Someone reviewed v on Jul 5, 2022

Pros: 555

Cons: 555

Bottom Line: 555

raback reviewed v2.28.0 RC1 (2.27.92) on Apr 28, 2010

That is a extremely usable, light and stable desktop environment, easy to understand, reasonably powerful and rich of features for anyone.
Even OSX and W7 has still something to learn from Gnome's usability - I'm not talking about KDE 4 because it is no longer a desktop environment, it is just a sad joke.

ahjefri reviewed v2.23.2 on Jun 6, 2008

in General Gnome is lighter and more stable than KDE,, though I like KDE interface but stability is a questionable ,

Thanks to all Linux developer in all over the world, I am waiting for the day that all abandon MS product "like Vista"

the artist reviewed v2.21.5 on Jan 17, 2008

THIS IS A DEVELOPMENT BUILD Betanews, tag it as such!

There is no clear changelog for this release but a roadmap and little of a an explanation is available here.
http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentyone

Looking Forward to GNOME 2.22 - Here you will find a little about the next important release. I find personally sweet that the interface will be more CONSOLIDATED as there are too many applets and tabs to mess around with. Yes, its a mess.
http://www.gnome.org/sta...x.html#rnlookingforward

And| reviewed v2.20.1 on Oct 19, 2007

I have an extra computer running Ubuntu 7.04. Ubuntu comes with Gnome.

I am a Windows user, because I play games. Linux is a little weird when it comes to that.

So I wanted KDE because it looks more clean and you know... bla bla.

I found KDE somewhat annoying to setup, so I kinda ditched the idea again. Once Gnome is running its rock stable.

agent2killa reviewed v2.19.92 (2.20.0 RC1) on Sep 7, 2007

I have used both KDE and GNOME under Ubuntu.

All I can say is, KDE is for people who are used to Windows. Probably it is best for those who just converted from Windows. KDE's level of customization is amazing. People who wants to tweak it to their hearts' out, they should use KDE.

On the other hand, GNOME is for people who want clean look. It's simple and this makes it easy to use. Mac-lovers would love it. I also love it even though I always use Windows (sorry!).

I am looking forward to KDE 4 and GNOME 2.20. Let us see how it will compare with each other

Ain Soph Aur reviewed v2.19.92 (2.20.0 RC1) on Sep 6, 2007

i use ubuntu and fedora and i must say that GNOME is the best way for ME (maybe not for someone else) to handle linux.
its easy to use and very simple. also i think that KDE looks a bit like "windows for kids". its more childish. GNOME is - i think - more professional and its very "clean". i love the design and the way it works. maybe there are more possibilities in KDE but i dont really use them, so theres no reason for me to use KDE.
also it uses less memory on my pc than KDE.

sorry for my bad english :)

Alpha258 reviewed v2.19.92 (2.20.0 RC1) on Sep 6, 2007

You guys really use Linux??? - Yes we really do.
Oh my God, you gotta be kidding!!! - eh no we are not.
What a bunch of losers... - why??
Windows Rocks!!! How??
And give me a break, yes I use Windows, never paid
for it and never will! - You have to buy Windows no matter what, you dumba**!
There is nothing better than Windows XP. Well, in fact there is... it´s called Windows Vista!!!

- Actually I would consider Windows XP better than vista as you need at least 1GB RAM, 128mb Graphics card and 15GB of harddrive space to run Vista and its costs more.

I can't wait for Gnome 2.20, I think KDE is too feature packed and it is overkill for most people. Gnome is simple, fast, intuitive and logical.

sjc001 reviewed v2.19.91 (2.20.0 Beta 2) on Aug 31, 2007

comeoffit, Ubuntu comes in KDE as well. It's called Kubuntu. The Gnome version IS much more stable. I've tried both.

brusco reviewed v2.19.91 (2.20.0 Beta 2) on Aug 31, 2007

Gnome is far superior to the clunky KDE 3.5.x

Gnome is fast, responsive and doesnt crash as often as KDE in my experience. KDE is for MS Windows closet-cases who pretend to like linux but secretly yearn for Redmond's OS. KDE is too much of a compromise. Gnome is prettier too, none of the crud and junk from KDE.

Newbie users may feel safer with KDE but once their training wheels come off Gnome (or possibly Xfce) is the way to go.

comeoffit reviewed v2.19.91 (2.20.0 Beta 2) on Aug 30, 2007

KDE is still better, and to the person who said KDE noticeably slower on the same system than Gnome under any distro--Have you tried every distro? I don't think so, so you can't rightfully say that. GNOME is becoming Mono (.Net) dependent. That alone is reason not to use it. The current version of KDE blows GNOME out of the water in terms of usability & features. When KDE 4.0 is released, it will be even better while GNOME continues to stagnate.

@sjc-- I know very well what kubuntu is. You've tried KDE & GNOME on ONE distro. Big deal. Means nothing.

@brusco -- You must be an ubuntu fanboy, they always resort to calling people childish names when someone says something they don't like.

You say GNOME is prettier, none of the crud & junk from KDE. That's a classic statement from an ubuntu fanboy. KDE varies from distro to distro, and can be customized like GNOME.

I stand by what I wrote 100%. GNOME is becoming more & more mono/.net dependent everyday, so it's closer to MS than KDE is.

Tene reviewed v2.19.6 on Aug 2, 2007

It's beautiful. It's elegant.

But it's so damned restrictive. And bloated. Major refactoring needed. Xfce can do it, why can't Gnome?

animaleecher reviewed v2.19.4 on Jun 21, 2007

simple and fast. i would like a little more usability. that's why 4

zridling reviewed v2.19.3 on Jun 7, 2007

What ds0934 said.
Once I start tweaking, I can't stop. And though KDE is verra nize, it's noticeably slower on the same system than Gnome under any distro. If you're bored, check out my serial account of one Windows user's account of "Making the switch to GNU/Linux."

Dsfargeg reviewed v2.19.2 on May 17, 2007

Much better than clunky Kde. I'll put Ubuntu's success (at least part of it) down to using Gnome as default.

ds0934 reviewed v2.16.0 Beta 2 on Aug 10, 2006

They need a cohesive GUI. GNKDE maybe? Tired of Linux forking itself to death while crappy Windoze sits back and makes jokes about it. Gnome is nice, as is KDE, but my complaints about both are that KDE is too much and Gnome isn't enough. Seems to be no closing that gap at this point either. Too bad.

eclipsingdivinity reviewed v2.16.0 Beta 2 on Aug 10, 2006

Excellent frontend to Linux. I use it mainly for speed, but combining Gnome with the ease and popularity of Ubuntu and i'm able to get a great looking/working desktop with ease (in Linux sense). I have used KDE and liked all the 'little' things about it. All the programs KDE have under its wing are actually excellent and it makes me mad that Gnome doesn't grab more developers to create various Gnome-friendly applications.

But if you don't want the eye-candy and clutter of KDE that tends to be a little slow with PCs, Gnome is a speed demon you want.

AlanS2001 reviewed v2.14.0 on Mar 19, 2006

Far Superior as far as usability and _ease_on_the_eye_ goes than KDE.

ds0934 reviewed v2.14.0 Release Candidate on Mar 2, 2006

Not bad, but really wish Gnome would close the gap in feature options with KDE. Just little things like customizing the desktop via right-click options, stuff like that. Nothing major. As for being user-friendly, esp for people trying to make the jump from Windows, Gnome is the easier/friendlier way to go. It just restricts things too much compared to KDE, at this point anyway. I always like to try out the updates however.

anmol.2k4 reviewed v2.14.0 Release Candidate on Mar 2, 2006

it looks like mac os 9.
still it is free

osric reviewed v2.14.0 Release Candidate on Mar 2, 2006

Sounds good but the process of building sounds to complicated for a n00bi3 like me. I'll just wait till it is integrated into popular distros and then install the distro.

horsecharles reviewed v2.13.90 on Feb 2, 2006

I have actually always preferred Gnome to KDE-- and mainstream opinion nonwithstanding-- believe it to be better than its counterpart for new adherents from Windows camp; especially with recent developments.

marty reviewed v2.13.90 on Feb 2, 2006

I give it a 5 on basic principles. Linux is so far superior to Windows (and I WP XP x64 beta) than theres no need to beat a dead horse. More user friendly apps and if you want Windoze apps - use Wine. I have to prefer KDE - since I prefer not to tweak the Gnome desktop - but hey I boot into KDE, GNOME, Xfce etc. Get a life Windows fans (Vista will have a rootkit remover - maybe). Linux has had it for several months at least. I triple boot with Fedora Core 4 using RAID 1 (three WD hd's so I have a spare), Win 2K (the best that M$ ever offered) and WinXP x64. I know many have bought shareware for Windows - that's what 2K is for. Wake up people

yokozuna reviewed v2.13.2 on Nov 17, 2005

I prefer to use Gnome rather than KDE. KDE is an eye candy, but I work with apps instead of looking at them ;-) Gnome is far more intuitive and practical.

httpd.confused reviewed v2.13.1 on Nov 3, 2005

Another quality review from the very, very disoriented HelgeFossmo.

CyberHobo reviewed v2.13.1 on Oct 27, 2005

My choice on my Linux box. KDE reminds me too much of Windows.

digitalking reviewed v2.12.1 on Oct 6, 2005

Why would you name an interface, after something that can be deformed? The name always bugged me, even though it is a nice interface.
Webster definition for Gnome:
an ageless and often deformed dwarf of folklore who lives in the earth and usually guards treasure

ModderXManiac reviewed v2.12.1 on Oct 5, 2005

Faster than KDE. Very customizable, large array of nice apps.

I use both KDE and GNOME for the special apps, but I use GNOME for most of my everyday use.

This release has some nice bug fixes.

*now compiling*

DiGiTaLFX reviewed v2.12.0 on Sep 8, 2005

A great release. Nice new features - a prettier theme by default for one :D

Vantorax reviewed v2.12.0 on Sep 8, 2005

Well, since AlexBR1974 obviously does not know Gnome and has never even tried it, I'll come here to counter-balance his vote. I too never tried it. ;)

Sabz reviewed v2.12.0 on Sep 8, 2005

AlexBR1974 you must work for Microsoft to post such a stupid comment like that,

Gnome Will Always be My Number 0ne choice of DE in Linux, Keep Up the Good work Gnome Devs!!

agent2killa reviewed v2.12.0 on Sep 8, 2005

AlexBR1974, you have not seen the whole world yet.Windows is just an OS.There are a lot more which are MORE stable than Windows.

I've been using Windows for,like,10+ years but recently I switched to Linux(Ubuntu+KDE) and I never regret it.Yeah,there are a lot to learn but it's worth it.

OK back to Gnome,it's good that there is a new version out there.Never try it though but I will.

I'm using KDE and I like it because it's more comfortable to me since I used Windows before(yeah,I'm a nOOb).I used Gnome before(Ubuntu use Gnome as default) but I prefer KDE more than Gnome.

5* for a good software!

the way reviewed v2.12.0 on Sep 7, 2005

Wow, I can't believe they still allow people like this to post on here. Did you actually test out this version of GNOME? If not you should probably ask yourself why you're even wasting time posting here. If you've got a considerable excess of time in you're life try picking up some hobbies, loser.

AlexBR1974 reviewed v2.12.0 on Sep 7, 2005

You guys really use Linux???
Oh my God, you gotta be kidding!!!
What a bunch of losers...
Windows Rocks!!!
And give me a break, yes I use Windows, never paid for it and never will! There is nothing better than Windows XP. Well, in fact there is... it´s called Windows Vista!!!

allsiante reviewed v2.12 Beta 2 on Aug 11, 2005

Best Gnome ever. I'm a wholehearted KDE user, but you still gotta give credit where it's due. 5* people, keep up with it.

DiGiTaLFX reviewed v2.12 Beta 2 on Aug 11, 2005

Must admit this is now my favourite desktop. It can be much prettier than the screenshot shows, its just a shame that the defaults aren't a bit nicer... Aside from looks however, its got the best functionality by far.

omarmakki reviewed v2.12 Beta 2 on Aug 11, 2005

I can't believe u guys saying that GNOME has a good interface. It really sucks! KDE's interface kicks ass!
But have to admit that GNOME is faster...

CyberHobo reviewed v2.12 Beta 2 on Aug 11, 2005

Gnome all the way! To me, Gnome is pleasing to the eye, had a few minor problems with KDE though.

surfbum4fun reviewed v2.12 Beta 1 on Jul 28, 2005

I love this desktop. I use three differnce linux systems and I use Gnome on all of them.As for the bonehead that does not like (ALL) those toolbars,you can hide them silly....

Nikkie reviewed v2.10.2 on Jul 6, 2005

Still the best . Clean and looks great.I'd rather this over kde . Gives the linux experience something more .Eye candy is always good .

The user below doesn't know what he/she is doing , to make such a comment .

thehunger reviewed v2.10 on Mar 10, 2005

GNOME still looks ugly as hell and consumes way too much deskspace. Look at those toolbars!

allsiante reviewed v2.10 on Mar 10, 2005

Ok, I'm a hardtime kde fanatic, but checking out each new gnome release regularly, and I have to tell, I very much like 2.10. Won't make me drop kde though :))

surfbum4fun reviewed v2.10 Beta 2 on Feb 11, 2005

i like Gnome better then KDE. My default login is with KDE, but i always switch to the Gnome Desktop.

DiGiTaLFX reviewed v2.10 Beta 1 on Feb 4, 2005

DarthVeda: Use windows blinds. sure some skin like gnome for it. Great. not as good as KDE though.

allsiante reviewed v2.10 Beta 1 on Feb 3, 2005

DarthVeda, .... get a life.

DarthVeda reviewed v2.9.2 Development on Dec 6, 2004

Nice.
Is there a windows port for this?

Fidelio reviewed v2.9.2 Development on Dec 6, 2004

I still think Gnome wastes too much real estate space. Look at the size of buttons, items in a list, text box, etc. and you will see they could be smaller and have better appearance.

Is it getting better? Absolutely, but the UI design stills need some tuning.

kernelsn reviewed v2.8.1 on Oct 27, 2004

Still the Best !

Saad_alshawwa reviewed v2.8 on Sep 18, 2004

gnome still my best , 2.8 is a great upgrade compared to 2.6 , upgraded with no problems on my FC2 , faster , more stable , new tools.

IVStalin reviewed v2.8 on Sep 15, 2004

After some time testing both KDE and Gnome on Linux, i have recently been impressed enough with the latest Gnome to actually switch from Windows permanently. I have to admit that I am impressed with the quality of both gnome and kde, but there remain things about both that I dislike. KDE has better file dialogs (open / save). Some distributions i have used have replaced the defaults open/save in Gnome, and i think new Open/Save dialogs would contribute much to usability. Also, I don't much like the default theme, but fortunately this is easily fixed. The speed of the file browser could still use some improvement, but overall, i find GTK apps more resposive than their QT equivelents. This version of Gnome is excellent, and very high quality. I recommend that you try it.

thoffmeyer reviewed v2.8 on Sep 15, 2004

woohoo, cant wait untill dropline gnome has gnome 2.8!

Lokheed reviewed v2.8 RC1 (2.7.92) on Sep 1, 2004

Gnome is clean, reliable and snappy. With its GTK themes that render it so crisp and clean looking, how can you not love this desktop environment.

The only problematic area behind Gnome is the lack of support it has. Many seem to be hacking KDE. With more support behind it and more programs available for it, Gnome could be incredible, now its just great.

dac9 reviewed v2.7.2 Development on Jun 15, 2004

Very Stable Desktop Enviroment.... I look forward to future update as I have been a user of this desktop environment my whole life

allsiante reviewed v2.7.2 Development on Jun 15, 2004

I personally always preferred KDE over Gnome, even t o this day, but try the newest Gnomes from time to time. And I have to say I found the 2.6 series very nice, in terms of everything, even speed (I remember the 1.2/1.4 series when Gnome was so sloooow that tea could be prepared between window openings :))

So I have to say good job to the Gnome dev. team, this time it really begins to show that they know what they are doing.

Well, I still will stay with KDE for a while, mainly because of my habits. Still, 5*.

ssb reviewed v2.6 on Apr 2, 2004

Excellent ! It looks that Linux/BSD/XWindows community return back to UNIX tradition leaving Win-like garbage like KDE and adopting Gnome.

slimshady165000 reviewed v2.4.1 on Nov 20, 2003

Go figure.....I just downloaded the Mandrake 9,2 ISOs, and there's already an update to the environment I use :p great job!!! much better than KDE in terms of speed

AlanS2001 reviewed v2.4.0 on Sep 12, 2003

Gnome is getting faster. I've been building RPMS from the releases over 2.3 and a few since 2.4 has been released and the speed differences with kernel 2.6.0-test and Gnome 2.4 are pretty cool.

jrepin reviewed v2.4.0 on Sep 12, 2003

Wow they managed to make it even faster then 2.2. Nice work. And I like to see the desktop more consistent.

AlanS2001 reviewed v2.4 Beta 2 on Sep 2, 2003

veeoh - Why are you responding to something written 18 months ago?

veeoh reviewed v2.4 Beta 2 on Sep 2, 2003

latz:- why the hell are you trying to run KDE on a 100mhz? Duh!

kilimanjr0 reviewed v2.2 Release Candidate 2 on Jan 29, 2003

to espectro: try ctrl+shift+t in gnome-terminal =)

trapanator reviewed v2.2 Release Candidate 2 on Jan 29, 2003

One of best desktops ever!

davisfactor reviewed v2.02 Desktop and Developer Platform on Sep 19, 2002

Gnome is cool ... I like Fluxbox better though :)

jrepin reviewed v2.0 on Jun 28, 2002

GNOME 2 is great. Runs much faster then GNOME 1.4 and also faster then KDE 3.0.1. I also like it's GUI more then Qt.

espectro reviewed v2.0 Beta on Feb 22, 2002

Most of gnome 2 new features have been in kde since qt2 appeared. yes, faster than kde, but all that time you save when loading up software gets lost when you need to compile something in gnome (because of all the dependencies crap) yes i know about red carpet , debian etc but this is a workaround for crappy development. Gnome needs a stabilized development process. Oh please implement a default terminal with multiple tabs like multi gnome terminal

Latz reviewed v2.0 Beta on Feb 22, 2002

KDE is slow like hell, Gnome is convenient. Gnome is usable on my old 100 MHz machine, KDE isn't able to start any application in a reasonably amount of time (even xterm did never show up before I was frustrated and hit Ctrl-Backspace).

Get Gnome and enjoy!

espectro reviewed vDeveloper Platform Beta on Dec 16, 2001

gnome is good, but kde is better
gnome has too many dependencies, corba, orbit, bonobo, oef, gtkhtml, gtk, libxml, gal, etc...

kde practically just requires the kde libs and qt, better features, easier portability. I still dont know why gnome-terminal cannot open multiple instances in tabs, like konsole can.