Reviews of Internetrix

1. 
   raylay

   Reviewing 1.11 Beta (Apr 24, 2000)

   N0,NO,NO. This is BETAWARE. When do the beta testers US, get it free. Our computers pay the price. We have to fix them, after their BETAWARE bugs out. They should pay us. Yeah,Yeah,Yeah, I don't have to try it. I just think we should get the program free for our troubles.
2. 
   steve

   Reviewing 1.10 (Feb 16, 2000)

   I would only like to say that Adware SHOULD be a combination of Share/Ad ware, give the users a chance to register for a small fee to block the ad's, that seems to be a new trend taking off now.. Bullseye is another prog that offers this function and it is the best Share/Adware I have ever seen.
3. 
   gerryf

   Reviewing 0.99 (Dec 27, 1999)

   OK, don't really care for the freeware tag when it's adware, but that said it's a fine FTP program that does what you want and does it well. Nicely organized, intuitive...if you don' mind adware, then by all means give it a try. Just an aside, do people get this upset about television, magazines and newspapers (which are all supported by ads) or is it merely the misnomer "freeware" that's riling everyone up. This is a decent program and the programmer deserves a couple of bucks for his efforts. If I might suggest to the programmer, how about an adware/shareware deal, where the user can disable ads by paying a nominal license fee?
4. 
   MrDisco

   Reviewing 0.99 (Dec 27, 1999)

   where is v5?????
5. 
   asaenz

   Reviewing 0.99 (Dec 27, 1999)

   I didn't see advertising in this version which is good for now but it seems like the program is taking off in too many different directions. You might want to clearly define what it is supposed to do and then the user can determine it's usefulness for their particular needs.

Discuss Internetrix

No comments yet