Favorite Files

No favorite files added yet

Recent Posts

1. 
   Review - Rapid Process Manager

   1.7 Beta (Oct 27, 2011)

   @HeilNizar - I apologize that I'm not an artist.

2. 
   Review - Rapid Process Manager

   1.6 Beta (Oct 26, 2011)

   mentallo666 and anomoly - I implemented both of your requests and submitted the new version to FileForum as v 1.7. Should show up in FileForum in less than 24 hours.

3. 
   Review - TubeQueue

   1.63 (Jun 25, 2011)

   wmpl, sure, any suggestions are welcome

4. 
   Review - TubeQueue

   1.62 (May 2, 2011)

   anomoly - I am aware of the inconsistent formats it downloads the videos in in the first place. The fix I implemented was a quick fix just to make the program functional again.
   
   In the next version, I want to have radio buttons that allow the user to select what kind of format to download in (mp4, HD, whatever)

5. 
   Review - GMail Drive

   1.0.15 (Dec 19, 2009)

   Can confirm that this does not seem to work on Vista 64 bit

6. Comment - Despite Real ID, WV licensees may exclude photos from licenses

   1.0.15 (Aug 9, 2008 - 5:12 PM)

   "Religion is evil"
   
   I'm curious - what standard are you using to define your interpretation of "evil" on? If you're defining what is right and what is wrong yourself, it would appear as if you're the victim of being subject to a subjective morality, which is in itself a oxymoron and an utter farce. "It is no morality at all; it is a mere game. If I (or we) make rules, I (or we) can change them. If I tie myself up, I am not really bound. And a nonbinding morality is not morality, only some "good ideas". It has no laws, nothing with teeth in it; only "values": soft, squooshy things that feel like teddy bears.".
   
   Your kind of mentality is exactly why society in general is "more violent, dishonest, crude, selfish and superficial".
   
   http://homepages.paradis...schedj/ca_morallaw.html

7. Comment - Custom 404 pages from Google Toolbar beta cause a stir

   1.0.15 (Feb 12, 2008 - 5:44 PM)

   I fail to see why a setting that the user has to activate willingly and that will only be experience on rare occasions given that it is even activated is generating a "stir".
   
   If the user installs the Google toolbar, they are subject to whatever features Google wishes to impose on them, but obviously this is bounded by according to the toolbar's privacy policy. Google took the safer route and made this an optional feature, so I don't see the big deal.
   
   Sure, it's obviously Google trying to horizontally monopolize the search engine market completely in small and insidious ways, but in a relative sense this is a non-issue.

8. Comment - Custom 404 pages from Google Toolbar beta cause a stir

   1.0.15 (Feb 12, 2008 - 5:43 PM)

   ^ read above

9. Comment - Researcher: US Gov't Editing Wikipedia Entries

   1.0.15 (Aug 20, 2007 - 12:27 AM)

   Except that the government is editing a completely open content user generated extensible cross continental encyclopedia, not completely banning even the thought of such a concept.

10. Comment - Net Neutrality Fight Gets Religious

    1.0.15 (Sep 9, 2006 - 12:22 AM)

    Can someone summarize this article for me?