Reviews of Microsoft Virtual PC

1. 
   us3r

   Reviewing 2007 SP1 (6.0.192.0) (Aug 5, 2009)

   Try to install Ubuntu Server Edition on it - the terminal would be fk glitchy, so you can't use it. M$ instead of developing the s***ty Win 7 XP Mode should update this crap.
2. 
   Raysy

   Reviewing 2007 SP1 (6.0.192.0) (Oct 31, 2008)

   I chose it, because it's easy to use. Never thought it would be so easy to virtualize. And it's of course 1000% Windows compatible, as an MS-product. Í'm not ashamed to write this ;-)
3. 
   RYAN2679

   Reviewing 2007 SP1 (6.0.192.0) (Aug 1, 2008)

   Microsoft should be ashamed for putting this product on the market. It has an main interface that's so basic it looks like a two year old created it. After TWO HOURS of installing Vista Home Premium I had NO SOUND, NO INTERNET and it ran INCREDIBLY SLOW even after adjusting the settings for best performance and changing the memory to 1280 MB. I've tried VirtualBox and VMware Workstation and by comparison they ran Vista Home Premium at normal speed and were a pleasure to use. Microsoft has a long way to go to make this program usable.
4. 
   moog

   Reviewing 2007 SP1 (6.0.192.0) (May 19, 2008)

   The answer is because VMware is bloatware
5. 
   bgronas

   Reviewing 2007 SP1 (6.0.192.0) (May 19, 2008)

   VMWare Workstation Rages way beyond this software. The servicepack does not make it any better. The question is the same as it is for Vista, Why would anyone use Vista or Virtual PC?

Discuss Microsoft Virtual PC

No comments yet