Sasha's Profile

Member since January 23, 2008

Favorite Files

  1. 7-Zip (32-bit)
  2. Audacity for Windows
  3. AutoHotkey
  4. AVG Anti-Virus Free
  5. Blender for Windows
  6. FileZilla Portable
  7. FileZilla v3 for Windows
  8. Flock for Windows
  9. IceChat
  10. IZArc
  11. K-Lite Mega Codec Pack
  12. MediaMonkey
  13. Mozilla Firefox for Windows
  14. Mozilla Thunderbird Portable Edition
  15. Mp3tag
  16. Notepad++
  17. PHP
  18. PHP Editor
  19. phpDesigner
  20. PSPad editor
  21. Rapid PHP 2014
  22. SideSlide
  23. SmartFTP (x86)
  24. The GIMP
  25. Trillian
  26. Ubuntu
  27. XAMPP for Linux
  28. XAMPP for Windows

Recent Posts

  1. Review - IZArc

    3.81 Build 1550 (Jan 23, 2008)

    I was using it a lot but it seem to fail to deal with unix-style files starting with dot (.foldername or .filename). This is one major down for me (and one star off the rating). Made some icons ones that can be found at - http://www.sanusart.com/graphics.php page.

  2. Review - The GIMP

    2.4.3 (Jan 23, 2008)

    It's only natural for users defend their favorite programs.
    Regarding GIMP - it is not made for people who want to use it as picture cropper or photo re-touching only, nether individuals who'd like to start dealing with graphic design. GIMP is complete tool kit for any pro, semi-pro graphic designer that sticks to one goal only - to design something from scratch and the best thing that I see in GIMP, is non-automatic process of creation e.g. 'styles' of "photoshop" and such. Everything you create is totally in your hands and you have full control over the layers, what assures uniqueness of design.

    After some 1-star reviews of this software it is obvious that you need some skills and raster graphic orientation (and basic phisics knowledge too) for better layer manipulation.

    The bottom line GIMP is capable to do anything Photoshop can do with some additional uniqueness in the process. I have both and use both depends on the results needed to achieve.

    P.S.
    It is not nice of people to write a bad review of a program that they've fail to use because of their laziness or lack of knowledge or purpose.