Reviews of PeaZip for Windows (32-bit)

1. 
   DeadFly

   Reviewing 4.5 (Apr 10, 2012)

   I like everthing about PeaZip except it's lack of unicode support. I still have to use 7 Zip frequently to deal with unicode filenames and paths.
2. 
   Sammo

   Reviewing 4.3 (Dec 27, 2011)

   Currently my favorite. Its come a long way over the years and now offers more features and functions than it used to.
3. 
   Input Overload

   Reviewing 4.2 (Nov 22, 2011)

   if you want a free zip program you won't go far wrong with this gem.
4. 
   johnusa

   Reviewing 3.6.2 (Feb 28, 2011)

   This is an excellent and free software.
   But, don't download it from here, as the file here is not the full program.
   I think it is stupid for this site not to provide the full installer which is only about 6 MB in size.
   To get the full versions, 32 bit and the 64 bit versions, go here:
   http://code.google.com/p/peazip/
5. 
   Input Overload

   Reviewing 3.6.1 (Feb 11, 2011)

   anomoly, thanks for that, i'm using PeaZip & I'm impressed with it. All the best.
6. 
   anomoly

   Reviewing 3.6 (Dec 28, 2010)

   Since peazip and 7zip both use the 7zip algorithm, comparison-wise it makes no difference. This is of course a much more powerful program and a much slicker gui. But again I only use it for the secure delete as freearc can make 7zip's quite easily as well. Between the four; freearc, this one, 7zip and winrar, it's just a matter of which one you prefer. Winrar has terrible compression next to the others but it integrates well if that's your bag.
7. 
   Input Overload

   Reviewing 3.5.1 (Dec 13, 2010)

   Hows it compare to 7 Zip, which I prefer to WinRAR? Gave it a 5 as to not mess system of stars up!
8. 
   TC17

   Reviewing 3.2.1 (Sep 15, 2010)

   Not perfect, but pretty good. I think Winrar is still the best, but Peazip supports much better encryption than Winrar does, it also supports using keyfiles for the encryption, including 7zip files, which 7zip doesn't even support.
9. 
   nilst2006

   Reviewing 3.1 (May 2, 2010)

   Yeah, i reacted the same way....Windows 3.1 ! LOL !
   
   Anyway it is a quite good program, i give it a 4.
10. 
    nvic

    Reviewing 3.1 (Apr 30, 2010)

    Haven't used it recently, but it worked fine the last time I did.
    
    At the reviewer below me, I was thinking the same thing: that they wrote a version for Win 3.1...
11. 
    elitegangsta

    Reviewing 3.1 (Apr 30, 2010)

    haha, title should say "Peazip 3.1 for Windows" As suggested, this is a new archival tool for Windows 3.1! Lets bring it back old school guys.
    
    Anyhow, aside from betanews being dumb... seems like a good app!
12. 
    B__B

    Reviewing 3.0.beta (Feb 13, 2010)

    I hadn't updated it for a while (2.8), but 3 beta worths the update.
    BTW it would be nice an auto-update feature.
13. 
    anonymouscowturd

    Reviewing 2.9.0 (Jan 21, 2010)

    Good god, the GUI just became usable. I thought this day would never come.
    Still takes an age to start up though. It's getting there. Albeit slowly.
14. 
    umi81

    Reviewing 2.9.0 (Jan 20, 2010)

    Nice compressor and file manager, opens anything I know of.
15. 
    Havokdan

    Reviewing 2.9.Beta (Jan 5, 2010)

    A little different, both visually and in usability, which is used to Winrar for example, stay with it even, unless you do not have curiosity to try something diferente.Eu use default since version 2.8, I asked in the forum, two resources, and the two have been implemented in version 2.8
16. 
    darthbeads

    Reviewing 2.8 (Nov 20, 2009)

    @emanresU deriseD:
    
    Grow up.
17. 
    luluz

    Reviewing 2.8.Beta (Nov 9, 2009)

    2.8.beta seems promising: the new file browser is much better than older one, and even more important to me is the new very cool archive conversion feature, and the task scheduling that is much more efficient.
18. 
    anomoly

    Reviewing 2.7.1 (Oct 20, 2009)

    Not as good a gui as freearc & has about the same compression but better than 7zip. I only use it now for the ease of the secure delete function.
19. 
    DKDude

    Reviewing 2.7 (Sep 18, 2009)

    Nice zipprogram, I like it, keep up the good work.
    
    @emanresU deriseD
    
    You keep voting one star all over the place, and you admit you have a different username, yes you have, the one you use when you release your own program "Process Lasso" if people vot one star for that program you go crazy in many different usernames.
    
    Geezzz dude get a life.
20. 
    elkal000

    Reviewing 2.7 (Sep 15, 2009)

    Has everything I need, I like it!
21. 
    emanresU deriseD

    Reviewing 2.7 (Sep 15, 2009)

    Thank you for the concern but I've never used this user name on any other site but this one. If it exists elsewhere it's not by me... Actually there are many sites that simply copy software reviews and show them as if it's their original content. That's probably what you're talking about but in any case it's not me posting all over the place.
    
    BTW, it's pretty weird you Googled this user name.
    
    But in any case, I do tend to review mostly software I dislike with this user name. I use another user name for positive reviews. Gee, why would that be? Can you figure it out? (Apparently you can't. It's not a nefarious purpose as you suggest.)
    
    Regarding PeaZip, it still sucks. Terrible interface, and there are better alternatives for free and for cost.
    
    P.S. I am not the author of Process Lasso, but I do respond to the idiots who slam that utility for no real reason.
22. 
    anonymouscowturd

    Reviewing 2.7 Beta (Aug 28, 2009)

    Oh look! a new interface that looks just as crap as the one before.
    Why can't open source come up with decent interfaces?
    I want to like this but i just.can't.do it.
    Still obscure buttons sitting on the status bar like Clipboard, bookmarks and history. WHY are they there?!
    At least the idiotic little triangle button that used to be in the menu bar is gone. I'll just use Winrar or 7zip and be done with it. This app is just non-sense and i haven't seen any improvement over the years.
23. 
    B__B

    Reviewing 2.7 Beta (Aug 28, 2009)

    @dart, you can easily discover what is "emanresU deriseD" idea of having a good time googling a bit and reading how this name is owned, in nearly all software download websites, to a troll "slapping one stars everywhere"...
    You can guess how much his/her reviews are worthy: one star!
24. 
    darth

    Reviewing 2.7 Beta (Aug 28, 2009)

    "Still obscure buttons sitting on the status bar like Clipboard, bookmarks and history. WHY are they there?!"
    Hmm... maybe to show clipboard, bookmarks and history? :)
    Some apps hide them in menu, IMHO too scarcely visible, some others show them on the top, IMHO is intrusive, some on the left or right, which is fine for me, some at the bottom, which is fine too, expecially is the page layout is horizontal like in PZ's file manager.
    In general, top or bottom is better than left or right for implementing a two pane view for all file managers using a view similar to Windows' "details", like PZ, the opposite is true for vertical priority views, like Windows' "view icons".
25. 
    thost

    Reviewing 2.7 Beta (Aug 28, 2009)

    Works nicely, interface is fine, not ugly as mentioned but who cares anyways as long as it can do compression and decompression etc accurately
26. 
    anomoly

    Reviewing 2.7 Beta (Aug 27, 2009)

    Albeit it still opens multiple instances it does seem to behave smarter and does have the secure delete ability. That and multiple archive creation sets this above 7zip which btw looks gradeschool next to peazip's gui and theming abilities.
    For people complaining about looks please see an eye doctor asap.
    Winrar will still be the one for general manipulation but this will come in handy as well.
    Still if it could all be handled within one instance that would be awesome.
    I can not knock this for what it can't do.
27. 
    lucianct

    Reviewing 2.7 Beta (Aug 27, 2009)

    Same old ugly interface... 7-zip can do almost everything PeaZip does and looks better (though not perfect).
28. 
    bobad

    Reviewing 2.6.3 (Jul 15, 2009)

    Nice GUI, but I don't use the GUI. Nice context menu options, and I do use the context menu. The fact it doesn't handle IMG and NRG archives is a deal killer. Setup file size is unnecessarily large, 4700 KB compared to 7-Zip 900 KB. I'll be sticking with 7-Zip for now, but will check back after another update or 2.
    
    I do recommend it to the average user, but not if you like to extract IMG and NRG files.
29. 
    anomoly

    Reviewing 2.6.3 (Jul 14, 2009)

    Exactly. I can install either 7zip or winrar or both and easily set them to do whatever I want without having to read directions. Winrar handles multiple archives, files, folders without exception. 7zip has optimal compression but will not create multiple archives at once. Peazip has option to save current settings which I find entirely useless as even IT will not create multiple archives and had a problem in selecting more than a file at a time. For an ap to have the ability to create multiple archives from a single selection but then also to have just as many instances open for each archive it creates is absolutely unacceptable. If this is a limitation or other I definitely don't want to read about it. Bottom line, there are too many instances wherein I need an ap that can handle manipulating many archives at once without me needing to give it directions, or baybysit them with bedtime stories.
30. 
    overlandpark4me

    Reviewing 2.6.3 (Jul 14, 2009)

    LOL, why would he want to read the doc's? It's easier to whine instead of actually trying to improve yourself..
31. 
    luluz

    Reviewing 2.6.2 (Jun 30, 2009)

    @anomoly
    Would you please just take time to read the documentation before spending 10x the time to write absurdities on the web?
    you can add multiple files and dirs to a single archive from the application itself: open peazip and just add files to the archive... or just drag them to the application (this way you are not limited to add only from the folder you are browsing as in 7zip, winrar, winzip and the others)... or you can just use the SendTo menu entry (just one click away) "Add to archive" rather than the context menu entry "Add to SEPARATE archives" (did you get the SEPATATE part?).
    Why not from context menu (this is in documentation too)? Because Windwos API sucks and you can't pass multiple itmes through a context menu entry, unless you write specific code to query the system for selected items... defeating the purpose of writing a multiplatform application and bounding developers to work for Windows word... nice move Microsoft, I guess there are just people deserving the Monopoly.
32. 
    anomoly

    Reviewing 2.6.2 (Jun 12, 2009)

    STFU luluz. At peazip's early stage it could not handle multiple archive creation from the selection of multiple files. I requested this specifically. No matter from right click or send to (from the gui itself it is impossible) you have multiple instances opening for each archive it tries to create. can you read??? Winrar is the ONLY ap I am aware of which can compress a virtually unlimited # of folders & or files AT ONE TIME within a SINGLE INSTANCE of itself, mimized to the tray in the background, and will even delete the originals upon completion so that once you start the compression, NO MORE input is needed WHATSOEVER. com****inprende?. winrar's compression leaves something to be desired but it's capabilities are apparently in a leaugue of it's own. I may as well use 7-zip albeit it has a few less features.
33. 
    anonymouscowturd

    Reviewing 2.6.2 (Jun 12, 2009)

    It doesn't matter what i do. I just simply can.not.like.this.app.
    Why are there menu items to the control panel? where are some buttons in the bottom right hand corner? Why can't i get rid of the text under buttons? Where's the folder tree? Why the hell does the portable version take about 10 seconds to start up? Why would i want to switch from archive view to folder view when the app should know when i'm looking at a directory and when i'm looking at an archive? The GUI is simply horrifying.
34. 
    luluz

    Reviewing 2.6 (May 4, 2009)

    It is a good update, the new interface is more powerful for handling bookmarls (very useful) an history.
35. 
    darth

    Reviewing 2.6 Beta (Apr 7, 2009)

    @ staff u don't mod messages, right? Right?
    Why on earth are they called "comments" if someone has nothing to say like this one?
    Please, mod comments to keep discussions on topic.
36. 
    darth

    Reviewing 2.5.1 (Feb 27, 2009)

    I really like the gui, fast and clean (and gets better at each update), I've just never found a program of this type with so many useful features.
37. 
    reddy.shyam

    Reviewing 2.5.1 (Feb 27, 2009)

    Good thats its free but very very slow to load.
38. 
    TomRC

    Reviewing 2.5 (Jan 31, 2009)

    Pretty powerful archive tool. But the gui you have to love it or hate it. In my opinion the gui isnt that... ah .. look at my rating.
39. 
    anomoly

    Reviewing 2.5 (Jan 28, 2009)

    After testing this can now easily replace winrar (done). Looks better than ever and with secure delete and encrypt options makes for one powerful prog even on your flash drive.
    Nice
40. 
    B__B

    Reviewing 2.4 (Nov 17, 2008)

    Amongst other positive aspects, this program is very fast to start up and also it is very fast to open huge archives.
    As for the user interface, color marking for folders and archives rows make browsing very simple and intuitive.
    
    btw, a) never had problems in switching flat and browse mode, and b) as WinRAR and 7-Zip, the program is SUPPOSED to let you browse both inside and outside archives, so I really don't understand who complains of it behaving exactly as any other (good) archive manager.
41. 
    hunterb

    Reviewing 2.4 (Nov 16, 2008)

    Interface is ok, although some items are not intuitive and some labels still leave me wondering. 2 biggest issues for me is: 1. Slow to startup (10s) 2. The browser mode interface does not show tree view and even seems to not show the folders very distinctly. I went to flat mode, now it won't go back to the browser mode. I also allows to you browse outside of the archive which can get confusing if you didn't intend to.
42. 
    PagingDrLeoMarvin

    Reviewing 2.4 (Nov 11, 2008)

    Excellent cross-platform program! I love PeaZip!
43. 
    dejavu

    Reviewing 2.4 (Nov 10, 2008)

    Excellent!
44. 
    anonymouscowturd

    Reviewing 2.4 (Nov 10, 2008)

    Archive support wise its great. GUI wise its wrong in so many ways it's laughable. Check out the little arrow in the top right hand side. What the hell is that about? Is it intuitive to stick it there? Nope. And then there are the buttons within the tabs...If they'd just sort that stuff out i'd switch to it over 7zip (which also has a sucky UI, though not as crap as this, Peazip really takes some beating in this department)
45. 
    joeshmoe7

    Reviewing 2.3a (Sep 25, 2008)

    this program rocks, and the interface is good enough for me.
46. 
    RWW

    Reviewing 2.3a (Sep 24, 2008)

    I ditched WinRar to use this program and to me it is flawless. I have placed it on several machines.
    I do like the GUI......I am so tired of all the super slick Vista type GUI's out there. Several programs I have used in the past have been ruined by that.
47. 
    B__B

    Reviewing 2.2 (Aug 13, 2008)

    Guys, the GUI is a subjective thing.
    Don't cry it sucks (or don't cry it is a miracle) if it is a bit different from the plethora of WinZip clones.
    I've used all 2.* releases and after a few sessions IMHO most users will find the GUI is fully usable: simple since hides unwanted finesses to basic users, powerful since allows high level of freedom and interaction to advanced users.
    But it is not a clone, and doesn't look like a clone... that for me worths 5 star!
48. 
    the_lord_almighty

    Reviewing 2.2 (Aug 12, 2008)

    7-Zip has a terrible GUI, PeaZip actually I think did an excellent job on the GUI. It's all a matter of opinion in the end. A lot of "computer guys" prefer a techno or sharp look but I prefer a more soft and polished look.
49. 
    anonymouscowturd

    Reviewing 2.2 (Aug 12, 2008)

    I've got to agree with some of the other comments here. As an archiver this is really quite good as it supports so many different formats (for decompression). GUI-wise though it really sucks. What is it about open source stuff that almost always condems it to having a crappy interface? Think GIMP, 7zip and now this. All fantastic technically, but brought down by sucky interfaces.
50. 
    rotjong

    Reviewing 2.2 (Aug 12, 2008)

    I've used this program for awhile. It's not the only compression software that I use but I find in some cases that it is amazingly useful in its own ways such as joining split files and splitting files among other things.
    
    The only issue I really have with the program is the UI. I find it not be especially intuitive.
    
    I'd give this software a 5 but I'm removing 1 point because of my extreme dislike for the UI.
    
    It's great software, nonetheless.
51. 
    DudeBoyz

    Reviewing 2.2 (Aug 12, 2008)

    I'd never heard about this program before this. But my first impression is that it works really, really well.
    
    I own and use WinRAR all the time, but really appreciate the value in free and open source applications.
    
    Context menu support is absolutely cool, and I'm glad this app supports that feature as well.
    
    I may have more comments after a more detailed analysis of it and perhaps a modification in the rating. But so far, so good.
52. 
    darth

    Reviewing 2.1 (May 26, 2008)

    Excellent file manager, and very powerful compressor.
    The interface is simple to use and at the same time very feature-rich, because anything is in the right place where you would expect it.
    A nice plus: many handy keyboard shortcuts.
53. 
    WhiteZero

    Reviewing 2.1 (May 23, 2008)

    Decent program, however I really didnt like the interface....
54. 
    dejavu

    Reviewing 2.1 (May 19, 2008)

    Powerful archiver. Excellent freeware. Congratulations Giorgio Tani and thank you!
55. 
    H2O_lover

    Reviewing 2.1 (May 19, 2008)

    I have read it, and this option is available for "Send To" menu ONLY, but what I need is for this to be in the root of the context menu. And in the root there is only an option to "Add to separate archives(s)", for which I have no use.
56. 
    kise

    Reviewing 2.0 (Apr 12, 2008)

    Extracts and craetes compressed files without requirement of installation. No messing with my registry (as Winrar does) so I
    m replacing winrar with this one.
57. 
    improvelence

    Reviewing 2.0 (Mar 23, 2008)

    H2O_lover if you would have actually READ the installer options you would have been able to turn that on. I, on the other hand benefit greatly from the "add to seperate archive" option. Great app, finally replaced 7zip and ICEOWS.
58. 
    H2O_lover

    Reviewing 2.0 (Mar 21, 2008)

    The only thing that is missing, for me to use PeaZip on a regular basis, is the context link to create ONE archive from many files.
    
    I don't know why the author does not implement this. I never need to create separate archives from the files that I select in explorer. But only ONE archive.
    
    I know about the "Send To" menu. But that's just not it. It's inconvenient.
59. 
    RWW

    Reviewing 2.0 (Mar 21, 2008)

    Never a problem with Pea Zip. I reccomend it to everyone.
60. 
    luluz

    Reviewing 1.11 (Jan 29, 2008)

    Very good release, and good to have the CRC column in the browser of archives.
    The CRC and hash tool is cool too, I'm using it a lot for checking MD5 / SHA of downloaded files!
61. 
    dejavu

    Reviewing 1.11 (Jan 28, 2008)

    Peazip is an excellent software. I use since first public release of Pea-Peach project! Thank You Giorgio Tani!
    About Winrar 64 bit:
    
    http://www.win-rar.com/i...4&kb_article_id=190
62. 
    nika27

    Reviewing 1.11 (Jan 28, 2008)

    RARLAB has no 64bit version of WinRAR. Hmmm... I wonder how their business survives, and keeps WinRAR so polular?.. What a mystery!
63. 
    KRome

    Reviewing 1.11 (Jan 28, 2008)

    7-Zip offer a 64 bit version. Until this does I wont even consider.
64. 
    TarrantM

    Reviewing 1.11 (Jan 28, 2008)

    Works great for a while and then suddenly stops bringing up the gui when opening zip files despite launching the process. Which means I need to go into task manager and manually terminate the process. Then I need to uninstall and re-install the software for it to work properly again - until it breaks the same way.
    
    Despite looking pretty, it's not worth that annoyance.
65. 
    RWW

    Reviewing 1.10 (Dec 12, 2007)

    Switched to this from WinRar and have had zero problems.
66. 
    luluz

    Reviewing 1.10 (Dec 11, 2007)

    @gundamboyzack
    You can delete files in archive (if the archive type allows modification): rightclick, modify archive, delete selected objects.
    
    @anomoly
    Disappearing options? That's a weird bug but I never meet it, fortunately. What system do you have? I'm on Vista HP on dual boot with XP Home and it just doesn't happens.
    Too, on my PC it allows flawlessly to set a default compression value for each format, I would not even touch a program not allowing me to do so, can you please elaborate the problem better?
67. 
    anomoly

    Reviewing 1.10 (Dec 10, 2007)

    It does work but I have issues.
    STILL, (as with previous versions) when I go into options and mouseover them they all disappear & I have to mouse again to see what the hell is what the hell. very very irritating
    Also-Why is there no default compression value. I can't see browsing for a saved file in order for this to act a specific way on a regular basis.
    As for being portable-so is winrar, 7-zip, etc... (& peazip) if you simply copy prog folder to another location.
    Using winrar 4.65 now and it is FLAWLESS.
    I am on an amd with a gig of ram.
    If gui was fixed so that options did not freakin' vanish AND it could hold a default compression value without looking for another file (ridiculous). I would install this again.
    I used it every day for a couple months but got tired of the gui issue etc.
    At least now it has progress indicators. ?
    7-zip (format) is better than rar imo.
    Almost forgot.
    One other peeve is if it extracts the same data twice it renames files and creates extra work for me.
    Exactly why it needs a default compression value that DEFINITELY does not do that.
68. 
    gundamboyzack

    Reviewing 1.10 (Dec 10, 2007)

    great to finally see drag and drop support. Now if we could only get an option to delete files from within the archive...
69. 
    Ian C.

    Reviewing 1.9.3 (Nov 4, 2007)

    Neat looking program, supports lots of formats, and does them well (7z works as well as the official 7z app). Another nice feature is being able to make each selected file a separate archive, a feature I've been longing for with 7zip. However, the interface is somewhat counter-intuitive, like when you go to options, to get out of it, you need to go to 'File' -> 'Main'. Also the context menu's aren't cascaded, which makes my context menu twice it's normal size, not cool.
70. 
    luluz

    Reviewing 1.9.3 (Nov 2, 2007)

    Very good, many smart improvements here and there over previous versions, overall better and even more usable.
    
    @sammCA
    lpaq5.exe is a 9KB open source program released by compression researchers (see http://cs.fit.edu/~mmahoney/compression/ ) and it's not likely to come with Windoze malware... anyway I tested it (from PeaZip and PeaZip_portable) with latest AVG virus definition and no malware was found.
    I also tested the lpaq5 executable in PeaZip with original one from Mahoney's site, through PeaZip's compare function :), and they are byte to byte identical, so your report may either be a false positive or the file may have get corrupted after the download (you can test it with original one as I did).
71. 
    sammCA

    Reviewing 1.9.3 (Nov 2, 2007)

    Um-m-mh - Attempted installation of the mobile version (at least) seems to give a virus error: "New Malware.j" in \res\lpaq\lpaq5.exe.
    
    (Otherwise, the utility looks admirable)
72. 
    anomoly

    Reviewing 1.9.1 (Sep 12, 2007)

    Drag n Drop support would be nice.
    Providing it can extract archives of type (.001 .002 .003 etc), which it couldn't before, it will be close to perfect.
    Love the gui. Merits a 10 (ugly? get your eyes checked)
    As far as being slow, it depends on your setup. Winrar slows explorer to a halt. Peazip is very robust and I haven't noticed this in particular.
73. 
    luluz

    Reviewing 1.9.1 (Sep 11, 2007)

    @zridling
    C'mon man, have you even tried the app or just watched the vrey out of date screenshot?
    Keyboard shortcuts are everywhere, you can see them in archiving and extraction context menus and are documented in the FM.
74. 
    zridling

    Reviewing 1.9.1 (Sep 10, 2007)

    Lovely app, but dang, no keyboard shortcuts? C'mon, man!!
75. 
    guti

    Reviewing 1.9.1 (Sep 10, 2007)

    Good point to have an universal GUI for other compression technologies, but it still lacks lots of features, and is a bit ugly.
76. 
    Nikkie

    Reviewing 1.9 (Aug 25, 2007)

    good start but..
    
    where is the drag and drop?
    
    why does it stall and extract slower than izarc/tugzip?
    
    otherwise, keep up the good work.
77. 
    anomoly

    Reviewing 1.8.1 (Jul 12, 2007)

    magnifique
78. 
    horsecharles

    Reviewing 1.8.1 (Jul 10, 2007)

    Be careful w/ laatest release: the box check for clearing all file associations does not work.
79. 
    molumen

    Reviewing 1.8 (Jun 11, 2007)

    Very nice GUI, overall functionality is very good, it is stable and it is absolutely free.
    
    5/5!
80. 
    ZenoLabs

    Reviewing 1.7 (May 14, 2007)

    Great job, man!
81. 
    dejavu

    Reviewing 1.6 (Apr 26, 2007)

    Since version 0.10 (first) I use this excellent freeware!
82. 
    yokozuna

    Reviewing 1.6 (Apr 26, 2007)

    PeaZip is a very good utility in the way 7-Zip should be heading. Aestetically pretty refined, pretty simple but very capable. Ironically the weakest point is the PEA format, which does not seem to have any advantage in terms of compression over 7z files (fortunately fully supported bt PeaZip). Anyway, the program IMO deserves 5/5.
83. 
    horsecharles

    Reviewing 1.6 (Apr 26, 2007)

    Very 'promising' project...can act as front end for quad, izarc, 7zip, etc.
84. 
    anomoly

    Reviewing 1.6 (Apr 25, 2007)

    VERY VERY nice. With basic default settings blew away winrar in compression to 7zip format as opposed to winrar's rar at fastest. Will create separate archives for each file. (7-zip: day late & a $ short). KEEPER
    goodbye winrar

Discuss PeaZip for Windows (32-bit)

No comments yet