SecureCRT 6.1 Beta 2 beta
Publisher's Description:
SecureCRT software combines the secure login and data transfer capabilities of Secure Shell (SSH) with the reliability, usability and configurability of a proven Windows terminal emulator.
Latest Changes:
Screenshot:
Latest User Reviews:
| Reviewer: | SuzzyWoozy | Jan 16, 2008 |
| Version: | 6.0 | |
| |
Well, you're right about the speed here and I can also add that the resource consumption are higher than putty's: 15MB vs. 5MB on a fresh connection (minimum lines in the buffer).
Still I'll rate this high because, regardless of the low speed and hight memory requirements, is still the only suitable tool due to better sessions management screen and estra-session automations it provides.
(Is very hard to use putty when working with 195 Unix machines in my case).
4.50 out of 5
|
| Rating: |  |
|
| Reviewer: | ssb | Jan 9, 2008 |
| Version: | 6.0 Beta 5 | |
| |
|
I do like SecureCRT features but performance wise I have to agree with TomekLutel. Terminal speed is much slower than Putty, even with fast lines (24Mb).
|
| Rating: |  |
|
| Reviewer: | TomekLutel | Dec 24, 2007 |
| Version: | 6.0 Beta 4 | |
| |
SecureCRT doesn't come close to Putty, Putty is much faster, try
time cat /var/log/somebiglog
and look at "user time"...
Putty is almost 2 times faster on 1Mb link, no metter of compression settings.
Home and End keys works correctly by default, unlike in SecureCRT.
The same with line wrapping.
Putty wins hands down, and its free.
|
| Rating: |  |
|
| Reviewer: | Diam0nd | Nov 29, 2007 |
| Version: | 6.0 Beta 2 | |
| |
|
Works great, as always!
|
| Rating: |  |
|
| Reviewer: | Diam0nd | Nov 24, 2007 |
| Version: | 6.0 Beta 1 | |
| |
|
putty doesnt come close, indeed. this is excellent
|
| Rating: |  |
|
|
| Released: | July 2, 2008 |
| Publisher: | VanDyke Software |
| Homepage: | SecureCRT |
|---|
| Downloads: | 18,594 |
| License: | Shareware; $99.00 to buy |
| Limitations: | Yes; 30 day timeout |
|---|
| OS Support: | Windows 2000/2003/9x/XP |
| Rating: | 3.5/5 (102 votes)
|
|