rjparker1
No favorite files added yet
2.95 (Apr 13, 2011)
-Starting this program will merely start harddisk and registry activity ad infinity by itself, thus it is worthless at actually finding out what is happening.-
Wilfried is a COMPLETE Idiot. Of course it wont do YOUR job for you, stupid ass, it's a TOOL you babbling baffoon. It is to diagnose read/writes. That is a GOOD place to start to find out what programs are causing system slow downs.
Despite what Wilfried the dork has to say, Sysinternals makes GREAT tools, no equal
Campaign to initiate deletion of stupid posts!
11.01 (Apr 5, 2011)
TO:Smokingcat
What are you stupid? If a website isn't supported by a browser it's not supported, where is the intelligence in that thinking mr wizard?
TO:Sephiroth
You must be related to Smokingcat
Enough said.
So to reiterate what Jack and Phat Ester said.. Opera SUCKS.
Tried many versions, they STILL can't get it right.. If I could give a ZERO I would. This software is worthless
6.0.2.2074 (Mar 30, 2011)
For people that don't know google does NOT own or operate their own satellite, so the pictures are NOT google property they are "borrowed" from NASA, the pictures are taken from space (in case you didn't know that either) or a high altitude airplane.
So if the pictures are not updated frequently enough for you.. call NASA complain to them, google makes software NOT spaceships.
4.0 (Mar 21, 2011)
I like Firefox, however it becomes bloated with all those add-ins.
I switched to chrome. I still have the same amount of add-ins.. But my question is Firefox TRUE 64-bit yet?
Chrome is still 32-bit I know, but if Firefox isn't 64-bit I am not switching. I still try it, but nothing seems to get better..
4.0.2 Beta (Feb 14, 2011)
I was excited ... until I install it.
It looks like it COULD go somewhere, but it's lacking like cross domain support.. and reports is STILL under construction, plus the documentation and UI is rather sparse. It's intuitive, but it's not very robust in terms of usage.
I say it needs a LOT of work.
4.0.2 Beta (Jul 7, 2011 - 10:27 AM)
-+1. My parents don't want a smartphone, too complicated for them to learn and they don't care about web access-
That's BS! They care they just don't want to PAY for it. I will bet you a thousand dollars RIGHT NOW if you GAVE them a smartphone with WEB and they didn't have to PAY for it, they would LEARN to use it. They would be surfing.. you can't tell me that NOONE sees value in having information 24 hours a day accessible whenever you pick up the phone, movies, bank account management, email, yellow pages.. weather
Not learning is no substitute for being cheap.
4.0.2 Beta (Jul 7, 2011 - 10:18 AM)
-5) Someday, I too may have but a cell phone and no land-line, but not today. Today it is DSL and land-line, with some cell phone talk. Yea, I can talk on a phone -- no text required - yippee!
Yeah because that desktop goes with you everywhere huh? What you take it to Walmart and plug in the bathroom outlet?
A phone is a portable device. You don't want one, that's fine.. continue living in the past, that's great for you. Just because you HAVE a phone doesn't mean you MUST use it. but it *IS* convenient to have one.
Better to have one and NOT need it, than to NEED it and not HAVE it. I wouldn't go bragging about your DSL line just means you are still living in the 90's... and you live in the ozarks somewhere and you probably still need indoor plumbing... Not something I would relish. But hey if it makes you happy, go with it.. I suppose you still have bunny ears on your TV and car has a hand crank too? Yeah modern conveniences are such a b****!
4.0.2 Beta (Jul 7, 2011 - 10:13 AM)
-People without "smartphones" are a quickly shrinking minority.-
WTF did you READ the article?!?!? READ it again. 2 of 3 mobile users do NOT use smartphones. I bet you are the pride of your cub scouts aren't ya? 10 people. 2 of every 3 is NOT using smartphones. NOT that means they don't have a smartphone. So 7 people DO NOT have a smart phone, and 3 DO.
a, no, b, no, c yes. so that 33% that DO have a smartphone. So if 1/3 (33%) have a smartphone and the other 66% do NOT, do you REALLY think that makes THEM a minority?
Where do you learn math, remedial school?
4.0.2 Beta (Jul 7, 2011 - 10:01 AM)
- But the numbers tells another history.-
I think it's time I bring up the Apple debacle and their patent lawsuit against a certain mobile company.. for the SAME thing. What is the difference between SUING and Negotiating a ROYALTY fee eh mr. wizard?
I will tell you. If it PROVES that a company owes another for code they copied, ripped off, stole, whatever.. and that other company chooses to ASK for the ROYALTY to keep this from becoming a legal nightmare, that's not better than typing up courts with these lawsuits? It amounts to the SAME thing. You get money for intellectual property. What did you fall asleep in economics class ?
Google agree to it, so there MUST be something to this ROYALTY. It's better than getting lawyers involved.. because who gets the money then?
4.0.2 Beta (Jul 7, 2011 - 9:58 AM)
-And now they are reduced to being nothing more than a reviled Patent Troll in the cellphone market.-
Do your homework loser. MS fortune 500 company, top 100. They make in excess of 60 billion in revenue. 25% of that (15 billion in profit for you people that are too stupid to live) each year.
Yeah it really sounds like MS has been reduced to nothing..