Reviews of Pixel for Windows

1. 
   molumen

   Reviewing 1.0 Beta 6 Build 557 (Oct 18, 2006)

   a little more stable tan the previous build, but still far from the 1.0 release IMO...
2. 
   molumen

   Reviewing 1.0 Beta 6 Build 553 (Sep 25, 2006)

   Pixel is still unstable and a little weird in its behaviour, but the main idea (to create a photoshop-like application on all major platforms) is IMHO a good one. Let's hope that it will become a reliable product in the near future.
   I gave it a 4 because Pixel, even its early devel stages, is already much more usable that GIMP. It has at least CMYK support (GIMP didn't even manage to have CMYK support in all these years!!!) and Pixel has also a normal interface (not the weird unusable crap that GIMP has).
3. 
   klakson

   Reviewing 1.0 RC3 Build 445 (Apr 12, 2005)

   Watching development of this tool for few months. It still needs a lot of bugfixing but it has great potential and if all bugs are fixed in few next months this will become very powerful tool for winblows, linux and possibly others supported, personally I prefer OSX. Anyway, as far I know this is a too big project for one man show, just give it a chance...
4. 
   zridling

   Reviewing 1.0 RC3 Build 445 (Apr 12, 2005)

   Well I'm back and this latest beta is yet another disaster. Words can't describe how truly bad this software is. The interface is great, but the code underlying it is mush.
5. 
   kanzels

   Reviewing 1.0 RC2 Build 425 (Dec 1, 2004)

   Interface is not DOS/Windows 3.1 like, it's fully skinable. You may notice them on screenshots, for example here:
   
   http://pixel32.box.sk/shot/pixel_live.png
   
   It's default skin is simple because of interface speed.

Discuss Pixel for Windows

No comments yet