Mono is a comprehensive open source development platform based on the .NET framework that allows IT and ISV developers to build Linux and cross-platform applications with unprecedented productivity. Mono's .NET implementation is based on the ECMA standards for C# and the Common Language Infrastructure.
- WCF client and server, the subset exposed by Silverlight 2.0
- LLVM support, to improve performance on server/computational loads
- Co-routine framework Mono.Tasklets
- Preview of LINQ to SQL using DbLinq
- New Soft Debugger, integrated with MonoDevelop 2.2
- Joint release with MonoDevelop 2.2.2
Reviewing 2.6.3 (Mar 30, 2010)
Not only this is based on patented stuff.
(It includes ECMA + other .NET stuff)
It's also a replica of something that has it's home on that platform.
They are trying to get developers use Windows to write cross platform.
To make certain it only/mostly/has the most certainty to work on Windows.
Developers, please don't use this .NET/MONO crap. MS can pull the plug any time. Do you research and invest in real cross-platform and free(dom) toolkits, API's, tools. Such as Python, Java, C/C++. Not in .NET clones/wannabe's. Do your research and discover how ugly the area is marked and bordered with .NET. (The flies are you, developers, not the users per se)
@elitegangsta
Get of your a** and do some trouble for not getting spanked, sued, trapped, abused. There is a reason for those ratings and it's more than high horses. I can assure you.
Reviewing 2.6 (Dec 16, 2009)
Fantastic. Has done wonderful things in the community. Viva la Open Source as well :)
I pity the people who are giving this 1 star ratings due to the fact it uses .NET... get off your high horse and learn something. Ignorance is NOT bliss...
Reviewing 2.6 Preview 1 (Dec 16, 2009)
Mono is targetting cross-platformness. So... what needs to be explained here...?
Here's an example of a sucessfull large enterprise-grade project that uses Mono:
http://medsphere.org/com...y/project/openvista-cis
http://medsphere.org/com...ect/openvista-appliance
Reviewing 2.6 Preview 1 (Nov 12, 2009)
Would it be better to write an Development Environment for Linux rather than writing Mono for Windows ? Sorry but I don't get the idea of Mono on Windows.
Reviewing 1.9_4 (Aug 15, 2008)
Very disappointing, but should have been expected from a too-many-dependencies software. Compared with the Microsoft .NET, Mono is twice as large, more memory hungry, more time to load (due to dependencies), and more slower too - although you might not notice it. Unless one only works in Windows environment, there is no need to even try it out.
No comments yet