RockHead96
No favorite files added yet
(Jul 3, 2008 - 5:29 PM)
I always expect more from my elected representatives than I get. This letter is disgusting. What "harm" are they attempting to "mitigate?" The only harm here is to me, a consumer and member of the public. This is so transparent. Do they think I'm so stupid that I can't choose for myself and they need to step in and help me somehow? And why do they want to take up to 50% of the spectrum and do what with it? Elected representatives are clearly the problem here, not the FCC.
They want HD (it certainly does not mean high definition) capability in satellite radio receivers so, are HD receivers going to be mandated to have satellite radio receivers? Seems only fair. As a consumer I don't want to pay for HD when I am buying satellite radio.
Elected representatives are the problem and have nothing to do with the solution. Why do people keep sending this scum back to Washington?