Paint.NET 3.5.11 Fileforum Pick

4.7 out of 5 stars 4.7 (1517 votes)

()

Windows 7/Server 2003/Server 2008/Vista/XP / Open Source / 5,630,519 downloads

Paint.NET is image and photo manipulation software designed to be used on computers that run Windows. It supports layers, unlimited undo, special effects, and a wide variety of useful and powerful tools. It started development as an undergraduate college senior design project mentored by Microsoft, and is currently being maintained by some of the alumni that originally worked on it. Originally intended as a free replacement for the MS Paint software that comes with Windows, it has grown into a powerful yet simple tool for photo and image editing. The programming language used to create Paint.NET is C#, with a small amount of C++ for installation and shell-integration related functionality.

Paint.NET is freeware, but the team is accepting donations here.

Reviews of Paint.NET

  1. 4 out of 5 stars
    Andem

    Reviewing 3.5.10 (Oct 3, 2012)

    Paint.NET is the program I use on all of the systems where I don't have a license for Adobe Photoshop, that is on all of the systems where I sometimes need to do light image editing such as resizing, cropping, adding text, etc.

    It is extremely fast and if you're not doing much more than minor image modifications, then Paint.NET is perfect. I have it installed on our home PC (which is a touch screen) and the kids love creating things with the touch screen.

  2. 5 out of 5 stars
    MikeTechno

    Reviewing 3.5.8 (Mar 8, 2011)

    I absolutely love this program. I am a professional photographer and use Paint.net for editing on 95% of the shots that I take now. Sure, there are things that this program can't do and that you need a program like Photoshop for, but those are things that most people are likely to need to do only once in a great while (and maybe never). Since this program came out, I have (almost) stopped using Photoshop all together. This program is so much smaller, lighter, faster, less boated and easier to use than a huge editing applications like Photoshop, that unless there is a specific reason to have to do so, Paint.net is just a far better tool to use for nearly all of your editing needs, at just about every level. Well done!

  3. 5 out of 5 stars
    PaulWilliams

    Reviewing 3.5.6 (Jan 21, 2011)

    This is so much easier to use than Photoshop. You can save in almost any image format, resize, crop, add layers, adjustments and effects. Basically Paint.NET is everything that Microsoft and Adobe programs should be, but aren't. Thanks for your hard work.

  4. 5 out of 5 stars
    us3r

    Reviewing 3.5.5 (Apr 27, 2010)

    Paint.NET v3.5.5 - Download, released on April 25th, 2010
    This update fixes a bug when saving 8-bit images, improves layer composition and Gaussian Blur performance, and is now updated to support the new .NET Framework 4.0 in some cases.

    * Fixed the bug where saving as 8-bit PNG/GIF/BMP wasn't always working, usually with larger images.
    * Improved the performance of the Gaussian Blur effect by 30-40%.
    * Improved the performance of all the layer blending modes by 15-30%.
    * Improved the performance of zooming with the mouse wheel on dual-core Intel Atom systems.
    * Updated to support .NET 4.0 if no other version of .NET is installed.
    * Reduced download size from 4.8MB down to 3.5MB.
    * Fixed a small error in the Chinese translation.

    Please note that the system requirements have been updated. For Windows XP, you must now have Service Pack 3 (SP3) installed; SP2 is no longer supported. For Windows Vista, you must now have Service Pack 1 installed.

  5. 3 out of 5 stars
    frankwick

    Reviewing 3.5.5 (Apr 26, 2010)

    I am a pro photo and this is not a Photoshop replacement for me. However, this tool is great for people who don't need a full-blown photoshop. If you use Photoshop Elements, then you should consider this tool. Paint.net is MUCH easier to use than the GIMP.

  6. 5 out of 5 stars
    Mystenes

    Reviewing 3.5.3 (Feb 9, 2010)

    Changes and fixes since v3.5.2:

    * Fixed DirectDraw Surface (.dds) file format support for CPUs which do not have SSE2 (Pentium III, Athlon XP)
    * Fixed an issue with the File->Save dialog related to file type plugins that were only written for opening (importing).
    * Fixed some crashes which were supposed to be "out of memory" errors.
    * Fixed a race condition with the New Image, Canvas Size, and Resize dialogs. If you typed extremely fast you could cause a crash by typing a negative number and immediately pressing OK or Enter.
    * Fixed a File->Save dialog issue in Win7/Vista where it could ask you about overwriting the wrong file.

  7. 3 out of 5 stars
    JustForMyMemory

    Reviewing 3.5.3 (Feb 9, 2010)

    i prefers GIMP for more advanced features.

    Paint.NET should be included in Windows so long ago as "basic paint program", but Microsoft did not.

  8. 5 out of 5 stars
    rstat1

    Reviewing 3.5.2 (Jan 20, 2010)

    Wouldn't use anything else. Plus its dependence on .NET is a non-issue since .NET is kind of embedded in windows now and has been for a while.

  9. 3 out of 5 stars
    nugro

    Reviewing 3.5.2 (Jan 5, 2010)

    changelog?

    While this is a great program on its own, I question the usefulness of it.
    I have this, GIMP, and your standard MS Paint on Win 7.
    I ended not using this, cause if I want to do something serious, GIMP is more powerful despite the horrendous UI and MS Paint if it's just a printscreen and small quick text placement is more than enough.

    And then we have Photofiltre which is also as good (or more) as this and faster cause no .Net dependency.

    3 stars for now.

  10. 5 out of 5 stars
    roj

    Reviewing 3.5.2 (Jan 4, 2010)

    DudeBoyz:

    First of all, .NET is the NOW of application development. Not the future, the NOW. Accept it and move on.

    Secondly, The GIMP is pure and utter garbage, rendered that way by a pathetic excuse for an interface that was designed by propeller-headed weenies FOR propeller-headed weenies - not humans. It is the equivalent of dropping a 442 engine block into a Lada. No one I know who uses Photoshop (including several professional graphics artists) would replace it with that ersatz.

    This program has both power and usability (something the GIMP cannot spell the "U" in) and is developed in a very credible application framework that is now standardized since two major Windows releases. It continues to grow, evolve and (again unlike the GIMP) enjoy interface enhancements. While no Photoshop replacement, it can easily hold its own against the GIMP or Paint Shop Pro.

    FIVE stars.

  11. 5 out of 5 stars
    gubmonte

    Reviewing 3.5.1 (Dec 13, 2009)

    So wait, you come to a program named "Paint.NET" just to rate it down because it uses .net? Again, all of your reviews seem to have jack to do with the application and instead focus on stuff that has little impact on the usability of the application. Stop being a troll Dudeboyz and rate the application for usability and not some oddball thing like using dot net when ".NET" is in the program title!

    On that note, Paint.NET is not designed to be a Gimp/Adobe PS replacement but a paintbrush replacement for windows. So comparing it to such tools is laughable and like comparing apples to seaweed. 5/5

  12. 3 out of 5 stars
    DudeBoyz

    Reviewing 3.5.1 (Nov 26, 2009)

    Dependence on DOT NET is a big negative, and GIMP has it all over this program. I see no reason to use this app given the alternatives.

    Yes, it has some ok features, and it is free, but it certainly is not the best in class - not by a long shot.

  13. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 3.5.1 (Nov 24, 2009)

    Bill2, um, multiple document editing has been a feature for almost 3 years, since the v3.0 release ...

  14. 4 out of 5 stars
    Bill2

    Reviewing 3.5.1 (Nov 23, 2009)

    Missing multiple documents editing but may be with version 4?
    It's a really good soft, having simples and advances features for simple and quick image edition.

  15. 5 out of 5 stars
    RWW

    Reviewing 3.5.1 (Nov 22, 2009)

    Sure hope you are wrong about your "about to go shareware" feeling.

  16. 5 out of 5 stars
    emanresU deriseD

    Reviewing 3.5.1 (Nov 21, 2009)

    The professional appearance and functionality this project is taking on give me the "about to go shareware" feeling... I hope I'm wrong.

  17. 5 out of 5 stars
    thartist

    Reviewing 3.5.1 (Nov 21, 2009)

    Much faster and way more beautiful than 3.36, and very well balanced in features for the medium-complexity tasks sector it targets. It doesn't lack a thing for the tasks i want to accomplish, but for being a program thought for home users, it could add some more artistic filters by default to toy with. An absolute pleasure to use.

  18. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 3.5.1 (Nov 20, 2009)

    New: For Windows 7, added taskbar progress reporting for long running operations (effects, adjustments, Image->Resize, save, install)
    Image
    · Made some corrections to the French translation
    · Running setup with /auto will no longer launch Paint.NET when it’s done
    · Fixed an issue where Paste into New Image would refuse an image on the clipboard, even if regular Paste would take it
    · Fixed a race condition with Edit->Paste and Image->Resize whereby it would take up 100% CPU and take between 1 minute to 1 hour to finish
    · Fixed an issues with Copy/Paste where it would leave an extra line of transparent pixels on the left, top, right, and/or bottom edges
    · Fixed lag with the paintbrush tool that was being seen on some systems
    · Fixed some issues with the paintbrush and eraser tool being misaligned when zoomed in
    · Fixed a crash that would happen at (seemingly) random times, such as after drawing with the paintbrush tool, on some systems
    · Fixed a minor and obscure rendering glitch with the Move Selected Pixels tool
    · Fixed an issue with glass over Remote Desktop or Windows 7 Virtual PC
    · Fixed a minor glitch whereby the "Unsaved Changes" confirmation dialog could never finish rendering the image thumbnail if one of the Move tools was active

  19. 5 out of 5 stars
    VilainChien

    Reviewing 3.50 (Nov 10, 2009)

    One of the best freeware to edit photos.

  20. 5 out of 5 stars
    schuler

    Reviewing 3.50 (Nov 10, 2009)

    good program

  21. 5 out of 5 stars
    emanresU deriseD

    Reviewing 3.50 (Nov 7, 2009)

    The first thing I noticed after updating to 3.5 was that it loads MUCH more quickly (after the initial launch, anyway). This is great because the previous version took an annoyingly-long time to load on my crappy old system.

  22. 5 out of 5 stars
    GadgetPig

    Reviewing 3.50 (Nov 7, 2009)

    Great freeware app that has evolved nicely in a relatively short period of time. Incredibly easy to use and very intuitive. Great for touch-ups, logos, web graphics, simple layering and text effects. Supports third party plugins for additional features, just google "paint.net plugins".

    @rom8_3139
    for missing spray paint feature, simply use the spray paint add-in: (part of plugin pack)

    http://www.isimonbrown.co.uk/plugin-pack.htm

    free GIMP "brushes" for the spray paint addin above:
    http://www.techzilo.com/gimp-brushes

    free paint.net tutorials:
    http://www.youtube.com/r...al&orig_query_src=4

  23. 5 out of 5 stars
    spiked

    Reviewing 3.50 (Nov 7, 2009)

    Still a great program, but no longer Open Source (officially beginning with version 3.5 released November 6, 2009 but informally announced on December 30, 2008 on the developer's forum).

  24. 2 out of 5 stars
    EMOgirl

    Reviewing 3.36 (May 27, 2009)

    aaaa

  25. 3 out of 5 stars
    rom8_3139

    Reviewing 3.36 (Mar 6, 2009)

    Although I think paint.net is a great update to ms paint, I'm very disappointed that they left out one of the most important tools you can have, and that is the spray tool....darn!

  26. 4 out of 5 stars
    brucola

    Reviewing 3.36 (Jan 23, 2009)

    Layers, effects, tools....II couldn't ask more for free. It's easy, complete and robust enough for every home user.

  27. 4 out of 5 stars
    MikeB

    Reviewing 3.36 (Dec 10, 2008)

    Great free program, 4 out of 5 from me. I would have given it higher but it doesn't support the .8bf format ( http://dotwhat.net/8bf/6039/ ) among others - which is a slight shame.

  28. 5 out of 5 stars
    shelb

    Reviewing 3.36 (Nov 29, 2008)

    Is there ANY free or affordable program that includes magnetic lasso? No- so it is irrelevant to mention it. Paint.net is a good balance between ease of use and features. GIMP is more powerful, but only a few % of people will be able to learn to use it. Picasa can't do much. If you need TWAIN it only takes a few seconds to scan/upload to Irfanview and then copy and paste into paint.NET.

  29. 1 out of 5 stars
    picsoetje

    Reviewing 3.36 (Nov 16, 2008)

    I just bought PhotoShop Elements 6 for only $25 via a totaly legal sales channel.
    If I would have decided to use Paint.Net on a permanent basis, I would have spent the same amount of money for a donation.
    The programs are however not at all comparable : PhotoShop is much more powerful and much more user friendly.
    A 1-rating because people are invited to make a donation for a program that does not even have a "magnetic lasso" or a "quick selection tool".
    Oh and by the way : PSE6 does Twain too (without cutting and pasting via another intermediate program).
    PDN is better than Windows Paint like so many others - but that's about it.

  30. 5 out of 5 stars
    argybee

    Reviewing 3.36 (Oct 29, 2008)

    For free ! this has got to be 6 out of 5 stars.

  31. 4 out of 5 stars
    twood

    Reviewing 3.36 (Sep 12, 2008)

    It's a good program for users who have no image editting experience. small download and install makes it powerful for its size, although. Not as powerful an application as I need. so it gets a 4/5.

  32. 4 out of 5 stars
    myboy

    Reviewing 3.36 (Sep 12, 2008)

    Good but still missing some things such as re-editable text and re-editable nubs on the lines/curves. Once you save, that's it. Oh, it doesn't feather the selection (although there is a 3rd party plugin for it) and the paint brush only has one shape.

  33. 4 out of 5 stars
    Galifray

    Reviewing 3.36 (Aug 27, 2008)

    It's a good, strong program, but it has some flaws that have not been fixed. On slower systems, like mine, it can take ten or more seconds to open images, regardless of the image's size. The program simply hangs with a busy cursor until it's finally ready. This is a real annoyance when I'm attempting to open several images at once, or I've pasted content into a new image.

  34. 5 out of 5 stars
    Metshrine

    Reviewing 3.36 (Aug 27, 2008)

    This is one of those programs which, if changed to commercial status, I would gladly pay for just because of the years of free use I have been given out of this program. I cannot rate this higher than a 5 on bn, but it deserves much higher. Use it, you won't regret it

  35. 5 out of 5 stars
    shdwstar

    Reviewing 3.35 (Jul 29, 2008)

    This is one of the best open source graphics programs out there.
    I wrote a more detailed review for it at http://mzk.gofreeserve.c...s.php?lng=en&pg=127

  36. 5 out of 5 stars
    argybee

    Reviewing 3.35 (Jul 8, 2008)

    As freeware this is truly a work of art!
    Superb... thank you all.

  37. 3 out of 5 stars
    jogygeorge

    Reviewing 3.35 (Jul 8, 2008)

    If only this would allow us to use the 8bf filters we have collected over the years!

  38. 4 out of 5 stars
    Co0L

    Reviewing 3.35 (Jul 8, 2008)

    Very nice entry level photo editing software.
    Extra plus for variety of (free) plug-ins.
    Missing TWAIN-support is a minus, there still are huge amount of twain scanners on users desks ...

  39. 4 out of 5 stars
    Johnbald1

    Reviewing 3.35 (Jul 8, 2008)

    Solid medium type photo editing program. Not in the caliber of photoshop, PhotoImpact, or Paintshop Pro but a good solid program for the average person who does not have intense knowledge of advanced graphic software

  40. 5 out of 5 stars
    NunjaBusiness

    Reviewing 3.35 (Jul 8, 2008)

    Calling this program "MS Paint-like" is similar to calling the new Mercedes SLK "VW Beetle-like."
    Let's face it, Paint.NET is what MS Paint SHOULD HAVE evolved into several years ago.

  41. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 3.35 (Jul 7, 2008)

    Doesn't need to.

  42. 3 out of 5 stars
    skidmarks

    Reviewing 3.35 Beta 2 (Jun 26, 2008)

    Doesn't support twain scanning :(

  43. 5 out of 5 stars
    Winkler

    Reviewing 3.31 (May 3, 2008)

    Perfect and easy to use!

  44. 4 out of 5 stars
    ahjefri

    Reviewing 3.31 (May 3, 2008)

    missing basic rotate, flip Hor,Ver within selected area,

    Otherwise this program has improve a lot in performance and adding useful filters.

  45. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 3.31 (May 2, 2008)

    Already beats photoshop if you just want a light editor that is fast.

    I don't want a bloated heavy photoediting app. If it heads that way I bail.

  46. 5 out of 5 stars
    madmike

    Reviewing 3.31 (May 2, 2008)

    Top stuff, looking forward to the day - which will eventually come round, when it beats Photoshop

  47. 3 out of 5 stars
    skidmarks

    Reviewing 3.30 (Apr 23, 2008)

    When is it going to support twain drivers/scanners?

    With that feature, it's freeware perfection!

  48. 5 out of 5 stars
    And|

    Reviewing 3.30 (Apr 23, 2008)

    @roj

    How can it be a "Gimp kill" when it only comes to Microsoft windows? It would be a gimp killa, if it came to linux and mac :)

  49. 5 out of 5 stars
    roj

    Reviewing 3.30 (Apr 14, 2008)

    Excellence that keeps getting better.

    GIMP killa.

    FIVE stars.

  50. 4 out of 5 stars
    AntiochMedia

    Reviewing 3.30 (Apr 12, 2008)

    It's a very capable, full featured application.

    However, those comparing it to Photoshop are making a huge error. Photoshop does have many features that Paint.net lacks, namely support of the ubiquitous PSD format that is essential when using PAINT.net for commercial reasons and exchanging files with other people in the industry. It's for the same reason that any office suite must be backwards compatible with Microsoft Office.

    If you read the plans for v4.0, you'll note that upcoming features are all features present in Photoshop and features that are widely used by professionals:

    http://www.getpaint.net/roadmap.html

    The PAINT.net team has made a fantastic product, and I think that they are doing a wonderful job of providing an alternative to Photoshop that is a more viable option to GIMP.

  51. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 3.30 (Apr 11, 2008)

    Great program... but why bother zipping it for a savings of ~6K? Silly-Wilies!

  52. 5 out of 5 stars
    yokozuna

    Reviewing 3.30 (Apr 11, 2008)

    Me too! I hate the interface of the GIMP! I am not a newbie - I use Photoshop at work and I have worked with Paint Shop Pro for almost a decade (till Corel has g**ed the app)!
    Paint.NET - 6/5!

  53. 5 out of 5 stars
    oafed

    Reviewing 3.30 (Apr 11, 2008)

    Paint.Net is the best free photo editor that I've used. I recommend it to everybody. There is no way I'd ever recommend GIMP to the average user. Like the guy, I also prefer Paint.Net to GIMP.

  54. 5 out of 5 stars
    SuzzyWoozy

    Reviewing 3.30.3019 RC1 (Apr 9, 2008)

    This is tool, that can do virtually everything (no kidding) that Photoshop is doing - if you have the knowledge and creativity for it; is free and open source. I don't care if it does not support magnetic lasso, or other small features that can be accomplished with other edit operations... for me is 5 out of 5.

    Good job guys!

  55. 5 out of 5 stars
    nailzs

    Reviewing 3.30.2993 Beta 2 (Mar 16, 2008)

    I actually prefer Paint.NET to Gimp.

  56. 4 out of 5 stars
    theyletmein

    Reviewing 3.30.2980 Beta 1 (Mar 11, 2008)

    Still awesome though I would like for them to have an option keep the ratio when resizing manually as well as better text support. Also, worth nothing that being beta, this is program suffers from crashes when using 3rd party plugins. So if you use a lot of plugins, it's best to use the stable.

  57. 5 out of 5 stars
    keir

    Reviewing 3.30.2980 Beta 1 (Mar 3, 2008)

    And that's worth giving it 1/5? Get some perspective!

  58. 5 out of 5 stars
    tatool

    Reviewing 3.30.2980 Beta 1 (Feb 29, 2008)

    Don't mess with the best ;-) Simply, but powerful - and it's free! Absolutely MUST HAVE!

  59. 5 out of 5 stars
    madmike007

    Reviewing 3.30.2980 Beta 1 (Feb 29, 2008)

    Absolutley Fantastic, Freeware that (in due course) might even take on the mighty photoshop. Keep up the good work:)

  60. 4 out of 5 stars
    Jorpheus

    Reviewing 3.22 (Feb 26, 2008)

    Wonderful stuff, if a bit limited in scope, but I've had major issues with installing the new version, and nothing on their forums helped much, and it was finally solved by installing an older version and then a newer over it. I suspect it's phanthom of the .NET opera of really bad ideas from our beloved software tyrant, erm I mean giant, sorry.

  61. 5 out of 5 stars
    Floodland

    Reviewing 3.22 (Jan 14, 2008)

    Pretty and usefull application. One of the very limited .net applications that work as they should.
    I think this may be the exception that confirm the rule: .net is pathetic...

  62. 5 out of 5 stars
    GoodThings2Life

    Reviewing 3.22 (Jan 14, 2008)

    Excellent program all the way around, and I always look forward to the new features in each release. It's easy to use, and it's generally fast and stable.

    I'm a huge fan of the fact that the default format is PNG, since JPG image quality degrades over time, and it's just as compatible with GIF and JPG formats (unless you use transparency and IE6, but seriously, it's time to upgrade browsers already).

  63. 4 out of 5 stars
    Fidelio

    Reviewing 3.22 (Jan 13, 2008)

    This is a great program... I've been using it since it first became available and seen how it has evolved. Issues/bugs are fixed pretty quick and having in mind this is a FREE app, that was designed to replace the Paint application included in Windows, you get an amazing set of features.

    Keep the good work!

  64. 4 out of 5 stars
    rsx508

    Reviewing 3.22.2925 Beta 2 (Jan 5, 2008)

    Very nice for a free product. Still needs more tools and features to replace others, but it is very helpful.

  65. 5 out of 5 stars
    white lightning

    Reviewing 3.22.2925 Beta 2 (Jan 5, 2008)

    Great software & easy to use .
    I would like to see Outline objects plug-in in the next Beta release

  66. 4 out of 5 stars
    keir

    Reviewing 3.22.2918 Beta (Dec 28, 2007)

    it would be great if my chosen format would persist, I must have changed from png to jpg over 1000 times by now when saving scans, that's a lot of clicking I shouldn't have to do.

  67. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 3.22.2918 Beta (Dec 28, 2007)

    It would be great if the /auto parameter also worked silently so I could install this via batch script quietly...

  68. 5 out of 5 stars
    wiak

    Reviewing 3.20 (Dec 21, 2007)

    Great photo editing tool, looks great, supports 64-bit OS, loads RAW (NEF) 10mpix images fast using the Weird Silence's Raw File Plugin or rawloader with dcraw (supports most SLR cameras with RAW), supports plugins, check out the forums, does not cost you bank (600 usd vs Free!), supports layers, great for school work, my aunt is a teacher and is useing it

  69. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 3.20 (Dec 19, 2007)

    wox, It absolutely can edit two images at once. Just use the File->Open command twice, then click the respective thumbnail in the upper right of the window to switch between the two images... tada.

  70. 3 out of 5 stars
    wox

    Reviewing 3.20 (Dec 18, 2007)

    Just found out that the program cannot edit two images at once.
    If I'm editing one image and want to copy something from another image into this one, I have to use another program to open that image.
    The first time, I did a lot of editing on one image, and when opening a new one, all my work was lost.
    Paint.NET NEVER alerted me to save my work.
    How sad. Would've gotten a 5/5 but this is a big downside.

    @panic82:
    have you EVER used Photoshop? Saying that this is even "close" just proves how much you know.

  71. 4 out of 5 stars
    panic82

    Reviewing 3.20 (Dec 13, 2007)

    Great app. From a feature perspective it's not quite Photoshop (but close), but from a pricing perspective (free) it beats the crap out of photoshop!

    @oomingmak
    Are you serious? Who the f uses 2000 anymore? You make it sound like they stopped supporting 2000 "just because". I'm sure there's a technical limitation of some sort.

  72. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 3.20 (Dec 13, 2007)

    Incredible work. Light is the key, and it's stayed that way. This is not a photoshop replacement. Why? We don't need one. we need something basic users can use and get their feet wet into. this is what we use...

  73. 5 out of 5 stars
    bobad

    Reviewing 3.20 (Dec 13, 2007)

    Good, and getting better. The authors are trying to keep the program light, which is very wise and commendable. I wish they would make it portable like PhotoFiltre, another 5/5 photo editor. People tend to use 2-3 computers these days, and portability is getting to be a must. I consider Paint.Net and PhotoFiltre to be tied for best Freeware graphics editor. Gimp may be a little more powerful, but I consider the exploding window GUI to be unusable. Thanks to the authors of Paint.Net for a worthy and usable photo editor.

  74. 5 out of 5 stars
    gehtnix

    Reviewing 3.20 (Dec 13, 2007)

    Nice piece. It's somehow like Photoshop 3 which i still have archived on my pc, somewhere. A very good alternative and free application for doing some basic picture editing and even creating own grafics.
    I rate it 5 for being free, if it was a commercial demo in the price range of 20,- - 30,- US$ i would rate it 4. Maybe.

  75. 5 out of 5 stars
    aruprc

    Reviewing 3.20 (Dec 13, 2007)

    Excellent, a very light and functional free alternative to many expensive PS type programs. Best of all, it has native x64 support for XP, that means with resource hungry big images, you get full speed from your x64CPU in case you are running XPx64.

  76. 3 out of 5 stars
    oomingmak

    Reviewing 3.20 Release Candidate 1 (Dec 10, 2007)

    Pretty good program.

    Minus 2 points for deliberately making it not work on Windows 2000.

  77. 3 out of 5 stars
    b0mmel

    Reviewing 3.20 Release Candidate 1 (Dec 9, 2007)

    I don't have a need for this program as it's so limited. It can't work with fonts having Postscript outlines (OpenType/T1). The Gimp is much better.

  78. 5 out of 5 stars
    rotjong

    Reviewing 3.20 Release Candidate 1 (Dec 9, 2007)

    A superb freeware program!

  79. 5 out of 5 stars
    wox

    Reviewing 3.10 (Dec 2, 2007)

    Very, very good. More than enough for me, perhaps because I don't need much.
    For those that compare it to Gimp and PhotoShop, get a brain. Paint.net is supposed to be an advanced version of mspaint, not a free version of PhotoShop.
    For a free alternative to PhotoShop, Gimp is a winner- not Paint.NET

  80. 5 out of 5 stars
    yokozuna

    Reviewing 3.20 Alpha 2 (Nov 12, 2007)

    0.02$ In general something is wrong with the organisation of FileForum. IMO the organisation of Softpedia is better - the program would be announced there as Paint.NET 3.10 Final/Paint.NET 3.20 alpha 2 with links to both versions.

    The proggie is great. I love it!

  81. 5 out of 5 stars
    arjesus

    Reviewing 3.20 (Nov 6, 2007)

    i didnt understand that either, and they changed the screenshot for the changelog link.. well, still its an awesome prog and very useful

  82. 5 out of 5 stars
    horsecharles

    Reviewing 3.20 (Nov 6, 2007)

    Why the separate thread for this release?

  83. 5 out of 5 stars
    hell0

    Reviewing 3.10 (Oct 24, 2007)

    Keep crying you babies, this app is great.

  84. 4 out of 5 stars
    roj

    Reviewing 3.10 (Oct 22, 2007)

    This would be a wonderful app - if I could use it.

    Unfortunately, it is incompatible with Windows Magnifier which I need to be able to see things like the options and configuration panels. Those panels are invisible to Magnifier - and also a host of other screen enhancement / enlarging tools.

    My son uses it and from his description of the feature set, it's quite a piece of work. However, lack of Magnifier and screen enhancement tools is a show stopper for me.

    FOUR stars.

  85. 5 out of 5 stars
    Point Zero

    Reviewing 3.10 (Aug 24, 2007)

    Fantastic piece of software !

  86. 5 out of 5 stars
    rsx508

    Reviewing 3.10 Beta 2 (Aug 23, 2007)

    It should have been named Photo.Net since it doesn't have things like airbrushing, smearing, or off-canvas placement of objects. However, with respect to image editing and enhancement, it rocks (for being free). Each upgrade continues to show major progress.

  87. 5 out of 5 stars
    Pensador

    Reviewing 3.08 (Aug 22, 2007)

    I use this program to quickly edit pictures (crop, resize, etc). It is quick, light and does exactly what I need it!

    Just one thing: I wish it would remember the last tool I used—I always mess my pictures thinking I have the selection tool selected!

  88. 5 out of 5 stars
    xsnred

    Reviewing 3.10 Beta 2 (Aug 12, 2007)

    It started out as replacement for MS paint, at what point will it be a replacement for Photoshop. Eventually you will lose the people who just want to dabble in photo editing. Nevertheless, it is a great program and hats off to the developers.

  89. 5 out of 5 stars
    some guy

    Reviewing 3.10 Beta 2 (Aug 12, 2007)

    great free program should be in Linux destro

  90. 4 out of 5 stars
    A_T

    Reviewing 3.10 Beta (Jul 30, 2007)

    Great program. Just a shame the CPU gets flooded when using the magic wand tool.

  91. 5 out of 5 stars
    bobad

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jul 7, 2007)

    This program just gets better and better. Is it just me, or is it also getting smaller and quicker?

    One problem. When doing an automatic update from 3.07 to 3.08, my Paint.Net files disappeared. That was a shock, because it usually updates just fine.

  92. 5 out of 5 stars
    dawmail333

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 6, 2007)

    Who needs expensive stuff like Photoshop with great freeware like this? Make sure you check for plugins and effects!

  93. 4 out of 5 stars
    A_T

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 5, 2007)

    Good program. Shame it swamps my CPU when using the magic wand.

  94. 4 out of 5 stars
    thehunger

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 3, 2007)

    Coming soon to Linux (and possibly Mac OS X) thanks to Mono, the open source implementation of .NET.

    http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/May-15-1.html

  95. 5 out of 5 stars
    RWW

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 3, 2007)

    I appreciate this program so much. I try to teach some graphics to others on their machines and always wish they had Photoshop so I could do it right. Paint.Net is the only freeware that let's me get even close.

  96. 5 out of 5 stars
    ricktendo64

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 2, 2007)

    Keep It Simple Stupid... Thanks Paint.NET Team

  97. 5 out of 5 stars
    internetworld7

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 2, 2007)

    Pain.NET is an excellent product and a must have for me.

  98. 5 out of 5 stars
    screamin_jesus

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 2, 2007)

    this is a great lightweight app for quick photo editing, my favorite.

  99. 5 out of 5 stars
    forresterinc

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 2, 2007)

    An excellent freeware tool -- does everything I need. Easier than the Gimp, IMHO. The GUI beeter matches the Windows GUI.

    @ V.A.: crop is found under menu: Image -> Crop to Selection (Ctrl-Shift-X)
    File -> Acquire gives you the option to read an image from a Scanner of Camera, it works for me with my digicam.

  100. 3 out of 5 stars
    Johnbald01

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 2, 2007)

    Not a bad program for free, it is a little past basic as it has some of the better features of a graphic software. It cannot be compared with Photoshop elements, PSP, PhotoImpact not on that level.

  101. 4 out of 5 stars
    utomo

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 1, 2007)

    Great software, as alternative.
    However it still need some improvements
    Good critics are welcome.

    critics which is not true, is a junk.

  102. 5 out of 5 stars
    ModderXManiac

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 1, 2007)

    Does not have as many features as The Gimp, but it's simplistic interface and small install size makes up for this.

    With plugins and fast development, this could render photoshop useless...But for being sponsored by Microsoft, surely they could hire more than two developers?

  103. 5 out of 5 stars
    Second Shadow

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 1, 2007)

    Yes, it looks like Adobe decided to hire some trolls to post in this forum :D
    They must be beginning to feel the heat ....
    Anyway, scanning is supported by Paint.NET via the new standard (WIA) and cropping IS easy.
    Just wanted to set things straight ...
    This is an excellent piece of software.

  104. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 1, 2007)

    Scanning and cropping work fine for me? what is this, a war between paid for products and free ones?

  105. 1 out of 5 stars
    Adrian79

    Reviewing 3.08 (Jun 1, 2007)

    no easy crop tool?

  106. 1 out of 5 stars
    V.A

    Reviewing 3.08 Beta (May 30, 2007)

    It does not suppport TWAIN, what a pitty !
    This means that you cannot acquire a scanned image from you TWAIN scanner.

  107. 3 out of 5 stars
    taxis

    Reviewing 3.08 Beta (May 30, 2007)

    The interface of this application is very well written, runs smooth and looks impressive. The functionality is still very basic; most advancement over Paint are just strange effects which are nice to watch once but in my opinion don't help much for seriously editing pictures. Others like adaptations according to a histogram are already nice to look at but lack configuration options (like defining a function that defines how the colour space should be transformed).

    As the overall quality seems good, it is a pity that the .NET environment was chosen (starting with an installation that tells me to wait because my system is configured for optimised performance, although I only expected it to install the software).

  108. 5 out of 5 stars
    Diam0nd

    Reviewing 3.08 Beta (May 29, 2007)

    Quality stuff.

  109. 5 out of 5 stars
    Diam0nd

    Reviewing 3.07 (May 28, 2007)

    If there is a FREE program like this out there, Adobe is NOT doing its job good enough.

  110. 1 out of 5 stars
    vercinstex

    Reviewing 3.07 (May 19, 2007)

    maybe cool but not till it support all win system also without service pack

  111. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 3.07 (May 9, 2007)

    installed fine for me. tested on up to date Vista and XP SP2.

  112. 5 out of 5 stars
    tinkerdill

    Reviewing 3.07 (May 8, 2007)

    what can i say. easy, fast, simple and still like professional. thanks!!!

  113. 5 out of 5 stars
    bigmama

    Reviewing 3.07 (May 8, 2007)

    best image processing tool

  114. 5 out of 5 stars
    rsx508

    Reviewing 3.07 Beta (May 4, 2007)

    Very nice! Been a longtime user of PN and it's nice to a project progressing so well. I'd still like to see an airbrush tool, some additional text effects, and maybe enhanced spline vertex editing, but this is still a nice upgrade. Great work!

  115. 5 out of 5 stars
    ModderXManiac

    Reviewing 3.07 Beta (Apr 26, 2007)

    Now small enough to fit on a floppy disk! Kudos to that, by the time this reaches a 5 meg download size again, the number of features will be phenominal.

    While not being as feature-filled as GIMP, it's definitely a smaller download, nicer interface, and less of a resource hog.

    For having only two programmers,or even a dozen, this project is excellent, despite being funded by M$ :D

  116. 5 out of 5 stars
    Hazim_azim5020AD

    Reviewing 3.07 Beta (Apr 26, 2007)

    Hem...nothing happen yet...but why the effect still the same..is there any plugin that we can install like photoshop...

  117. 5 out of 5 stars
    G0tchas

    Reviewing 3.05 (Apr 24, 2007)

    Great program! Don't ever stop enhancing it.

    Just one small request - never stop it from working in XP. I refuse to upgrade to Vista until it's at least been on the market for 5 years and MS has plugged all the wholes on it.

    Apart from that, fantastic tool.

  118. 5 out of 5 stars
    Adrian79

    Reviewing 3.05 (Mar 30, 2007)

    kramy.. windows2000? one word... upgrade.

    we are getting closer to the year 2008 skip xp go straight to vista ultimate btw

  119. 5 out of 5 stars
    benyahuda

    Reviewing 3.05 Beta (Mar 27, 2007)

    PaintDotNet is quite useful for me as it does some things in a fraction of the time that they could be done in Photoshop.

    They complement each other in a way that makes my day much simpler.

    Thanks people.

  120. 5 out of 5 stars
    bigmama

    Reviewing 3.05 Beta (Mar 26, 2007)

    " ...... It started development as an undergraduate college senior design project mentored by Microsoft, and is currently being maintained by some of the alumni that originally worked on it. Originally intended as a free replacement for the MS Paint software that comes with Windows ....... "

    -----------------------------------------

    I like MsPaint, I'm not a n00bie but for some silly jobs like copy-pasting screenshots,
    bitmap-2-jpeg etc, msPaint is great.

    i know it's not paintshop, gimp or photoshop but...

    ---------------------

    i don't understand why microsoft doesn't include this fine piece of software in windows by default

    Programs MsPaint & Notepad are good but they have been the same since windows 95

    -----------------------------

    Paint .NET is great and FREE! 5 out of 5. thnx

    -----------------------------

  121. 4 out of 5 stars
    Kramy

    Reviewing 3.01 (Mar 25, 2007)

    v3.0 no longer supports Windows 2000. A bit sad, since Win2k suffers from MSpaint as well, but nothing we can do about that.

    Found the last version to support Win2k:
    http://tinyurl.com/2opk6n

    Would be nice if betanews mirrored it, for people with Win2k.

  122. 5 out of 5 stars
    mikefromuk

    Reviewing 3.01 (Feb 26, 2007)

    Excellent program, having just bought Photoshop CS2 - with due resentment, I am hoping in future , when I need an alternative that this program comes of age and knocks PS off the post

  123. 5 out of 5 stars
    Vimes

    Reviewing 3.01 (Feb 26, 2007)

    A pleasure to use, especially after trying the now bloated PSP.

  124. 5 out of 5 stars
    uberfly

    Reviewing 3.01 (Feb 26, 2007)

    Great app, free or not. This program is great to learn and use indefinitely on its own merit, or even as a jumping off point to a higher-end program like Photoshop. The interface is very clear and standardized.

  125. 5 out of 5 stars
    VirtualGhost

    Reviewing 3.0 (Feb 4, 2007)

    This is an awesome piece of software! However, unless I just haven't found it, there doesn't seem to be a direct way to "browse" a particular folder. You have to keep going back and opening individual files. Am I missing something?

  126. 5 out of 5 stars
    hemu_u

    Reviewing 3.0 (Feb 1, 2007)

    very nice software and plz ignore that crap rating by 'lesliejb' with equally f* comment!

    The features I like most are:
    1) Layers (you can use visibility control to get an effect of transparent wallpaper!!!)
    2) Undo (history)
    3) Lots of effects.

    Gimp look promising too, but is slow as compared to this.

  127. 5 out of 5 stars
    Chacky

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 30, 2007)

    Does everything an everyday computer user needs. Very fast and easy to use.

  128. 5 out of 5 stars
    guitardave78

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 30, 2007)

    Superb! Still the easiest to use freebie photo editor!
    The autolevels is better than photoshop as well.
    Still needs layer masks to help with image cut outs!!

  129. 5 out of 5 stars
    cacko

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 30, 2007)

    Very handy!

  130. 5 out of 5 stars
    gabtrat

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 29, 2007)

    Proves to be a very promising photo editor & one I will definitely keep my eye on.

    If it ever adds the ability to group layers into folders and something like Photoshop's blending options it will become my number 1 choice.

  131. 5 out of 5 stars
    ricktendo64

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 28, 2007)

    Beats the crap out of MSPaint... Thank YOU!

  132. 4 out of 5 stars
    Johnbald01

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 27, 2007)

    This is a good intermediate type photo editor. It does more than the basic photo editors in comparison to standard Paint, or even Irfanview, but it of course does not come close to programs such as Paint Shop Pro or PhotoImpact.
    Tools are standarized and easy to recognize across other platforms, is small in size overall a pretty solid program.

  133. 5 out of 5 stars
    yokozuna

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 27, 2007)

    Paint.NET is a gem!

    However, gems can be further polished. I miss following things:
    - Linux port
    - magnetic lasso
    - compatibility with Photoshop plug-ins (at least basic functionality like PhotoFiltre Studio or Paint Shop Pro)
    - opening RAW files (dcraw is open source...)
    - denoising and purple fringing removal
    - better autolevel algorithms and putting the button in a visible place (you have to digg it now)

    Anyway, I am impressed by Paint.NET!

  134. 3 out of 5 stars
    laurince

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 26, 2007)

    Very nice program, but why drop win2k support?

  135. 3 out of 5 stars
    DudeBoyz

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 26, 2007)

    I also agree - there seems no reason to drop 2k support.

    Nice concept, slick design, but it doesn't feel quite "finished", ya know?

    Maybe it needs more configuration options, such as anti-aliased and/or feathered selection settings.

    Also, the Red Eye thing is just garbage. Pupils should come out black, not green or whatever. Not enough refinement controls for blur / feather / etc.

    I hope that they keep up the good work, cause for a FREE program, it's pretty nice, even with all that .NET junk you need to run it.

  136. 5 out of 5 stars
    Pensador

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 26, 2007)

    Once upon a time, Adobe Photoshop...

  137. 5 out of 5 stars
    antigin

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 26, 2007)

    Yeeah!! Finally!! First release version with MDI support! Awesome.

  138. 5 out of 5 stars
    Altman

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 26, 2007)

    WOW, Nice program. I have used Photoshop and I think I like this better. I know it doesn't have the same amount of features as Photoshop but they were features I didn't use. I love the new feature with having multiple pictures open at once.

  139. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 26, 2007)

    My users love this app. Good work! Donate!

  140. 5 out of 5 stars
    Mandeep

    Reviewing 3.0 (Jan 26, 2007)

    The only problem I had with the earlier versions is that they took too long to load, almost as long as PSP and Photoshop. With the new version I can click on the shortcut and it opens instantly. Same ole program but even faster now. Nothing has changed from the RCs from what I can see.

  141. 4 out of 5 stars
    z0TK

    Reviewing 3.0 RC1 (Jan 26, 2007)

    Its a good application but the only thing to me is
    the lock down when the beta period expires a real
    pain in the arse.

    So i give it 4

  142. 5 out of 5 stars
    skrag

    Reviewing 3.0 RC1 (Jan 24, 2007)

    I find a couple of things both amazing and somewhat amusing. First I find the Paint.NET program pretty amazing and that is it just darn good and offered to users for FREE! That is the amazing part, and I also find both amazing AND amusing how some people will come to a site like this to rail on a program such as this and make disparaging comments about the program and tout the fact that there are other better ones, yaddah, yaddah, yaddah... what is amusing to me is WHY do they come here in the first place? If other stuff is so much better, or they have it so good on some other front, then shew, shew, be off with you... go play with your other toys! I am glad someone has the skills, the time and talent and just desire to create something for others to use because they can, and because others appreciate it. Keep GOING! I find this program to be just GREAT! Photoshop it ain't... YET! But does it cost near as much as Photoshop!? ;-) And it has plenty of power for a lot of us. About the only thing I have difficulty with in most cases is how text is handled. I admit I am used to how Photoshop handles text more or less as an object that can be resized, etc. on the fly and I can't seem to do this in Paint.NET, but that isn't enough to disuade me from using it in the least.

  143. 5 out of 5 stars
    belthurgp

    Reviewing 3.0 RC1 (Jan 21, 2007)

    @tipsboy,

    I bet you haven't written a line of code in your life. You have no right to degrade the hard work of others. I am sure there are other better applications, go and use it. Why do you come and b**** here?

    Instead of cribbing about something not working, why don't you write something even remotely equivalent to Paint.NET. I am sure you just don't have the brains to do it.

  144. 4 out of 5 stars
    ChristOff

    Reviewing 3.0 RC1 (Jan 20, 2007)

    @tipsyboy: it has nothing to do with MS... this prove how far you've gone with testing this app

    I personnaly find this program is really good for its category. Of course it doesn't compete with heavier ones (like photoshop, paint shop pro, etc). It's fast, easy to manage (respects windows logic) and has features that seems to be enough for occasionnal use. So for me it's worth a 4

  145. 1 out of 5 stars
    tipsyboy

    Reviewing 3.0 RC1 (Jan 20, 2007)

    This is typical MS stuff. It may be good, but I hate programs that do whatever their programers like and - especially this one - won't work suddenly no longer and treat users as little dumb idiots. I don't care that they give it away for free. There are other freeware or open source programs out there that do similar or better things than this one.

    What are these programmers thinking who they are?!

    Keep it for yourself and your kids - annoy them with your stuff.

    So - because of their arrogant attitude - only a one. A pity that you have to give them a one, anyway ...

  146. 3 out of 5 stars
    scrantic

    Reviewing 3.0 RC1 (Jan 20, 2007)

    Would love to see an Airbrush included in the package about the only thing its missing.

  147. 5 out of 5 stars
    yokozuna

    Reviewing 3.0 Beta 3 (Jan 9, 2007)

    I am amazed by the proggie almost like everybody here. Maybe you should also try some plugins for Paint.net, which are available here: http://paintdotnet.12.fo....com/viewforum.php?f=16 ?

  148. 5 out of 5 stars
    brusco

    Reviewing 3.0 Beta 3 (Dec 25, 2006)

    A class act! This has matured nicely over the short time since it started.

    I only wish it had an multiple document interface like photoshop.

  149. 5 out of 5 stars
    some guy

    Reviewing 3.0 Beta 3 (Dec 24, 2006)

    Amazing this gets better and better hats off to you guys for sutch a great job.

  150. 5 out of 5 stars
    aruprc

    Reviewing 3.0 Beta 3 (Dec 24, 2006)

    Excellent, for those of us who can't afford PS or need that big a program, seems to do all that and best of all, superb 64but performance that even Adobe can't match due to Paint .Net having native 64bit support.

  151. 5 out of 5 stars
    hainrs

    Reviewing 3.0 Beta 3 (Dec 23, 2006)

    This is better than Gimp and better than Photoshop. I'm not an idiot and have experience with every 2D package on the market.

  152. 5 out of 5 stars
    DatabaseBen

    Reviewing 3.0 Beta 3 (Dec 23, 2006)

    a work in progress that is worthy of a high 5.

    all my fonts appeared exquisitely and unfortunately the view/grid needs a bit more
    fine tuning - but who needs it. But any talented graphic artist knows how to make a grid if needed....

    Watchout Adobe, you'll be goin out of business with programmers like these...!

    I guess my only question is the microsoft's copyright that is mentioned in the agreement... I hope that this will not be another good program stolen from the "free marketplace".

  153. 4 out of 5 stars
    vcorvinus

    Reviewing 3.0 Beta 2 (Dec 14, 2006)

    Good for basic tasks but still a bit unpolished though. Some fonts on the dropdown list are invisible and the font that are listed looks uneven, choosing View/Grid does nothing, the aforementioned limited text options, etc.

  154. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 3.0 Beta 2 (Dec 12, 2006)

    Rating a 5 because free versus $hundreds it does the job I need wonderfully.

    Don't rate it down because you are angry.

  155. 3 out of 5 stars
    ds0934

    Reviewing 3.0 Beta 2 (Dec 12, 2006)

    Anyone who compare this to PaintShop or PhotoShop is either stupid or has VERY limited experience with those two products. This is "nice" for a freeware app and definitely has it's uses. I'm really tired of people using this REVIEW posting to espouse their GENERAL feelings about a product, instead of the VERSION POSTED for download. I'm commenting on 3.0 Beta 2.

    STILL NO AIRBRUSH or SPRAY tool. Still very limited text effects. Still limited bitmapping capability. This makes it low on my list for doing graphic arts. Useful for quick and dirty image edits and cleanups (crops, simple effects, etc.) NOWHERE near powerful enough for press work, but as I said, useful for many common chores. More likely to add to my arsenal than to replace anything I have. I keep using it in the hopes they continue to improve it enough to where it might replace other things and make my life easier.

  156. 5 out of 5 stars
    jimdean

    Reviewing 3.0 Beta 1 (Dec 5, 2006)

    Paint.NET is the best free photoshop alternative out there, and it does so much with so much less system resources and no $700 cost. Its better than gimp, has a vigorous development, and rocks as a program overall. Its filters/effects are astounding, and the new version 3.0 beta1 has tolerance slidebars, which rule over photoshop's format, and has the best save/dont save/cancel dialogue ive ever seen.

    Paint.NET is a super-great image program, calling it a replacement to ms paint is absurd, its more like a replacement for photoshop itself.

  157. 5 out of 5 stars
    XNeo```

    Reviewing 3.0 Beta 1 (Dec 4, 2006)

    I never imagined that something like this would ever make it to be in Windows, it's great and really awesome professional yet simple at the same time, i love it, i wish all the windows products are like :) and i hope windows Vista is the OS that will revolutionize the way of making Operating systems...
    Let's just hope it is... But Paint.Net is a good start!

  158. 4 out of 5 stars
    kbstanley

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 29, 2006)

    like it alot, but would like to ask for one thing, if you ever get the time a magnetic lasso would be great! If i missed that you had it please let me know, i have been known to do that someimtes..........

  159. 5 out of 5 stars
    Felinity

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 24, 2006)

    I think the changes are awesome, but I really miss the colors being available at the bottom of the tools box. It's a bit of a pain to close the Colors box then have to go to Window > Colors to bring it back up. Maybe a minimize feature would solve this?
    I think an airbrush tool would be great as well or some options with text such as being able to curve and such.
    I love this program, I use it almost daily and enjoy seeing the new features, keep up the great work guys!

  160. 4 out of 5 stars
    ds0934

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 22, 2006)

    Getting better all the time (Beatles). However, I'm still waiting for an airbrush/spraycan tool. Some nifty-er text effects would be nice as well.

  161. 5 out of 5 stars
    onbir

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 22, 2006)

    An excellent application with a very reasonably resource usage and wide capacity.

  162. 5 out of 5 stars
    zridling

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 6, 2006)

    In the words of Borat: Very nize!

  163. 5 out of 5 stars
    The_Zeroorez

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 6, 2006)

    utomo; get a plugin :-)

    Anyways, a great program for the home-users..

  164. 5 out of 5 stars
    some guy

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 6, 2006)

    great paint program in sutch a small package !
    has low resource footprint great for lowend machines, great work guys!

  165. 5 out of 5 stars
    rafaelcage

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 6, 2006)

    Great utility!!!

  166. 5 out of 5 stars
    Frank Bicking

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 6, 2006)

    Excellent piece of software. I especially like how the developers have successfully avoided a cluttered configuration dialog and placed options just where I need and expect them.

  167. 4 out of 5 stars
    utomo

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 6, 2006)

    Can It open .PSD ? Can It save to .PSD ?
    Can It Open RAW ?

    If Paint.net can open and save .psd It will be great :)
    Yes, there is Plugin here
    http://frankblumenberg.d...p?id=paintnet:psdplugin

    It still have a lot to do.
    For the following Paint.Net blend modes I don’t see a direct counterpart:

    Reflect
    Glow
    Negation
    Xor
    And also for these Photoshop blend mode keys

    hue
    sat
    colr
    lum
    diss
    hLit
    sLit
    smud

    and it will be great if it is included in the paint.net original installation

    Good work guys

  168. 5 out of 5 stars
    Eemeli

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 6, 2006)

    In Paint shop pro 9, there is a spot, "One step photo fix". When clickin it, it fix photos fast. Can this software make that. If yes, then I will download this pretty good looking program.

  169. 5 out of 5 stars
    yanike

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 3 (Nov 6, 2006)

    Still one of the best top paint programs :)

  170. 5 out of 5 stars
    Nikkie

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 2 (Oct 31, 2006)

    i love you guys.. keep up the great work!!!

  171. 4 out of 5 stars
    guitardave78

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 2 (Oct 27, 2006)

    Outstanding, this is nearlly what I need!!
    All we need now is masks and paths so I can do some proper cutting out :)

  172. 4 out of 5 stars
    utomo

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 2 (Oct 26, 2006)

    I wish we make a table comparison of fetures between paint.net and photoshop, and paint shop pro.
    and then we decided what is important features till missing from paint .net which mostly needed by user. and hopefully the developer will consider to implement it in maybe version 3.1 ?

    I hope the developer listen and try to make user more happy with paint.net.

    Good luck guys.

  173. 4 out of 5 stars
    jrezin

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 2 (Oct 26, 2006)

    It's a good app. Too bad it doesn't support Tablets and dev don't want to add this feature.

    But it's good with what it does.

  174. 4 out of 5 stars
    xiaozhang

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 2 (Oct 26, 2006)

    GOOD

  175. 5 out of 5 stars
    the artist

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 2 (Oct 25, 2006)

    DARN! the same as cowgaR here! Gradients and Layer Merging!!!
    A perfect replacement for Paint now! i guess i'll no longer need Photoshop...

  176. 5 out of 5 stars
    cowgaR

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 2 (Oct 25, 2006)

    New: Gradient Tool
    New: Merge Layer Down command

    AAAAAAAA could my prayers be heard? :) 5/5

    an extremely powerfull app in good hands, I am twice (or more) as productive in it compared to say Paint Shop Pro X, althought I miss some important features I already wrote authors about...

    but as a complementary editor it is the king!

  177. 5 out of 5 stars
    Mark Gillespie

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 2 (Oct 25, 2006)

    Essential application on anyones system. The new gradient tool is also VERY good.

    Video of it in action here: http://youtube.com/watch?v=z5CBWpX08lk

  178. 5 out of 5 stars
    The_Zeroorez

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 2 (Oct 25, 2006)

    @alexweber15

    That's what it is for. People like you and me, who sometimes want to edit something, but don't feel like using a heavy-duty tool for it, which they have to pay for, or even use illegal.

    PdN is a great tool for people who like editting some things but don't need pro-like stuff :)

  179. 5 out of 5 stars

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 2 (Oct 25, 2006)

    awesome! :)
    this is officially my main image editing program and i recommend it to everyone i can!

  180. 4 out of 5 stars
    Azreal89

    Reviewing 2.72 (Oct 24, 2006)

    This is great. I have been using Gimp, which is, well, not close to good compared to this. There is one thing I noticed that I think could be better. I think you should be able to open multiple files within the program.

    Keep up the great work.

  181. 5 out of 5 stars

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 24, 2006)

    YAY FOR MDI!!!!!!!!

  182. 5 out of 5 stars
    zridling

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 22, 2006)

    For basic photo editing, Paint.NET has come a long, long way. The keyboard shortcuts are quirky, but not a big deal. Damn fast, and it has some nice UI tweaks like remembering all your last settings that other apps should just steal.

  183. 5 out of 5 stars
    donpacman

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 20, 2006)

    Can the EXIF info be modified?

  184. 5 out of 5 stars
    Dinkum

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 18, 2006)

    Been using P.net since the beginning of the project. It is always evolving and getting better. Just when my own editing skills develop into a new facet and the application becomes inadiquite, they come with a new release and address the problem! It is briliant and never lets you down. Falls a bit short on web graphics though. Otherwise no complaints!

  185. 5 out of 5 stars
    nefarious1

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 16, 2006)

    just one word: AWESOME!

  186. 4 out of 5 stars
    ernest33

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 16, 2006)

    It's a really bad news, because this new version don't support Win2000. It's not a good news because at least the multi-doc interface it's a great evolution for this great program. I hope he will support Win2000 again in futur version.
    Philippe

  187. 5 out of 5 stars
    aruprc

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 15, 2006)

    This program turns into a powerful beast eclipsing Adobe PS once you use it under 64bit OS like XP64 with 64bit dual core CPUs like AMD XP64x2 or Intel C2D. The memory management and multi threading is excellent and filters work out much faster than Adobe PS.

  188. 4 out of 5 stars
    utomo

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 15, 2006)

    Yes, please add
    - Magnetic Lasso selections. It is usefull.
    - Support the common Adobe .8bf plugins
    http://www.fileinfo.net/extension/8bf

    It will really Rocks. :)

    Please reports any bugs with version 3 here or to the developer.

    Good Luck.

  189. 2 out of 5 stars
    Floske Tuf

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 14, 2006)

    Version 3 does still not have a "magnetic lasso" selection tool like Photo Shop Elements (which does not cost hundreds of dollars).

    That's a pity, maybe version 4 will get a full 5 from my side. For now it is still a 2 because of the above shortcoming.

  190. 5 out of 5 stars
    DatabaseBen

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 14, 2006)

    this program deserves a five star because it is a worthy challenge to those others that cost hundreds of dollars, like the ones i use.

    i would encourage any student or novice to use this because it works good and it is generously contributed to the public for free by a bunch of hardworking programmers.....

  191. 4 out of 5 stars
    jogygeorge

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 14, 2006)

    Yeah ... this is really nice ... but the 1 missing star is cause it still and I guess may never support the generally accepted Adobe (.8bf) plugins.

  192. 5 out of 5 stars
    The_Zeroorez

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 14, 2006)

    Great program, very stable 'alpha' which can indeed be considered as a beta.

  193. 5 out of 5 stars
    Keith Lard

    Reviewing 3.0 Alpha 1 (Oct 14, 2006)

    Been testing pre-alphas of PDN3 for a month or so, and it's very stable. Although it's labelled as an alpha, I would consider it beta quality.

    A worthy upgrade from PDN2.7

    There are more features planned for PDN3, like Gradient Fill (a sorely mission option).

  194. 5 out of 5 stars
    aruprc

    Reviewing 2.72 (Sep 26, 2006)

    Excellent freebie alternative to Adobe PS, many plugins are being developed for it, best of all, its the only program that works under 64bit XP in true 64bit mode making its performance phenomenal as compared to PS which works in 32bit mode under XP64. Takes full advantage of your latest Athlonx2 64 or Core2Duo EMT64.

  195. 5 out of 5 stars

    Reviewing 2.72 (Sep 1, 2006)

    excellent!
    more than suits my needs and i've been installing it on most computers i fix :)

    about the jpg compression thing i did notice that sometimes it likes to save really big jpgs not sure why... might wanna look into that!

  196. 4 out of 5 stars
    utomo

    Reviewing 2.72 (Aug 31, 2006)

    It need some more features:
    - More plugins please.
    - It need to be able to manage photos to optimize the paper. example we can print few 2x3, 3x4, 4x6 photos. and paint.net will optimize the positions to make 4R print optimum. (almost all area used)

  197. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 2.72 (Aug 31, 2006)

    Good stuff.
    It has some compression issues with jpgs. We were unable to compress several test jpgs below 10KB, but this worked fine in photoshop and PSP.

  198. 5 out of 5 stars
    JPSeixas

    Reviewing 2.70 (Aug 25, 2006)

    I cant install the PaintDotNet because it gabe me a error message.

    The error message it's:
    You dont have the correct permissions in:
    HKEY ... MAchine\soft\classes\.jpeg\OpenWithProgids

    I have the permission to read/write ....

    Regards

  199. 5 out of 5 stars
    Mark Gillespie

    Reviewing 2.70 (Aug 3, 2006)

    Awesome!

    PS. MDI is planned for V3, due later this year, according to the Paint.NET roadmap.

  200. 5 out of 5 stars
    Mick Leong

    Reviewing 2.70 (Aug 3, 2006)

    Excellent software. Beats GIMP (open src) hands down. Its fast. Very good UI. With a few more plugins this may give Adobe Photoshop a run ... great work guys/girls.!!!

  201. 5 out of 5 stars
    urbanriot

    Reviewing 2.70 (Aug 3, 2006)

    An awesome paint program with advanced features, totally for free! Eliminates much of the bulk of Photoshop for those that don't require the advanced features. This latest version includes third party effects that you previously had to download seperately. Great idea!

    Personally I prefer this application not utlizing MDI for my setup.

  202. 4 out of 5 stars
    spiked

    Reviewing 2.70 (Aug 2, 2006)

    In addition to the wish that it were MDI, I find it really annoying that the source code download link is ALWAYS broken for several days after every new release. If they can't host the source reliably themselves, they either need to let others mirror it, or start describing the code as "sometimes-open" source.

  203. 4 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 2.70 (Aug 2, 2006)

    dogwaffle, indeed.

    We have seen some strange things when resizing files. We resize them, but we can't get them to reduce under 20kb in filesize, for *some* images. We've seen this with a few "free" image editors. Hopefully the paint.net team addresses this.

  204. 5 out of 5 stars
    yanike

    Reviewing 2.70 (Aug 2, 2006)

    I agree! If this program was MDI, it would take it to the next level. I still give it a 5 :)

  205. 4 out of 5 stars
    roj

    Reviewing 2.70 (Aug 2, 2006)

    DESPERATELY needs a MDI interface.

    FOUR stars.

  206. 4 out of 5 stars
    utomo

    Reviewing 2.70 Beta 1 (Aug 1, 2006)

    Better every release.

    Please post your feature request in the forum or here, to make this better in the next release.

  207. 5 out of 5 stars
    Mark Gillespie

    Reviewing 2.70 Beta 1 (Jul 31, 2006)

    * New effect: Glow
    * New effect: Bulge
    * New effect: Polar Inversion
    * New effect: Tile Reflection
    * New effect: Twist
    * Updated system requirements
    * Fixed nub selection for Line/Curve and Move tools where the cursor would sometimes affect the wrong nub when zoomed in

  208. 4 out of 5 stars
    Togora

    Reviewing 2.64 (Jul 30, 2006)

    This program may not be the best but at least it is free of price and spyware and not listed at http://www.spywarewarrio.../rogue_anti-spyware.htm as spyware unlike "Spywarebot" (exploits name "Spybot Search & Destroy"; same app as AdwareAlert [A: 5-14-06 / U: 5-14-06]) which is advertised on the right of this forum listing.

  209. 3 out of 5 stars
    the artist

    Reviewing 2.64 (Jul 29, 2006)

    i didn' like this proggie. it was really between purposes, lIke it couldn' do anything it touched really well...

    for those who are looking for a FAST & SIMPLE mspaint REPLACEMENT, I STRONGLY RECOMEND "PROJECT DOGWAFFLE 1.2 FREE". SWEET!
    http://www.thebest3d.com...ee/mirror_dw12free.html

  210. 5 out of 5 stars
    pwned32

    Reviewing 2.64 (Jul 20, 2006)

    i really like the picture used in the screen shot

  211. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 2.64 (Jul 10, 2006)

    lequid, that is fixed with this release. It was just .NET trying to verify a digital signature anyway. http://paintdotnet.12.fo...com/viewtopic.php?t=657

  212. 5 out of 5 stars
    S_K

    Reviewing 2.64 (Jul 10, 2006)

    Very useful software. It does exactly what is advertised.

  213. 5 out of 5 stars
    nordlicht

    Reviewing 2.64 (Jul 10, 2006)

    Becomes better with every new Version. I love this Tool. Very nice.

  214. 5 out of 5 stars
    DigiSyn

    Reviewing 2.64 (Jul 10, 2006)

    5 from me. It does everything that I've needed so far, I'm happy.

  215. 5 out of 5 stars
    crashoverride

    Reviewing 2.64 (Jul 9, 2006)

    ok ...so it has a box asking for a donation. Big woop. you people need to get over yourselves.

  216. 5 out of 5 stars
    paint it blue

    Reviewing 2.63 (Jun 7, 2006)

    I was trying to do something SIMPLE in MS Paint and boy it is a piece of junk. I finally just gave up and thought I'd search around. Thank GOD for Paint.NET .. it's really saved the day. Easy to use, fast, great interface. I'm in love! Thanx! :)

  217. 4 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 2.63 (Jun 5, 2006)

    One step down with ads. Look, open source/rfee does not mean laden your apps with ads or splash screens. If you have a donate button, fine, but I refuse to give up my mindshare for any form of advertising.

  218. 5 out of 5 stars
    urbanriot

    Reviewing 2.63 (Jun 5, 2006)

    Note to the ignorant reviewer below - this is NOT adware, there's a advertisement displayed while you're installing. The software itself does not contain any advertising.

    Awesome / free paint program that's a cross between Windows Paint and Adobe Photoshop. None of the bloat of Photoshop but featuring many advanced functions and runs very quick. Once more plugins are created by the user community, this program will rock even more. Extremely fast compared to Photoshop.

  219. 5 out of 5 stars
    spiked

    Reviewing 2.63 (Jun 5, 2006)

    If you're a Photoshop power user looking for an equally bloated replacement, you're going to hate Paint.NET so don't even bother.

    If you're a GIMP user who is already accustomed to its UI (or worse...if you LIKE it) then you're going to hate Paint.NET so don't even bother.

    On the other hand, if you're looking for a substantial improvement in capability over Windows Paint without sacrificing ease of use, Paint.NET absolutely rocks.

  220. 3 out of 5 stars
    zridling

    Reviewing 2.63 (Jun 5, 2006)

    Now that's a great screenshot, but I'm not seeing the wonders of Paint.NET. Still very basic.

  221. 5 out of 5 stars
    slyckidiot

    Reviewing 2.63 (Jun 5, 2006)

    Boo to the new OneCare ad in the installer (not that you are forced to click it, or that it is visible for long) but otherwise this is a fantastic piece of software. Long ago replaced paint as my quick and dirty editor of choice.

  222. 5 out of 5 stars
    agent2killa

    Reviewing 2.63 (Jun 4, 2006)

    "It serves the digital imaging community as a free alternative to the standard paint application included with Windows."

    To Nekobibu and all those bashing Paint.NET, I think it's better to read first before bashing this useful software. I agree it does not have as many feature as GIMP or Adobe Photoshop, but it is superb for those who need simple image editing software.

  223. 2 out of 5 stars
    Nekobibu

    Reviewing 2.63 (Jun 4, 2006)

    Your having an IQ below 80 should not be used as a reason to trash perfectly good software simply because your head is stuck so far up your a** your brain doesn't get oxygen and isn't able to perform simple tasks anymore.
    The Gimp is a great image editor, its interface is simply different from standard Windows software (no surprise here, it was not developped for Windows).
    On the other hand, Paint.net is extremely poor and lacks a million functions. It should be enough to resize a couple pictures, though, so I'll give it a 2.

  224. 5 out of 5 stars
    Gerwin

    Reviewing 2.63 (Jun 4, 2006)

    The gimp sux because it's one of many OSS trash that is made by smelly programmers who can't get a paid job and refuse to understand that users are not programmers and not the computer's time is valuable, but the user's time is valuable. Paint.net is good, and will always be better then gimp, because any program is better then gimp. Even paint is better then gimp, because you can actually use it. The gimp is for wimps.

  225. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 2.63 (Jun 4, 2006)

    Oooookay Soulslayer.

  226. 2 out of 5 stars
    SoulSlayer

    Reviewing 2.62 (May 18, 2006)

    I don't understand what all the fuss is about... This is nowhere near Photoshop OR Paint Shop Pro. If you want a free image editor GIMP's as good as it gets. It has more functions than Paint.NET and is a HELLA lot faster. Yes, of course you can make gradients in Paint.NET. Just put 2 rectangles next to eachother and blur away. But in GIMP you'll get the gradient TOOL. In Paint.NET you have to click arrow buttons to move layers. In GIMP you can drag the layers. All very basic functions that Paint.NET should have but doesn't. And even if the day comes Paint.NET has all of GIMP's functions, I'll still use GIMP cuz Paint.NET will NEVER be faster than GIMP. Paint.NET is still better than Paint and the interface is nicer than GIMP's, that's all I can give ya.

  227. 5 out of 5 stars
    Mark Gillespie

    Reviewing 2.62 (May 11, 2006)

    Awesome, use it all the time for regular tasks. very stable.

    Win2k does not support the Imaging and Printing API required. (notice how if you print a picture in Paint.NET, it looks the same as the printing photos wizard that XP uses). This is why printing is not available in Win2k.

    The XP userbase is HUGE, there is no way they will drop XP support when vista is released. Perhaps in 5 - 10 years maybee..

    Whilst it's not photoshop, it does not pretend to be, it does a nice selection of tools, very well, and very nicely. It's ideal for the beginner, who would not stand a chance of getting anything done in Photoshop, Paintshop Pro or GIMP, due their complexities.

  228. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 2.62 (May 11, 2006)

    Who said anything about dropping support for Win2K? It works just fine in Win2K.

  229. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 2.62 (May 11, 2006)

    A great app. My one concern is how they dropped support for the newer versions of paint.net on W2K. Will they do they same for XP when Vista shows up?

    W2K is still a MS supported OS, and it can run the latest .net framework.

  230. 3 out of 5 stars
    thehunger

    Reviewing 2.61 (Mar 30, 2006)

    Apparently an effort is underway to make this run on Mono, the .NET implementation for Linux. Porting would involve removing Windows-specific code and replacing it with new code for Mono on Linux.

    Anyway, once it is ported to Linux it will really make an impression in those environments.

  231. 5 out of 5 stars
    KAK

    Reviewing 2.61 (Mar 30, 2006)

    VERY NICE WORK!
    Respect to the Stundents °___°
    This Fantastic piece of Software
    is FREEWARE unbelievable!

    Photoshop Setup 200-MB ($$$)
    Paint.NET Setup 3,4-MB (FREE)

  232. 5 out of 5 stars

    Reviewing 2.61 (Mar 30, 2006)

    awesome tool especially for beginners and casual image editors!!

    one thing that i really can't wait for is MDI... that would help tremendously!

    KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!

  233. 3 out of 5 stars
    huppel

    Reviewing 2.61 (Mar 30, 2006)

    Paint.net will take over from Paint Shop Pro and Photoshop Elements on my machine as soon as it offers a "magnetic lasso" feature.

  234. 5 out of 5 stars
    Madjock

    Reviewing 2.61 (Mar 30, 2006)

    Impressive is the word that comes to mind, I don't have complex needs for my graphic apps, Paint Shop Pro 6 is what I usually need for image resizing and touchups, but Paint.Net is taking over.

  235. 3 out of 5 stars
    huppel

    Reviewing 2.61 (Mar 30, 2006)

    It will become my first and only choice as soon as it offers a magnetic lasso feature.

  236. 5 out of 5 stars
    dono1216

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Mar 12, 2006)

    very usable and stable. intuitive especially for beginners, but photoshop users like me are likely to keep this for quick editing.

    Possible conflict with Windowblinds 5: include paint.net in the wb exclusion list and it'll work just fine.

  237. 5 out of 5 stars
    urbanriot

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Mar 11, 2006)

    Excellent program for quick / lite photo editing. Loads up in 1/5 of the time it takes to load photoshop and is extremely stable.

  238. 4 out of 5 stars
    MurrayH

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Mar 2, 2006)

    This is a great program, easy to use and navigate. A little slow at times (e.g. acquiring clipboard images) but on the whole a good product.

  239. 3 out of 5 stars
    jermort

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 28, 2006)

    Still needs a lot of work!! Only took 45seconds to crash the program.
    open a jpg for editing,
    click file, edit
    viola! crash

  240. 5 out of 5 stars
    cybergen

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 26, 2006)

    Wow, for a free program this is excellent. Reminds of the bloat-freeness of uTorrent.

    Having said that it does lack some basic features and I would reiterate what cowgaR said that I would have would have been included by version 2.6 of any program.

    Can't beat the cost, file size and development activity. Well done all involved!

  241. 5 out of 5 stars
    oomingmak

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 26, 2006)

    Very impressive (even more so given the fact that this program is free).

    The program has not stagnated and seems to be actively developed, but the new features being added are forward looking and useful (e.g. 64bit support and resolution independent UI) rather than just a mass of useless bloat to bump the feature numbers up.

  242. 5 out of 5 stars
    cowgaR

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 25, 2006)

    Best of the best =)

    O.K. being honest, I would really like 'spray' tool added to this application + better function of red-eye removal tool. Free hand selection would also make me happy (I know I can use magic wand but..) and some better 'working' recolorer tool. So I could select one color, set tolerance like I can now, but begin to paint with another color this time with NO-SOLID color tone but with the same shades and lightness as the bottom color. So color change would not be such visible.

    Cut->new image->paste will somewhat paste image with some offset most of the time.

    But the most needed feature for me are some shade effects so I can shade image via some vector + better TEXT typing tool. Now, when I type a text in the image, the color and font and style of the font can only be changed till I switch to another tool (say pickcolor/selection). Then the font-position ability with all the features is lost in the layer. So if I won't start using another font layer, I cannot play with font much. But another layer is just a particular win (I can rotate font there) because once I switch back from typing it is again all lost, worser is that antialiasing isn't working the right job it would typing to another layer. Ability to rotate text would also make me smile (I can only position it after writing now).

    In Paint Shop Pro you could allways select part of the text later and exchange the font or color. I would love to see it here.

  243. 5 out of 5 stars
    jmbadger

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 25, 2006)

    It has been said of MS Office: "80% of users don't need 80% of the features, so why pay for them when you can use a free suite like Open Office?"

    Exactly the same sentiments apply here. I have used Photoshop and as nice as it is, the only reason I'd use many of the features is to see what they do or show off to friends what I can do with Photoshop. Hundreds of templates, brushes, and special effects may be pretty or interesting, but for my needs it is overkill in the extreme.

    Removing red-eye, adjusting the tint/hue, cutting out my sister's ex-husband from the family portrait—I can do it all with Paint dot NET for free.

  244. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 25, 2006)

    If you have a crash, instead of decorating this page with it, please report it in the forums, http://paintdotnet.12.forumer.com

  245. 5 out of 5 stars
    Shadow Wing

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 25, 2006)

    To feverfive:

    You might want to inspect/reinstall your OS, and/or make sure you have the lastest .NET (2.0) installed. Just about everyone else is able to install this program without any problems, so in all likelihood, your computer is at fault here, not Paint.NET.

    This is a wonderful program, and free to boot. I'd give it a 10 if I could!

  246. 5 out of 5 stars
    some guy

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 25, 2006)

    I think its the best free paint program out their.
    Even being free I think it gives paintshop pro a grood run for their money,
    1 adobe
    2 jasc-coral
    4 xara-Paint.net
    my 2 cents

  247. 5 out of 5 stars
    sn0wflake

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 25, 2006)

    Much better than the GIMP.

  248. 4 out of 5 stars
    seier

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 25, 2006)

    If you can't get it to work, you might try installing the >net FrameWork 2.0. I'm not sure if that's the problem, but it seems like a likely cause :).

  249. 5 out of 5 stars
    uberfly

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 24, 2006)

    McHale - ONE star due to a buggy installer for an app you'd otherwise rate a 5??? Put down the shotgun man.

  250. 5 out of 5 stars
    McHale

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 24, 2006)

    Warning: There was a problem with 2.5 (for some people) where it won't uninstall to let you install 2.6. It has been fixed in 2.6 going forward but those upgrading from 2.5 may have the same problem I had.

    To fix the problem, install this, uninstall Paint .NET 2.5 with this and reinstall 2.6.

    http://support.microsoft...px?scid=kb;en-us;290301

    Top Notch software. If this had a proper smudge tool and a spray paint tool, GiMP would be history.

    Thanks Rick for pointing me to the fix and for another fine version of Paint .NET!

  251. 5 out of 5 stars
    Das mod

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 24, 2006)

    to huppel

    if you have access to Photoshop why then are you using Paint.NET .... ????

    just because this FREE app. is missing a couple of tools is not worth awarding it such a low rating ....

    go back to editing your porn pictures on photoshop :P

  252. 5 out of 5 stars
    wincement

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 24, 2006)

    Outstanding application. Has a lot of features but is still light and fast.

  253. 5 out of 5 stars
    sniggle

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 24, 2006)

    huppel: News flash... this isn't Photoshop. It's free. Get over it.

    This app rocks for being a free alternative to paint, with way more features. Combine this with PhotoFiltre and you can do a whole lot of stuff that Photoshop can.

  254. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 24, 2006)

    Great app. We use heavily more and more.

  255. 5 out of 5 stars
    gawd21

    Reviewing 2.6 Final (Feb 24, 2006)

    Still the best free photo editing software I have used. Thanks for all of the hard work.

  256. 5 out of 5 stars
    yanike

    Reviewing 2.6 RC1 (Feb 6, 2006)

    Great Program! I used Jasc Photoshop, Adobe CS2, Ulead and others. I still fall back on this one to get the job done. Awesome program, especially for making skins and program graphics. Resize tool is phenomenal! Recommend it for anyone who paints on a PC!

  257. 5 out of 5 stars
    Patriots

    Reviewing 2.6 RC1 (Jan 30, 2006)

    Great program. I really can't say one bad thing about it. I use it everday for skinning applications with no problems...Your right about photoshop being a better program. But, in all honesty; I have Corel graphics suite 12 and I still use this program along with Corel

  258. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 2.6 RC1 (Jan 30, 2006)

    Magic Wand works fine. Make sure your Tolerance isn't accidentally set to 100%, and read the Help file.

  259. 5 out of 5 stars
    danilloOc

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 2 (Jan 18, 2006)

    This is a great software, have many good features and it's have a great update routine.
    I recomend it for sure.

  260. 4 out of 5 stars
    markoX

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 2 (Jan 18, 2006)

    This program is just great, but I think GIMP is even better... (and Photoshop is even better, but Photoshop is too expensive for average user.)

  261. 5 out of 5 stars
    winterman

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 2 (Jan 18, 2006)

    Well, talk about optimising your code.

    This latest (2.6 beta 2) launches in 2 seconds on my 1.8Ghz Laptop and opened a 10Mb Image in an instant.

    This baby is getting more and more powerful everytime they realease an update.

    More file format support would be brilliant along with more plug-ins.

    But hey for open source it is really starting to give the commercial apps (Paintshop pro etc) a really good run for their money.

  262. 4 out of 5 stars
    SirDarius

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 2 (Jan 18, 2006)

    Good and serious replacement to MS Paint, but not quite the GIMP or Photoshop yet.

    The GUI is very clean, and having transparent dialogs is a very good idea.

    One thing I don't like is the installation process... it's extremely slow and uses two different engines (NSIS and MSI... that's really contrived)

  263. 2 out of 5 stars
    twosheds

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 2 (Jan 18, 2006)

    Poor interface and far less powerful than the GIMP.

  264. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 2 (Jan 17, 2006)

    That's because it's a beta. Final releases don't expire.

  265. 3 out of 5 stars
    alberta expediter

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 2 (Jan 17, 2006)

    Expires on 15/02/2006......ummmmmmmmmmm

  266. 5 out of 5 stars
    AntiochMedia

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 2 (Jan 17, 2006)

    I would still appreciate limited PSD support - even if it is only for reading the PSD file as a composite or only reading certain layers. If Irfanview can view PSDs as a flat image, this should at least be available in PAINT.NET =)

  267. 5 out of 5 stars
    AntiochMedia

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 1 Updated (Jan 4, 2006)

    This is a fantastic application, certainly one that I look forward to using in place of Photoshop in the future. As has been mentioned before, PSD support would take Paint.NET from being an awesome application to being an awesome free solution able to take the place of Photoshop for a large base of users who design web graphics and do not need many of Photoshop's specialist features.

  268. 5 out of 5 stars
    ModderXManiac

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 1 (Jan 3, 2006)

    The speed of development on this is just incredible, it's awesome.

    Fast, stable, and full of features, this is definitely the best photo manipulation app of it's kind. When it finally implements vector image support, I can drop adobe photoshop as well

  269. 5 out of 5 stars
    googun

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 1 (Jan 3, 2006)

    This is an excellent piece of software, particularly considering its short development cycle and the fact that it started out as a classroom project. It is often compared with Paintshop and Photoshop, but this misses the point of Paint.Net. Paint.Net is designed to provide features that ordinary people are likely to need for photo-editing, in a way that is easy to understand and use. Hence the apparent paucity of options and settings. It was never intended to mirror every feature of, or compete with, PhotoShop.

    Considering the software in accordance with its design brief, it succeeds very well. Given the lightning speed of its development by a handful of students for free, one has to wonder why Paintshop and Photoshop development is so grindingly slow.

  270. 5 out of 5 stars
    Mark Gillespie

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 1 (Jan 3, 2006)

    laxmikantb4u, your reviews are a joke. Your giving it a 2* rating, and admit you havn't even looked at Paint.NET!! Paint.NET and Picasa are not even the same type of program. Picasa is for photo indexing, and touchups, Paint.NET is a full blown graphics package!!!

  271. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 1 (Jan 3, 2006)

    This product has about as much to do with picasa as Firefox has to do with filezilla. Please don't rate products you neither understand nor use. kthz

  272. 4 out of 5 stars
    utomo

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta 1 (Jan 3, 2006)

    Good at it is improved from version to version.

    what need to improve :
    - Support PSD, which is a famous file format.
    - Better tools such as easier to use red ey removal tools.
    and more functions.

  273. 5 out of 5 stars
    imanino

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 2 (Dec 25, 2005)

    I would compare this to MS Paint, but mommy says not to take advantage of the disabled. I'll just say it's better.
    What I want to comment on though, is the autoupdate system. I'd say if the paint thing doesn't work out, sell that model and interface to Microsoft as the substitute for the nightmare that is their own autoupdate system and your fortunes will be made. Good job.

  274. 5 out of 5 stars
    cowgaR

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 2 (Dec 20, 2005)

    bobad, you're doing red-eye with airbrush? Can you provide me some help on it? I been using this program heavily last few days, found a few bugs there (interface not displaying current selection/progress, cut/new/paste is not what I would like or sometimes it 'moves' image on paste) and I had a hard time with RED-EYE reduction. It almost was no help as it wasn't working, at the maximum it could throw some black pixels. So I solved it via saturize/lightness color tools. But i would like to get some amateur info on other way to do it...I TOTALY! need 3 tools:

    1. this airbrush(I think), so I could fill area with particular color only slighlty, e.g. no SOLID FILL and complete change of saturation

    2. a tool which could alias edges with a pen, today I do it with selection, resize, inverse, blur, but its not convenient. And some option to say Pain.NET how it aliases, I understand that it allways alias everything that I am working with, e.g. each layer. Any help here?

    3. and the most needed, hand drawn selection. I can't find any, and its a hard time allways doing it with pickcolor!

    And it would be AWESOME to add user buttonbar with some user-defined actions, sometimes I almost exlusively using mouse and I am FREEZED going to MENU->Edit->Inverse Selection when I can't press CTRL+I on keyboard.

    All in all a *very* nice program, those who say it's better than Windows Paint haven't seen Paint for a while :-) It's HELL of a better !!! It is another league! Last day I found out that it is quite fast when working with effects and others(almost no kernel time usage), althought I would like more effects to come, glass effect is really really weeeak and PLEASE give me BETTER LAYER ZOOM, with +/- sign in lower steps.

    And last but not least, I was doing some background, cca 10 layers, 1280 size, cca 7 hours (I am a coder not artist:-) and 2.5 version (I assume that even if 2.6 is called ALPHA it can be the same) it:

    1. Haven't crashed at all, been rock stable, ALLWAYS cleared memmory

    2. Eat at minimum 80MB, BUT AT MAXIMUM ONLY 130 MB PEAK which is great!!!

    3. I LOVE THIS PROGRAM, it's free, and It is using .NET which I love (and code in).

    WAY TO GO Paint.NET guys! Thank you.

  275. 3 out of 5 stars
    bobad

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 2 (Dec 20, 2005)

    I agree the screen shot is bad. The author forgot to show the SS at full size. If he is that careless, what else did he forget in the program?

    I couldn't find the airbrush, but found the paint brush and flood fill tool's textures to be a fair substitute. There is no real substitute for an airbrush. Sometimes you have to do redeye with an airbrush because the color of the redeye is not really red. So I'm lobbying for an air brush!

    Calling "desaturate" "black-and-white" is dumbing down the program. The author will now have to find dumb people to use it.

    There is a golden opportunity for the authors to offer average people a nice photo editor/paint program without all the garbage. Unfortunately, the author is making the program non-standard by breaking with standard naming conventions, and withholding standard tools like the air brush.

    Maybe I'm getting excited over nothing, because Paint.NET _IS_ still an alpha.

  276. 4 out of 5 stars
    Banquo

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 2 (Dec 20, 2005)

    Nice little paint alternative, getting better with each release. Siyavash, you're giving this progam a bad review because of the screenshot? That's dumb.

  277. 5 out of 5 stars
    Tx3

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 2 (Dec 20, 2005)

    Program is light-weighted so it's very good for small & fast editing. Updating to new version is made easy and updates are released often. Very good program! :)

  278. 4 out of 5 stars
    UNprofessional

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 1 (Dec 18, 2005)

    Install & run okay on P3 XP Pro. Had to download .NET framework from MS and then several MS updates to the .NET framework. No spy/ad-ware detected. Difficult for me to figure out but my 3-y/o was able to create a couple nice pieces. Better than the Paint program that comes bundled with MS OS. Have used for freehand drawing but not for photo editing, (Picasa2 is a great free PE). More features than I am used to for a free drawing program but need to play, (or read), to figure out more of these features. Overall, this is a great program!

  279. 4 out of 5 stars
    ahjefri

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 1 (Dec 14, 2005)

    I like this program , but it seem to me that erase is bit annoying , I do not have choice to use trasparent of solid background, when you delete you got the grid,, I have to close it and open it again when dealing with BMP that does not support transparent.

  280. 4 out of 5 stars
    bobad

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 1 (Dec 13, 2005)

    Hey! I can now install and test this exciting software! I wasn't about to re-install the old implementation of DotNET Framework just to test 1 paint program/editor! That said, I only have 3 complaints with this alpha release, and I'm sure the developers know about them. The GUI took a huge step backward. The icons and boxes look fat, smudged, and like they are "bleeding" blue ink. Ak! What's that about? Gone is the crisp, clean GUI that attracted me to this program in the first place. Strangely, I can not find a spray paint icon. I know there must be one, but why is it so hard to find? The redeye feature didn't work so great. I played with the tolerance and saturation, but no go. Admittedly my subject's red eyes were on the orange side, but my other editor handled it OK. I REALLY like the alpha blended tool boxes. I give the program a 3.6/5. Restore the GUI to its original quality, make a prominent Spray Paint icon, tweak up the redeye, and it gets a 5/5!

  281. 5 out of 5 stars
    Webprofusion

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 1 (Dec 13, 2005)

    Excellent Stuff. Would like to see effects as plugin I could download of a central website as the current set are fairly limited (need bevel, shadow?). Number one feature I would like to see before I can ditch psp would be MDI or document Tabs - just being able to open multiple images in the same app window. When working with several images (or using app as a viewer) this would be great. Like many people my number one use of this kind of app is opening/converting/modifying/resizing images so the ability to open more than one image at a time is a must. Looking good though, and performance seems to be improving.

  282. 4 out of 5 stars
    cowgaR

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 1 (Dec 12, 2005)

    I love this project, but..

    I've given 2.5 final a harder try, e.g. actually tried to do something. Because in past I just install/uninstall it, I thought it had very limited capabilities, say much much lower than PSP70.

    What I found is, it can actually be more powerful than one would thought (like it CAN work with layers, just via little tool at the bottom, no menu or additional buttons :-). I'd been finnaly grasped by some inner logic, e.g. cuting/pasting or resizing canvas etc etc.

    Just give me more effects and more tools, but keep the simplicity please. I think the only 'bad' thing ppl feel(and I felt too) is, that it is so simple yet powerful. The one needs to understand it ALL can be done via this simple interface, which in the end is great. love the undo feature, nicely done, bring me more such goodies in copy/paste to transparent image and correctly resize it, or some more inteligent working with selections and coordinates navigations and some other $$$ goodies. The best way I would develop it is to take interface of PaintShopPro 6 or 7 which I L O V E D, and implement some smart things from them. Because todays Photoshops or Corel PSP X bigas releases and their context-menu on everything or dozens of buttons etc have their magic, but power of simplicity of PSP6 can be reborn!

    1 point off because my CPU is having a very hard time using this progie, constant 60-70% CPU usage just free-hand DRAWING on small(1024*768) image with one color, and more to CPU in some other cases. One would expect this when working with effects, not when working with paintbrush. Note that the Paint.NET is blazing fast despite its CPU usage.

  283. 4 out of 5 stars
    utomo

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 1 (Dec 12, 2005)

    What need to improve:
    - Support for windows 98. because still many win 98 user. I believe many people will love it. and it is possible. I know it need more work.
    - Why the minimum 1024 x 768 screen resolution, how about 800x600 ? and better if can reduce the minimum processor requirement to 300Mhz instead of 400 Mhz.
    - Please support scanning on windows 2000 too.
    - Add crop tool. so people will less confuse.
    - Use visual studio 2005. from Now visual studio 2003 will not be available in the market.
    - Please add link to download the alpha or beta source code, so others can see and improve too.
    and other improvements

    if you want to suggest or report the bugs, go to http://paintdotnet.12.forumer.com/

  284. 5 out of 5 stars
    horsecharles

    Reviewing 2.6 Alpha 1 (Dec 12, 2005)

    This version's plethora of innovations should silence the last holdout doubters fer sher.....
    Hearty congrats.

  285. 5 out of 5 stars
    Polychronopolis

    Reviewing 2.5 Final (Nov 28, 2005)

    This program is becoming quite interesting and I am very happy to see it continue.

    To all reviewers who are knocking on the various .Net frameworks.

    1. You can have several versions of .Net framework simultaneously installed. (1.0, 1.1, and 2.0)
    2. Most applications using .Net framework are built using Visual Studio. Each version of VS tends to use a different version of .NetFW. Developers of freeware do not always have the money to purchase upgrades to VS. (VS2000 uses .NetFW 1.0, VS2003 uses .NetFW 1.1, VS2005 uses 2.0) Applications do not smoothly transfer between different vesions of the framework. (Thx Mi¢®o$oft!)
    3. .Net is relatively new and Betanews has not adequately prepared their site for **any** requirements that an application can have. Do not blame the developers for problems that arise on a review site.

    5 stars to a freeware application developed by Washington State University students!!

  286. 5 out of 5 stars
    roj

    Reviewing 2.5 Final (Nov 28, 2005)

    I like this app - it works as advertised and is fast. It's got a simple to use UI and while it's no Photoshop, it sure competes well with midline apps, even without the free price sticker.

    Five stars.

    Regarding the .Net nonsense:

    If you have your shorts in a bunch, run BOTH versions. You actually CAN do that. I personally don't see a reason to run out and install the latest and greatest verison of .NET just yet, but then again I'm a seasoned user who knows better than to grab the newest candy just because it's there.

  287. 5 out of 5 stars
    BobTheVeg

    Reviewing 2.5 Final (Nov 28, 2005)

    bobad: You could review the product, and not the requirements

    And fyi, Description of a product does not include the requirements.

  288. 5 out of 5 stars
    ModderXManiac

    Reviewing 2.5 Final (Nov 28, 2005)

    Awesome, final version, finally!

    Lucky for me, I havent upd8ed to .NET 2.0 just yet, I'm waiting for all my fav apps to catch up to eliminate unncessary bugs.

    If they just add .ai support I can dump my "pirated haxxored" copy of Photoshop forever!!!

    Kudos to all the authors.

  289. 5 out of 5 stars
    ahjefri

    Reviewing 2.5 Final (Nov 28, 2005)

    I am very impressed by this product ,, I think the auther has put a lot of time to come with this powerfull image editor yet simple to use, very clever ideas , I think this is a true pick for People who is not very sophisticated into photoshop, but they want to create good stuff. Best of all it's free, to me it is must have product , I will add it to total commander, ad muncher, and astonshell ,,

  290. 5 out of 5 stars
    Mark Gillespie

    Reviewing 2.5 Final (Nov 28, 2005)

    Awesome product. puts all other non-payware graphics packages to shame.

    Ignore the comments about .NET framwrok support. It clearly states framework 1.1SP1 is required, anyone complaining about it not installing with .NET V2.0 is an idiot who has problems understanding basic concepts like "Requires .NET Framework 1.1".

    V2.6 will support Framework V2.0

  291. 5 out of 5 stars
    Bachalor

    Reviewing 2.5 Final (Nov 28, 2005)

    Nice idea, thanks to the author(s) for this freeware.

  292. 3 out of 5 stars
    razorhasyou

    Reviewing 2.5 Final (Nov 27, 2005)

    Sure it's good for being free and all, but it's not even close to Paint Shop Pro and Photoshop in features. Also, the developer can't make the setupfile install the program if you only have Net Framework 2.0. And this really blows. At least they could offer a compressed version for people who doesn't want to install it, since it works perfectly not installed (Had to install it on my old computer and copy the whole folder to my computer running windows xp x64 with framework2).

  293. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 2.5 Final (Nov 27, 2005)

    Quality. We use in our enterprise. Saves us thousands in licensing.

  294. 5 out of 5 stars
    AskyBgr8@aol.com

    Reviewing 2.5 Release Candidate 2 (Nov 19, 2005)

    I am using this program to size my Ebook covers.
    I can even change the background color to one even tone. My covers are original and creative as I can make them. I place JPEG's on top!

    It is the best method I've found. It could use more special effects I could apply to JPEG's. Then I would not have to depend on any other software product. I suggest looking around at all that can be done.

    Thanx - Chaplain Winston

  295. 5 out of 5 stars
    photonboy

    Reviewing 2.5 Release Candidate 2 (Nov 18, 2005)

    Has potential.

  296. 5 out of 5 stars
    the_root

    Reviewing 2.5 Release Candidate 2 (Nov 17, 2005)

    It is a great program, but a word of caution. For some reason, when I uninstalled the last version, it left a lot of clutter on my machine. I had to do a lot of registry cleaning to get it all out.
    Perhaps something just went wrong with my uninstall, but it did happen.

  297. 5 out of 5 stars
    wincement

    Reviewing 2.5 Release Candidate 2 (Nov 17, 2005)

    Excellent program. It provides a very realistic alternative to Photoshop IMO, and you can't beat the price.

    @ ModderXManiac:

    It requires .Net 1.1 at the moment. I only had .Net 2.0 installed on one computer, and it popped up asking me to install 1.1. They plan to release a version next summer that won't be dependent on 1.1 at all.

  298. 5 out of 5 stars
    ModderXManiac

    Reviewing 2.5 Release Candidate 2 (Nov 17, 2005)

    Drastic and muuch required updates each and everytime, I'm glad to see this out of alpha stage, and very much looking forward to the final version..

    has anyone tested this on .NET 2.0?

  299. 5 out of 5 stars
    GeorgeSantayana

    Reviewing 2.5 Release Candidate 1 (Nov 14, 2005)

    Different versions of the .NET framework are designed to be installed and run concurrently. Not working on .NET 2.0 should be a nonissue unless you do something foolish like uninstall .NET 1.1.

    ModderXManiac: Let me help you feel at home with open source. The source is available, the programmers have conveniently separated out all the Windows platform specific calls so that it can be ported to Mono. Fix it yourself.

  300. 5 out of 5 stars
    kise

    Reviewing 2.5 Release Candidate 1 (Nov 14, 2005)

    For people who dosn't want use/understand .NET Framework, Go and buy yourself a java or *nix computer or something, the rest of us i guess using loves an optimiezed framework faster then Java and faster then several nonnative languages.

    Second of all, this is open source, so don't complain about lacking support for old framework 1.1.

  301. 5 out of 5 stars
    Kramy

    Reviewing 2.5 Release Candidate 1 (Nov 13, 2005)

    bobad, it is very clearly stated - I saw, and I didn't even download this!

    What would you rather have - giant red letters in the installer?

    "OMG you have .net 2.0 - install .net 1.1 or this will get buggered!"

  302. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 2.5 Release Candidate 1 (Nov 13, 2005)

    bobad, You've already made your opinion known. Give it a rest already.

    "Still won't run on the current version of .NET framework!" Yes, and you've been told many times WHY, and also that a .NET 2.0 based version is in the works. What more do you want? Software engineering, testing, and validation take time. Read up on all the breaking changes between .NET 1.1 and 2.0 over here: http://msdn.microsoft.co...es/runtime/default.aspx

    "The authors should state this limitation." While I disagree that it's a "limitation," it's stated very clearly on the app's website, and there is a very clear FAQ entry about it as well.

    So what's the real problem here?

  303. 5 out of 5 stars
    Adrian79

    Reviewing 2.5 Release Candidate 1 (Nov 13, 2005)

    I had to remove .net 2.0...went back 2 1.1 because my ATI control center was not enjoying it much ;-)

  304. 5 out of 5 stars
    httpd.confused

    Reviewing 2.5 Release Candidate 1 (Nov 13, 2005)

    How funny is this quote from bobad's review?

    "It's insane to install an old version of .NET just to run 1 program. All my other .NET programs run great on either version."

    If all your other applications run fine with .NET 1.1, then why did you install .NET 2.0? Just run .NET 1.1 and you will have no reason to complain. You will be able to run Paint.NET, and all your other applications will "run great". Seems simple to me.

    Besides, they provide a very good reason for their .NET requirements.

    Paint.NET works fine with .NET 1.1. Microsoft released .NET 2.0 final only a couple weeks ago.

    You installed .NET 2.0 for no real reason.

    You uninstalled .NET 1.1 for no real reason. (Given that it can be run alongside 2.0.)

    Yet, because of something Microsoft did, and your own inability to run your system, you rate Paint.NET down?

  305. 5 out of 5 stars
    Mark Gillespie

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 5 (Oct 31, 2005)

    Excellent, Gimp is pretty dire in comparison.

    PS. There is a .NET framework implementation for linux, it's called mono. .NET language although created by MS, is open and ratified standard.

  306. 4 out of 5 stars
    ModderXManiac

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 5 (Oct 31, 2005)

    .NET framework is the weakness of this app. Its the reason that this app lacks the ability to seamlessly work on multiple platforms.

    Which is where the Gimp is ahead.

    C'mon, all thru version 1 of OpenOffice, they used Java code, and it proved to be a bad idea, so version two dropped Java completely and now uses C++ and Python.

    This is an excellent app, nontheless, I just wish they wouldnt require the use of a programming language created by a monopoly *cough* MICROSOFT!

    The essence of Open-source is primarily multi-platform support.

  307. 5 out of 5 stars
    bangbang023

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 5 (Oct 31, 2005)

    It's sad that this app's rating is hurt by reviewers not having an understanding of the .Net Framework. It's an excellent app and I'm glad to see more people pushing .net based applications out the door. Kudos.

  308. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 5 (Oct 31, 2005)

    bobad, It requires .NET 1.1 for compatibility and stability reasons (is that a "good enough reason" ?). .NET 2.0 does not supercede .NET 1.1 in the way that, for example, DirectX 9 supercedes DirectX 8. There will be a .NET 2.0-based release in January. In the meantime, just install both versions of .NET.

  309. 1 out of 5 stars
    bobad

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 5 (Oct 31, 2005)

    Still does not work with the current version of the .NET framework. Is that as lame and inexcusable as it seems, or is the Paint.NET team hanging on to the obsolete version of .NET for a good reason? .NET framework is OK with me, there are many fine new apps coded using it. (C# comes to mind) However, it's insane to install an old version of .NET just to run 1 program. All my other .NET programs run great on either version.

  310. 5 out of 5 stars
    kebabi

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 5 (Oct 31, 2005)

    "I just wish there was a version that didn't require that .Net crap."
    Did you read the name of the program?
    It's called Paint.NET, what does .net mean to you?
    Anyways, I like it and I don't have anything bad to say about .net.

  311. 3 out of 5 stars
    ye110mann

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 4 (Oct 28, 2005)

    Strike 1: Requires the .Net Framework.
    Strike 2: Requires .Net Framework 1.1.
    Otherwise it's great. I just wish there was a version that didn't require that .Net crap.

  312. 3 out of 5 stars
    bobad

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 4 (Oct 17, 2005)

    Excellent program. Beautiful GUI, and a great balance of small program size and features. Why the mediocre rating? Because Paint.Net does not work with the latest .net framework! Figure that one out boys and girls! I will continue to use my favorite, PhotoFiltre, for now until the grevious oversight is fixed. It's a little better progam than Paint.Net anyway, plus it runs from a single EXE file!

  313. 5 out of 5 stars
    brotherS

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 3 (Oct 14, 2005)

    Stable and intuitive software, I like it!

  314. 4 out of 5 stars
    unikum

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 3 (Oct 12, 2005)

    Why all this expires date every time?

  315. 5 out of 5 stars
    ModderXManiac

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 3 (Oct 10, 2005)

    "Improved GIF save quality"
    "Text Tool's rendering now uses GDI instead of GDI+, which results in much more consistent (better) quality "
    "Text Tool is now optimized for dual core and dual processor systems"
    "Optimized memory usage in some areas"
    "Performance improved in some areas"

    I've been tracking progress on this for about 7 months, and it has come a long way!
    It's Faster than Adobe Photoshop, free, and just as functional. This is the OpenOffice of photo manipulating applications.
    WUNDERBAR!!!

    ^_^

  316. 5 out of 5 stars
    McHale

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 2 (Oct 8, 2005)

    Been using Paint .Net for a few months now. Considering I'm not a profesional graphic artist, I can't find a better product for the basic graphic stuff I do. Magic wand, layers, aquire from scanner... I'm happy.

    Tried GIMP for about a month. H A T E D it... Came back to Paint .Net with no regrets.

  317. 5 out of 5 stars
    bunghole

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 2 (Oct 7, 2005)

    Agree with all the others...needs MDI...Open Source done as it should be done...GIMP sucks...

  318. 5 out of 5 stars
    kprovance

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 2 (Oct 5, 2005)

    Wow. Awesome job.

  319. 5 out of 5 stars
    benZin

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 2 (Oct 5, 2005)

    Tremendous and thorough. Mi@m!

  320. 5 out of 5 stars

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 2 (Oct 5, 2005)

    awesome!

    another vote for MDI! :)

  321. 5 out of 5 stars
    ModderXManiac

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 2 (Oct 5, 2005)

    Removing anti aliasing was a good move, so now you can actually see the raw quality.

    This is the OpenOffice of all photo manipulation utilities. Exceptionally better than Adobe Photoshop, considering the pricetag. ^^

  322. 5 out of 5 stars
    cool_guy

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 1 (Oct 4, 2005)

    Five stars but MDI is a must.

  323. 2 out of 5 stars
    Lisa Hayes

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 1 (Oct 3, 2005)

    no MDI [multiple document interface] support...

  324. 5 out of 5 stars
    benZin

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 1 (Oct 3, 2005)

    Yeaaaah! With photofiltre, the best!

  325. 5 out of 5 stars
    ModderXManiac

    Reviewing 2.5 Beta 1 (Oct 3, 2005)

    This is the OpenOffice of all image-manipulation applications.

    This is the official the open-source killer to Adobe Photoshop.

    5 stars.

  326. 5 out of 5 stars
    benZin

    Reviewing 2.5 Alpha 3 (Sep 20, 2005)

    Yeap, excellent!! Great program!!

  327. 5 out of 5 stars
    gawd21

    Reviewing 2.5 Alpha 3 (Sep 20, 2005)

    This and Gimp ... I like Adobe , but I hate the cost. Love Paint.net and Gimp.

  328. 5 out of 5 stars
    benZin

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 2 (Sep 16, 2005)

    Je me rattrape !!! Useless?? Noo, what the hell.. I used this prog and i though, AW!! Very very very gooooood. Sorry but Merci. And leave your Job.

  329. 5 out of 5 stars
    heyupandy

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 2 (Sep 8, 2005)

    its been a while since i've used paint.net and i've got to say...major improvements!!! great features and easy to use and get used to :) keep it up dudes

  330. 5 out of 5 stars
    dpmcenderfer

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 2 (Sep 8, 2005)

    Hey Sybs... did you notice on the install that you had the option not to automatically check for updates. (a.k.a. 'virus')

    Noob.

  331. 5 out of 5 stars
    bobad

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 2 (Sep 8, 2005)

    Nice program! I think it has all the features that 90% of users will ever need. 1 point off for the ugly truck in the screen shot, 1 point awarded for a change log! Keep up the good work guys!

  332. 5 out of 5 stars
    cool_guy

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 2 (Sep 8, 2005)

    Great program, easy to use but needs MDI.

  333. 5 out of 5 stars
    Sybs

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 2 (Sep 8, 2005)

    Since it's open source we should try to modify the virus in it to just email DarkMana.

    Great program though.

  334. 3 out of 5 stars
    soots

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 2 (Sep 8, 2005)

    nice but needs to have fucus command with it

  335. 5 out of 5 stars
    Kramy

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 2 (Sep 8, 2005)

    Awesome image editting software! Took me about two minutes to figure everything out. Gets better every version, and I can't wait for v2.2(or that magic v3.0)!

    To the guy below, I haven't noticed any odd connection activity on my computer...

  336. 1 out of 5 stars
    DarkMana

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 2 (Sep 8, 2005)

    omg u should not use this i herd from my friend who works in computers that it has a virus inside of it and when you run it the virus inside of it will email all of your friends and tell them they are g**. don say i dint warnn you

  337. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 1 (Aug 30, 2005)

    We use this in our law firm. It's saved us tens of thousands in license fees! Thanks MS!

  338. 5 out of 5 stars
    RWW

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 1 (Aug 30, 2005)

    After all this time I am still learning Photoshop and PSP. Decided to bring this up just to see if I could use it and was amazed how quickly I could accomplish something I had struggled with before. The only drawback is that I had to reload .Net 1.
    Small price to pay, though. Excellent program!

  339. 5 out of 5 stars
    guitardave78

    Reviewing 2.2 Alpha 1 (Aug 30, 2005)

    If you look at this product for what it is, it is fantastic. It is meant to be a halfway house between the pathetic ms paint software and the high end stuff like paint shop and photoshop.
    It has a lot of features and is quite fast.
    It is also free.

    I would recomend it for people who want more power and flexibility than ms paint, don't want to pay or don't need hte features of paintshop or photoshop and don't get on with GIMP (again great but just can not get on with the interface!!)

    Keep it up!!

  340. 2 out of 5 stars
    ptolemy

    Reviewing 2.1b (Aug 15, 2005)

    Yup, it's Paint. Dot Netted. And it's almost Paint Shop Pro. Woopdeedoo. How about only telling us about v2.5 or v3? Hmmmm?

  341. 5 out of 5 stars
    Mark Gillespie

    Reviewing 2.1b (Aug 15, 2005)

    Errm, hasn't V2.1b been out since MAY?? Hardly new...

    "Too resource hungry due to .NET"

    Does this guy know anything about .NET? Apparently not... Go and read up on .NET resource usage, and performance compared to Win32 apps.

    You will see, that altough .NET apps take a while longer to start (as the .NET VM has to initialise), .NET apps have massive performance gains over Win32 apps, and the resource usage is far less... (and shared between other .NET apps).

  342. 3 out of 5 stars
    guti

    Reviewing 2.1b (Aug 13, 2005)

    Mark Gillespie, I have developed using C# and C++, and they are not comparable.

    C++ is a lot of faster. C#, is at the execution speed of Visual Basic 6.

  343. 5 out of 5 stars
    Geckoboy86

    Reviewing 2.1b (Aug 13, 2005)

    I really like this program. I do not have photoshop because I dont like it. It seems to confuse me. This Paint.NET is like MS paint and photoshop combined into a feature rich and easy to use program.

  344. 1 out of 5 stars
    benZin

    Reviewing 2.1b (Aug 13, 2005)

    Useless.

  345. 5 out of 5 stars
    Tal_Kohn

    Reviewing 2.1b (Aug 13, 2005)

    Very Light And Easy To Use Compared To Other "Big Guns" In The Industry...

    Highly Recommended And You Can't Beat The Value....

  346. 4 out of 5 stars
    mcm

    Reviewing 2.1b (Aug 12, 2005)

    Hopefully this will replace Microsoft Paint on Windows Vista.

  347. 5 out of 5 stars
    AntiochMedia

    Reviewing 2.1b (Aug 12, 2005)

    At the moment, I see no reason to switch from Photoshop CS2 to Paint.NET as I require many of PS's features for my work with digital photography editing, however, I follow Paint.NET closely and enjoy testing new versions.

    It's a damned impressive program, especially for being free. You really cannot beat Paint.NET for value, ease-of-use, and especially for giving to friends and family who want to start using their computers for image editing & manipulation. It's user friendly and has a great interface.

    I cannot wait to see this project grow and grow!

  348. 4 out of 5 stars
    bobad

    Reviewing 2.1b (Aug 12, 2005)

    Last time I used it, Paint.net was a nice program. However, this version will not install on the latest version of Dot Net! I guess that's excusable,,, if the guys hurry up and fix it. :)

    The screen shot is the same size as the little preview shot above. Come on guys! Wake up! :)

  349. 4 out of 5 stars
    Lammikko

    Reviewing 2.1b (Aug 4, 2005)

    Really promising. Resembles old Paint Shop Pro versions in a good way. Without .NET installation and with more nternationalization support this would be just excellent.

  350. 5 out of 5 stars
    joeastacy

    Reviewing 2.1b (Jul 8, 2005)

    1. The price is right. (Unlike Photoshop)
    2. It is intuitive. (Unlike GIMP)
    3. The GUI is great. (Like Paintshop, refer to 1)
    4. I can train users in 30 min. or less
    5. It is exactly what I needed.

  351. 4 out of 5 stars
    imanino

    Reviewing 2.1b (Jun 13, 2005)

    Great for a beta. I kept getting a bug when playing around with the resizing program but in any case this is leaps and bounds past the pitiful paint program that Microsoft has been plaming off for years without much of an upgrade. Maybe outsourcing does have its advantages.

  352. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 2.1b (May 13, 2005)

    Hey zridling, the reason it doesn't have the features of high-end photo editing programs is because it is not a high-end photo editing program :) The lack of an "Options" dialog is deliberate, but the desire to have it remember the last font is a valid one so we're going to consider it for the next release.

  353. 4 out of 5 stars
    zridling

    Reviewing 2.1b (May 13, 2005)

    It's definitely an improvement on MS Paint, but doesn't provide near the features of a high-end photo-editing program. Anyone else notice there's no "Options" to adjust anything with? What if I don't want to use Arial font every time I open the program? Oy.

    [Addendum: thanks skizatch, you're right!]

  354. 5 out of 5 stars
    UTAKER

    Reviewing 2.1a (May 5, 2005)

    Neat
    Free
    Fast
    Easy
    It seems like the way they are developing, it might become a rival to The GIMP (free), Adobe Photoshop and Paint Shop Pro very soon

  355. 5 out of 5 stars
    mutara

    Reviewing 2.1 (May 3, 2005)

    May not reach the quantity of functions of, say, The GIMP, but what counts for me is the user interface. Here it is mostly self-explaining and straightforward, whereas The GIMP's user interface - if u can even call it that way - gives me the creeps.

  356. 5 out of 5 stars
    mjm01010101

    Reviewing 2.1 (May 2, 2005)

    Were it not free and open source I'd give it a four. The value is just astounding however and approaches gimp levels. Amazing for how quick they've worked on it.

  357. 5 out of 5 stars
    skizatch

    Reviewing 2.1 (May 1, 2005)

    shicaca, I don't know what kind of system you're using but on mine it's very fast and responsive. No lag anywhere, and it starts up almost instantly with pretty much any image.

  358. 2 out of 5 stars
    shicaca

    Reviewing 2.1 (May 1, 2005)

    I installed it and deleted it right after that.

    First off it takes forever to open a simple bmp file. I'm not talking a huge one either ... just under a meg. My computer can open the same file in a program MS Office had installed in less than 5 seconds (and that's without the program already running). Paint.NET took like 10 or so (after the program had fully already opened and I used the "File-Open" command!) All the time spent was in the rendering of the picture.

    I'm not sure how long this program has been developed, but I have at least three programs that are better -- by far -- and the only program that I really think it is better than is MS Paint (and not by much because Paint can open the bmp file faster too).

    I'm not saying speed is everything, but it puts a bad taste in my mouth.

    ANOTHER PROBLEM: When using the paintbrush function, there is a noticeable lag between the stroke and when the program actually places the mark on the image.

    I may install again in a few years, but as of right now the program (sorry) kind of blows.

  359. 4 out of 5 stars
    hkm

    Reviewing 2.1 (Apr 30, 2005)

    Cool prog. Hint -- downloads can be slow, so use a download manager like FlashGet.

  360. 5 out of 5 stars
    theheff

    Reviewing 2.1 (Apr 30, 2005)

    The amount of work these guys put into this program really shows. Without a doubt superior to mspaint, and it can perform a lot of photoshop tasks.

  361. 4 out of 5 stars
    utomo

    Reviewing 2.1 RC1 (Apr 27, 2005)

    They need to add the feature list at the website
    http://www.eecs.wsu.edu/paint.net/features.htm

    Add more photo tools:
    resizing, add custome frame, watermark, etc.
    including the batch processing.

  362. 4 out of 5 stars
    GeneralLeoFF

    Reviewing 2.1 Beta 3 (Apr 13, 2005)

    This is a good program but it is geting to complex to be usefull as a basic MS paint replacment.

    MS paint is about simple editing and cut/paste jobs like print screening a program to take a quick and simple screenshot. The only change I want to see done to MS Paint is adding animated gif creation, transparent gif creation, better PNG (including transparency), and full MNG creation. The main GUI should remain 100% unchanged.

  363. 4 out of 5 stars

    Reviewing 2.1 Beta 3 (Apr 13, 2005)

    awesome effort and program!
    one thing i'm starting to notice is it getting somewhat bloated... plz keep this small and fast! :)

  364. 5 out of 5 stars
    bobad

    Reviewing 2.1 Beta 2 (Apr 6, 2005)

    Very nice paint program, with fairly capable photo editing. This is a nice release, and runs very smoothly. The only seriously competing free programs are PhotoFiltre and gIMP. I consider PhotoFiltre to be the best in this class. Although I think gIMP a good program, it's a confusion of windows popping up all over the place, and that ruins it for me (YMMV). Since Paint.NET is an ongoing school project, I think development will continue be rapid and keep getting better. I hope the project manager hates bloat, because Paint.NET is getting a little fat. We do not need another bloated PSP or PhotoShop. Try Paint.NET, and I think you will like it.

  365. 5 out of 5 stars
    Ziad270

    Reviewing 2.1 Beta 1 (Mar 30, 2005)

    Free...OpenSource...
    I love it...the problem was the ressources needed to use it..it seems far better.

    Ziad O'hanlon

  366. 5 out of 5 stars
    TomRC

    Reviewing 2.1 Beta 1 (Mar 30, 2005)

    Fabulous piece of software. This version brings a significant improvement in startup time.
    It does exactly what it promises. Its a better
    alternative to the classic MS Paint. And i just
    want to say Paint.NET is in a too early
    development stage for comparing it with PSP or GIMP or whatever.

    I cant imagine why the rating is that bad. Maybe
    the betanews user are rating it more strictly because it was under the guidance from Microsoft? ;)

  367. 4 out of 5 stars
    Dave_Man

    Reviewing 2.1 Beta 1 (Mar 30, 2005)

    Why not just use gIMP???

  368. 4 out of 5 stars
    glaniator

    Reviewing 2.1 Alpha 3 (Mar 16, 2005)

    Lower memory usage
    Getting rid of the "flicker" when a selection is under a floating window!

  369. 3 out of 5 stars
    allsiante

    Reviewing 2.1 Alpha 3 (Mar 15, 2005)

    I tried some versions up to now, and I still find it painfully slow. It will probably gain more features later so I won't complain about the lack of them. In my opinion, as someone who knows gimp fairly well, this one is a very long way behind gimp in many aspects, no matter what anti-gimp guys say.

    The day when they make it run with mono I'll give it a 5.

  370. 5 out of 5 stars
    GeorgeSantayana

    Reviewing 2.1 Alpha 3 (Mar 15, 2005)

    This program has replaced all of my second-tier image editing programs. My appraisal of the developers is certainly not second-tier, though! I'm astonished at the pace of development, and I can easily envision a day in the not-so-distant future when this program stands shoulder-to-shoulder with Photoshop.

    The UI of this program is what impresses me more than anything else. All of the features seem just so intuitive; I've never found myself fighting it--unlike, incidently, The GIMP.

  371. 4 out of 5 stars
    tigger4046

    Reviewing 2.1 Alpha 2 (Mar 15, 2005)

    Love the layout and speed, but not to happy i have to click on BROWSE to navigate where to save the file other than a default setting. At least with MSpaint when you click SAVE as it says okay, choose the directory. Other than that, I can hardly wait for it's next release.

  372. 3 out of 5 stars
    donpacman

    Reviewing 2.1 Alpha 2 (Mar 2, 2005)

    System Resources...WOW

  373. 3 out of 5 stars
    DiGiTaLFX

    Reviewing 2.1 Alpha 1 (Jan 25, 2005)

    Can't say i'm too impressed to be honest. Admittedly its much better than MS Paint, and the interface is very swish (people should take a lesson from these guys in their attention to detail - best was dialogs going translucent when over work, but then normal with out mouse over them!) but its just not my cup of tea. I feel I can achieve much more with the GIMP, which has a less interesting interface, but much more intuitive and usable once (despite just having the windows float about rather than being part of a main program window).

    Anyway nothing bad about this. just nothing particularly useful for me.

  374. 4 out of 5 stars
    ramian

    Reviewing 2.1 Alpha 1 (Jan 25, 2005)

    Really love Paint.NET.
    It'd be perfect if it had a color picker like Paint has. Perhaps, the user should be given the choice of having the color circle or a fixed set of colors to choose from. It becomes a tad complicated to pick a particular color from the circle after having chosen it earlier. Perhaps, the last 5 or 10 selected colors could be kept in memory in a selection box. If a Paint-like selection list was added, then it could also include a custom color selection list. Also would be good if it had a proper bezier curve tool and a faster startup time.

  375. 4 out of 5 stars
    LordJezo

    Reviewing 2.1 Alpha 1 (Jan 25, 2005)

    Does this thing have a tool similar to Photoshop's magic wand?

    Besides for that this is a great freeware tool. Might be replacing The Gimp on my PC because it is just so easy to use!

  376. 5 out of 5 stars
    Pipewrench

    Reviewing 2.0 (Dec 20, 2004)

    This is awesome.

    What's funny is that this is similar to Paint Shop Pro. I'd rather use this than "Gimp 2.0".

    It's really a darn good free product. I can't say much else. It's just good.

  377. 4 out of 5 stars
    TomRC

    Reviewing 2.0 (Dec 20, 2004)

    Wow, this is a nice one. Does exactly what it says.
    A free and enhanced alternative to the standard paint application. I think i gonna stick with this for small jobs i usually did with the standart paint.
    Espacially the layer and history support are very nice.

    The only flaw is that there are still some small bugs. For example it gots problems with maximizing itself on my system.

  378. 5 out of 5 stars
    Valathax

    Reviewing 2 Alpha 4 (Dec 11, 2004)

    Great Product, using version 1.1 in Terminal Services for 70 people and it works great.

  379. 4 out of 5 stars
    Neoanarchist

    Reviewing 2 Alpha 4 (Dec 1, 2004)

    in answer to all the "uses up too much memory":

    -Limit History Length
    -For those worried about using up all their memory

    maybe you ought to try that.

  380. 2 out of 5 stars
    shiften

    Reviewing 2 Alpha 4 (Nov 30, 2004)

    I would like to point out that they pretty much just copied Paint Shop Pro's interface, the buttons especially.

  381. 4 out of 5 stars
    Jaz-M-Taz

    Reviewing 2 Alpha 4 (Nov 30, 2004)

    Great program with a lot of great features, but has a very large memory footprint.

  382. 5 out of 5 stars
    Vantorax

    Reviewing 2 Alpha 3 (Nov 16, 2004)

    Very impressive! Great job and keep it up!!

  383. 5 out of 5 stars
    ddrcoder

    Reviewing 2 Alpha 3 (Nov 16, 2004)

    Glad to see so many people are trying the program, and that they are enjoying it.

    EdenAdore: Paint.NET does support external filters. Check out our website. The Effects API is fully accessible and easy to program. This hasn't been a feature for a long time, however, so we don't have too many effects, but they're on the way.

    Maverick16: Thanks, glad you like it. Yes, C# & .NET are great for coding, and they result in rather high memory usage.

    ckjnigel: That's your problem. :)

    sheppe: It has a text tool now, and while this is a little bit of a way away from MDI, you can use multiple copies of Paint.NET at once, and this is fully supported.

    -Tom Jackson, Paint.NET co-developer

  384. 4 out of 5 stars
    donpacman

    Reviewing 2 Alpha 3 (Nov 16, 2004)

    Nice memory pig.

  385. 4 out of 5 stars
    AntiochMedia

    Reviewing 2 Alpha 3 (Nov 15, 2004)

    I am very impressed with this program. Every last element has been carefully designed to be user friendly.

    The idea for the tools, layers window, and history window turning transparent when not selected are fantastic and lacking in Photoshop.

    While the application does lack the ability to open multiple files simultaneously, is not as optimized as Adobe Photoshop, and could definately benefit from the ability to use External Filters - it is only on a 3rd milestone and is already an extremely usable alternative to Photoshop for businesses and individuals unable to purchase a license (or pirate) Adove Photoshop (or Corel PhotoDoodledoo).

  386. 5 out of 5 stars
    Maverick_16

    Reviewing 1.1 RC1 (Oct 2, 2004)

    SERIOUS: A+++++ to Rick et al. Paint.Net is a clear example on how students may surpasse teachers :) . A message to the team (pdn2?): learn from them but don't become one of them !!!

    NOT SO SERIOUS: no wonder ms software is sooo bloated as ms uses such gorgious models for the developers so they keep coding and coding and coding and coding...

  387. 5 out of 5 stars
    ckjnigel

    Reviewing 1.1 RC1 (Oct 2, 2004)

    Great! But how do I get the chick in this photo to tutor me in the finest points?

  388. 4 out of 5 stars
    sheppe

    Reviewing 1.1 RC1 (Sep 30, 2004)

    A nice light graphics application that could be good for those who don't have the time to learn the ins-and-outs of a commercial application. Unfortunately, it doesn't have an MDI interface, which means that you are contrained to working on one image per application instance. Also, its text tool could stand to be a little more flexible. Aside from those items, though, this seems to be a very good freeware graphics editor.

  389. 5 out of 5 stars
    DigitalSin

    Reviewing 1.1 RC1 (Sep 30, 2004)

    Very nice. Light and easy to use

  390. 5 out of 5 stars
    donpacman

    Reviewing 1.1 RC1 (Sep 29, 2004)

    "second that"
    Great program!

  391. 4 out of 5 stars
    virtorio

    Reviewing 1.1 RC1 (Sep 29, 2004)

    Impressive set of features for a free image editor. Now if only I had some graphical talant.

  392. 5 out of 5 stars
    noredspoon

    Reviewing 1.1 RC1 (Sep 29, 2004)

    Not bad at all! I'm very impressed with the lightweight feature set. It keeps the old familiar strongholds and adds some very useful features. It's definitely worth a shot! See what you think

Discuss Paint.NET