keith walton
UK
No favorite files added yet
(Oct 10, 2000 - 4:39 PM)
Is it me or were they both supposed to have 64-bit pro's by the 3/4 of 2000??? where the hell are they because it the 4/4 and nobody has heard a thing about them for at least 9 months, and this i think has been caused by Microsoft refuseing to make a 64-bit only OS. So AMD's dual 32/64-bit chip should work best. Also whats the point of a 400fsb, when a 200fsb is currently limited by 133mhz ram??. That is why AMD/VIA r developing 133DDR which will solve this problem, but what Ram does intel expect use to use?? i hope its not that RDram that costs £800 for 64mb. spose though it runs at 800mhz or was it 700mhz but its too expensive for anyone ever to use unless they are rich and thick
(Jun 5, 2000 - 5:41 PM)
yeah whatever link plz if it does actually exist
(Jun 5, 2000 - 5:39 PM)
Well no i just thought it was sad that this msg didnt have any threads yet
(Jun 4, 2000 - 11:18 AM)
Well i just hope it does come out on monday, and not get delayed again
(May 4, 2000 - 1:26 PM)
Personaly i prefered the old wma as it was stonkingly quick you could drag a file in and it would work imediatly now it takes too long for the program to load then it takes time to start the file. Sorry microsoft but i liked the old version better. But I do like the look and feel of it though