Reviews of Mozilla Firefox Portable Edition

1. 
   anomoly

   Reviewing 3.5 RC3 (Jun 29, 2009)

   Very stabile and fast. However with no addons or plugins or anything, it still uses 60 MB of memory when minimized between it's 2 exe's.
   K-MeleonCCF?, which is also very portable?
   less than ten
   Good in the tor browser for sure. But definitely not my daily driver.
2. 
   caffeinejolt

   Reviewing 3.1 Beta 3 (Mar 18, 2009)

   I like the apps from portableaps.com and I think they allow users to try out betas easier than overwriting the local stable copy. I could not notice a huge speed increase with this beta, but I guess it seemed slightly snappier. I am hopeful Firefox can hit a homerun with this release and keep theor steady market share gains intact.
3. 
   Nahkanunna

   Reviewing 3.1 Beta 3 (Mar 18, 2009)

   Djucan & others having difficulties. It's normal to take longer the first time it starts as it checks extensions, converts old profile etc.
   
   Also the memory usage is better than almost any other browser. Getting better even.
   
   It's sad that fanboys give it 1 star, because they can - without any merit. Someone who doesnät know that much about software may even take your "review" into consideration.
   
   With B3 they have fixed some of the annoyances from previous beta, like last tab closing the browser with it, problems deleting items from history etc. I haven't installed all the normal extensions, so can't comment about the speed reliably yet. looks like a solid 5
4. 
   Djuzan Belic

   Reviewing 3.1 Beta 3 (Mar 18, 2009)

   Still nothing has changed about the most miserable parts of this browser, it's startup speed is ridiculously slow, also the interface reacts slow, browsing speed is sub-average, and memory- and cpu-usage are horrible.
5. 
   prghon

   Reviewing 3.1 Beta 2 (Jan 13, 2009)

   ... takes about a minute to start the first time.

Discuss Mozilla Firefox Portable Edition

No comments yet