Reviews of NoClone Home

1. 
   noclone

   Reviewing 2011-5.1.31 (May 17, 2012)

   Try this latest version of NoClone& you will know NoClone knows your computer best!!
2. 
   cassidy

   Reviewing 2007(4.1.35) (Nov 30, 2008)

   NoClone front end has serious usability issues that a serious programmer would not permit.
   
   Column widths for Year and Comments, for example, are almost the same as file path. While these are adjustable, a variety of actions (expanding a column past monitor display view, clicking on a column header to sort), eliminate these adjustments. There is no way to save the view the way you want it.
   
   In addition, in the middle of my first and second session, I was prompted to purchase NoClone. When I clicked away the message, my sessions were wiped out. This is 30-40 minutes of work reviewing and tagging duplicate files.
   
   This is no way to get someone to like your program.
   
   It's puzzling why the programmer did not concentrate on simple usability features, since this program potentially has a lot it could offer.
   
   After it destroyed my first two sessions, I am uninstalling this program, and not purchasing as intended. Being nagged to purchase is one thing, kicking a trial user out of a session because it isn't purchased within an hour or two of downloading is atrocious and not very user friendly.
3. 
   noclone

   Reviewing 4.1.10 (Sep 7, 2008)

   Price is now excellent: 10% off discount exclusively for FileForum
   http://noclone.net/buy.aspx?dc=FILEFO
4. 
   zridling

   Reviewing 4.0 (Aug 15, 2006)

   I like NoClone and this is a nice version upgrade, but have since moved on to CloneSpy, which is significantly faster and cleaner.
5. 
   zridling

   Reviewing 3.2.49 (Dec 30, 2005)

   Good points JMM, and I won't deny that Mo-Search is a great alternative. Mo-Search's ranking algorithm is both accurate and intuitive.

Discuss NoClone Home

No comments yet