Reviews of Win7codecs

1. 
   ballyhairs

   Reviewing 2.3.7 (Feb 8, 2010)

   I liked it until I found out the subtitle problem with MPC, there was no way to get it to work. And why do they optimize their settings to work with WMP anyway? Who uses that anymore? Almost all professionals use MPC.
   So until they find a solution for subtitle in MPC I'm sticking to K lite Codec
2. 
   CyberDoc999

   Reviewing 2.3.3 (Jan 29, 2010)

   Best of the Best !!!!!!!!
   Not ugly
   only perfect in every way
3. 
   JustForMyMemory

   Reviewing 2.3.3 (Jan 29, 2010)

   I don't like its UI, it's UGLY and arranged improperly
4. 
   dolcesculacciare

   Reviewing 2.3.3 (Jan 27, 2010)

   Just let me say that Shark's codecs and this one in particular are just outstanding in every way ! It may be the best piece of add on software for WIN7 available.
5. 
   egg83

   Reviewing 2.2.7 (Jan 13, 2010)

   Am probably like many users of this software. Used to use K-lite codec pack, had few problems with it, however, got Win7, and tried this codec pack on a whim. At this time, have had zero issues with compatibility, and plays all my file formats (divx, xvid, etc) using Windows Media player. Works for me!
6. 
   boelectronic

   Reviewing 2.2.7 (Jan 12, 2010)

   I was a k-lite fan for a long time, but since I use this pack in win7 I feel more comfortable, this is more customizable, more stable and also easier settings, less conflict and also play more formats in fact! K-Lite mega pack says cover many format, but this win7codec pack is playing every format better with less trouble... Thanks Shark007!
7. 
   sn0wy82

   Reviewing 2.2.5 (Dec 28, 2009)

   Used this for a while now, and no problems.
8. 
   v4npro

   Reviewing 1.3.8 (Oct 9, 2009)

   Works great here, got these and the x64 ones. No problem's on Windows 7 64-bit. Only using it to have WMP12 64-bit to be default player and to play .mkv files. Everything else is set to microsoft default.
9. 
   VistaUser

   Reviewing 1.2.9 (Aug 18, 2009)

   I was impressed with Shark's ability and commitment with the creation of the Vista Codec Package and now that I've switched to using Windows 7, I am in total disbelief at how well he has taken on the task of supplying codecs to this new operating system. WTG SHARK !
   
   As stated on his homesite, he does not interfere with the native decoding supplied by Microsoft, and still enables MediaCenter to play everything I have.
   Very nice work.
10. 
    Vimes

    Reviewing 1.2.5 (Aug 1, 2009)

    As usual for his work Shark007 continues to develop, improve and update his excellent and well received set of codecs. Top marks and much appreciated.
11. 
    pjb

    Reviewing 1.2.4 (Jul 28, 2009)

    Great app. I really like it. :-)
    Works really well. Thanks.
12. 
    Shark007

    Reviewing 1.2.2 (Jul 15, 2009)

    frankwick, this doesnt replace any builtin codecs supplied by the operating system. Based on the simple fact that you ask "Why do I need this in Win7?" means that you do not need it.
13. 
    frankwick

    Reviewing 1.2.2 (Jul 15, 2009)

    Giving this the 4* avg rating so I won't skew the votes with my question................ Why do I need this in Win7? Outside of Ogg or some other obscure codec, the built-in codecs for Wi n7 seem very good. Can someone enlighten me why I need to replace the built-in codecs?
14. 
    alo23

    Reviewing 1.2.0 (Jul 1, 2009)

    I love the new codec testing tool.
    Glad to see some real development, keep it up.
15. 
    elitegangsta

    Reviewing 1.2.0 (Jul 1, 2009)

    works flawlessly as advertised. I am sure this pack will be of even greater need in the future once more codecs come out that are lacking in a default Windows 7 environment.
16. 
    Shark007

    Reviewing 1.1.7.1 (Jun 1, 2009)

    Jeremy; If you have no need for a calculator, would you write a review for it?
    Also, why rate a product that has no obvious value to you at 3?
    Wouldn't the products lack of providing anything useful to you warrent a 1?
    Do you understand the concept of a 'review'?
    
    A review requires the opinion of someone that unserstands the product provided
    and is capable of testing that software's ability to do what its developer says it can do.
17. 
    JeremyGNJ

    Reviewing 1.1.6 (May 29, 2009)

    Why is this needed? I've yet to find a codec that Windows 7 does not have from the start.
18. 
    jorgosch

    Reviewing 1.1.2 (May 6, 2009)

    While Windows 7 allows DirectShow Codecs, those is not the preferred Codecs anymore. Windows 7 now supports Windows Media Foundations Codecs and Directshow Codecs are only an intermediary solution.
    
    As always, be weary of Codec Packs as they are known to break stuff. You're better off just installing ffdshow which lets you play anything you throw at it.
19. 
    Virtual_ManPL

    Reviewing 1.0.8 (Apr 25, 2009)

    4/5
    
    for me missing are simply encoders like h264, DivX or Xvid...
    and DivX decoder (for files encoded by DivX) - provide sometimes better error resilience and postprocessing than Xvid...
    
    good development with dev team attention to problems and updates...
    
    P.S. Why can it be only one pack from XP, Vista and 7 like KLCP which I'm using now ?
    
    @ Shark007- KLCP is not crap, I dont have any problems with this pack, when I started to use it...
    both pack are good if you know what you want to install, not olny click "NEXT" & "NEXT", like I said in other comment...
    you can easy install any s*** like trojan or virus on your PC...
20. 
    Vimes

    Reviewing 1.0.7 (Apr 6, 2009)

    As usual Shark continues to develop his codec packs with professionalism and great attention to detail. I have confidence in using his work due to that dedication.
    He deserves to be supported.
21. 
    ilev

    Reviewing 1.0.5 (Mar 30, 2009)

    What about windows 7.7057 blocking any third-party codecs to be used with WMP ?
    
    http://i.gizmodo.com/518...hird+party-video-codecs
22. 
    GibMonkey

    Reviewing 1.0.4 (Mar 23, 2009)

    If you want media player to play ANY file without a hassle then this is the software you need. Please disregard the poorly informed below. This software does as it says.
    
    As an IT guy I install this on ALL fresh machines (upwards of 50 plus) and have never had a problem. This is a fantastic piece of FREE software that makes my life easier.
23. 
    Shark007

    Reviewing 1.0.3 (Mar 15, 2009)

    @ the poorly informed person typing below me
    
    Some people like to use Windows Media Player.
    Others happen to like Media Center.
    Yet even more prefer using Media Player Classic.(or any other player)
    Well I have to inform you, the intent of this release is these people.
    
    NOT YOU.
    
    The whole idea is to not be restricted to a using only a certain player. And your google search for codec issues stems from 10+ yrs of K-Lite crap people have been installing on thier systems. Its actually my insperation to create a pack that didnt scew up your system. And what exactly does Premier have to do with anything? Those that can afford the $800 pricetag are probably not using a FREE codec solution. And now I just went and wasted more of my FREE time having a pointless discussion with a closed mind.
24. 
    CademiaX

    Reviewing 1.0.3 (Mar 15, 2009)

    @Shark007
    
    Using something like mplayer or vlc is much better, codecs are built in, there is no registered dll hell with codecs packs, which if you do a simple google search you will see the problems they can cause. If I were to rely on your codec pack for adobe premier it would crash, simple as that. Check it out if you don't believe me.
25. 
    Tenoq

    Reviewing 1.0.3 (Mar 11, 2009)

    I still haven't come across a media file I can't play in the Windows 7 beta. I've added VLC because WMP is prone to crashing, but all my video files of varying formats seem to play just fine.
    
    Codec packs like this though are great for the uninformed or the lazy. Like most codec packs though, this one doesn't uninstall cleanly either. :P
26. 
    statm1

    Reviewing 1.0.3 (Mar 11, 2009)

    Shark's codec packs are very nice if you want any video you download to work in any program you have install. So you arent crippled in to only using one app.
27. 
    picsoetje

    Reviewing 1.0.3 (Mar 11, 2009)

    @ VistaUser
    
    You wrote :
    "The author is very knowledgeable and always helpful with providing a fix in case of problems."
    
    Well, I have only got extremely blunt answers from him that didn't help me at all.
28. 
    Shark007

    Reviewing 1.0.2 (Feb 27, 2009)

    People like CademiaX who write reviews without ever installing or testing the product are also evil but thats OK, I wont try to stop people from reading another useless opinion from an uninformed drone. Its entertaining.
29. 
    CademiaX

    Reviewing 1.0.2 (Feb 25, 2009)

    codec packs are evil! lol, download something like VLC player that has them built in..
30. 
    VistaUser

    Reviewing 1.0.1 (Feb 20, 2009)

    This codec pack is excellent. It does what it needs to do very well and is highly flexible.
    
    I help many people to fix their computers and always recommend this pack when my customers have trouble playing videos. I frequently get e-mails from very satisfied users thanking me for giving that recommendation.
    
    The author is very knowledgeable and always helpful with providing a fix in case of problems. If you got a problem, go to the MSFN support forums and you will get a solution very quickly.
    
    I highly recommend this pack.
31. 
    fuknukl

    Reviewing 1.0.1 (Feb 19, 2009)

    I've been using Sharks codec packs for some time now, on XP, Vista, and now Win 7 in 32 and 64bit. Never had any problems at all. I was actually prompted to make an account here because of the rubbish posted below.
32. 
    CyberDoc999

    Reviewing 1.0.1 (Feb 19, 2009)

    Worst Codec Package ever made..... creates too many problems
33. 
    pcexpert

    Reviewing 1.0.1 (Feb 18, 2009)

    This pack has many flaws. The installer is awful. My recommendation is to avoid this like the plague.
34. 
    Shark007

    Reviewing 1.0 (Feb 4, 2009)

    picsoetje, your post here and in my forums only show a lack of maturity.
    
    To those experiencing corrupted M2TS playback after installing 1.0 final
    The corruption is caused by the installation of other codecpacks and I cannot undo what they have done. You will need to start with a clean install of Windows 7 to fully enjoy what this codec package can do for you.
35. 
    picsoetje

    Reviewing 1.0 Beta 2 (Feb 2, 2009)

    This 1 is for GibMonkey who thinks that he is the only one in the universum with more than 3 braincells !
36. 
    GibMonkey

    Reviewing 1.0 Beta (Jan 23, 2009)

    CodecPack and Kylde are a couple of a$$ hats. When it comes to reviewing software is it really necessary to 1 star software that works as advertised (and quite well I might add)? I've been using this for XP AND VISTA for dozens of people and have NEVER had any issues that someone with more than 3 braincells couldn't figure out. Thanks Shark007 for providing this excellent FREE software! Everyone that wants to pimp there own preferred codec should just give positive reviews to THAT software leave the peanut gallery comments to themselves.
37. 
    Kylde

    Reviewing 1.0 Beta (Jan 23, 2009)

    what's the worry with codecs? Just install ffdshow, that's ALL you need on ANY win OS for playback, and in most cases all you need for encoding too. And yes, I've tested it in Win 7
38. 
    BIg_DD

    Reviewing 1.0 Beta (Jan 22, 2009)

    Tthanks Shark007. Excellent job on these codecs. Works great on my HTPC.
    
    Its about time someone built a real package instead of all that klite crap that has been around destroying computer systems for more years than I care to remember. Keep up the good work, its appreciated.
39. 
    CodecPack

    Reviewing 1.0 Beta (Jan 22, 2009)

    The author doesn't seem to have a clue what he is doing. There is no need to make separate packs for XP/Vista/Seven. A proper codec pack should work on all three of them. A smartly written installer can adjust itself and its actions based on the OS.
    
    This is just a scam to attract more n00b users with a familiar sounding name.
    
    Get the K-Lite Codec Pack instead. That is more advanced and fully compatible with Windows 7 and below.
40. 
    artfuldodga

    Reviewing 1.0 Alpha (Jan 19, 2009)

    a good step forward, i have a clean install of Windows 7, i haven't come across any major issues after installing this pack, it icompliments the native support W7 provides while providing some extras

Discuss Win7codecs

No comments yet