Reviews of KM Note

1. 
   j02hn

   Reviewing 0.53a (Mar 2, 2009)

   It's true that it is heavy on memory, looks nice though
   I much rather Tiny Pad, which looks awesome and is extremely light (http://tinypad.info)
2. 
   Lick

   Reviewing 0.49 Beta (Aug 11, 2003)

   Good job with the fixes. I agree no sense in testing betas if you not going to send feedback directly to the program author. "testing betas" Not lets rip on the software, without an attempt to improve it.
   
   Keep up the good work. Let ya know if anything pops up.
3. 
   bangbang023

   Reviewing 0.48 Beta (Aug 10, 2003)

   Whiterose: as developer of this program, I would appreciate if you would contact me about these bugs. I release the BETA versions in hopes people will contact me about a bug that I missed.
4. 
   whiterose

   Reviewing 0.48 Beta (Aug 3, 2003)

   Firstly, I must say that this program has a very nice interface; the skins are excellent and the program looks great in general. However, there are some serious problems with this program. The most annoying fault that this program uses an enormous amout of RAM: with 7 notes open, it uses 32 megabytes! Additionally, the program often crashes when nearly any default is changed. For example, I tried to change the text font and size, only to be thrown an error and have all my notes become unreadable. Then, when I tried to start the program from a batch file, it complained because the batch file was not in the same directory as the program (for some reason, it started looking for program files in the directory from which the batch file was run). Though promising, this program has many bugs that need to be fixed for it to reach its true potential.
5. 
   vasarnap2000

   Reviewing 0.46 Beta (Jun 12, 2003)

   It is a shame that the Websamba site the developer uses is not available most of the time.

Discuss KM Note

No comments yet