2009)
Thank you, Chrome ... you have resolved the rendering problems that I have experienced, and I can, again, use this browser.
However, the issue with the unusual installer remains. The installer installs quietly, that is it does not notify the person installing that anything is being done, and does not notify that the installation is finished. The only way to determine that the installation is done is to open the browser and check the version number. While this does not in any way affect the use of the browser in any way, it really could be a bother to someone not used to installing this browser. They really do need to improve the installation process through some sort of notification (-1)
I will continue to mark down this fine browser for not having access to bookmarks except through the bookmark bar. The bar is totally unnecessary and takes room that would be better used by more webpage space. A simple button adjacent to the address bar would greatly improve this browser (-1) -
coover
Reviewing 3.0.190.1 Beta (Jun 25, 2009)
With this new version, Google has evidently fixed some bugs and/or added or removed features ... but they still haven't fixed the problems I have been reporting.
The unconventional installer does not report when it has started installation or finished installation. How is one to know that something ... anything has happened (or has not)! The installer reminds me of a malware installer where the software author does not want you to know what occurred (-1 point).
The browser still does not properly render certain webpages. http://my.myway.com is an example.(-1 point)
The Bookmar Bar is a space waster, but is required to access Bookmarks. A simple button on the present toolbar to access bookmarks would be sufficient and would give more space for the webpage (-1 point) -
alanpalmer
Reviewing 3.0.190.1 Beta (Jun 25, 2009)
Two main faults, plus various smaller ones. The memory footprint is too large, Viewing the same page (this one), Firefox is using 6K and Chrome 22K. That's with just one tab open. The other is the silent installer. A point off for each of those, plus another for some of its smaller annoyances, such a lack of an ad -blocker. I know Google wouldn't provide one for obvious reasons.
On the bright side, it seems to render all the sites I regularly visit well and fast. The minimalist UI is quite a good effort, too. -
Aegis69
Reviewing 3.0.190.1 Beta (Jun 25, 2009)
HUGE memory requirements, by far this browser is the least efficient when it comes to memory usage.
http://dotnetperls.com/chrome-memory
1.2 gig of ram??? This browser will continue to be a joke till they get that under control. -
coover
Reviewing 3.0.189.0 (Jun 18, 2009)
3.0.189.0 seems much more stable than 3.0.187.0. The frequent crashes are gone.
But the "unusual" installer is still a problem. How is one to know that the installation has started or finished if nothing happens on the desktop (-1 point)
And the browser continues to require the "Bookmark Bar" to be present in order to get to your Bookmarks. A Bookmark Button is all that is needed (-1 point)
Rendering of some webpages (http://my.myway.com, for example) is very bad. Less than half the features of that page, which can be customized individually, end up appearing in Chrome ... bad, bad, bad (-1 point)
This browser is much faster than Internet Explorer, Firefox and Opera (I haven't yet gotten around to checking the lastest version of Safari, but reports on it's speed are not encouraging), so I do hope that the above "features" can be fixed. I'd love to make this my default browser, but at present, I cannot. -
bobad
Reviewing 3.0.189.0 (Jun 18, 2009)
3 points off for a very tricky installer. Who can trust an installer that does not tell you what it is installing, and where it is installing it to? (or allow cstom install, for tha tmatter) Reminds me of some of the scam AV software you see around the Internet.
-
-
-
roj
Reviewing 3.0.189.0 (Jun 18, 2009)
Not for me, especially after that Draconian EULA (yes I know they amended it after being pressured - I don't care).
THREE stars (Charity begins at home) -
coover
Reviewing 3.0.187.1 Beta (Jun 12, 2009)
3.0.187.1 seems much more stable than 3.0.187.0. The frequent crashes are gone.
But the "unusual" installer is still a problem. How is one to know that the installation has started or finished if nothing happens on the desktop (-1 point)
And the browser continues to require the "Bookmark Bar" to be present in order to get to your Bookmarks. A Bookmark Button is all that is needed (-1 point)
Rendering of some webpages (http://my.myway.com, for example) is very bad. Less than half the features of that page, which can be customized individually, end up appearing in Chrome ... bad, bad, bad (-1 point)
This browser is much faster than Internet Explorer, Firefox and Opera (I haven't yet gotten around to checking the lastest version of Safari, but reports on it's speed are not encouraging), so I do hope that the above "features" can be fixed. I'd love to make this my default browser, but at present, I cannot. -
mikefeuer
Reviewing 3.0.187.1 Beta (Jun 12, 2009)
Crashes every time when selecting any option from the 'wrench' menu.
-
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 3.0.187.0 Beta (Jun 12, 2009)
"About Chrome" & "New Incognito Window" Chrome crash already fixed in 3.0.189.0 release (nightly build).
-
pdail
Reviewing 3.0.187.0 Beta (Jun 11, 2009)
Wait for the next Version. Crashes right out of the Gate! Very dull Chrome..
-
coover
Reviewing 3.0.187.0 Beta (Jun 11, 2009)
Crashes frequently. This version is unstable. Wait for the next version.
-
bobad
Reviewing 3.0.187.0 Beta (Jun 11, 2009)
I've been trying out beta software for many years, but NEVER has "Help, About" caused a crash.
-
-
The MAZZTer
Reviewing 3.0.187.0 Beta (Jun 11, 2009)
WARNING: Do not install this version. Google has already retracted it from the automatic updater. It is very crashy. The dev team is expected to release a fix later today.
Also don't rate Google Chrome based on a version that isn't supposed to be publicly posted anymore since it was retracted. -
nugro
Reviewing 3.0.187.0 Beta (Jun 11, 2009)
On XP SP3 x86 crashing every time within seconds
uninstalled within seconds -
Vimes
Reviewing 3.0.183.1 Beta (Jun 8, 2009)
Very fast and agile browser that surpasses others that I have used, regarding its speed. I have not found any displaying or formatting issues and it does seem to be maturing nicely.
-
vaxop
Reviewing 3.0.183.1 Beta (Jun 7, 2009)
Im sorry I just had to make an account to deal with the idiots that are commenting here. First of all, Google Chrome scores 100/100 on the Acid 3 test. Next, just how is the autoupdate 'invasive'? If a more secure and stable version came out, autoupdate ensures that I am protected with any patches without having to check for updates on my own manually. Third, Chrome is fast as hell. It has shown time and time again on benchmarks that Chrome runs away on speed if there is any sort of javascript or ajax on the webpage. As for rendering, it rivals Opera in terms of speed. And now with version 3 there are addons that can be developed for the browser.
I truly think you people bashing Chrome are either retarded or trolling fanboys.
5/5. -
stevvie
Reviewing 3.0.183.1 Beta (Jun 6, 2009)
Have google dumped V2, V2 has lots of rendering bugs and V3 has lots of font related bugs along with the same rendering bugs V2 has. What are they playing at. Why don't they get a nice stable and bug free version before adding extra stuff :( This looked like a good browser when it was first released but it still has MAJOR rendering bugs.
-
coover
Reviewing 3.0.183.1 Beta (Jun 6, 2009)
I am impressed with Chrome and I recommend everyone to try it. It is extremely fast. much faster than IE 7 or 8, Firefox 3.x, and Opera 10.
However, I have been rating the browser with a 3 for two reasons ... 1) The unusual installer which doesn't notify the user when the installlation begins or ends .... how is one to know that the installation actually took place? and 2) That the browser requires a "Bookmark Bar" to open in order to get to Bookmarks, when a Bookmark Button would do the job without wasting space.
I now have a third complaint ... the browser does not render some web pages properly. The one glaring example I can give is http://my.myway.com. Check out this page on Chrome and then on any other major browser and you will see major differences.
Installer = -1 rating point
Bookmarks Bar = -1 rating point
Rendering Problem - -1 rating point
Total Score = 2 -
Aegis69
Reviewing 3.0.183.1 Beta (Jun 5, 2009)
FF3.5 beta is just as fast as Chrome, and I get to keep my addons. I see no advantage in this browser, and one huge disadvantage in the form of invasive update software being installed and running in the background.
-
-
Sammo
Reviewing 3.0.183.1 Beta (Jun 5, 2009)
Huge resource hog and slower than Firefox on my computer. And still no themes or extensions.
-
H3KTIK
Reviewing 3.0.183.1 Beta (Jun 5, 2009)
I don't understand what everyone is complaining about regarding extensions??
Chrome has had extensions for a while now - There aren't many yet but the all important adblocker works VERY well this end! Better than adblock under Firefox if I may be so bold!
Headover to www.adsweep.org and install it and then compare Chrome with Firefox! :) -
-
thartist
Reviewing 3.0.183.1 Beta (Jun 5, 2009)
i kind of enjoy the simplicity and forward-looking design of this, but it is lacking a bit in usability features.- extensions. is. the. word.
@stevelw: you've made one of the most retarded comments i've seen.
Chrome was finally launched like a week or two ago, and now they are towards v3 in beta. they didn't jump in a week. they had been in v2 beta for months. -
jzamoras
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (Jun 4, 2009)
It's damn fast, but useless until there are extensions available.
-
svenna
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 30, 2009)
What´s wrong with you guys. Now I need a magnifieng glass. I´ll go back to the slow Firefox.
-
lucianct
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 29, 2009)
nice! chrome it's getting better and better... i like that the interface is really simple and it's really fast. i hope it will get an extension repository, 'cause i really need a google bookmarks extension :)
@stevelw: 2.0 was released as a full version. but probably you're using the weekly updated channel so you always have the development version.
@ain: there are some changes in the way that chrome displays fonts (family and size is now based on OS), so a lot of people experience small or big fonts, but i'm sure this will be fixed next week :) -
stevelw
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 29, 2009)
I've found this latest version unusable due, entirely to the small font used on the interface.
BTW way how can google jump a full version number in only a week without releasing a full version? (only a week ago the current version was 2.0.181.1 and now we have version 3 ??????) -
myboy
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)
Yes, we all know it's alpha or beta. That doesn't mean we're going to give it a high score just because it's from Google. We're (or at least I am) rating it based on how it is RIGHT NOW -- not in the future when all bugs have been ironed out. Stable releases will have their own ratings. And quite frankly, whether it's labeled with the beta tag or not makes no difference to me since I've used rock solid beta software and buggy "stable" software (Google's own 2.x Chrome). When the bugs are right in your face and obvious, that doesn't bode well for their programmers. It's not as if they're making their own rendering engine. It's an over-glorified GUI. Compare Opera's alpha to this. It's like night and day. Also until recently, half of Google's products were in perpetual beta status and people didn't seem to have as much problems with those. While Chrome doesn't deserve a 1 star rating, it most certainly doesn't deserve a 5 star one.
-
dm1030
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)
@Coover
There is a bookmark button for Chrome. Add this to the target in your shortcut "--bookmark-menu" -
Ain Soph Aur
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)
i love chrome, but this beta has a bug:
the fonts in chrome (on the tabs, and so on...) are to small. -
coover
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)
This is not my favorite browser and it does have a couple of problems that I dislike, but it certainly isn't fairly rated with only 1 star. The one thing i do like about it is it's speed. It is considerably faster than IE 6, 7, or 8. And it is, indeed, quicker than either Firefox or Opera. So it does have it's advantages.
But it still requires the space hogging Bookmark Bar in order to access Bookmarks. This is totally unnecessary. A Bookmark Button is all that is needed. Minus 1 star.
And it still has this strange installer that doesn't inform the user that the installation is being done and when it is finished. The only way to determine if the installation was actually done is to open the browser, and check the version number. Obviously not a problem with the browser itself, this still bothers me enough that I must lower the rating of the browser itself for this "feature." Minus 1 star. -
catchpole
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)
alpha that has been out for a quite long time that is...
-
po4ko
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)
All you 1-star raters, you do realize that this is alpha build (and not beta as listed) that suppose to have problems, including small font bug?
IMO, BetaNews must not allow rating of beta or at least alpha grade software, as judging from comments, most people are rating bugs and not a product. If you are using a pre-release software that is not intnded for general public, then please be at least a little bit objective in your ratings. And help make software better by reporting them to a developer, instead of ranting about what is known to be a problem. -
H2O_lover
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)
Site www.teamxbox.com opened for me on IE8 and Chrome at about the same speed. And it is nearly the best browser for me.
-
pjb
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)
Gets worse.
Agree with previous poster, the font is far to small.
One day it may have usable potential - but not today! -
lang999
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)
Not the best browser or even near.
Ive tried many lightweightpages and compared to IE8 And IE8 was about 2 seks faster on really lightweightpages. Try on harder pages like www.teamxbox.com and u need to wait one year. -
nika27
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)
This is a development build (it is not even beta, whoever labelled it as beta on BetaNews, is wrong), you must expect problems. Don't install it unless you want to help developers. If you want to b**** about something, how about find something esle.
Major changes are internal ones:
* WebKit - 531.0
* V8 - 1.2.5.1
* Gears - 0.5.21.0
And many fixes:
http://sites.google.com/...v-channel/release-notes -
reddy.shyam
Reviewing 3.0.182.2 Beta (May 28, 2009)
Installed today. Text on chrome (like menus,bookmark bar etc..) is unreadably small. Major version change and still not much to tweak on the settings. Disappointed!
-
-
myboy
Reviewing 2.0.181.1 Beta (May 26, 2009)
Fast but buggy as hell. Did nobody at Google do any testing prior to releasing this onto the public? I mean it's not hard to notice that the damn back button sometimes goes back to the same page instead of the prior page.
-
easeus
Reviewing 2.0.181.1 Beta (May 26, 2009)
I don't like chrome for it can't enlarge text of websites, I have to use Mother's Magnifier to do it.
Computer screen magnifier URL:http://www.mothersmagnifier.com -
cltx99
Reviewing 2.0.181.1 Beta (May 22, 2009)
This bare bones browser is quite good. Aside from being ugly, it does everything right. I also use FF3 and Opera 10. Although both of these browsers have lots more bells and whistles they both have quirks. Chrome on the other hand has few if any bells and whistles, but is straight forward, faster and better at page rendering than either FF3 or Opera 10.
I gave it a four because it's so damn ugly. -
Ain Soph Aur
Reviewing 2.0.181.1 Beta (May 21, 2009)
@catchpole
For sure you can block ads with chrome! do you know the google search engine?? USE IT --> AdSweep
chrome is really very fast - it starts fast and shows the pages also very fast. its minimalistic and looks really cool. also you have a autoupdate funktion (you can desable it), autocomplete for forms, integrated download manager (you can pause and resume downloads) and the interface is just great.
i think if you dont need all the useless firefox plugins, then you should try it out. -
catchpole
Reviewing 2.0.180.0 Beta (May 14, 2009)
not so good as someone says. cant block ads at all, so im happy with my Firefox. and actually Chrome aint no fast as someone claims.
oh and SuzzyWoozy, Maxthon at least block ads. not using it offen, but its still way better than Chrome. -
rsx508
Reviewing 2.0.177.1 Beta (May 1, 2009)
I love Chrome 1.x, but 2.x seems to break features in some web sites like Blogger and Community Server. I keep installing 2.x updates but end up rolling back to 1.x each time.
-
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 2.0.177.1 Beta (May 1, 2009)
@coover, regarding this observation:
"Chrome has two easily fixable problems, which the developers, evidently, have decided either not to fix (permanently) or that they are not important enough to deal with now...."
Please check the nightly (more like hourly) build page and notice that they indeed have important stability and functionality issues to deal with:
http://build.chromium.or...ldbot/waterfall/console
(The latest interim release when I've wrote this, is 2.0.178.0, build 15035)
Notice also that this is an open source project and you can make your contribution as well, if not by writing code at least by posting suggestions, bugs, etc -- see below:
- Report bugs at http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/entry
- View existing bugs at http://code.google.com/p/chromium/issues/list
On me, it works better with every release, I have a list with sites with problems and I see that is improving every day; already replaced Maxthon as my first browser. -
pwkenny82
Reviewing 2.0.177.1 Beta (Apr 30, 2009)
coover can you stop posting the SAME review EVERY time a new update is released.
Do you work work Microsoft or something? -
coover
Reviewing 2.0.177.1 Beta (Apr 30, 2009)
Chrome has two easily fixable problems, which the developers, evidently, have decided either not to fix (permanently) or that they are not important enough to deal with now....
My main objection is that the "bookmarks toolbar" must be a part of the browser in order to get to the bookmarks. The bookmarks toolbar is totally unnecessary. A Bookmarks Button is preferable, and would not take up the space that the toolbar does. (- 1 star)
The second objection has to do with the installation of this browser. Normally, when installing an application, several screens are viewed, some requiring interaction, and then a final screen comes up indicating that the installation has been done. But this isn't true with Chrome. With this version (2.0.176.0), for example, I clicked on "Run" and nothing happened (visually on screen). I wasn't sure that the installation was being done. I sat and waited for something to happen. Nothing did. Finally, I opened Chrome and checked the version number, and 2.0.176.0 was showing ... so the installation was complete. It was too easy. The developers must realize that there must be something visual to notify the computer operator that the install is being done and that it is complete. Of course, this is not a problem with the operation of the browser. But it bothers me (and I'm sure, a lot of others) a great deal. (-1 star) -
T_LOKZz
Reviewing 2.0.176.0 Beta (Apr 28, 2009)
@coover Remember this is a beta software, the public stable is still back on 1.x. So really the install should be what ever works best for the beta testers. If you are not one then you should not be using this other then just a preview and should not give a rating based on the result of the browser or installer in this case.
-
alalec
Reviewing 2.0.176.0 Beta (Apr 28, 2009)
This is a nice and pleasant piece of software but it is far from being complete. The software development process needs to be better managed. Some beta releases were rushed up without sufficient testing.
-
dgtlchlk
Reviewing 2.0.176.0 Beta (Apr 25, 2009)
@coover: the beta and nightly builds have a command line option for a bookmark(s) button. Its "--bookmark-menu". Its simplly not enabled by default because its not a stable feature yet.
-
ckliebert
Reviewing 2.0.176.0 Beta (Apr 25, 2009)
Excellent, BEST out there. My everday browser. Nuff said.
-
coover
Reviewing 2.0.176.0 Beta (Apr 25, 2009)
Chrome has two easily fixable problems, which the developers, evidently, have decided either not to fix (permanently) or that they are not important enough to deal with now....
My main objection is that the "bookmarks toolbar" must be a part of the browser in order to get to the bookmarks. The bookmarks toolbar is totally unnecessary. A Bookmarks Button is preferable, and would not take up the space that the toolbar does. (- 1 star)
The second objection has to do with the installation of this browser. Normally, when installing an application, several screens are viewed, some requiring interaction, and then a final screen comes up indicating that the installation has been done. But this isn't true with Chrome. With this version (2.0.176.0), for example, I clicked on "Run" and nothing happened (visually on screen). I wasn't sure that the installation was being done. I sat and waited for something to happen. Nothing did. Finally, I opened Chrome and checked the version number, and 2.0.176.0 was showing ... so the installation was complete. It was too easy. The developers must realize that there must be something visual to notify the computer operator that the install is being done and that it is complete. Of course, this is not a problem with the operation of the browser. But it bothers me (and I'm sure, a lot of others) a great deal. (-1 star) -
KSzostek
Reviewing 2.0.176.0 Beta (Apr 24, 2009)
Sturgess
If you think this is the best I just have to say you don't know much about browsers, I'm still laughing. That was a good one, but for real come on dude. -
sturgess
Reviewing 2.0.176.0 Beta (Apr 24, 2009)
I have no idea what "extensibility" is halc, and I give not a fig if it phones home every day, as long as it's not long distance, and I don't get billed. So unlike you I'll be brief, it's fast, and it doesn't crash, that's it really, oh, and it's the best browser out there, so if you haven't tried it yet you should.
-
halc
Reviewing 2.0.174.0 Beta (Apr 20, 2009)
Tech demo, still. Not ready for prime time.
Lacks a huge number of even basic UI features (like disable underlining of links).
Not to mention extensibility is near to zero still and as the basic feature set doesn't contain what modern competition does, well...
Further, it phones home like a madman and these are hard or impossible to turn off (unless one uses SRWare Iron 3rd party build).
One extra star it gets is for its Javascript speed: Chrome blows the competition out of the water (Opera 10 alpha, Firefox 3.1b3, Webkit Nightly, IE8) in terms of speed. It really is that fast.
Second comes from its memory protection and current level of security, which is unparalleled so far.
BTW, the Google version numbering system is completely useless and silly. V2? Gimme a break, it's not even out of alpha yet (i.e. feature complete for v1)! It's as if they're trying to close the distance with IE.
Ok, fair enough. I'll start using Chrome, when it's at version 8.0... It'll probably start to be useful then.
Really google, nice ideas, but bad implementation (sans the js engine and tab based memory protection). -
ssb
Reviewing 2.0.174.0 Beta (Apr 18, 2009)
Totally useless without a proper installer that copies Chrome inside Program Files directory. Google has to understood that Windows had specific guidelines that every program has to follow.
-
bobad
Reviewing 2.0.174.0 Beta (Apr 18, 2009)
Crisp and clean. I like the spell checker!
I don't like the fact there are no custom install options in the setup.
The tab groups are useless without an option to automatically close all open tabs when opening a new group of tabs.
There also needs to be an option to open a tab group by simply left clicking instead of right click>open group.
I REALLY wish for search aliases like Maxthon.
It's getting there. A few more simple convenience options and it will be in Maxthon's league. -
bls2k5
Reviewing 2.0.174.0 Beta (Apr 17, 2009)
This is a simple really fast browser. You know have the option to turn off the phone home function so there really isn't that much to gripe about unless you are a plugin junkie. Also no themes yet, so if you don't like the way it looks then don't waste your time. I really like Chrome myself and it is my primary browser and the browser I wrote this review with.
-
sturgess
Reviewing 2.0.174.0 Beta (Apr 17, 2009)
It's still the best browser out there. Just one gripe, all the beta versions show "Update server not available" when confirming you are running the latest ,and greatest version, so if you have missed your daily fix at Betanews it leaves you wondering if an update was required. The proper versions of Chrome don't suffer from this glitch, click on them, and they do a quick check thus putting your mind at rest, which is nice.
-
coover
Reviewing 2.0.174.0 Beta (Apr 17, 2009)
Chrome has two easily fixable problems, which the developers, evidently, have decided either not to fix (permanently) or that they are not important enough to deal with now....
My main objection is that the "bookmarks toolbar" must be a part of the browser in order to get to the bookmarks. The bookmarks toolbar is totally unnecessary. A Bookmarks Button is preferable, and would not take up the space that the toolbar does. (- 1 star)
The second objection has to do with the installation of this browser. Normally, when installing an application, several screens are viewed, some requiring interaction, and then a final screen comes up indicating that the installation has been done. But this isn't true with Chrome. With this version (2.0.174.0), for example, I clicked on "Run" and nothing happened (visually on screen). I wasn't sure that the installation was being done. I sat and waited for something to happen. Nothing did. Finally, I opened Chrome and checked the version number, and 2.0.174.0 was showing ... so the installation was complete. It was too easy. The developers must realize that there must be something visual to notify the computer operator that the install is being done and that it is complete. Of course, this is not a problem with the operation of the browser. But it bothers me (and I'm sure, a lot of others) a great deal. (-1 star) -
malirene
Reviewing 2.0.172.2 Beta (Apr 6, 2009)
Better and better...
http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/ -
yokozuna
Reviewing 2.0.170.0 Beta (Apr 3, 2009)
It is easy to obtain a decent ad-blocker from www.adsweep.org. You can run it with two clicks.
-
utomo
Reviewing 2.0.170.0 Beta (Mar 29, 2009)
Read the news and also comments from
http://www.betanews.com/...-31/1237326927#talkback
so it still need a lot of tweaking -
-
malirene
Reviewing 2.0.170.0 Beta (Mar 18, 2009)
Hey Dhry! Who is we? And you are?
LOL some people are trying to make a point by talking in the name of everyone...
Chrome is far from "the best browser" but that's just personal taste anyway. This browser is not going in the good direction, Chrome is flying in the good direction. :o) Simplicity, speed and original ideas are things I like. Shore, lots of tings are still missing but all of that is on the way. This is still baby browser with just basic features. Looking froward to extensions. -
DACWILSOL
Reviewing 2.0.170.0 Beta (Mar 18, 2009)
Good browser, but it still can't render some secure sights. Bill pay sights are essential part of web and convience. If browser can't render sight for transactions why even use it. Site is a well know and renders in all browsers, except for Safari and Chrome. Submitted numerous feedback to Google Chrome team and problem still persist. When this is fixed, rating will go up.
-
alanpalmer
Reviewing 2.0.169.1 (Mar 17, 2009)
I don't like the way the installer runs silently.
When I checked Help > About I found I was still using version 1. something so I downloaded the current version and ran the installer and nothing seemed to happen. Thinking I'd got a bad download I tried again using Firefox. When the same thing happened I realised, checked again, and found I now had 2.0.169.1.
The UI is clean and the browser renders sites well and fast, but it won't become my default because there's no ad blocker available, and I can't see Google ever agreeing to one! -
bobad
Reviewing 2.0.169.1 (Mar 17, 2009)
Interesting, but hasn't nearly arrived yet. I suppose Chrome should get high marks for where it is at this point in development.
Sometimes more is less. I like the clean, light GUI and the dearth of heavy, useless features. I hope it stays that way. I would like to see groups handling, search aliases, and form filing. All the above can be accomplished without sacrificing speed and stability. Startup is badly missing an option to open a group folder.
Incidentally, this release isn't nearly stable. It crashed 3 times on me in 1/2 hour of light surfing. One point off for that, because even though it's a beta, it should be a little more stable. -
AntiochMedia
Reviewing 2.0.169.1 (Mar 16, 2009)
coover: RTFM. Hit CTRL+B to open and close the bookmarks bar.
Chrome is a great browser and most of the negative reviews here are from fearmongers.
The real debate here is whether you like the rendering engine from Mozilla, IE, Opera, or the webkit rendering engine. If you enjoy the speed of webkit and the js engine that Chrome uses, then it goes down to interface. Chrome is an excellent browser and I use it and Firefox mainly.
I find Chrome to be a more enjoyable browsing experience as it is very fast and more featured than Safari and less cluttered than Opera. I find it to be weak for web developers as many of Firefox's plugins are indispensable to me as a developer.
[shrugs]
And as far as 'Who is Trusting Chrome? Who is Trusting Google?' -- many people. Google exists to make money and to improve the web. While you may not believe the latter, it is in Google's best interest to fulfill their mission statement as they have developed many trust based relationships between themselves and other businesses. If this trust is broken, then it hurts Google financially. Unlike Microsoft and many other companies, Google is a company whose message and actions define both who they are and how successful they are. -
yleclerc
Reviewing 2.0.169.0 (Mar 12, 2009)
As anyone also notice that you can not use the Google web site in other browsers when Chrome is running.
It would be a good browser if it would install correctly in Program Files, under Windows. -
cengizkhan
Reviewing 2.0.169.0 (Mar 12, 2009)
beside every disadvantage of that browser, I hate the googleupdater which is resident everytime in the memory even if I close the google chrome. It must run when the google chrome is started and stop when the google chrome is closed.
-
radiomaffia
Reviewing 2.0.169.0 (Mar 10, 2009)
I saw this browsing coming in 2008 and only one question comes to my mind : who is trusting google and his google chrome? raise your hand now...
-
coover
Reviewing 2.0.169.0 (Mar 10, 2009)
Still lacks an option to close the Bookmarks Bar and still have access to Bookmarks without having to reopen the Bookmarks Bar (all it would require is a button placed next to the Address Bar).
In addition, the installation is very disconcerting. The installer gives no indication that it is actually making changes, and does not announce in any way when it has finished. The average user may not understand that browser was actually installed. This is bad form and must be corrected.
Because the software authors continue to ignor adding a bookmarks button on the address bar line, and because of their use of an unconventional installer, I have downrated this (otherwise) excellent browser to a 3. -
molumen
Reviewing 2.0.168.0 (Mar 10, 2009)
2.0.169.0 is out. Grab it here: http://dl.google.com/chr....0/chrome_installer.exe
Notable Changes:
Fixed the address bar not getting focus when you open a new tab. You can once again press Ctrl+T and start typing.
Increased the amount we scroll when you use the mousewheel.
Known Issues:
Issue 8526 (and others): You might have issues with Google Chrome in maximized window when you change screen resolutions, exit the screensaver, or unlock the screen.
Issue 8438: Browser hangs if history page shows after clearing history
Issue 8456: History tab search tab eats every alternate clicks
Issue 8453: Regression: about:network dialog shows up behind current Google Chrome window
Issue 8399: Bookmarking a page not reflected on history page when open
Issue 8318: "Exit Full Screen" link does nothing
Issue 8372: Background paint issues with Task manager in maximized mode.
Issue 8289: Drag drop of bookmark from IE/FF crashes tab and then loads the page
Issue 8071: Javascript debugger doesn't come up for constrained windows
Issue 8040: Zoom is broken in [New Tab]
Issue 8527: No context menu with one tab -
molumen
Reviewing 2.0.167.0 Beta (Mar 7, 2009)
Looks like 2.0.168 is out, with more than 150 bugs fixed and even some enhancements! :)
Great and fast browser with a small memory footprint! -
Skyfrog
Reviewing 2.0.167.0 Beta (Mar 3, 2009)
When you install Google Chrome it generates a unique ID for you and they collect usage information. Not a huge surprise though, Google tracks everything you do with their services. If Microsoft were doing this they'd be burned at the stake but Google has legions of fanboys who think they can do no wrong.
-
Joco
Reviewing 2.0.167.0 Beta (Mar 3, 2009)
Is Chrome truely Open Sourced? If so, is it still possible that Google could add extra stuffs in the code to violate user privacy?
There are millions of eyes looking at the code, some developers would certainly raise the ethical question about any suspicious code.
NOTE: I don't use Chrome at all, sorry for the neutral rating. Just wonder, what is Google's motivation for creating a new browser?
EDIT: just read "Google Chrome Browser Q&A" http://knol.google.com/k...qvw5h03s1/12#references
Seems fair, anyone knowing Chrome well can confirm that there is nothing suspicious? -
The MAZZTer
Reviewing 2.0.167.0 Beta (Mar 3, 2009)
Warning: This does not appear to be an official Dev channel release, so it might not be as stable as Dev channel releases.
Check http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/ for the latest release notes for all official Chrome releases from all channels.
Ain Soph Aur: I encourage you to check out my own portable launcher for Google Chrome. :)
http://www.mzzt.net/2009...-chrome-portable-201620/
It is set up for 2.0.162.0 but it will happily import and portable-ize a newer locally installed copy of Chrome. -
ap3rus
Reviewing 2.0.167.0 Beta (Mar 2, 2009)
i dont mind the problem in collecting anonymous usage statistics, the windows os does the same things
-
Banquo
Reviewing 2.0.167.0 Beta (Mar 2, 2009)
Garbage, if you like webkit use Safari or just use Firefox if you want a good browser. Also Google is notorious for spying and gathering information on it's users. Their search is bad enough but now they can track every single thing you do (and they do). A browser made by an ad company, yeah I'll pass.
-
coover
Reviewing 2.0.167.0 Beta (Mar 2, 2009)
Still lacks an option to close the Bookmarks Bar and still have access to Bookmarks without having to reopen the Bookmarks Bar (all it would require is a button placed next to the Address Bar).
In addition, the installation is very disconcerting. The installer gives no indication that it is actually making changes, and does not announce in any way when it has finished. The average user may not understand that browser was actually installed. This is bad form and must be corrected.
Because the software authors continue to ignor adding a bookmarks button on the address bar line, and because of their use of an unconventional installer, I have downrated this (otherwise) excellent browser to a 3. -
Ain Soph Aur
Reviewing 2.0.167.0 Beta (Mar 2, 2009)
really the fastest browser out there and if you want to use the portable verison (only in german i think):
http://stadt-bremerhaven.de/2009/02/28/portable-google-chrome-201670-beta/ -
-
davewalden
Reviewing 2.0.166.1 Beta (Feb 28, 2009)
"It's a 5, always been a 5 since way back. The fastest, safest bloomin' browser out there. If you ain't using it don't knock it. Most who give it less than a 5 are still struggling with whatever version of Opera is not crashing this week, and as for Firefox fans, well you need to make the most of the next few versions of your little browser, it's doomed you know ? Google will cut it loose, and it'll be up at the back of the class with the Linux crowd."
Hey Sturgess... whatever you are smoking or popping is deluding your rational thought processes. Detox and come back to reality.
As I stated before Speed is not everything. Just because the Google logo is plastered on it does not make it a gem. From reading the reviews, it is pretty clear that the devs break more stuff than they fix with each release. That is really sad. -
coover
Reviewing 2.0.166.1 Beta (Feb 26, 2009)
Still lacks an option to close the Bookmarks Bar and still have access to Bookmarks without having to reopen the Bookmarks Bar (all it would require is a button placed next to the Address Bar).
In addition, the installation is very disconcerting. The installer gives no indication that it is actually making changes, and does not announce in any way when it has finished. The average user may not understand that browser was actually installed. This is bad form and must be corrected.
Because the software authors continue to ignor adding a bookmarks button on the address bar line, and because of their use of an unconventional installer, I have downrated this (otherwise) excellent browser to a 3. -
molumen
Reviewing 2.0.164.0 (Feb 20, 2009)
There seem to be a problem with d download link provided by google.
The http://dl.google.com/chr....0/chrome_installer.exe link actually leads to 163.0 (anf there are some UI bugs as a red square next to the minimize button, blue Chromium logo)
If you want to download the real 2.0.164, go to http://dl.google.com/chr....1/chrome_installer.exe
Anyway, do not forget that the 2.xx versions are devel versions so they may be unstable, crash, not work at all, etc... -
computorial
Reviewing 2.0.164.0 (Feb 20, 2009)
Decent and best of all very fast browser. Bookmarking panel should be visible inside browser and I have a little concerns about privacy issue. In the end, we are talking about Google
-
ssb
Reviewing 2.0.164.0 (Feb 20, 2009)
No better rating than 1 until Chrome make use of standard installation guidelines, putting its binaries inside "Program Files" directory and not in local user profile.
-
MarcFou
Reviewing 2.0.164.0 (Feb 20, 2009)
-
coover
Reviewing 2.0.164.0 (Feb 19, 2009)
Downloaded what I thought was 2.0.164.0. File reports it is 2.0.163.0 ...
Still lacks an option to close the Bookmarks Bar and still have access to Bookmarks without having to reopen the Bookmarks Bar (all it would require is a button placed next to the Address Bar). -
ZenWarrior
Reviewing 2.0.162.0 (Feb 14, 2009)
For the simple-minded masses, this is not a bad browser. But, anyone looking to "power-browse" or have any measure of control over their browser and/or browsing experience will find it irritatingly simple. It also deserves a serious ding for the most idiotic and non-informative installation procedure of any software I've ever seen. I thought Google hired geniuses. What part of "tell the user what is happening" didn't they understand?
-
veeoh
Reviewing 2.0.162.0 (Feb 13, 2009)
Excellent. Our ticket system @ work uses java and javascript heavily and this just flies with it - leaves IE and FF standing.
-
ckliebert
Reviewing 2.0.162.0 (Feb 12, 2009)
The Absolute BEST Browser out there bar none. I love it. Now if only they would open some coffee shops. Give Starbucks a run for the money. I would spend all my days at the GoogCAFE. I CAN dream!!!!!!
-
coover
Reviewing 2.0.162.0 (Feb 12, 2009)
Still lacks an option to close the Bookmarks Bar and still have access to Bookmarks without having to reopen the Bookmarks Bar (all it would require is a button placed next to the Address Bar).
-
Josh97
Reviewing 2.0.162.0 (Feb 12, 2009)
I can't recall a program to have a worst installer than Chrome. I mean, you click on the exe and it goes installing without notifying you what's its status or when it's finished installing. Weird
-
MikeTechno
Reviewing 2.0.160.0 Beta (Feb 9, 2009)
Well, as much as I hate to say it because I do not like this browser and I do not like Google as a company, I have to admit that this browser actually has some real potential and likely has a bright future. It is fast and there are some sites out there that it actually renders more accurately and with fewer snags/problems and faster than any other browser out there. There is still a lot wrong with this browser and it has a long way to go before I would even call it "good", but I have to admit that it looks promising now and I think it will be very good at some point down the road.
-
Galifray
Reviewing 2.0.160.0 Beta (Feb 7, 2009)
Yeah, it's fast, it's blue and it's basically functional, except for two things. Even though it allows a user to set his or her own font choices, it ignores them completely. No matter what font I choose, it uses Times New Roman to display text if a web page doesn't specify one. And unlike IE, Firefox, and Opera (but rather like Safari, so it may be a webkit issue) it doesn't allow a user to choose his or her own colors for links AND it has no option for shutting down the underlining of links.
I'd expect this behavior in a 0.x beta, but not a "supposedly" 2.0 version. -
madmike
Reviewing 2.0.160.0 Beta (Feb 6, 2009)
Google should stick to other tools and search services, this is awful. Firefox is excelent and for the -not-so-well-informed there is IE7. This is just kids stuff compared to them
-
AsianAngel
Reviewing 2.0.160.0 Beta (Feb 5, 2009)
@sturgess - Your prediction of Firefox' imminent doom is extremely amusing, but nothing more. ^__^ Firefox is here to stay. Get used to it. ^__^
As for this release, the browser is definitely showing improvement but still has the same tracking/information gathering problems as always, which is sad. Clean that problem up Google and you have a nice browser to build on... -
anarkhy
Reviewing 2.0.160.0 Beta (Feb 5, 2009)
The interface is sweet, still miss some functionalities...
-
sturgess
Reviewing 2.0.160.0 Beta (Feb 5, 2009)
It's a 5, always been a 5 since way back. The fastest, safest bloomin' browser out there. If you ain't using it don't knock it. Most who give it less than a 5 are still struggling with whatever version of Opera is not crashing this week, and as for Firefox fans, well you need to make the most of the next few versions of your little browser, it's doomed you know ? Google will cut it loose, and it'll be up at the back of the class with the Linux crowd.
-
Zoroaster
Reviewing 2.0.160.0 Beta (Feb 5, 2009)
I must say I agree with Conrad.TDI, except that Safari here is rather Firefox : Microsoft + Apple + Mozilla verses Google ?
When did Google become the bad guy ? Google has expanded because they have found the stability point between giving (excellent software/services) and taking (as much personal data as possible). It seems this balance is failing, as intrusion is becoming too obvious. GoogleUpdate service, Chrome's privacy concerns, YouTube requiring cookies in order to stop asking for language preferences on every launch etc.
Concerning Chrome, I had only tested one of the first builds. The concept may be interesting, but how to say... not for me. So my score is not technical, but emotional : I don't like it. -
Conrad.TDI
Reviewing 2.0.160.0 Beta (Feb 4, 2009)
Give Safari a try....
I'm not an Apple boy, far from it. But, the Safari version of Webkit browser is smooth, fast, and doesn't log data like Google.
I'm sure the next versions of Chrome will include the wonderful and amazing GoogleUpdate service.....not removable, of course.
When did Google become the bad guy?! -
gsteele
Reviewing 2.0.160.0 Beta (Feb 4, 2009)
If it didn't have the Google name on it, it would be considered a 3rd rate effort.
-
-
CGA1
Reviewing 2.0.160.0 Beta (Feb 4, 2009)
One of my fastest uninstalls. If you want speed, go with Opera. Me, I'll stick to Firefox.
-
kindbud1
Reviewing 2.0.159.0 (Jan 28, 2009)
This release has some serious problems drawing window frames on Vista... http://code.google.com/p...m/issues/detail?id=5054
-
-
hagjohn
Reviewing 2.0.159.0 (Jan 28, 2009)
2.0.159.0 seems to have issues with forums. Otherwise great browser.
-
prixi
Reviewing 2.0.159.0 (Jan 28, 2009)
I like that it has a win process for each tab.. much more reliable!
-
The MAZZTer
Reviewing 2.0.159.0 (Jan 27, 2009)
Fortunately Downloads is no longer completely broken as was the last few releases. However opening multiple tabs at once and Vista Glass borders are still wonky.
karlslZ: Overviews of new features in every dev build are here: http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/
The complete changelog is here: http://sites.google.com/...v-channel/release-notes -
tigger4046
Reviewing 2.0.158.0 (Jan 24, 2009)
This new release includes form auto filler, this one is auto learning what you type. To activate this feature, go under tools and click options, choose minor tweaks check box. Also includes profiles for individual users in the toolbar. Also when you take any webpage and make it an app, the (ctrl-f) find scrolls down for easy access.
Remember you must download the chromechannel-2.0 and choose developer. Close all chrome windows,launch chrome, wrench, about google chrome, update. Enjoy -
kindbud1
Reviewing 2.0.158.0 (Jan 24, 2009)
i've previously been giving this 5's, but this version introduced some weird new bugs.
-
karlslZ
Reviewing 2.0.158.0 (Jan 23, 2009)
where can I find the update for this Chrome version 2 from version 1? I can't find the info?
according to PC mag's review, it is the fastest browser around. -
molumen
Reviewing 2.0.158.0 (Jan 23, 2009)
the 2.x versions are still very buggy (I have problems with page rendering, downloading etc...)
Although I give it a 3/5 because of that, it is still my preferred browser (it is my default browser actually).
Also, I am quite sure that these bugs will be dealt with very fast and the next release will be a lot better. -
yleclerc
Reviewing 2.0.158.0 (Jan 23, 2009)
Nice browser but the installer crashed on the two PCs I installed Chrome on.
-
AntiochMedia
Reviewing 2.0.158.0 (Jan 23, 2009)
Fantastic WebKit browser. I'm a developer and enjoy the DOM inspector and really just enjoy the efficient, fresh take on the browser interface. Rendering is extremely reliable and fast.
I'm still at a loss as to why people like 'Sven' claim that this is 'worse browser out there'. I think it is 'great browser out there.' -
-
saadsaleem
Reviewing 2.0.158.0 (Jan 23, 2009)
Changelog: http://dev.chromium.org/...v-channel/release-notes
-
-
molumen
Reviewing 2.0.157.2 (Jan 19, 2009)
Looks like the 2.x versions have so far small rendering problems (probably due to some enhancements in CSS that need polishing). On the other hand these 2.x releases seem more stable and the few added features (like smooth scrolling or a newer version of Gears) are very welcome :)
Chrome is my default browser for quite some time already and I love it for its simplicity, speed, small memory footprint and overall high rendering quality (thanks to WebKit). -
pnutts
Reviewing 2.0.157.2 (Jan 18, 2009)
It is fairly obvious that most of the negative reviewers did not read why they built a browser and how it works (in a comic book format):
http://www.google.com/go...books/chrome/index.html
or the features of Chrome:
http://www.google.com/chrome/intl/en/features.html
Take a moment and find out why you should be using this browser. -
ailef
Reviewing 2.0.157.2 (Jan 17, 2009)
this is the browser i use all the time now, it runs faster than any other browser, but i got some issues with some webpages look on build 2.0
no prob with build 1.0
i'm going to try this new one to see if the rendering is fixed on some webpages.
the thing that misses is the possibility to chose the cache size and how many days u let keep the history browsing.
except that, this browser is great, we will know if it has security issues very soon if lot of people begin to use it. ;-) -
coover
Reviewing 2.0.157.2 (Jan 16, 2009)
The browser is acceptable and I do use it occasionally because it is so fast.
However, I dislike the "Bookmarks" bar and would like to remove it. When I do, of course, I lose the ability to go directly to my bookmarks. To do so, I must do a "contol b", adding the bookmarks bar back on the screen. The fix, adding an additional "Bookmarks" button adjacent to the address bar would be easy to do and Google should do so. -
-
horsecharles
Reviewing 2.0.157.0 (Jan 15, 2009)
1. General display and tab scroll bugs on dual monitor setups.
2. No tab manager or even a tab list button.
3. No support for using bookmark locations of other browsers instead.
Google Chrome is way too minimalist re settings, tweaks and addons-- to be of use, and still needs a lot of work.
On the other hand, it's the fastest browser-- even when opening a kazillion tabs. -
Tockman
Reviewing 2.0.157.0 (Jan 15, 2009)
An optimal browser for me. But since previous version it's suddenly stopped to scroll down by pressing Space tab...
-
waxwing
Reviewing 2.0.157.0 (Jan 15, 2009)
This a bug fix on a DEV release, still a few problems but fixes a bunch and still very fast and seems pretty secure. This is a work in progress and will get smoother and better as it ages and move DEV version get issued
-
sturgess
Reviewing 2.0.157.0 (Jan 15, 2009)
Been using it since it stopped being a beta. Never had a problem, it's so very fast, and from what I read also very secure. With all the other secure browsers requiring major updates more often that Windows, it seemed the right time to say bye-bye to those old timers and try something new. It was a good choice, just lovin' it.
-
DACWILSOL
Reviewing 2.0.157.0 (Jan 15, 2009)
Has potential, but shares some problems with Opera browser. Does not render some secure sites,
-
KSzostek
Reviewing 2.0.157.0 (Jan 14, 2009)
Chrome has a long way to go. As with most google apps little or no add in's.
It seems google just wants to put stuff out just to get it out, Look at GMail Picsa isn't bad but the rest garbage pretty much. -
-
-
dpcdpc11
Reviewing 2.0.157.0 (Jan 14, 2009)
one thing i don't understand... why would any new browser start it's development in these times with such poor features and and missing many of the basic elements?? why in the world i don't get it.. it's not like we're back in the 90's when the first browsers emerged! they had all the right elements ready just 'steal' them from the other browsers.. i mean it's not a secret that you need all those missing elements in a browser... and talking about slow development... come on google people... u got your super computers and your super nerds there... work people work!!
-
LakotaElf
Reviewing 2.0.157.0 (Jan 14, 2009)
Needs allot of work yet. Coming along nicely but more needs to be done before I will install it again. I give it a three for effort. You can not complain too much, it is free and they are working on it. In time I suspect it will be a very good browser. But remember, the more a browser has in it, the slower it becomes.
-
iamnotyou
Reviewing 2.0.156.1 Beta (Jan 11, 2009)
Nice and fast , especially on a Google page , but it lacks add ons for ad-blocking and other things I value for web surfing.
Seems too minimal for a "real" release.
If you use Google maps it is a great browser , I'll wait for an easy way to dodge the blinking ads before I try this again. -
g4qb
Reviewing 2.0.156.1 Beta (Jan 10, 2009)
a)
doesn't render
192.168.1.254 correctly
this is due to the webkit rendering ending since lunascape set to also does the same thing
b)
doesn't have global find, this reminds me of IE 5.2.3 for MacOS
eg.
1. find "chrome" in one tab - Ctrl-F
2. go to next tab
3. Ctrl-F
note that "chrome" is not entered in search field
c)
can't open MHT files
d)
can't d'load
ftp://majorgeeks.mirror.internode.on.net/browsers/chrome_installer.exe -
halc
Reviewing 2.0.156.1 Beta (Jan 10, 2009)
Rendering engine and app model is not a browser.
Way too little user configurable options for basic rendering. Not even at the level of 1995 browser in this regard!
This is a tech demo and it has a loooong way to go, before it is a usable, day-to-day, stable and full featured browser.
I'm rating it as a 3-star alpha level app with promise, because that's what it is. -
ZenWarrior
Reviewing 2.0.156.1 Beta (Jan 9, 2009)
As much as I say I hate it, I find myself using it. Why? Because it works. I [consciously] say it's too simplistic to be my browser of choice, but it works and [subconsciously] I use it.
-
keir
Reviewing 2.0.156.1 Beta (Jan 9, 2009)
It's now preventing my auto-hidden taskbar appearing again, which the last version didn't.
-
shelb
Reviewing 2.0.156.1 Beta (Jan 9, 2009)
Chrome does not work with Adblock Plus. A browser that displays ads? Useless garbage. It is faster for Google Maps than Firefox though.
-
waxwing
Reviewing 2.0.156.1 Beta (Jan 9, 2009)
This DEV version contains a ton of fixes and new features such as:
New version of WebKit. WebKit is the open source code Google Chrome uses to render web pages (HTML and CSS). 1.0.154.36 used basically the same version of WebKit as Safari 3.1, but the WebKit team has made a lot of improvements since that was released. 156.1 uses WebKit version 528.8 or, more precisely, revision 39410 from the WebKit source tree. In addition to fixing bugs and enabling features like full-page zoom and autoscroll, the new version also enables some nifty CSS features:
CSS gradients
CSS canvas drawing
partial implementations of CSS reflections and CSS masks
Form Autocomplete. Google Chrome remembers what you've typed into fields on web pages. If you type in the same form again, it will show any previous values that match what you've typed so far. You can disable Form autocomplete on the Minor Tweaks tab of the Options dialog. (Note: this is like the basic form autocomplete available in Firefox or Internet Explorer. It is not the same as the form fill feature in Google Toolbar.)
Full-page zoom. Previously, page zoom (Ctrl++ or Ctrl+-) increased or decreased only the text on a page. Zoom now scales everything on the page together, so pages look correct at different zoom levels.
Spell-checking improvements. You can now enable or disable spell checking in a text field by right-clicking in the field. You can also change the spell-checking language by right clicking. To enable spell-checking in a language, add it to the list of 'languages you use to read web sites' in the Fonts and Languages dialog ([Wrench] > Options > Minor Tweaks > Fonts and Languages). Note that Google Chrome doesn't have spell-checking dictionaries for every language you can add to this list.
Autoscroll. Many users have asked for this and (thanks to our WebKit update), we now offer autoscrolling. Middle-click (click the mousewheel on most mice) on a page to turn on autoscroll, then move the mouse to scroll the page in any direction.
Docking dragged tabs. When you drag a tab to certain positions on the monitor, a docking icon will appear. Release the mouse over the docking icon to have the tab snap to the docking position instead of being dropped at the same size as the original window. Docking positions are:
Monitor top: make the dropped tab maximized.
Monitor left/right: make the dropped tab full-height and half-width, aligned with the monitor edge.
Monitor bottom: make the dropped tab full-width and half-height, aligned with the bottom of the monitor.
Browser-window left/right: fit the browser window and the dropped tab side-by-side across the screen.
Browser-window bottom: fit the browser window and the dropped tab top-to-bottom across the screen.
Import bookmarks from Google Bookmarks. The [Wrench menu] > Import bookmarks & settings... option now has a Google Toolbar option to import Google Bookmarks. The bookmarks get imported into your Other bookmarks folder. The bookmarks are not kept in sync; the import process simply reads in the current set of online bookmarks.
New SafeBrowsing implementation. SafeBrowsing is now faster, more reliable, and uses the disk less often.
Use different browser profiles. You can start a new browser window that uses a different profile (different bookmarks, history, cookies, etc.). Use [Wrench menu] > New window in profile. When you create a new profile, you can name it and add a shortcut to your Desktop.
Update the V8 Javascript engine to version 0.4.6.0 (from 0.3.9.3).
New network code. Google Chrome now has its own implementation of the HTTP network protocol (we were using the WinHTTP library on Windows, but need common code for Mac and Linux). We fixed a few bugs in HTTP authentication and made Google Chrome more compatible with servers that reply with invalid HTTP responses. We need feedback on anything that's currently broken, particularly with proxy servers, secure (https) sites, and sites that require log in.
New window frames on Windows XP and Vista, supporting windows cascading and tiling, and other window-management add-in programs.
Experimental user script support (similar to Greasemonkey). You can add a --enable-user-scripts flag to your Google Chrome shortcut to enable user scripts. See the developer documentation for details.
A new HTTPS-only browsing mode. Add --force-https to your Google Chrome shortcut, and it will only load HTTPS sites. Sites with SSL certificate errors will not load. -
safaa26174
Reviewing 1.0.154.42 (Jan 6, 2009)
I don't understand why some peoples are giving the Chrome bad review ! in my opinion: Chrome in comparing with firefox, has same construction , it's fast as firefox .. in my tests never crashed under Windows Vista, at least better than IE7 .. and I see it's getting better with last updates ... I'll give it 5
-
-
-
cjsxbb
Reviewing 1.0.154.42 (Dec 23, 2008)
My experience with Google Chrome has been excellent. It is a rocket compared to all other browsers including Opera which I used until Chrome was released.
The compatibility with websites has gotten progressively better with each automatic update. The only websites I have come across that don't work with this browser are early AJAX web applications I use at work. These were created in 2004 and were specifically written for IE (6.0 at the time) and they don't work with firefox, opera, or safari either.
It does not have all the wizbang plugins and skins that Firefox has but that's fine. 99% of those plugins are superfluous anyway adding little value to the actual navigation experience.
My only complaints with Chrome is the sketchy support for flash and other plugins which is more the fault of Adobe and other developers than Google. This too has gotten better but at first I had trouble watching videos on hulu.com. -
Standa.Holecek
Reviewing 1.0.154.42 (Dec 23, 2008)
after deinstalation call Internet Explorer for survey question! Cannot install from google.com/chrome ebglish version on Czech Windows Vista Home Premuim.
-
-
BelgianWaffle
Reviewing 1.0.154.42 (Dec 23, 2008)
I was hoping that now that Chrome is out of beta it would be somewhat useful; but I dont see that it is whatsoever and i've had it with this browser. I think the amazing and unstoppable Google era is coming to an end and this is the first sign.
-
waxwing
Reviewing 1.0.154.39 (Dec 18, 2008)
Keep in mind, this is a .DEV issue. Not one for general distribution.
-
-
toohightocomply
Reviewing 1.0.154.39 (Dec 17, 2008)
I personally don't see what the current "pros" of running this browser are besides using it for all things "Google." Even the German government advises against using it! "Furthermore it was said to be risky that user data is hoarded with a single vendor. With its search engine, email program and the new browser, Google now covers all important areas on the internet."
-
allthebestnamesgone
Reviewing 1.0.154.39 (Dec 17, 2008)
use this cleaned up version by srware instead - without the spyware and bizarre install location - and includes an adblocker!
plus they have a portable version
http://www.srware.net/en...re_srware_iron_news.php -
MikeTechno
Reviewing 1.0.154.39 (Dec 17, 2008)
I'm sorry but I just don't see the point of this browser at all. Why do we need this again? What problem does it allegedly solve for the world? With IE, Maxthon, Safari, Opera, Firfox, Avant and Orca all out there, what specifically does Chrome give us that we don't already have? What is the point of creating yet another web browser? (Other than Google just doing it because they are rich and they can, of course) From what I can tell, nothing new or special in this browser to get excited about. No real reason to use it, at least not any obvious ones. I am missing something big here?
-
KSzostek
Reviewing 1.0.154.39 (Dec 17, 2008)
It is featureless, no bloat because it is stripped of everything!
-
neapolis
Reviewing 1.0.154.39 (Dec 17, 2008)
incredibly fast. great for developers. very interesting fresh ideas. very promising for the future. thumbs up.
-
-
digital.ivan
Reviewing 1.0.154.39 (Dec 17, 2008)
I don't know why are you ppl complaining, chrome was never meant to be bloated with useless features instead it's the fastest, secure and completely crash free browser, I've been using firefox for 2 years and now I changed to Chrome and believe me, what a good decision that was.
-
AlanS2001
Reviewing 1.0.154.39 (Dec 17, 2008)
Best thing about this browser is its low resources usage and its speed. Aside from that Firefox beats it in every other way.
-
rocugbg
Reviewing 1.0.154.39 (Dec 17, 2008)
A great and really fast browser, when the extensions thing is done it's gonna be hasta la vista Firefox.
-
Sven123456789
Reviewing 1.0.154.39 (Dec 17, 2008)
Have no clue why people like this featureless browser.
-
TDreamer
Reviewing 1.0.154.39 (Dec 17, 2008)
Don't know what kind of issues you guys are having. It works great for me (64bit Vista) really fast, As soon as Roboform works with it, bye bye firefox.
-
Daddy_Spank
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 14, 2008)
Google is going downhill. Keep on doing what you do best, Google. SEARCH!!!
-
DoHickey
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
I can't believe they released this browser as is.
No thanks Google. -
madcats
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
It's not perfect but is much faster now. I use Firefox when I need to use a secure site. But use Chrome to open at once 6 of my most read sites,
then using search and tab features to keep going.
It's great to now have an ever improving browser rather than using outdated, slow Internet Explorer -
catchpole
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
final? see ya later chrome!
(bittermann, not fast and not great security) -
rburly
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
After spending 30 minutes of trying to import data from Firefox, I canceled the import.
I immediately uninstalled the prog. Get back to me when it's a viable piece of software. -
AlanS2001
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
Agree with Pjb. Had issues with the import of Data from Firefox. I definetly don't where the program files are installed to, in the users 'Documents and Settings', instead of 'Program Files' where they should be. Like how minimal it is, but it still has a long way to go. Is quite fast and doesn't use much system resources though.
-
pjb
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
Horrible.. Don't like it at all. Tried it, even though it crashed on trying to import settings from firefox, which was a major issue working out how to bypass that import. Got there in the end. For a very minimal browser it is usable, but not by me.
-
bittermann
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
This is the best browser out there by far! Super fast, stable and great security. I use the latest nightly builds and they are even better than the final release. I applaud Google's determination in getting this browser to market as soon as possible, so as long as it keeps improving it will be a winner...
-
sorlag
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
Evil data gahtering software from Google.
Also installs in suspicious locations that the user can't change.
Google is turning from its coolness into an evil company... This build only isn't beta taged, so it can be included with dell pc's.
Dell doesn't want to include beta things so google removed the tag too early.
If you wanna try Chrome, better try a version without this nasty things...
Some sites have special builds of Chrome available... Iron etc -
kencman
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
There is an " Add Block " you can download and install ... its called Privoxy and this is the addy to get it : http://www.mychromeaddons.com/page/2/
Ken -
Prospero424
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
Even if I will most likely never use it as my primary browser, I can still recognize that it's very, very good.
I see no reason to use Safari (for Windows) over this whatsoever. Opera is great, I like it, but I will also probably never use it as a primary browser (not gonna go into it), and I prefer Chrome's interface. It's fast (especially in Java), it's light, it's functional, and it's compatible.
The privacy concerns, though usually WAY overblown, have a grain of truth. This is part of the reason I will never use it as a primary browser. Privacy mode is legitimate and convenient, but it's not something most users can use all of the time due to loss of functionality on many major websites.
I keep this installed as an alternative to Firefox. I use it when I want to look up something quickly, when I let a guest use my PC, or when I need snappier webapp performance.
If they ever get serious about plugin development, I'll give it a five. -
theqwerty
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
I am sorry but no ad block nowadays is a huge minus. Opera 10 alpha makes me happy.
Speed... Sure I d love for my browser to be faster but not at the price of no ad blocking. Block content, block content, block content ... no more flashing lights on my screen :-) -
Hawk999
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
It's fast and nice to use but no adblock, no use for me. :(
-
BelgianWaffle
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
I was hoping that the all of a sudden Final version would change my view of this browser - unfortunately it did not and I uninstalled it after half an hour.
-
McAleck
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
No sooner did I open this "stable" version of Chrome, than I got a series of video rendering errors. If there's any difference between this and the previous versions of Chrome (incidentally, what is the difference? anyone knows?), it's that this one's apparently worse.
-
twood
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
1. It's a fast browser
2. It's a nice interface
3. It's easy to use
Just one thing I'm after, addons, like ad block plus, etc. Nothing slows down browsing like ads on a webpage. 4/5 for being relatively good but no addons as of yet. -
cltx99
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
I just uninstalled Chrome "final". All I can say is that it's not that fast for a browser that is so skimpy. It's appearance is pure ugliness. It can't hold a candle to opera 10 Alpha. It's plain boring and rather useless.
-
H2O_lover
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 12, 2008)
Without a doubt, Chrome has the cleanest interface for a web browser, and the ability to run websites as an application with an even tidier interface is a novel approach. And it's always nice to have another competitor in the browser market. There are problems here and there with Chrome, but they will be dealt with and in overall it's a nice browser, though I don't see switching anytime soon (if at all) from Firefox.
-
stevvie
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 11, 2008)
So if this now final does that meen I can click optins WITHOUT it giving me an error and crashing. It's in thier FAQ/Bug section.
-
The MAZZTer
Reviewing 1.0.154.36 Final (Dec 11, 2008)
Firefox's (Gecko engine) license is here: http://www.mozilla.com/e...al/eula/firefox-en.html
Gecko itself is bound by the Mozilla tri-license: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gecko_(layout_engine)
Opera's license isn't on a webpage but it's existence is mentioned here: