Favorite Files

No favorite files added yet

Recent Posts

1. Comment - US Senate Bill Holds IT Managers Responsible for Privacy Breaches

   (Feb 10, 2007 - 1:17 AM)

   Then I guess congress should be held responsible for the SSAN that were release accidentally, mind you by government employees.

2. Comment - Microsoft Closes Vista Upgrade Loophole

   (Jan 30, 2007 - 2:36 PM)

   What does upgrade mean to you? Like most people, I have several business applications, games, utilities, and others. I only have one that’s an original software package and it's days are numbered. The remainders are upgrades. I have found upgrade software requiring the original software to be installed extremely unreliable. Normally this kind of software runs slower, requires more hard drive space, is buggy, and doesn't clean up the registry and the hard drive file system. Now imagine your going to upgrade Windows XP with all of your applications installed. What would be required of Vista to accomplish such a massive task? In my opinion, it’s a nightmare about to unfold not only for the customer but for Microsoft as well. Let’s assume for a moment, that Microsoft required all OS upgrades have the previous version install. So what you would have to do is install MS 3.x than 97 than 98 than Me than 2000 than XP than Vista. I don't think so!
   
   Some have pointed out the availability of Vista OEM, which can be installed from starch. However, where did Microsoft support go? You have none! You are your own support.