halc ion
Sweden
10.4.1.10 (Aug 27, 2011)
It does a lot of things, that's for sure and it can't be faulted for being free and offering even free access to a lot of content.
However, it is:
- Bloated (I mean, 117MB for a mediaplayer / library controller)?
- Very sluggish, even on a modern 4GHz quad-core with 12 GB of RAM and 3rd gen SSD
- Installs a lot of annoying startup items and services, without asking or without need for them (I don't use iPod/iPhone/Apple devices, but support is force-installed for those)
- The x64 version isn't really a x64 version at all
So Apple needs to change their dev framework for Windows and refactor the code.
After they do that, it might get 3 stars.
5.9.3 (Jul 11, 2011)
I have used my copy c. 1.5 years now.
While being fairly happy with it in terms of performance, a couple of issues have prompted me to lower the rating.
1) Lately it has not been performing very well (I'm using 5.9.2 on Win7 X64). If I install and uninstall using Total Uninstall an application still leaves stuff behind and detects these later. I don't have time to start digging now with Systeinternal Tools, but clearly some files on my C: drive (all monitored) is left behind by the uninstaller.
2) The ability not to easily resolve uninstall conflict and control uninstall per app basis. This can lead to issues where I uninstall a later / newer file, installed by two different programs, when I use uninstall to remove one of them.
Other than that and some UI issues (it could benefit from UX refactoring), it's a very decent program.
I hope the author considers these issues for the next major update.
14.0.797.0 Beta (Jun 22, 2011)
v. 14.0.797.0 Beta
Reviewing this not as a pre-alpha beta, but as a functional software for everyday use:
- crashes on HTTP post page reload is a MAJOR bug.
People, if you are a normal user the version I'm reviewing is NOT ready for daily use, unless you are a masochist and never use HTTP POST pages ever.
Also, I have 15+ years of experience in software projects (incl FOSS) and the Chrome version numbering logic is just silly. They up a major version number every time they add some lowly new features.
Other than that (applies to all versions so far):
1. No selections of install location (breaks OS UI/UX converntions). Bad
2. No easy selection for multiople profile
3. No easy selection (other than command line hacks) for cache/profile directory placement or size (esp. bad for SSD users)
4. Missing really basic browser UI features like selection of link/style rendering
5. Still calls home by default and doesn't openly say so (hidden in legalese and setting in chrome:flags)
6. No granular control over JavaScript security or what is allowed to run
7. No true UI customization (esp. for small screens like netbooks)
8. No granular privacy control for history/visited URLs/cache/cookies/etc
9. Automatic update checking is constantly broken on many builds
10. Some really basic features have to be built by adding tons of add-ons, most of which are 3rd party supported (like getting a decent bookmarks menu and changing hidden flag/startup command line features)
Otherwise fast, secure and swiftly improving browser from a great browser team.
But people have made a gospel out of Chrome, while it's still miles behind of other browser (esp. Firefox and Opera) on so many areas it's not even funny.
I just wish their marketing team and installer team would be fired. They are morons.
5.4 Build 5904 (Jun 14, 2010)
The best and only one of it's kind.
If you read/scan multiple feeds and want to aggregate feeds by content (not by site!), then this gem is a must-have.
Been using for the past couple of versions and can't make this crash.
I run this with 14 different windows, 5 different Klip types and more than 100 different feeds.
A real time saver!
10.1.53.64 (Jun 14, 2010)
Updated to 10.1 (both ActiveX and other browsers). Running 3.6GHz Core i7 quad w/12GB of RAM on Win7 and Geforce 275...
and videos are now tearing?
Eh?? Adobe. What on earth is going.
Flash is:
- buggy
- slow
- a huge security hole
- and now doesn't even work properly
I can't wait for HTML5 to catch up and utterly kill Flash in years to come.
10.1.53.64 (Oct 8, 2010 - 9:01 AM)
No. Reasons:
- Next to zero 3rd party decent software, incl. a decent browser
- UI is flashy, but not sure it really is meant for gettings things done
- battery life is probably going to be mediocre, knowing WinCE core
- no real multi-tasking (this is a real mobile computer, right?), no copy/paste, no flash, no memory card file system level access
- has nothing *special*, nothing that differentiates it from the crowd that makes we want to get it
- has a *very* shaky future. Will not buy into another MS product that fails as platform when I use it (WM6.5, anyone?)
I'll watch and learn.
Perhaps MS will have made it usable in two years. Till then, it's Android, iOS and perhaps MeeGo for me.
10.1.53.64 (Dec 15, 2006 - 12:01 PM)
Whatever the industry standard in the future, I hope it becomes FULLY open, with lots of competition on the software the can open/edit/save/print/transform the particular document format.
Any possible format that is proprietary to Microsoft or to Adobe, is something I'd rather not have.
I mean, not have another proprietary format from them.
Formats should be open.
They can keep their software proprietary if they like, but document exchange format should be open to all.