Reviews of Mozilla Firefox (v3.6) for Windows

1. 
   DudeBoyz

   Reviewing 3.6.24 (Nov 22, 2011)

   3.6.x (now at 24) still works great on just about everything. All my plugins/addons remain functional and in tact and browsing each and every day is a pleasure. I like me some status bar!
   
   I really don't like that Mozilla has taken on the Chrome schedule It's not only a mess for plugin/addon writers and the like, but for anybody trying to get their company to actually consider Firefox as an option.
   
   Hope I don't have to leave 3.6.x anytime soon.
2. 
   jeck

   Reviewing 3.6.22 (Nov 4, 2011)

   I never had any real problems with v3; I believe I was using v3.6.18 when I first upgraded to v4.01.
   
   The only reason I upgraded was to see if v4 would handle heavy flash environments better than v3. V3 does handle Flash well, but in heavy Flash environments, at least for me, it tended to slow down and degrade a lot. V4 does handle the heavy Flash environments better than v3 and is faster overall, but v4 has problems.
   
   Firefox v3 is the most stable and reliable browser I've ever used and I had no problem with my add-on extensions with v3 either.
   
   v3 is still my favorite and I highly recommend it. If they can make the newer versions as stable and reliable as v3 then they will once again have a great browser, but they haven't achieved that yet.
3. 
   Sativarg

   Reviewing 3.6.22 (Sep 6, 2011)

   {{("Mozilla Firefox (v3.6) for Windows")}] 3.6.22
   or
   Mozilla Firefox (v3.6) build 3.6.22 for Windows
   or any thing but
   "Mozilla Firefox (v3.6) for Windows 3.6.22"
4. 
   TROLL

   Reviewing 3.6.22 (Sep 6, 2011)

   Windows 3.6.22 is never released just Windows 3.11
5. 
   Monkey_Punch

   Reviewing 3.6.20 (Aug 16, 2011)

   Bruno70, you're and idiot.

Discuss Mozilla Firefox (v3.6) for Windows

1. May 19, 2010 - 5:48 PM
   alanladd

   Anyone got any ideas as to why 3.6.3 will not open on Vista Home Premium x32? Even 3.5.9 won't open either.