Reviews of Microsoft Windows Virtual PC

1. 
   Joco

   Reviewing 6.1.7600.16393 (Feb 12, 2011)

   VPC ?!?! Even a caveman will stay away from that crap. Here is one example: On 64 bits Windows OS, the CPU is 64 bits having VT capabilities. And yet, you cannot install a 64bits guest OS with VPC.
2. 
   rjparker1

   Reviewing 6.1.7600.16393 (Feb 10, 2011)

   -Better try the free Virtualbox from Sun or vmware options (not free). Some corporations never learn...-
   
   I agree Virtual PC is not good, however Virtualbox is even worse.. Try doing NAT some time, no communication from local machine to the VM by default.. Brilliant.
   
   If you REALLY want a good Virtualization, just use VM Ware player, it's free and it's good
3. 
   Floodland

   Reviewing 6.1.7234.0 RC (Aug 4, 2009)

   The worst option available, as said before: Another product destroyed by Microsoft incompetence...Virtual PC used to be a good product and now is slow, unreliable and sluggish.
   Better try the free Virtualbox from Sun or vmware options (not free). Some corporations never learn...
4. 
   guru_v

   Reviewing 6.1.7234.0 RC (Aug 4, 2009)

   There must be more to it than the description gives. Otherwise, Microsoft would appear to be cutting its own throat vis-a-vis Windows 7 versions that include XP mode.
5. 
   Aegis69

   Reviewing 6.1.7234.0 RC (Aug 4, 2009)

   Another once great product destroyed by microsoft. I have never been able to get anything other than microsoft products to run on it.
   
   Crap.
   
   Get virtualbox instead.

Discuss Microsoft Windows Virtual PC

No comments yet