Reviews of QuickPar

1. 
   VicarBook

   Reviewing 0.9.1 (Jul 1, 2009)

   A good program. After 4 years it's still the newest and best in a very small field, it gets the 5 stars, if there were further development in the field by anybody it would probably rate lower.
   
   QuickPar 0.9.1 has several problems, that would probably have been addressed by now if it hadn't been abandoned. To wit, it takes up a lot of resources (processor/memory-wise) when in use. Doesn't let one queue up several par2 scans in sequence to minimize the slowing down of one's system. Doesn't PAUSE! Doesn't have a run in background option.
2. 
   halc

   Reviewing 0.9.1 (Dec 9, 2006)

   The best error detection and recovery freeware for Windows.
   
   It's a bit sad that PAR2 is still the latest algorithm supported in freely available software.
   
   Error detection and esp. correction algorithms have progressed since the days of Reed-Solomon.
   
   Still, what QuickPar does, it does well.
3. 
   poisonu

   Reviewing 0.9.1 (Nov 4, 2006)

   Superb...
   
   Have been using it for more one year,
   & Never Any problems...
   Same goes for my mates & colleagues...
   
   Cheers,
   
   Roberta
4. 
   zridling

   Reviewing 0.9.1 (Jun 4, 2006)

   Well, we know hardgiant neither serious nor honest. QuickPAR is virtually a completed program with no weaknesses I can find. It's never failed me in several years.
5. 
   hardgiant

   Reviewing 0.9.1 (Aug 5, 2005)

   Fails to repair a lot of the time. This is a rather buggy program. Sometimes multiple runs are necessary to get the job done.
   
   QuickPar's tech support always blames the users hardware even if your machine can pass prime and whatever other stress test.
   
   It's to bad people are using Par 2 when it is not ready for primetime.

Discuss QuickPar

No comments yet