Reviews of Nic's XviD Codec

1. 
   tsaar

   Reviewing Build 141204 (Sep 20, 2005)

   The movie runs ,HEHEE, in my historical computer,
   it's true , no need for other codecs more, this is the best codec EVER MADE !!!!!!!!
2. 
   kmleow

   Reviewing Build 141204 (Dec 15, 2004)

   There are other XVid decoders around but this one is the best. Even the others that also make similar XVid codecs say so.
3. 
   brunok

   Reviewing Build 141204 (Dec 15, 2004)

   WRFan...I run any Xvid encoded movie (with Koepi's codec, I didn't try Nic's on this computer) ina Pentium II 400 mhz, 64MB RAM and S3 ViRGE 4MB...that's a s***ty computer and it works great with BSplayer 1.0...if you want a lighter filter try ffdshow...it sucks but it's the lightest filter I've found...
4. 
   LongDragon

   Reviewing Build 141204 (Dec 15, 2004)

   WRFan, you must be a complete n00b.
   XviD is the best mpeg4 codec next to none.
5. 
   kashin

   Reviewing Build 141204 (Dec 15, 2004)

   I used to be a huge fan of DivX, but that was back when there weren't many high quality alternatives. Since then, I have become an avid supporter of XviD. That being said, I completely disagree with WRFan's post and I feel it has no merit. I've been using the XviD codec for a long time and have had absolutely no problems with it. I have/had several computers, ranging from a Celeron 450Mhz to a P4 3Ghz workstation, and they are all able to play back XviD videos flawlessly and without 100% CPU usage. Since WRFan failed to give any specific information (other than some unrelated rambling about changing the video file's header) I'm assuming he's using some dinosaur of a computer, hence the problems. Once again, XviD is a superb format and the price is right. :)

Discuss Nic's XviD Codec

No comments yet