Reviews of PEBundle

1. 
   Jeffsoft

   Reviewing 3.10 (Jan 20, 2004)

   better
2. 
   Jeffsoft

   Reviewing 3.00 Beta 1 (Oct 31, 2003)

   good one!
3. 
   FunkyFred

   Reviewing 2.00 Beta 6 (Sep 21, 2001)

   Seems like a good idea. Keeping dlls separate is sometimes annoying. One example of this is with VB runtime dlls. When coding a quick little utility that certainly wasnt big enough to justify creating an installer package or whatever delphi was always my preference due to not needing to worry whether run time dlls were installed on any PCs the util would be used on. With this I assume it would allow you to package the VB runtimes into the main exe thus removing the headache of making sure vb (etc) run time dlls are already in place.
4. 
   McGarrah

   Reviewing 1.00 Beta 3 (Aug 9, 2000)

   Great product.
   
   The argument about linking DLL's into an EXE has been around forever. Sometimes you do want to bundle a DLL with an EXE. Agreed it would be stupid to bundle DirectDraw DLL's with a commerical game but for a custom application this tool makes sense.
   
   Awhile back I was thinking about building this functionality into a custom utility I'd written. I'm glad PEBundle was around and have been using it for a couple of months in my testing. I've seen it improve drastically in that time. The author is definitely working on it actively and responds to bug reports and request for features.
   
   I've yet to put my custom utility into a production environment but will be buying and using a copy of PEBundle before I do.
5. 
   Aleq

   Reviewing 1.00 Beta 2 (Jul 2, 2000)

   However, sometimes it's good idea to have static binary :)

Discuss PEBundle

No comments yet