Favorite Files

No favorite files added yet

Recent Posts

1. 
   Review - Clipdiary

   1.97 Beta (Nov 14, 2008)

   I give it 5 to compensate for mackley

2. 
   Review - HandBrake for Windows

   0.9.1 (Oct 10, 2007)

   Yeah Budgie29 you better stick with AnyDVD, ever looked at WinZip? Also an excellent program.

3. 
   Review - MonoCalendar

   0.7.0 (Nov 23, 2006)

   Crashes on import a google ical export.

4. 
   Review - Mozilla Firefox Portable Edition

   1.0.2 Beta (Apr 7, 2005)

   This doesn't even work from a local drive!
   I just get a 'document contains no data' error
   Recyclebin material....
   Oops mcafee firewall... exellent programming! :-)

5. 
   Review - Pixort

   1.3 Beta 1 (Sep 5, 2004)

   What is this!
   Can't even start the crap.
   I'd advise you, to first let your software gain some popularity and later ask money for it.
   This way you wil never make money and no-one will see your efforts.

6. Comment - The strange parallels between Microsoft's century start and decade's end

   1.3 Beta 1 (Dec 13, 2009 - 3:39 PM)

   WikiPedia: The term usually refers to a period of ten years starting with 0 and ending in 9. For example, "the 1950s" refers to 1950 through to 1959 (inclusive).

7. Comment - Google Chrome 4: Yes, it's fast, but is it usable?

   1.3 Beta 1 (Nov 7, 2009 - 3:21 PM)

   The Google developers need to get their heads from under the car. It's time you get some real Google ingenuity into this browser.
   I have been following Chrome since the start, and not much seems to have changed since its introduction. Surely they might have been working at it, but that's all under the hood.
   The 'new' bookmark sync strikes me as just plain foolish.
   I've been using google bookmarks for year and what does Google decide... lets store bookmarks in a google doc and not use google bookmarks (http://www.google.com/bookmarks/) at all.
   Do the developers even know whats in their portfolio allready?
   I agree with the author, Google needs to get with the program.