Brewskie
No favorite files added yet
(Oct 15, 2006 - 9:58 AM)
If the State has some "vested interest in protecting morals" then how would this be different then the Taliban, or the whackjobs in Iran?
I say no to the ruin of our freedoms from those who want to regulate morality, either from the extremist Christians, the extremist secularists or the Taliban and their Shria law.
Which is more immoral, someone who uses the internet to gamble or someone who uses the Government to force their own morality on others?
(Oct 14, 2006 - 12:20 AM)
If you ban "gambling" then you have to also ban investing in the stock market. They are both the same thing, if you are against gambling then how can you justify the stock market?
In the end it's personal freedom that is lost here. The Repulicans prove once again they are no different then the Democrats, in that they both crave more Government (power) and more intrusion into our lives. I say give Libertarians a try, cause if you keep voting the way you've always have....you'll keep getting what you've always gotten, legislation like this.