Favorite Files

No favorite files added yet

Recent Posts

1. Comment - Microsoft: No IE7 for Windows 2000

   (Jun 1, 2005 - 11:48 AM)

   lol i agree,
   
   its always nice to have a comedian in the forums
   
   ;D
   (btw i meant that in a good way)

2. Comment - Microsoft: No IE7 for Windows 2000

   (Jun 1, 2005 - 11:41 AM)

   dude, i think first u should try out SUSE Linux 9.3 Prof edtn. then compare it with xp in terms of stability and reliability.
   
   if there is a good MS OS out there then it might be win2k3, then win2k

3. Comment - Microsoft: No IE7 for Windows 2000

   (Jun 1, 2005 - 11:26 AM)

   yeah dont u worry, u'll see when longhorn does come out microsft will eventually boycott xp just like the're doing now to win2k

4. Comment - Microsoft: No IE7 for Windows 2000

   (Jun 1, 2005 - 11:22 AM)

   yea dude, i get what u mean. ur probably better of going with win2k3 or linux.
   
   or dual boot both, just like i did :D
   
   n e way win2k3 is like win2k but it is faster and has some of the good features built into it that windows xp had but win2k didnt i.e. system restore. and cos its a server OS (unlike xp) it dont come with all the bullsh** that xp comes with

5. Comment - Microsoft: No IE7 for Windows 2000

   (May 31, 2005 - 12:21 PM)

   win xp is by far the crappiest os ever made. it is unreliable and unstable, and not to mention that the users are still bombarded with the "Blue Screen Of Death". xp is so prone to viruses, all u gotta do is shove the cable into a modem and bingo, next thing u know, ur stinking rich with viruses, and what happens?? all the hours u put into reformatting the hard drive, installing OS, etc. have gone 2 waste and u have to start all over.
   winxp might have SOME better features and software included with its package than win2k, i.e. "system restore" and "faster boot up time" but that dont mean the entire OS is good. under its shell, it sucks. and u cant use those improvements to say winxp is better. win2k has even won awards for it security, and what has xp got -- F*** all thats what. users want good LONG-TERM enhancements that will make the os stable and secure, not just little incy bitsy improvements that make the os look nice, example= winxp GUI vs win2k GUI
   
   oh, and i almost forgot to mention, winxp takes up more installation space than win2k. most of the crap that winxp comes with is unused by many people who have winxp; why have crap on ur pc when u aint gonna need it or use it, just takes up space, users have to uninstall microsoft java VM themselves cos of security reasons (and get sun java instead), why dont microsoft stop supplying it with their OS's as a whole!?!