Reviews of ThreatFire

1. 
   Brian Johnson

   Reviewing 4.10.1.14 (May 12, 2011)

   Worked as advertised. Have used Threatfire for awhile and have no problems with it most of the time, although for only once it failed to help me remove a really tricky problem. I have good experience with it generally and I hope that it would be better! One star off because the user interface is not good enough.
2. 
   Zebbie79

   Reviewing 4.10.1.14 (May 6, 2010)

   It works and I think it gives good protection, but it also slowing down the computer a lot, so I decided to uninstall it.
3. 
   sturgess

   Reviewing 4.10.1.14 (Jan 21, 2010)

   The best of the best, and I won't leave home without it. Installed on all my machines, on my friends machines, and on my families machines. It's free and it works, what more can you ask for.
4. 
   smokingbeagle

   Reviewing 4.10.1.14 (Jan 20, 2010)

   Too many false alerts. cyberdoc999 is a wanker.
5. 
   CyberDoc999

   Reviewing 4.7.0.11 (Jan 2, 2010)

   I think the people who do not like this are the real virus writers
   psycros and mancub both write viruses for a living
6. 
   auutumnsun

   Reviewing 4.7.0.11 (Dec 7, 2009)

   I used this program for many years and I had no issues with it, found that it did a good job of protecting my PC. The only comlaint was it's Windows 7 support. All of my programs now take 3-10 seconds longer to launch and when I asked about this, the company had no response so I switched to Avast which works great.
   
   So give it a try, you have many options.if it doesn't work out.
7. 
   CyberDoc999

   Reviewing 4.6.0.19 (Sep 29, 2009)

   and it's the best ,it's completely free so you have nothing to lose by giving it a try!
   
   do not listen to the trolls below
8. 
   psycros

   Reviewing 4.6.0.19 (Sep 25, 2009)

   Absolute garbage. I'm starting to really suspect its an alpha release of one part of the next Trend antivirus product, and we're unwitting testers. AVOID.
9. 
   mancubs

   Reviewing 4.6.0.19 (Sep 24, 2009)

   last time i use it it f,./k up the comp
10. 
    Ramp4me

    Reviewing 4.6.0.19 (Sep 24, 2009)

    This application is just as secure as a BSOD, no malware can run after installing it, and beside that, no normal software either.
11. 
    TomWibbaert

    Reviewing 4.6.0.19 (Sep 24, 2009)

    It's just a honeypot to get you to dish out money for the paid version which is just a crap as the free.
12. 
    sturgess

    Reviewing 4.6.0.19 (Sep 24, 2009)

    Still the best, and it's free.
    TomWibbaert "It's just a honeypot to get you to dish out money for the paid version which is just a crap as the free.
    They don't do a paid version, get your facts right before you post such piffle.
    mancubs "last time i use it it f,./k up the comp"
    That was last time, you're supposed to be reviewing this time. So install it, try it, and then if you still have a problem pop back.
    Rampage "This application is just as secure as a BSOD"
    So why did you give it two stars ? Have you actually tried this version ? Thought not.
    Well I have tried it, and it's superb,it's completely free so you have nothing to lose by giving it a whirl.
13. 
    CyberDoc999

    Reviewing 4.6.0.4 Beta (Aug 28, 2009)

    Had to remove it because Fire Fox kept crashing
    and Fire Fox never crashed before and since I removed it Fire Fox has not crashed again
14. 
    fast777

    Reviewing 4.6.0.4 Beta (Aug 21, 2009)

    THIS IS A BAD PIECE OF KAKA... USELESS... A REAL FRAUD..... TRY AND SEE FOR YOURSELF.....!!!! BEWARE...!!!!!!!!!!
15. 
    Standupguy

    Reviewing 4.5.0.24 (Jul 13, 2009)

    I'm inclined to believe that this is program is bulls***. I installed TF about 2 weeks ago and after each periodic scan I get a pop up that indicates that there are numerous infections that would have been removed if only I had paid for the upgrade version. The last one looked like this:
    Events Analyzed
    16,655,496,584,421
    Programs Examined
    103,420,114,544
    Suspicious Activities Detected
    1,473,111,441
    Malware Blocked
    64,592,403
    
    I circled on the "learn more" link and a window came up listing the same stats and a pay to upgrade button. Just for fun, I changed a number in the address line and the same stats popped up. I tweaked the web address line several times and always got the same stats. I'm assuming that this is the same BS they send to everyone. I'm filing it under fearware. Thumbs down!
16. 
    MarcFou

    Reviewing 4.5.0.17 (Jun 8, 2009)

    Now with the keyboard driver removed apps seem to be a bit more responsive. Previously I never associated the lag with TF. But noticed the service and tray app are using less resources as well.
    
    I stand by most of the points from my previous review but I will give TF 5 stars now for lower resources and to balance out my previous 1 star.
17. 
    sturgess

    Reviewing 4.5.0.12 (May 29, 2009)

    Been using it from way back, kept me safe, so I'm giving it a five.
18. 
    DragonSlayer

    Reviewing 4.1.0.25 (Apr 26, 2009)

    ailef: Why do you rabid Comodo fanbois always harp on "IT'S FREE!!"
    yes Comodo crapware is free.
    Avira personal is free.
    Avast Home is free.
    AVG Free is free.
    Drive Sentry is free.
    The subject of this review,Threatfire is free.
    All of these FREE programs are more simple,easy to use,and trouble free
    than Comodo will ever be.
    (yes, even after "THE NEXT BIG RELEASE THAT WILL BE PERFECT."
    Comodo is free because no one other than a fanboi would dream of paying
    for this hodge-podge of a mouthy classical hips,Anti-BO snakeoilware,and a 4th string antivirus.
    Go burn a candle for,or write a love letter to Abdulhayoglu.
    Cut the crap.
19. 
    psycros

    Reviewing 4.1.0.25 (Apr 9, 2009)

    Still giving the "Start menu2" error right at the end of the install..and this is on a brand new XP SP-3 install with nothing but video and NIC drivers. PC Tools support is a joke. I guess this promising little program has become crapware.
20. 
    MarcFou

    Reviewing 4.1.0.19 (Feb 18, 2009)

    Prior versions were great. In the past I always gave a 5 star rating. Now, the av scanner has been removed and replaced with a tab advertising PCTools AV and that you should download it. They added another tab that says "Did you know".
    
    Come on. Why put getting started tips into the UI? Its not needed since there is a tutorial, getting started links in the tray icon and help menu. Not too mention upon install it opens a web page with the same info.
    
    This app is now n00bware and now puts PCTools AV program in your face. What if I dont want to install it? Why have a tab in UI for it?
    
    What about users who paid for a pro lic. that seems to be useless now?
21. 
    grimbles

    Reviewing 4.1.0.19 (Feb 18, 2009)

    I humbly suggest that those who complain about TF slowing down their machines must be running too many background processes with too few/little resources. TF does not slow down a machine off it's own bat but may when added to a plethora of existing running processes....sort of the straw that breaks the camel's back. That does not necessarily make TF the culprit, merely a part of the problem.
    I have used TF successfully on older machines running Pentium 4 CPU with 512mb RAM...no probs. The trick is to be selective with applications which include running processes.
    There is no doubt in my mind TF does substantially increase overall protection when used in conjunction with traditional anti virus software....highly recommended!
22. 
    psycros

    Reviewing 4.1.0.19 (Feb 18, 2009)

    Still getting the "error creating registry key", "RegCreateKeyEx failed, code 5" during installation (XP Pro w/SP-3). TF attempts to add an entry under Start Menu2 (why?) and Windows does not like it one bit. I can't be the only one seeing this.
23. 
    ailef

    Reviewing 4.0.0.10 (Nov 27, 2008)

    don't know about this tool,
    excuse me mister cowgaR,
    will u be able to code something like defense+ and release it for free and help people that know nothing about computers and need help, i imagine one day u started and knew nothing?
    it's not possible to be a simple user and need help, did u ever see some fight in comodo forums, do u think comodo people are some jokers about security network ? did u look near in this forum? admins and moderators are really correct persons and we can talk about some democraty attitude on those forums, there are all kind of people, some that knows not much like i am, some that are able to code for free comodo FW and if u say to be able to do that is not a real performance so u're jokin, even sharewares are not able to release something as good, i talk about software for user ok, not various gateways or crypted tunnels to feel like u're the nasa, i say who can realize the same today ? no one. those people deserve respect for the job they do, maybe u coded something u will release soon ? got some screenshots? about wilders, i read some posts but some people telling crap cause they're frustrated about some fact is not where i like to go but i read cause i learn from lot of people that know many more things than i do
    see ya in comodo man ;-)
    or maybe u like fighting with result zero like in wilders?
24. 
    cowgaR

    Reviewing 4.0.0.10 (Nov 27, 2008)

    another bogus to slow down your system...like horsecharles said already
    
    there is a Vista UAC already running, and you're not logged as administrator...don't fear then.
    
    there are NO viruses in this world (althought I understand having antivirus for casual unknown file check from unknown planet if virustotal.com isn't suficient) just stupid users and porn addicts...
    
    get a clue (or life), there's no way a virus can attack patched Vista with latest Firefox logged as standard user in a machine behind a router...
    
    rest of you, load antispyware, antimalware, threatfire, antivirus, better load another software HIPS firewall which won stupid (and moronic) matousec.com tests, get a serious FW router from Lynksys linked to another FW from D-Link and for security reasons unplugg your internet cable...
    
    and don't forget to come to securityforums (Wilders one, Comodo's one, you choose) and tell other users how cool you are, what your setup is and if you should improve something about your *bulletproof* security
    
    if you want security, call your mother stupid
25. 
    ShadowMagnet

    Reviewing 4.0.0.10 (Nov 27, 2008)

    ThreatFire used to be a very effective protection against new and unknown malware.
    Alas, after it became a bit more popular with the users, it also showed up on the radar of the malware writers.
    The result: alot of the current in-the-wild malware easily bypass ThreatFire (and all other major HIPS products out there).
    It still provides good protection against alot of malware, but you shouldn't 100% rely on it and keep an eye open and your system patched (browser, Java, Flash, PDF security updates!)
    
    I also had several serious problems with 4.0.0.8, the worst was a computer having no keyboard access anymore on Windows login screen. There was no way to fix (safe boot, recovery install, BartPE) except format+reinstalling Windows.
    It also interfered with Thunderbird and Visual Studio, probably due to it's intensive user mode hooking.
    
    Let's see if 4.0.0.10 fixes those problems, but I will need to make an image of the OS partition before I dare to install this tool again.
26. 
    MarcFou

    Reviewing 4.0.0.10 (Nov 27, 2008)

    By far the best and most complete solution I've used. Bahavioral based protection means you dont need not rely on 'if the threat is known'. Your protected from malicous actions.
    
    4.0.0.10 Chnages/fixes
    - Avast fix
    - Driver fix
    - Tray notifications
    - Multi user CPU issue
27. 
    sturgess

    Reviewing 4.0.0.10 (Nov 26, 2008)

    It's the best bit of security you could install. Been using it since it was in beta, and to the best of my knowledge it has never let me down. Google for reviews, and see what those who really know about such things think. They all say it's the best of the best, and that's good enough for me.
28. 
    horsecharles

    Reviewing 4.0.0.10 (Nov 26, 2008)

    I've used it...does a good job.
    
    However, I am against this type of app--
    
    that wants to filter every packet, monitor every app.. some apps and processes can actually fail sometimes as they're held up while being verified / checked out...
    
    before you know, your system grinds to a halt.
    
    It's overkill-- like making everyone who enters your house to submit to CONSTANT AND REPEATED frisking, running thru detector, investigating background, running bloodwork & dope tests, taping every conversation, reading all written & other contents of purse and pockets...and to boot including yourself as well...no one excepted...
    
    PLEASE... this is like a combo conspiracist paranoia & stereotypical neocon methodology... ruling thru fear & staged panic...
29. 
    leofelix

    Reviewing 4.0.0.8 (Nov 4, 2008)

    Easy to use, effective, light in usage memory.
    I use it with Avira premium and PC tools Firewall Plus.
30. 
    sturgess

    Reviewing 4.0.0.8 (Oct 30, 2008)

    It's prime function is to stop things which get onto your machine doing harm. This it does well, Google for reviews of this brilliant bit of software and you will see what I'm talking about.
31. 
    Diam0nd

    Reviewing 4.0.0.8 (Oct 30, 2008)

    It's an OK application. I mean, it scanned my system, but did not find any threats at all, so I can't really say much in this respect. But GUI is ugly, imho. Not the worst, but looks rather lame.
32. 
    Conrad.TDI

    Reviewing 4.0.0.8 (Oct 29, 2008)

    This has the potential to be a real winner.
    
    So far, no problems on install, operation, or update. It's even running happily in my tray along side Ad-Watch, Avira, and Comodo v3.5 firewall. It spotted my CIV III trainer, asked, then let me run it, didn't destroy it or quarantine it. I despise protection that universally 'knows better' than the user and run wild trashing items you use, that are proven safe.
    
    The community info pooling may well be the future of 'intelligent' spotting of threats between definition updates.
    
    I'm about to start beta-testing Lavasoft's 2009 product (like many others of you) and I think this product may prove to be the biggest threat to AdAware I've seen yet.
33. 
    Sammo

    Reviewing 4.0.0.6 (Oct 23, 2008)

    I used to really like this app. The big problem is that when it has found malware it also blows away other safe apps such as Firefox and Free Download Manager. It also takes up 100% cpu when it kills a file. I said enough is enough and went to BOClean instead.
34. 
    robmanic44

    Reviewing 4.0.0.6 (Oct 23, 2008)

    Works well for me. This use to come as an attachment to ESET's NOD32.
35. 
    gcbetaman

    Reviewing 4.0.0.6 (Oct 23, 2008)

    If you want to waste half a day (1) watching this app "initiate", and then (2) trying to uninstall it, then by all means, Threatfire is for you. It's more like "Threat-slow-my-machine-to-a-crawl."
36. 
    sturgess

    Reviewing 4.0.0.6 (Oct 23, 2008)

    Been using it since it was a beta, best bit of security I have ever installed.
37. 
    birkoff

    Reviewing 4.0.0.6 (Oct 23, 2008)

    I used to rely on this program and have just installed the newest version. Than I uninstalled a certain program which triggered internet explorer to open and visit that program's homepage. I was very surprissed by that, because I thought threatfire would at least warn me that this program was trying to open internet browser, which in some cases is the behaviour of malware. But no, threatfire did not even blink. I do not know what to thing about threat fire now. Every hips shoud protect such action, but threatfire did not. What if this website contained a virus and I would get infected. I am not sure, whether TF would protect me in that case. I am in great doubts, because TH is my only anti-virus defense.
38. 
    MarcFou

    Reviewing 4.0.0.6 (Oct 23, 2008)

    By far the best behavior security app I've used. Detects 0 day threats. Create your own rules for extra protection.
    
    4.0.0.6 Changes
    - Custom Scan Wizard
    - Configure and run custom scans including selected files/folders with exclusions.
    - Context Menu Scan file or folder
    - System Status tab on main menu
    - Smart Update Options
    - Configure update behavior via Settings->Check for Updates.
    
    Rules
    - Device Driver Modified (Catch malware that temporarily replace/modify system drivers and load them before SFP can restore them)
    
    - Program deleted itself (Catch suspicious self deletion)
    
    - System service modified (Catch malware that inserts itself into a previously defined service host startup list)
    
    - Malicious behavior sequence detected (Generic rule for behavior profile detection)
    
    Alert Dialog
    - Sensitivity Level information is included on the yellow alert dialog.
39. 
    irv4oh

    Reviewing 3.5.0.21 (Sep 1, 2008)

    Does not poorly affect system performance as it did with the last version I tried. Now includes full on-demand scan for all threats instead of just for rootkits, and a scan can be scheduled. However, the on-demand scan detected some false positives with some compiled AutoHotkey scripts. The default protection setting at 3 of 5 still seems overzealous to me, and I set it at 2 of 5.
40. 
    tipstir

    Reviewing 3.5.0.21 (Jul 2, 2008)

    Let me tell you this one works than prior versions were awful code wise. Not even Spyware Terminator could detect some trojans on my file server running Windows Server 2003. With this and 3.0.1.14 PFPS code injection and PCAV good combination for now. To many stuff hop on to the system and all the others just allow it to happen even with HIPs enabled happen!
41. 
    edd3800

    Reviewing 3.5.0.21 (Jun 17, 2008)

    This is a good program works with your anti-virus program. It's a Host Intrusion Prevention (HIPS) program. Not met to be a stand alone anti-virus.The free version works fine. But there is also a paid version. Didn't try that one I'm to cheap.
42. 
    Onsoku

    Reviewing 3.5.0.21 (Jun 17, 2008)

    Best free anti-malware solution out there. I use this with Spyware Terminator & Avast! Home; all of which are FREE...
    
    "ThreatFire 3's ability to block installation of malware strictly by identifying bad behavior is phenomenal. It did a better (and faster) job than Norton AntiBot and even beat out Spy Sweeper, our current Editors' Choice for signature-based anti-spyware. This free tool is an excellent addition to your security arsenal."
    - www.pcmag.com, October 2, 2007*
43. 
    CrashUK

    Reviewing 3.5.0.21 (Apr 29, 2008)

    Got to say this is a nice bit of software.. been looking for some thing that could remove or stop spyware and adware and I not seen any thing that works.. this stop every thing like keylogger and the like.. I run it with nod32. and its free which is a big plus and its a small program too :)
    
    I tested it on a keylogger and when I tryed to run it.. it deleted all the file to do with and reg setting to do with and removed it from add/remove menu.
44. 
    sturgess

    Reviewing 3.5.0.21 (Apr 29, 2008)

    Been using it since it was a beta. It updated this morning and all is well. I still use the free version, and would not leave home without it.It's a five in my book every time.
45. 
    Jegar48

    Reviewing 3.5.0.21 (Apr 29, 2008)

    It is indeed free, unlike some who post here I checked it out. I haven't tried it really so it's hard to give it a rating. However I gave it a 5 to counter act the nilist troll who claimed it wasn't free. Go here to compare the free and "pro" versions.
    
    http://www.threatfire.com/download/
46. 
    robmanic44

    Reviewing 3.5.0.21 (Apr 29, 2008)

    There is absolutely no reason for anyone to use this program. I run NOD32 on my system and it takes care of all my needs. It's both an anti-spyware and anti-virus which upgrades itself several times a day. Since it runs on demand it doesn't suck up system resources.
47. 
    nilst2006

    Reviewing 3.5.0.21 (Apr 29, 2008)

    This is NOT a freeware !!!
48. 
    MarcFou

    Reviewing 3.5.0.21 (Apr 29, 2008)

    Still using TF and love it. This latest release brings a few new features that users requested.
    
    Ive never had any problems with TF on my system. Its reliable and easy to use. Protects against 0 Day malicious files and adds a great layer of protection to your existing AV or firewall.
    
    TF hasnt let me down. Great work team!
49. 
    irv4oh

    Reviewing 3.0.14 (Apr 17, 2008)

    Behavior-based anti-malware might be the future of antivirus, and Threatfire is a free offering in this regard. However, it has a dealbreaker flaw in that the "ignore" feature after a suspected risk is detected does not work well. I noticed problems even after having set certain programs to be "ignored." Ignore would stop the prompts, but the scanning would continue, and I got data corruption. More specifically, programs that produced files (AutoHotkey's compiler, Audacity 1.3 batch processing), would make corrupted files unless Threatfire was fully suspended. Until Threatfire can stop itself from interfering with the processes the user specifies, I won't be using it. On the plus side, I contacted PC Tools about these issues, and they said they would fix the bug and post about it on their forums. Once they do so, I'd be willing to re-rate Threatfire.
    
    Short Amendment: It is not free (in fact, it's a relatively steep $29.95), but I prefer Mamutu to Threatfire-- Mamutu makes more sense to use and it doesn't (so far) interfere with my computer usage.
50. 
    erolyavuz

    Reviewing 3.0.14 (Mar 7, 2008)

    Pro version is not SLOW.
51. 
    bellgamin

    Reviewing 3.0.14 (Feb 12, 2008)

    Threatfire (TF) is a superb behavior blocker of the HIPS genus (Host-based Intrusion Protection System). For information about this type of security program, see THIS compendium.
    
    TF is a vital helper-app for Antivirus programs because TF will detect zero-day malware, & alert you to that fact. TF has a large community of users who contribute to TF's effectiveness.
    
    TF is highly configurable, but runs good right out of the box, as well. TF is FREE, rock stable, & very light on resources. It is vigorously maintained, & has a very knowledgeable & friendly support forum HERE.
52. 
    MarcFou

    Reviewing 3.0.14 (Feb 12, 2008)

    By far the best security application I've used in a long time.
    
    Threatfires detects malicious software by behavior as opposed to relying on signatures. Add the factor of being able to create custom rules to protect files, folders and registry keys and you have a complete solution.
    
    Threatfire uses minimal system resources and dosent get in my way.
53. 
    why hello there

    Reviewing 3.0.14 (Feb 12, 2008)

    There is a freeware version and a paid Pro version.
    
    I really like this application, but I must admit it does slow all the systems down I have tried it on.
54. 
    christoofar

    Reviewing 3.0.14 (Feb 12, 2008)

    Why is this listed as "freeware" when the website is selling it for $14.95 per 1 year license?
    Was hoping to find a little less resource-hungry replacement for SpywareTerminator (true freeware)...
55. 
    CyberDoc999

    Reviewing 3.0.13.11 (Jan 7, 2008)

    The best of the best!
56. 
    tipstir

    Reviewing 3.0.13.11 (Jan 7, 2008)

    Today I gave this program a test run on a system just running Armor2net, Peerguardan2, NOD32, Spyware Doctor. Now I rated this 1 out of 5 because it just hosed my system after leting it run for a few hours.
    
    I couldn't even open up anything just hanged there and just shown me a white outline of it shell. I never seen it popup and tell me it detected a program that was installing or removing. What would happen if it was malware, but I don't see how good this is if you already have NOD32 and Spyware Doctor doing the samething for malware protection.
    
    Just way to many programs trying to protect the system, and protecting the system to where it can't do anything just lock-up.
    
    My rating is 1.. awful program..
57. 
    meteecee

    Reviewing 3.0.13.11 (Dec 22, 2007)

    is it better than malawarebytes, i've been part of the beta for awhile but this looks complete.
    (my rating is based on the gui and the a first run)
58. 
    zapatero

    Reviewing 3.0.13.9 (Dec 18, 2007)

    Seems to work, no problems so far. But this download installs version 3.0.12.6.
59. 
    aruprc

    Reviewing 3.0.12 (Dec 3, 2007)

    I am using it along with Avira Premium, so far no high resource usage and if it delivers what its promising, thats proteciton from 0 day threats, then its a fine addition at a very little cost of resources.
60. 
    jofin

    Reviewing 3.0.10.0 (Oct 5, 2007)

    Should anyone be surprised at this program slowing down their computer? After all, it is from the same company who produce Spyware Doctor.
    This program like SD does the job but without stopping the constant scanning it undoubtedly slows to a crawl on many systems.
61. 
    MarcFou

    Reviewing 3.0.10.0 (Oct 5, 2007)

    I have to give this app a 5. It provides great protection against various types of malware and malicious programs.
    
    The ability to create advanced rules adds an extra layer of safety.
62. 
    Tao2005

    Reviewing 3.0.8.0 (Sep 28, 2007)

    Disregaurding the bad reviews to this program. I two have used it in the past. I didn't at all once or ever, run slow.
    
    How ever it isn't slim by a long shot. Great programs deserve great reviews. I think this program is awesome.
63. 
    CyberDoc999

    Reviewing 3.0.0.15 Public Beta 1 (Aug 21, 2007)

    ThreatFire was formerly known as Cyberhawk
    very good app
64. 
    bellgamin

    Reviewing 2.0.1.2 (Jan 22, 2007)

    I reviewed this a while back as "4+" but since then it has gotten bigger & slower. There is now a non-free version as well as a free version. It's still a good security app but it needs to stay fast & slim to remain on my box.
65. 
    bellgamin

    Reviewing 1.2.0.39 (Nov 1, 2006)

    I have to agree with RejZoR -- Cyberhawk provides excellent protection now, and it is getting better & better & better.
    
    I would rate it 4.8, but decimal points aren't allowed. ^_^
66. 
    RejZoR

    Reviewing 1.2.0.39 (Nov 1, 2006)

    @ZenWarrior
    I hope you do realize that you've been throwing adware/spyware at it. Behavior analyzers are mainly focused on worms, trojans and (partially) viruses. Adware and stuff is just an extra goodie but you can't really expect a behavior analyzer to do the job of dedicated signature anti-spyware or antivirus?
    Besides, there is no signature updater mechanism so it takes long for them to update it as it only comes with the program update itself.
    
    As of the program itself, it has a great potential. Some false positives and compatibility problems here and there but in general it's easy to use and does the job very well. And it's free.
    4/5 for now but i'm sure i'll be soon able to give them 5/5. We just got their team to Wilders Security and i've been in contact with them for quiet some time now. Just track this tool, it's worth it.
67. 
    bellgamin

    Reviewing 1.2.0.36 (Oct 26, 2006)

    I have used Cyberhawk for several week. It installed flawlessly in the beginning, and all subsequent updates have installed equally well. It has a very small footprint. Lighter than a feather. It is simple to use/administer, even for noobs.
    
    CH is a behavior analyzer. Therefore, it gives superb protection against zero-day exploits and, as such, is an excellent side-arm for one's antivirus+firewall combo.
    
    As to so-called testing by amateurs, it would be best to learn HOW to test a behavioral-based HIPS. The proponents of CH have provided a manual for those who wish to do that. Get it Yonder.
68. 
    pdail

    Reviewing 1.1.1.3 (Jul 17, 2006)

    I like this alot! Guess what it found. WGA, calling home, when I started up this thingy. Ha! Well, it didn't like Yahoo Messenger, Much ether. But, all you have to do is, Hit allow, and its, going about its job, of stopping the bad guys. Does what it says. Its a keeper!
69. 
    felixml

    Reviewing 1.0.5.11 Beta (Jun 8, 2006)

    Works fine here,
    using CA eTrust 7.0 Pro version
70. 
    buckshee

    Reviewing 1.0.0.50 Beta (Apr 11, 2006)

    If you are using Kaspersky AV don't even try this it will freeze your computer. Kaspersky 6 has application behavior blocking anyway, With other AV I experienced no problems but its hard to tell how effective it is unless you get some spyware that wants to run on your computer. It is a beta so I assume it will get better
71. 
    kraketoa

    Reviewing Public Beta 1.0.0.48 (Apr 7, 2006)

    Pretty good. I have not had any problems so far.
    There is a new release available 1.0.0.50
72. 
    CyberDoc999

    Reviewing Public Beta 1.0.0.37 (Feb 2, 2006)

    It is the best of the best!!!!
    THIS IS NOT AN ANTI-VIRUS
    It is more like anti-spyware
    anti-malware
    10 stars******************
73. 
    Shatylle

    Reviewing Public Beta 1.0.0.37 (Feb 2, 2006)

    I will repeat what has been said before, THIS IS NOT AN ANTI VIRUS, I find what CyberHawk does is far more useful than any antivirus I have used. A vast majority of attacks bypass the standard antivirus and maliware gaurds due to there, if it is not on the list allow it, policy.
    
    I have no problem with giving this a 5 star rating.
74. 
    chimpypimpy

    Reviewing Public Beta 1.0.0.37 (Feb 1, 2006)

    THIS IS NOT AN ANTIVIRUS.
    This is more like a host intrusion program. It monitors different areas and behaviors of your computer.
75. 
    PC_Tool

    Reviewing Public Beta 1.0.0.37 (Feb 1, 2006)

    Good idea to offer an anti-malware solution that is free, but please....don't claim to be the *only* av program in the world to offer advanced heuristics. NOD32 has had it for ages now, and many others do as well.
    
    I will use this for a while and see if it holds up. For a trusted solution that promises the same, check out NOD32 (Eset.com). Faster, more reliable, and less intruisive than the McAfee/NAV ilk.

Discuss ThreatFire

No comments yet