Reviews of Netscape Navigator for Linux

1. 
   Dwiebelhaus

   Reviewing 9.0.0.3 (Nov 2, 2007)

   3 Because they plugged weather bug without permission.
2. 
   espectro

   Reviewing 6.2 (Oct 31, 2001)

   Improvements to 6.1 make this the best netscape yet, of course there is still much to be done, but they are on the right track if they want to recover some lost users.
   Still, for power users, i would recommend mozilla anytime.
3. 
   espectro

   Reviewing 6.1 (Aug 9, 2001)

   IE takes less to load because it´s part of the OS, thus a big part of it loads when windows does. Dont let this fool you!
   Netscape/Mozilla knows this and have implemented a turbo mode, which loads mozilla without windows when Windows starts. It´s still in development, too bad no plans for linux yet :(
   Still, mozilla/netscape is far from getting done, but it´s not going bad. Netscape 6 was based on mozilla 0.6, and now 6.1 on 0.9.2
   Go figure the improvement
4. 
   phdd

   Reviewing 6.1 (Aug 8, 2001)

   I want to see how faster will be 'IE for linux' - Netscape 6.1 rocks! I confess that loading time of N6 Win is slower than IE, by other hand I suspect that windows is slow because of IE. :-)
5. 
   drxym

   Reviewing 6.1 (Aug 8, 2001)

   The mail/news component has received many needed improvements since I commented on problems in 6.0. While I still miss thread watching (which is apparantly implemented but not visible!), the mail/news is now very usable and recommended. The rest of the browser also runs much faster, being more polished and robust. Simply put, there is nothing out there to match NS (or Moz) for industrial rendering and browsing experience. Konqueror and Opera don't even come close to it for rendering quality or features.

Discuss Netscape Navigator for Linux

No comments yet