scruffy
No favorite files added yet
(Mar 26, 2008 - 6:04 AM)
Microsoft is pledging, under its Open Specification Promise, that it won't file any claims against anyone who producing and selling that implementation -- provided it follows the specification rather than attempting to amend it.
I thought "open" means community development... am I mistaken? (Maybe I am!)
Why do they want another standard when there already is one? Google ISO/IEC 26300
Other potential problems? http://www.noooxml.org/open:rejectooxmlnow