Reviews of Rightmark RAMTester

1. 
   The MAZZTer

   Reviewing 1.0 Beta 3 (Aug 6, 2005)

   The more I think about this, the more useless this program becomes.
   
   This program can only test unused memory. At any one time I have over half my memory used. That's when I'm not doing much of anything.
   
   So if I have bad memory, there's a 50% chance this program won't find it. So I'd have to boot from a floppy and use a DOS tool anyway.
   
   So why bother with this in the first place?
2. 
   husky87

   Reviewing 1.0 Beta 3 (Aug 6, 2005)

   did any of you even bother to read the description? tools.
3. 
   photonboy

   Reviewing 1.0 Beta 3 (Aug 5, 2005)

   This is really a waste of time.
   
   Someone with problems may even run this program and conclude that they don't have RAM problems because it only tests the free RAM.
4. 
   Banquo

   Reviewing 1.0 Beta 3 (Aug 5, 2005)

   "And sometimes it's better to test under the load of the windows GUI!" It's a nice program, but that's not how memory testers work. They load the memory themselves and test it; they don't test memory that is already being used. That's why it's better to run from a DOS startup disk so the memory is free.
5. 
   pyridox

   Reviewing 1.0 Beta 3 (Aug 5, 2005)

   >RAM tests are best run in DOS
   
   And sometimes it's better to test under the load of the windows GUI! Wjere most of apps run.

Discuss Rightmark RAMTester

No comments yet