This is a WHQL-Certified driver for GeForce 6, 7, 8, 9, 100, and 200-series desktop GPUs and ION GPUs.
- Adds GPU-acceleration for smoother online HD videos with the new Adobe Flash 10.1 beta. Learn more here
- Adds support for GeForce GT 240
- Adds support for OpenCL 1.0 (Open Computing Language) for all GeForce 8-series and later GPUs
- Adds support for CUDA Toolkit 3.0 features and performance enhancements. See CUDA Zone for more details
- Adds SLI and multi-GPU support for many top new gaming titles including Borderlands, Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, FIFA Soccer 10, and more
- Includes numerous bug fixes including improved performance for Need for Speed: Shift. Refer to the release notes on the documentation tab for information about the key bug fixes in this release
nVIDIA ForceWare Drivers for Windows 9x/Me
nVIDIA ForceWare Drivers for Windows NT
nVIDIA ForceWare Drivers for Windows Vista/7 (32-bit)
nVIDIA ForceWare Drivers for Windows XP/2003 (64-bit)
Reviewing 186.18 (Jul 4, 2009)
I'm having better luck with these 186.18 drivers under Windows XP Pro SP3 and the main games I play, like Lord of the Rings Battle for Middle Earth II - Rise of the Witch King and Painkiller.
8x Anti-Aliasing looks clean and stays that way, even if I ALT-TAB in the middle of a game and re-enter it. No shimmering, no odd renders on third-party created maps in ROTWK and I get great performance with the eye-candy in Painkiller Black at 1280x960, which is the same res I run ROTWK at. I don't seem to be experiencing too many slow-downs, even with tons of opponents in both games.
Have not experienced any NV4_DSP errors yet, but I haven't cranked all the eye-candy to maximum and done extensive testing with Triple-Buffering / Vsync and Super-Sampling, but those are coming up next. If they experience problems before a new release hits, I'll post the details.
But so far, they feel pretty solid. Worth a 4 as a result, at least for me.
Reviewing 185.65 Beta (Apr 3, 2009)
This seems to work ok for me, but I think 178.24 worked better with my 8800 GT 512 meg card.
Still - I don't get about the concern about the control panel. I have it installed and the default control panel seems just fine to me. Unlike that HORRIBLE ATI CATALYST CONTROL CENTER garbage.
Is there a problem with the default Nvidia control panel?
Could you elaborate on that "registry change" that will give me the classic one so I can compare?
Thanks
Reviewing 182.08 (Mar 16, 2009)
Remote desktop is ONCE AGAIN broken in this release, OMG, when is nvidia going to fix that for good? And why is MS WHQLing drivers that broke basic OS functionality? So much for their quality testing, I suppose WHQL is just a way to control the market and, of course, profit from one more thing...
Reviewing 182.06 (Feb 20, 2009)
Although the classic control panel can be enabled manually via registry, it's like Artem said - the panel is crippled and has user interface glitch that make the interface a little unstable.
And yes, it's becoming bloatware than ever. More likely be worse than ATI driver. It's not ISP's nor the programmer's fault. It's nVidia's vision fault since it controls what to give to the users.
It's so called Unified Driver - aka. "All for one, and one to rule them all" is a joke. The proof is that the driver can't rule them all. No, really.
From what I've known from nVidia users in forums and blogs, more and more various complaints regarding the drivers are pouring. Ironically, it's the other way around for ATI driver.
No comments yet