Someone reviewed v on Jul 5, 2022

Pros: 555

Cons: 555

Bottom Line: 555

uberfly reviewed v14.0.2.0 on Apr 19, 2013

This is commercial-grade software. TONS of well-done abilities. Awesome FTP and web front end file server. If you don't need all this by all means stop whining and use one of the free or cheap servers. Otherwise, serv-u is undeniably full-featured and great.

nedstark reviewed v12.0.0.2 on Jun 8, 2012

It's not free, but you get a lot of bang for your buck!

Also found a chart that does some FTP server price/feature comparison here:
http://www.serv-u.com/vs_commercial_servers.asp

nvic reviewed v10.5.0.21 on Aug 4, 2011

Absurdly expensive for an FTP server. I'll stick with Filezilla Server or Pureftpd.

Also, not sure why betanews lists it as "Shareware $49.95", because the cheapest version available (which is missing most of the features) is four times that at $199.95...and that's without the upgrade and support plans.

wftpserver reviewed v9.4.0.0 on Apr 15, 2010

It is so expensive! I can't afford.

browning3 reviewed v9.0.0.3 on Oct 9, 2009

It just keeps getting better!! They have added everything I requested in previous versions. Full UNICODE support, SSH public key auth, DLL integration support, user added events for emailing info to the users, and a ton of other stuff. Just check out the release notes list: http://www.serv-u.com/releasenotes/. Not much out there that comes close in terms of features at this price point. Just take a look at Globalscape and IpSwitch prices for their high end server. Not even close.

AWESOME!!!!

uberfly reviewed v9.0.0.3 on Oct 6, 2009

Absolutely awesome features, but expensive as hell.

Diam0nd reviewed v9.0.0.3 on Oct 6, 2009

This says more than a million words: the cheapest version costs $200...

http://www.serv-u.com/pricing.asp

They need a reality check, ESPECIALLY with that kind of crappy-ass ftpd.

Diam0nd reviewed v9.0.0.1 on Sep 30, 2009

Bloated. Slow. Overpriced. Lacking features.

Need an ftp to manage remotely - ioFTPD is #1 choice. Need solid ftp server for home use - RaidenFTPD is the best way to go (simply because "gui" [if we can even call it that] of io is so terrible).

io is free an amazingly flexible. Raiden is not, BUT for the price of Serv-U you can get 2 Raiden licences AND Serv-U doesn't even offer half the features Raiden's packing.

Conclusion: stay away.

P.S. $199 for the cheapest version?! Are you people out of your ffin mind? O_o

sorlag reviewed v8.0.0.1 on Mar 24, 2009

$500-$111,000 a year for 1 to unlimited servers a year is simply crazy...
The old versions where good... the new ones get more bloated and overpriced each and every version...

I don't like this version anymore...

emanresU deriseD reviewed v8.0.0.1 on Mar 24, 2009

$500 as the entry-level price for an FTP server with a crap interface and features I can get elsewhere for 1/15th the price? Yeah, uhhh... I'll get back to you on that, RhinoSoft. Did the price of crack cocaine go up or something? They're obviously on something...

shroom reviewed v8.0.0.1 on Mar 24, 2009

One of my huge concerns regarding v7 is still here in v8 : "Default rules cannot be edited or deleted. Create a new limit to override a default one."

At least, the speed is much better than it used to be in v7 : +1
But *that* little annoyance will prevent me from upgrading : -1
Pricing (considering v8 is what v7 should have been in the first place) : -1

uberfly reviewed v8.0.0.1 on Mar 24, 2009

It's a good server, really good, but the pricing is just beyond stupid. The true price for the basic Serv-U is now 499.95, NOT the 49.95 shown above. Good going Rhinosoft.

shroom reviewed v7.4.0.1 on Jan 18, 2009

- 4 major upgrades and it's still slow.
- "Default rules cannot be edited or deleted." : I'm keeping v6 until *this* is being revised.

Undesired Username reviewed v7.4.0.1 on Jan 7, 2009

Wow, ooo, yeah, the "new features" are so great, it's worth putting up with aggravating administration. You sure? It's like having a car that has a great stereo, but having to drive with a windshield the size of a postage stamp.

uberfly reviewed v7.4.0.0 on Jan 6, 2009

Interface is a bit sluggish, but v7 is a huge step beyond v6. Not even close. Yes, the built-in web client is awesome for sharing with the less-savvy users.

browning3 reviewed v7.3.0.2 on Oct 17, 2008

As a long time user of Serv-U, I was a initially a little upset with the drastic changes from ver.6 to 7. But once I wrapped my head around it and realized how much more powerful it is... I can't see going back. The benefits far outweigh the negatives. The interface takes awhile to get used to but when you think about what is really going on it's amazing. The whole frontend is done in a web browser which makes sense for remote configuration and maintenance. A little slow for large amounts of users but there is ways to handle that. Just set up ODBC DB. The basic web client is also fantastic. I no longer have to walk clients through setting up and configuring a ftp client. Saves me and my users time and $$. And by the way, the FTP Voyager JV plug-in is worth it's weight in gold. Just my $.02

zerox reviewed v7.3.0.2 on Oct 13, 2008

the layout looks oke little confusing but its oke
for the rest its a ideal program for users that work whit a lot of db information

grtz

shroom reviewed v7.3.0.2 on Oct 11, 2008

No improvements so far.
And no Opera support after so many releases. Switching from 3 to 2.

@ Undesired Username : it does apply, you can access the FTP Server within a browser now : http://demo.serv-u.com/?...C&password=demo-BWC

Undesired Username reviewed v7.3.0.2 on Oct 11, 2008

I'm sick of seeing this piece of crap posted. Just as I'm sick of idiots who sit down and change a good product just for the sake of change itself. Not easier to use (quite the opposite), not faster (quite the opposite), just different, to help justify a version bump.

I used to be a loyal user of FTP Voyager and Serv-U, but now I say to hell with RhinoSoft.

MickyFoley reviewed v7.3.0.2 on Oct 11, 2008

Sorry ... v6 interface was the best. Nothing more to say.

dynospectrum reviewed v7.2.0.1 on Aug 12, 2008

The interface is way too bloated now. What was wrong with v6.x interface? I get lots of errors saying my "Login Has Timed Out" when I'm setting up options in the administrator's console. Like someone else said before, stick w/v6.x for now.

VLStu reviewed v7.2.0.1 on Aug 5, 2008

PRAY TO GOD YOU DO NOT NEED SALES SUPPORT!
When I was setting up a new account, there was an incorrect email address entered. Since the order confirmation never arrived via email, I assumed the order did not go through and resubmitted the order a week later. This time, I received confirmation of the order via email (no typos). When I received my AMEX bill, there were two charges. I just spent 10 minutes on the phone with “Thomas” in Sales, who informed me he cannot help me with the double charge. He informed me that he could see the incorrect email address in his system, but it wasn't his problem. He further informed me that he is the highest authority I can speak to, and that I “waited too long” to try to cancel the first initialization. Never mind that I was not aware it had gone through until I received my AMEX bill. There was no concern in his voice -- it was matter-of-fact: I was out of luck. The product is great, but if you ever plan on Sales Support - I HIGHLY recommend you buy from someone else.

shroom reviewed v7.2.0.0 on Jul 23, 2008

v7.2 is slightly faster. But there is still no comparison with the v6.x serie.

They also still prevent you from modifying the default rules and ask you to create another ones to override them. Sticking with v6 until they change that.

Undesired Username reviewed v7.1.0.2 on Jun 16, 2008

It's like they took a design team and spent hours and hours sitting around deciding, "How can we take this high-quality FTP server and change it into one that is truly unbearable to use?"

shroom reviewed v7.1.0.0 on May 20, 2008

Accounts' rules are still messy (basic rules can't be deleted/modified, you need to create a second one to override it) and interface is still WAY TOO slow.
Web access through Firefox/IE (doesn't work with Opera !) isn't properly handled too : inactivity timeout while downloading and not being disconnected after closing the browser.

A lot of work need to be done.

Diam0nd reviewed v7.1.0.0 on May 20, 2008

It works, but that's about it really. RaidenFTPD is WAY better and more stable.

why hello there reviewed v7.0.0.4 on Apr 23, 2008

Serv-U is "simplistic"? Huh? It sports more features than BPFTP.

boulderdrop reviewed v7.0.0.3 on Apr 22, 2008

I gave up on Serv-U, way back in the late 90's. It's always been a little "simplistic".

I've been using BPFTP Server for years. It's rock-solid, easy to use and just plain works.

BetaNews has a listing:
http://fileforum.betanew..._FTP_Server/986402672/1

comeoffit reviewed v7.0.0.2 on Apr 10, 2008

Oh my, oh my is this a disappointment. I used and was happy with Serv-U 6.x, but this is a pile of dung. Listen to what shroom says about the front-end, because it's sssssssssslow indeed. For me, it's simply too annoying to put up with. When the app you're using needs to employ a "please wait" progress indicator each time you click somewhere, you know you're using a piece of garbage.

Rather than just slow, it's also much more difficult than it needs to be to navigate.

And what's this? They put my configuration files in the installation directory?

Back to Xlight FTP Server...

Diam0nd reviewed v7.0.0.2 on Apr 9, 2008

It's an OK ftpd. Nothing especially good or bad to say about it.

For those looking for the best FTPd for windows I'd suggest you give a try to those 3:
1. ioFTPD - best for a server that you manage remotely, since it doesn't really have a GUI. Those available are kinda crappy.
2. RaidenFTPD. Best ftpd for a both a home and remote server. It's amazingly easy to use and has all the advanced features like zipscript for instance BUILT IN already.
4. GENE6 - simply a good #3.

I personally prefer RaidenFTPD. Solid as a rock, has advanced stats, ziprscript, amazing UNPnP support (working behind a router) and a TON of more stuff.

uberfly reviewed v7.0.0.1 on Apr 9, 2008

After playing around with the new built in front-end file server (accessible via a browser), I'm officially a fan-boy. This is really great stuff. Rhinosoft has always made top-quality software. Yea, the new interface drags a bit due to it being browser-based, and it's totally different than previous versions interface-wise, but I'll take it based on what's new. Really good stuff - sets a new bar for ftp servers.

shroom reviewed v7.0.0.1 on Apr 6, 2008

This version has a really slow frontend, a very messy rules system and refuses to import my v6 settings.

Waiting for updated versions.

vesku reviewed v6.4.0.4 on Oct 25, 2007

This is the best ftp server i have tried and i have tried many of them. Clear intuitive interface, logical and easy to configurate (even for a newbie), good help file, comes from a professional software house (Rhinosoft), very good support and not too expensive price tag. Ís actively developed and has been around long time enough as bugs have been fixed.

Bozobub reviewed v6.4.0.2 on Feb 20, 2007

Serv-U is the most stable FTP server I've used to date on a Windows box, and deserves kudos for support of excellent security options (encryption and such) and excellent bandwidth controls, but its UI is... well... not so hot. Definitely a steep learning curve for a "noob".

uberfly reviewed v6.4.0.0 on Jan 24, 2007

Wow, so many one stars? No way. I've used this since the late 90's and never the slightest problem. It's stable - always been super reliable. When used with their ftp app it is especially good. Maybe all of you should not base your rating on the poorly cracked version you use for 5 minutes.

thezelda reviewed v6.3.0.0 on Jun 13, 2006

Excellent server, and deals with load well.

Problem is that it is priced incorrectly and has turned from a grass roots single guy super inexpensive project into an overpriced ftpd. Linux/UNIX ftpds are free and can handle astonishing loads ( http://vsftpd.beasts.org/ ) (Check out vsftpd, its fast, free and supports: Virtual IP configurations , Virtual users , Standalone or inetd operation , Powerful per-user configurability , Bandwidth throttling , Per-source-IP configurability , Per-source-IP limits , IPv6 , Encryption support through SSL integration and more)

As far as "conflicting" with a Linksys router, the software doesn't implement TCP, it just uses it. As long as port forwarding is working properly and Windows TCP isn't violating any RFCs, then it should work.

philosopher_dog reviewed v6.2.0.1 on Mar 16, 2006

I like the look and features of this program, but it was conflicting with my linksys router. In the forum they claim you should update your firmware on the router. I don't have patience for this sort of thing. I'm using ws-ftp server and it seems solid.

BoNeLeSS reviewed v6.2.0.0 on Jan 25, 2006

I always liked Serv-U, maybe there's no more feature rich ftp server out there. But be careful: If you don't need those extra features FileZilla server may fulfill your requeriments at no cost.

FailedCRC reviewed v6.1.0.4 on Nov 2, 2005

Serv-U is one of those programs which doesn't actually ever seem to improve with version numbers.
When gene6 came back from the dead and resumed development I ditched Serv-U all together. Gene6 has better resource usage and I have yet to have malicious users crash it (malformed time string was a good one in serv-u).

BobTheVeg reviewed v6.1.0.4 on Nov 1, 2005

ModderXManiac
Would you work for free all life long if you were a software devloper?

Filezilla is missing alot of feature.

muka3d reviewed v6.1.0.3 Beta on Oct 4, 2005

Best FTP server utility.
Changes in this version:
6.1.0.3
* Changed timer code in Serv-U to use multi-media timers, to avoid timer starvation on a busy server.
* Added 1 second timer tick event for add-on DLLs, EVNT_TimerTick.
* Fixed bug causing excessive memory use by Daemon under certain conditions.
* Added support for S/Key one-time-passwords for remote administrator accounts.

donpacman reviewed v6.0.0.3 Beta on Jun 15, 2005

Serv-U 6.0.0.4 Beta is current.

uberfly reviewed v6.0.0.3 Beta on Jun 15, 2005

Love this server. SSL can't be easier to implement, and yes, very secure and easy to use. Tons of built-in features. Like any other app with a port available to the web you need to keep it updated to stay safe. No complaining "i got hacked" when you're using an old version w/ known vulnerabilities.

Bachalor reviewed v6.0.0.2 on Jan 6, 2005

It works butthe workplace and the surface look unclearly - Then I miss a revisionslist...means "what's new" ?

sirhardi reviewed v5.2.0.4 Beta on Dec 2, 2004

Guys,....seriously.would you use this in a business enviroment along with VNC and No-IP Dynamic.....and feel safe ?

donpacman reviewed v5.2.0.2 Beta on Nov 26, 2004

Serv-U is great and secure... if you know what your doing. (:

FailedCRC reviewed v5.1.0.4 Beta on Sep 4, 2004

i haven't ever been hacked although the old time setting crash exploit was most annoying. i'm back to using ipswitch now as of version 5

shroom reviewed v5.1.0.0 on Jul 8, 2004

Certainly my favourite server... And now there's the MODE Z ! Getting better & better :)

isochar reviewed v5.0.0.12 Beta on Jun 13, 2004

Serv-U is rock solid, feature rich, and has a very clean interface. Top it off with good support and constant updates, and you don't have to question why it's one of the best FTP servers out there.

Johnoost reviewed v5.0.0.11 on Jun 13, 2004

Another fine release. The godfather of all ftp servers, this is really the best one.

FailedCRC reviewed v5.0.0.1 Beta on Feb 14, 2004

virtual path mappings are so much easier and less hassle to create in this win32 ftpd than any other. Additionally it has good performance (though not quite as good as ipswitch). Shame about the lack of virtual paths in the personal edition that it reverts to, making it pretty much useless in free mode.

Chief Wiggum reviewed v5.0.0.0 on Jan 20, 2004

Best FTP-Server in my opinion!

termito reviewed v4.1.0.9 Beta on Nov 25, 2003

Serv-u 4.x is a good FTP-Server with a lot of usefull features e.g. users can search files with the SITE commnad SITE INDEX - great feature!.
Although this FTP-Server is a good work I would never buy this, cause war-ftpd 1.82 RC2 include similar features and cost nothing and works great.
Only one FTP is better I think --> BulletProofFTP, but this FTP include no Tool to administrate remotly

Mii reviewed v4.1.0.9 Beta on Nov 14, 2003

I've tried a whole LOT of ftp servers, and none so far has this one beat - for a windows server, that is. And it's flexible enough to work through a NAT, even active, something a lot of other servers cannot (they lack a specific setting for ports, true IP, or don't respect it).

Now had it just been possible to DOWNLOAD it? The download has been dead for over a day, far as I can tell.

netean reviewed v4.1.0.0 on Nov 5, 2002

This is a great ftp server, it's very easy to use, simple to understand the relationship between users and groups, has lots of features and just plain works!

My hosting company use it (it was recommended to me by them in fact)- been running on a commercial server of mine for about a year without a single crash or successful hack attempt (that we can detect)

rseiler reviewed v4.0.0.6 on Sep 28, 2002

Oops, you forgot to mark this as a beta. 4.0.0.4 is the latest released version.

ShafuyZ reviewed v4.0 Release (4.0.0.4) on Feb 6, 2002

This program is near-perfect feature-wise. However, it does not limit upload resume to original uploader. Program should keep a record of who uploaded which file in the last 7 days (filename uploaded, username and ip mask of uploader - in a db file) and give the option to refuse upload resumption (corruption) UNLESS the IP mask is identical or the account name is identical (or both). That way you can safely offer an "upload/upload" account (or "anonymous") and limit resumption based on ip-mask (XX.XX.XX.yy). This way, also, you can allow only account "JohnDoe" to resume files which started by JohnDoe (based on uploader account name). .............. Some siteops deliberately disable upload resume due to the lack of the security feature mentioned above.

tem0 reviewed v4.0 Release (4.0.0.4) on Feb 5, 2002

3.x and now 4.x has totally grown on me, and I look forward to future versions.

YamahaBass182 reviewed v4.0.0.2 Beta on Jan 29, 2002

Why does everyone give this program such a bad rep, name me one other P2P software other than morpheus that lets you view so much information about what your downloading. Other P2P progs let you see the name and the size of the file and occasionaly the ETA. On KaZaA your drowning in information, around 8-10 fields! I say try it, if you don't like it go back to crappy limewire or bearshare.

BoNeLeSS reviewed v4.0.0.1 Beta on Jan 25, 2002

Mmmm... adds support for SSL/TLS. Good :)

Sponge Bob reviewed v4.0.0.1 Beta on Jan 25, 2002

This could be better, they could improve the UI , and let the user find differents mp3´s bitrates without tweaking the registry keys , and in the search options , they could put something to select if you want Real Video 8 , or WMV 8 , ogg vorbis , DiVX , MPG2 , zip , rar , or whatever. Don´t You think ? ah and by the way , remove the trojans . Correct me if Im wrong , please.

Karendar reviewed v4.0.0.1 Beta on Jan 25, 2002

Uh.. 4.0.0.1 beta? Wha? Didn't 3 just come out?

RAT reviewed v3.1.0.1 on Dec 27, 2001

Serv-U rocks, I have been using it for long times and i'm still satisfied. I like the very detailed user-informations. And, refering to the last reviewer: It IS possible to alter very much error messages! Just open your eyes, before you shout. Thanks. ;-)

theye reviewed v3.0.0.17 on Jul 29, 2001

Because Jgaa updates Warftpd like once every 30 years.

Serv-u 3 is one of the most advanced ftp servers for windows right now with its capabilities that the other servers just do not offer. Although it may be a little difficult for some to unlock it to it's fullest potential or even aware what it can do, the help and online help is very well detailed.

I give it a 5 for it's ability to set up virtual paths without restrictions to the users home path, for being able to run as a service and keeping the admin tool seperate (good on system resources) like it should and not like an application (Bpftpd), running multiple servers within one service, and remote administration. A significant improvement over 2.5.

HolyLiaison reviewed v3.0 Beta Build 11 on Feb 24, 2001

It is available as a service. It has been through all previous versions. You have to click then select the option "Start Automatically (as a system service)". You people should really go through the program before saying something isn't there when it really is.

Gradient reviewed v3.0 Beta Build 8 on Feb 13, 2001

I've tried many of the other ftp servers out there, and I have to say I like Serv-U the most. I've been using this beta for a couple of builds now (to use for our webserver's automatic backup), and will be purchasing the final version for our company. Good Work.

chewbacca reviewed v3.0 Beta Build 8 on Feb 12, 2001

I have been playing around with this version for a while. I think it rocks. I did find a security loophole which if the author could contact me at mambogilly@hotmail.com I would like to discuss with him. I think the software looks good aside from this loophole and from the fact it doesnt run on as a service on win2k I give this a 4.

Hielo reviewed v3.0 Beta Build 8 on Feb 12, 2001

Simply The Best

upnorthalicia reviewed v3.0 Beta Build 7 on Jan 24, 2001

I bought Deerfield.com's FTP Serv-U a while back and have been completely satisfied with it... it was a very low price, but it has more features than any other FTP Server I could find. And the features are easy to use - very intuitive - I didn't have to read a big huge help file everytime I wanted to figure out how to do something. I could pretty much figure out everything without directions...

CatSoft reviewed v3.0 Beta Build 6 on Dec 7, 2000

Great, helpful reviews (not!). Now if those people would actually submit those bugs and tell me what's so 'terrible' I could make it a better program. My E-mail address comes with the beta.
-Rob-
(Serv-U author)

Tux2000 reviewed v3.0 Beta Build 5 on Nov 30, 2000

So many bugs.. so little joy .. just wait until more bugs are found and removed.. no worth for trying this beta

deathmetal reviewed v3.0 Beta Build 5 on Nov 30, 2000

They dont appear to have done enough to this program to warrant an upgrade considering the previous version was easier to setup and looked better.

sumstuff reviewed v2.5h on Nov 8, 2000

Great except for 1 thing the user info window does'nt show the whole File/Path of the connected user(downloader)

Danone reviewed v2.5g on Oct 29, 2000

I give it only a four because the ONE missing feature in the program is RUN AS SERVICE, and not through other utilities.

controler reviewed v2.5g on Oct 28, 2000

why is this listed as beta.ALL beta software should be fully funtional and in NOT shareware!!!
Will this software stop the people we see on the new TV show Level 9?

astland reviewed v2.5f on Aug 31, 2000

Serv-U has everything I could want in a FTP Server. It was simple enough that I had my FTP Server up and running within 10 minutes... I dont want to be an FTP guru, i just wanted to get a FTP server up and running and that is what serv-u gave me.

PhrostByte reviewed v2.5f on Aug 4, 2000

Cool. But I also use G6... It's just better.

crowflyawa reviewed v2.5f on Aug 4, 2000

I used this for a while and many other to finally they are ok, but then I started using G6 FTP Server www.gene6.com. It's great easy to use and very powerful as well! It has all the controls and features an administrator could want. Inclusing adcanced remote lonin's to do maintencnce from another location! And it supports windows link (shortcuts) to direct people on your site around to other directories and files on your hard drive without the user knowing it... that's way cool!

Dsnake reviewed v2.5e on Mar 24, 2000

Not the best, not the worst, not very intuitive.
Lot of great options missing…

GangMan reviewed v2.5b on Dec 5, 1999

The best FTP-daemon available at the moment. Very easy to use although very powerful. Might not have as many functions as War-FTP but is also not so buggy and as said before much more easy to configure!