RSSBrowse Fileforum
Miranda IM 0.10.12
Windows 7/2000/Vista/XP / Open Source / 146,757 downloads
Miranda IM is a multi protocol instant messenger client for Windows. It is designed to be resource efficient and easy to use. It uses very little memory, requires no installation and can easily be carried around on a single floppy disc. The goal of this project is not to duplicate the functionality of AOL's ICQ Client, but to design a client that has the basic features that is designed for mouse-less operation with a small memory requirement.
- Publisher
- Homepage
Reviews of Miranda IM
-
Artem S. TashkinovReviewing 0.10.12 (Apr 5, 2013)
The project is basically dead.
Many required features aren't implemented (antispam, history view and management, etc), and plugins which implement them are buggy as hell. -
QlibReviewing 0.10.12 (Apr 4, 2013)
it was nice.. once.. upon a long bloody time ago.. now it's just poo :/
Sad since Digsby kinda died too, although it's source code was recently released it might never recover.. back to trillian I guess.. -
-Lord-
Reviewing 0.10.12 (Apr 4, 2013)
First, f**k dhry
next.. bonjour was ignored as was pretty much all other things requested. Miranda, rather than build strength around the program itself, relies on third party plugins to do the job it should do on its own and that's just poor form.
next... keeping up with a fairly dead and/or ignored protocol like ICQ... really? If I could give this a negative number, I would. -
Fred G. Sanford
Reviewing 0.10.12 (Apr 3, 2013)
Requests for Bonjour support: ignored.
Requests for a setting to turn off history for security's sake: ignored.
Requests for access to all AIM functions such as audio messaging, video messaging and file transfer: ignored.
But they sure do work hard on keeping the ICQ protocols up to date. -
-
-
Fred G. Sanford
Reviewing 0.10.4 (Sep 25, 2012)
Yet another empty update with no actual functionality enhancements.
-
-
-
Fred G. Sanford
Reviewing 0.10.0 Beta 1 (Jul 17, 2012)
Let's face it, Miranda will never, ever make it to a version 1.0. And the inability to turn off history is ridiculous. Listen to your users, devs.
-
-
-
Hutsman
Reviewing 0.10.2 Alpha 2 (Dec 14, 2011)
Miranda IM is the best instant messenger out there! Check out http://www.miranda-wizard.com it's an easy webinterface to download a Miranda IM ZIP!
-
SorbReviewing 0.10.2 Alpha 2 (Nov 28, 2011)
The constant updates are really starting to get on my nerves. Just when I start it up I have to close it down and if it's not once a week it's twice a week. And everytime they send me to that #!%& donation page.
-
-
mlazzaro
Reviewing 0.9.4 (Oct 5, 2010)
Best IM. Light with a hundred of plugins. Can be install or do this portable to go in your pendrive.
-
eviljolly
Reviewing 0.9.0 Beta 2 (Aug 8, 2010)
I have my gripes. It's not perfect, but it's the best I've found. Trillian is more than I need, and you have to pay for the good features. Miranda is running, using peak memory of 7.5MB, and I'm connected to 5 messaging services with several tabs open.
I have had some issues with the contact list flashing white over and over. There's no real way to block requests from people not on your list, so sometimes I get spam invites. I'm sure there's a few other things I can't think of at the moment.
Overall though, it's still a great, clean interface, with tons of options. -
Artem S. Tashkinov
Reviewing 0.9.0 Beta 2 (Aug 7, 2010)
To the previous commentator:
There are other clients out there... bloated, ad-ridden, malware rife -
dsp_418
Reviewing 0.9.0 Beta 2 (Aug 7, 2010)
Good client but I'm sick of wasting my time looking for the right plugins, customize it and get crazy with the options. There are other clients out there....
edit: bloated like what? like Pidgin for example? -
ballyhairs
Reviewing 0.9.0 Alpha Build 9 (Jun 10, 2010)
@johnk119
You don't know what your talking about, because I said the same thing when I used Miranda for the first time, but I found out that with some plugins it is so customizable, you just need to get the right plugins and go through the settings.
The best chat client ever, and its getting better all the time, they also have a great forum and very helpful.
5 years using those crappy Yahoo and MSN :( I want them back. -
ZenoLabs
Reviewing 0.9.0 Alpha Build 8 (May 6, 2010)
Clean, light, small, stable: the way every instant messenger shound be.
-
Mystenes
Reviewing 0.9.0 Alpha Build 5 (Feb 9, 2010)
the best piece of software. outstanding number of features
-
johnk119
Reviewing 0.9.0 Alpha Build 5 (Jan 23, 2010)
I'm rather happy with Pidgin, so it's difficult to use something less pretty
-
Targaff
Reviewing 0.9.0 Alpha Build 5 (Jan 21, 2010)
Blaxima: I have the utmost admiration for someone who is willing to admit in public that they're not smart enough to understand what another person is saying. To make it simpler for you, however: the release schedule is irrelevant to the quality of the software, and shouldn't factor into the grade, particularly if you don't appreciate why such a schedule was adopted. For that matter, the quality and maintenance of third-party plugins are equally irrelevant: when you use a program with a plugin design of this nature you do so (or at least should do so) full in the knowledge that contributions by third parties are extensions, not key components. Blaming Miranda for something that is beyond its control is like blaming your car because the road has potholes.
Miranda at its CORE is extremely stable and highly customisable with minimal hassle, and while it's not quite so small as it once was it remains the best of the bunch. -
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.9.0 Alpha Build 3 (Nov 2, 2009)
Well it's back to a buggy mess again. I've never had releases be so hit and miss like they have been ever since the version 8 builds although the latter ones of 7 were heading that way too.
The biggest problem(aside from the bugs) is that with this being such a bare bones program it, much like firefox, NEEDS 3rd party plug-ins to become more functional. That means that if the developers of the plug-ins stop developing you might be out of luck and that has become the case here. The old plug-ins are causing crashes and unfortunately they're not being updated which leaves Miranda thin.
While I've always appreciated the complete customization and lightweight nature of Miranda it has now become not really worth the hassle.
Targaff, I'm sure you feel you've made a point but I doubt that anyone but yourself knows what the hell it is because I know certainly can't decipher your gibberish to see one. Looking at your review history however makes things clear. You are argumentative and seem to be seeking some kind of attention on here because you aren't getting any in your real life and now you won't be getting anymore from me either. Have fun with your pompous self. -
arjesus
Reviewing 0.9.0 Alpha Build 3 (Oct 9, 2009)
The only messenger you can actually do whatever you want!
ps.: I miss the changelog -
Targaff
Reviewing 0.9.0 Alpha Build 1 (Aug 4, 2009)
Blaxima
"Giving something a good or poor rating based solely on your preference towards a piece of software rather then the release in question is just foolish."
Rather like using a rating criteria that has nothing at all to do with the actual software, you mean? Really, if actually being able to differentiate between a beta and an RC, and why that makes a difference, is the definition of misinformed, then colour me donkey any day of the week, twice on weekends.
The developers have included a 64-bit version with the newest cycle. I can't say I'm convinced that it's really needed, but if nothing else it'll put a stop to the endless requests on the forum. There have been some teething issues, though, so no doubt another beta will be along soon, much to the chagrin of the unwashed BN masses. -
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.8.2 Preview Release 1 (Jul 18, 2009)
Targaff
"I know what I'll do, I'll sign up to a site about beta releases and then complain when I get updates on beta and candidate releases because I know nothing about development cycles. Yes, that won't make me look foolish in the slightest."
------------
It never ceases to amaze me how people can be so full of themselves while being such misinformed asses.
First of all releasing 3 betas in a day is not a proper "development cycle" in spite of what you think and sites like this are intended for feedback on a per release basis. Giving something a good or poor rating based solely on your preference towards a piece of software rather then the release in question is just foolish.
This release is stable and still runs lean but the inability to choose one font and have it be the font for many things instead of having to do it manually for each is a pain that they introduced with the v8 releases and I wish that they would revert back to the old way of doing that. It kind of reminds me of VLC in that the preferences window was daunting at first but now in their attempts to simplify it they've succeeded in making it confusing in a new way -
Kajman
Reviewing 0.8.2 Preview Release 1 (Jul 18, 2009)
some guy: "after 3 billion releases it still looks the same lol"
Yes, it still looks the same, but many features is new or rewriten. And Miranda look. Miranda appearance is based on the skins, so skin can adjust each as needed -
some guy
Reviewing 0.8.2 Preview Release 1 (Jul 17, 2009)
after 3 billion releases it still looks the same lol
-
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.8.1 (Jul 3, 2009)
Well I've been using this final enough that I can say the stability issues I was having are back to normal but some of the plug-ins are broken now.
This is the fatal flaw that firefox suffers from too and that is having 3rd party plug-ins. They can give some great functionality but often impact the core negatively with heavy load or crashes and incompatibility with future releases.
With that said I will bump my rating back up one but not back to the 5 I normaly give it. -
Targaff
Reviewing 0.8.1 (Jun 27, 2009)
I know what I'll do, I'll sign up to a site about beta releases and then complain when I get updates on beta and candidate releases because I know nothing about development cycles. Yes, that won't make me look foolish in the slightest.
Miranda still does the job better than its competitors. The steps that have been taken thus far to attempt to improve on its user-friendliness have not been wholly successful, but on the whole it's still Smaller (well, relative to the alternatives) and Faster. There aren't many apps out there that pack so much into a 1.5MB download. -
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.8.1 Preview Release 5 (Jun 25, 2009)
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.8.0 Preview Release 8 (Jun 11, 2009)
I must say that the way they have been handling version 8 is silly. They seem to be releasing 3 beta's (now RC's) a week for every couple of bug fixes. Why not wait a week or two and get the feed back needed to make fixes for a proper RC!? I mean I appreciate the fixes but updating my miranda twice a day is just silly.
---------
That review really, really rings true now. Since then there have been 6 RC's and a (so called) final build. It's beginning to look like amateur hour and with each release I'm getting more problems. I've also never had it crash as many times as I am having with v8 releases. So again, I think they need to do proper testing before releasing every other day (some times twice in a day)
My once 5 rating continues to drop -
emanresU deriseD
Reviewing 0.8.1 Preview Release 5 (Jun 24, 2009)
Gotta love arrogant people like Neowhatever. I updated when MIM prompted me to... Since it AUTOMATICALLY checked for updates. After updating, POOF! All of my accounts except for ICQ went bye-bye. Nice example of semi-automated breakage.
It didn't take long to find a way to crash MIM 100% of the time by simply right-clicking the status area of the main window.
Obviously quality checked by a small gang of retarded monkeys. -
NEOhidra
Reviewing 0.8.1 Preview Release 4 (Jun 23, 2009)
Miranda IM is Smaller, Faster and Easier to use multi IM (thats what gives you the installer), but it can be turn 180 degrees with various plugins and not using the right versions are the most common cause some users like vincent326 and to think - its a junk - not knowing that 3rd party plugin they use (since 2001 sometimes is actually crashing their program). For the rest - people who actually read the release notes and the forum it works without crashing using 50 or more plugins - why is that :)
-
vincent326
Reviewing 0.8.0 (Jun 20, 2009)
I still like it the most. This morning I upgraded from 0.7.9 to 0.8.0 and then it crashes every time I try to change my status. Now I have to reinstall 0.7.9 and all the plugins. Better warn me next time for the damage it might cause for upgrading.
-
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.8.0 (Jun 19, 2009)
In their attempts to clean up the options window they have altered the way you change the font and while it might be a little cleaner it now lacks the option to have say your contact font options be the same as your status bar which means you have have to set EVERY font separately now. That won't endear it to those who say it takes too long to configure.
2 other problems I'm having are;
It crashes Transbar every other time I close Miranda. No other program in my tray does this.
The tabsrrm plugin which they link you to that is supposed to be specifically for this build is missing the icons dll which miranda now reminds me of at EVERY single start up. This can be corrected by downloading the Nova icon pack found here http://miranda.or.at/TabSRMM:Files
But Its having to jump through hoops to get miranda set up right that makes it not for everyone -
dhry
Reviewing 0.8.0 (Jun 17, 2009)
Hooray. Final release out. Back to 5 stars. Basically this remains the best multi-protocol instant messaging client out there. And yes, it craps on Trillian Astra.
-
Joco
Reviewing 0.8.0 Preview Release 11 (Jun 17, 2009)
0.80 release is out. Download + CHangelog: http://www.miranda-im.or...anda-im-v0-8-0-released/
-
Joco
Reviewing 0.8.0 Preview Release 10 (Jun 16, 2009)
Miranda IM v0.8 Preview Release 11 is now available. http://www.miranda-im.org/development/
Forum Discussion: http://forums.miranda-im.org/forumdisplay.php?f=37
ChangeLog (0.80.45: Preview Release #11)
This release includes some file transfer interface improvements along with a minor MSN fix.
ChangeLog (0.80.44: Preview Release #10)
* Improved connection times
* Improved file transfer screen refresh
* Hyperlink control background fix
* ICQ: Fixed user details handling of phones, interests, and timezone
* ICQ: Fix for options dialog to fit in options window
* Fixed network locks in core
* Fix exit on menu click
* Fixed multiple status windows issue
* Account manager crash fix and other UI fixes
* Jabber: Fixed loading of server urls -
dhry
Reviewing 0.8.0 Preview Release 10 (Jun 15, 2009)
Okay. Dropping off a star due to them releasing a new version once every fifteen minutes.
-
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.8.0 Preview Release 8 (Jun 11, 2009)
Light on resources and highly customizable which is good or bad depending on how much time you want to take to configure it just right. I always seem to encounter little annoyances every now and then like random crashes for every build though.
I must say that the way they have been handling version 8 is silly. They seem to be releasing 3 beta's (now RC's) a week for every couple of bug fixes. Why not wait a week or two and get the feed back needed to make fixes for a proper RC!? I mean I appreciate the fixes but updating my miranda twice a day is just silly.
and here's my example from their forum
Miranda IM v0.8.0 Preview Release #8 - Today, 1:40 AM
-NTLM authentication fixes
-Fixed crash during files transfer
-Updated Jabber XMPP server urls
-Fixed erroneous XMPP Ping stanza
Miranda IM v0.8.0 Preview Release #9 - Today, 6:30 PM
-Updated Jabber icons
-Fixed rare crash
-Fixed Modern contact list tray menu -
M^3
Reviewing 0.8.0 Preview Release 8 (Jun 11, 2009)
web site shows preview release 9 is up. Always has been a good, low resource way to connect to IM. Not a lot of features, but very configurable.
I still generally prefer Trillian Astra though. -
anonswgeek
Reviewing 0.8.0 Preview Release 3 (Jun 6, 2009)
this is the first beta of 0.8.0 that ive tried which doesnt crash. im running build 38. preview 4 out today june 6th. with this version you can log into more than one yahoo messenger account at the same time! :D
-
nms04
Reviewing 0.8.0 Preview Release 3 (Jun 6, 2009)
it'S not bad, but it takes ages to confugure everything ... at the moment i'll continue to use digsby
-
Joco
Reviewing 0.8.0 Preview Release 3 (Jun 5, 2009)
For users who complain about the GUI, you can use these absolutely stunning Miranda skins. WIth skinning, Miranda looks better than other standard IMs.
@prghon: don't be fooled by version number runaway game. Some number their version by 0.8.1, 0.8.2, 0.8.34, etc. Other numbers there version 1.0, 2.0, 34.0 etc. Google Chrome comes out of beta directly at version 3. Opera is already at version 10. Whether you call Miranda 0.8 or Miranda 8.0 it's the same program. -
Voox
Reviewing 0.8.0 Preview Release 2 (Jun 2, 2009)
I've tried Miranda before and gave up too quick. Recently, I've given her another shot, looked into a few plugins and I am truly satisfied. The plugins are easy to install and configure & much less hassle than I assumed (I only use 2-3).
She has a really low footprint and works amazingly well.
I'm so glad I decided to stick with her...bye bye pidgin :D -
prghon
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 34 (May 24, 2009)
This software's good but it got stuck at 0.8 forever.
-
Lare2
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 33 (May 15, 2009)
What an error for people to be comparing Miranda to other huge IM's that serves different audiences.
Miranda strongest feature is it's flexibility. The user can start with a basic default install of Miranda and from there take it to whatever level of complexity they may want thanks to the vast selection of plug ins.
Trying to compare it to the above mentioned IM's, is like trying to compare Foobar2000 to itunes (or Windows Media Player).
If you really want to appreciate what this program has to offer you may be willing to invest some time to learn it. If you can't invest a little time, then this app is clearly not for you -
Joco
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 33 (May 13, 2009)
Changelog: http://www.miranda-im.org/development/
Ok, it’s time to present Miranda 0.8 RC2 (build 0.8.0.33). Another two weeks of fixing bugs passed, and here is the result:
- some memory leaks and crashes were fixed;
- almost all IRC bugs were fixed;
- some fixes for Jabber & AIM;
- some minor fixes for the core.
So we have now the very narrow set of important bugs to be fixed… hopefully we’ll see RC3 soon & then - the release of 0.8. -
netean
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 32 (Apr 28, 2009)
I just can't get on with Miranda, I like the idea of a lilghtweight multi-protocol IM, but Miranda is just too fugly, with way too many plugins (so many it's just confusing to know which ones to install).
Overall, as a user experience it's fiddly to set up, fiddly to configure and after hours of tweaking it's still fuglyl.
It just seems way too GEEK for everyday people -
[deXter]
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 31 (Apr 22, 2009)
I can't understand why people keep comparing Miranda to Digsby, Trillian, Pidgin et al. I mean, sure, compare all you want, but why rate Miranda down just because it doesn't work according to *your* expectations? If Digsby/etc is working fine for you, great. On the other hand, Miranda does exactly what's expected of it.
Miranda till today remains true to it's nature: Portable, Small, Fast, Light.
Lets see Digsby or something else do that in 2 MB. -
Somnambulator
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 29 (Apr 14, 2009)
was never a fan of ICQ-like IMs. i grew up on AIM and used various AIM alternatives for the past 5 or so years. recently was using GAIM/pidgin and then switched to Digsby. Digsby is by far the best.
to be fair, i havent used Miranda in years and ive never used Trillian b/c of a cost. if you want AIM-like IM, nothing tops digsby. with 1 AIM, 1 MSN, facebook, and gmail all turned on it's using 25MB RAM and looks the prettiest of all the IM clients. it takes a little while to originally start up, but it has an autoupdater and all kinds of popups (can be turned off) and you can even chat inside the popup notifications so you can continue working without tabbing b/w applications.
sry miranda, you just cant do these things, or as nicely as digsby does. old-school users might still love the ICQ-like thing but overall features, GUI, and as an entire package, digsby beats all other free clients. -
anarkhy
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 28 (Apr 6, 2009)
digsby is a bloated piece of crap. Miranda rocks!
-
AntiochMedia
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 26 (Jan 5, 2009)
I love Miranda and have used it for a very long time. Recently I switched to Digsby as it DOES already have social media plugins as well as a more organized menu system and is a more pleasant overall experience. Digsby does have tons of opt-out applications in it and a few things that a pro user will want to disable (the creators have made it to utilize distributed computing when your computer is idle as a way to monetize Digsby).
So - my Miranda rating is down from a 5 to a 4 because there is real competition in the multi-im client world. Miranda needs to polish up a bit and start adding features and making itself more viable to end users! -
stefano.marzorati
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 26 (Jan 4, 2009)
Simple, the best! P.S. I attend protocol for facebook!
-
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 26 (Jan 2, 2009)
If someone is having a legitimate problem and the solution isn't easily accessible to them then they should inform the rest of us about it, thats how a site like this should work. Some of you people need to get over yourselves.
I've had a problem since upgrading and that is with the interaction with the ieview plugin. For some reason the headers for the template I am using no longer shows up, everything else does though. I've looked through the options and can't seem to figure it out which leads to my only real gripe about Miranda. While they have tried to clean up the preferences I still find them to be a bit of a mess. They did fix the msn file tranfer issue I had many builds ago so heres hoping they fix the rest
If you like customizing the look and feel of things then this is the IM client for you -
buzzyboop
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 24 (Nov 11, 2008)
Miranda betas have worked for me great in the past, but not this one. No plug-ins, only used Yahoo and AOL, but kept crashing when I send messages. Tried to go back, but screen freezes up on me. Perhaps it is because their changelog shows "significantly rewritten AIM & YAHOO protocols."
Because of that, would not recommend this or further Miranda betas until they clean up these protocols.
Tried to delete entirely and do a true reinstall, but I get no reaction when I click on an AOL buddy. Sorry, cannot recommend this one. Miranda has been stellar in the past, but this one needs a lot of work.
Update 1645 US Eastern Time 11/11/08 -- bugs were addressed and updated #24 is available for upload. Works again, so I upgraded rating to 5/5. This prompt response actually leaves me more impressed with these guys than before. Thanks, borkra. Cheers, Frank -
-
schmen
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 24 (Nov 10, 2008)
stop rating test builds low if youre having some kind of a problem or if you are too stupid to use it! ask for help in the forum.
and rating this low because of it looks??
man, stay with your bloatware then. this is not intended to be a bloated oneclick tool with a hip shiny itsybitsy barbie interface,
it is a low resource, higly customizable, slim & fast little gem.
and i hope it stays this way. 5 stars. -
brain51983
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 23 (Oct 18, 2008)
I can never get AIM to work on this. I can log into MSN and Yahoo with no problems. I try to set myself as Online and nothing happens. What am I doing wrong?
-
cricri_pingouin
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 23 (Oct 9, 2008)
netean: after unzipping the files, I only keep clist_nicer.dll (among the other clist_xxx.dll files) in the Plugins folder, this way it uses this style automatically. In fact, out of the numerous plugins, I only keep 9. I copy/paste the new ones, select yes when it asks if I want to overwrite, and when done, all the selected ones are the one I don't need, so press delete, and I'm done. It might take a couple of minutes to go through the plugins and delete the unneeded ones, but doing what I said, it's a one off effort. And as far as I know, there are no software that do not need a one off effort to configure it to your taste.
-
netean
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 23 (Oct 9, 2008)
Miranda drives me nuts:
Out of the box it is painfully ugly. Yes it's highly customisable, but a) why doesn't it look better by default, b)customisation takes time. Time that I have to invest making a program run "reasonably" is time I'd rather be doing something else.
it's a very powerful, very feature rich IM application, if you have the time to customise it and download the right plugins. -
dhry
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 23 (Oct 8, 2008)
Still the best IM client, bar none. Pidgin and Trillian can proverbial my proverbial.
-
Stoerpser
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 20 (Aug 7, 2008)
Has anyone an 3 times error-message
miranda.exe
_except_handler4_common in msvcrt.dll?
and!
a solution for this problem? ;-)
After this messages miranda runs with no other errors (on my XP Home). -
speedwaystar
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 18 (Jul 24, 2008)
The Unicode version gets a 404 Forbidden
You don't have permission to access /builds/miranda-v080a18w.zip on this server.
EDIT: seems fine now -
Joco
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 18 (Jul 12, 2008)
Ugly? Quite the contrary, try these skins: http://browse.deviantart.../im/miranda/?loggedin=1. Then customize fonts & colors of the contact list. This may take sometimes as Miranda doesn't have selectable themes at install time. There is some learning. However, the reward is great, Miranda looks really great, it has tabbed interface, no ads no craps, no popup. This is worth some learning.
My Miranda works and looks better than MSN Messenger of most of my collegues. Unfortunately, most prefer to bear the inconveniences rather than trying to learn a new tool. -
brusco
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 18 (Jul 12, 2008)
Uses far less system resources than Pidgin or Trillian and just as functional.
As for the comments saying its "butt ugly", that's your fault as its appearance can be configured extensively. -
Ryusennin
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 18 (Jul 11, 2008)
Butt-ugly, but it works decently. I still prefer Pidgin which has evolved a lot to replace Trillian. Miranda is still quite the fifth wheel on the car.
-
radiomaffia
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 17 (Jun 30, 2008)
Used it now and then, it works. Using Al's Messenger and this far the best msnclone there is, but Miranda does what is says.
-
Diam0nd
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 17 (Jun 30, 2008)
Very clean, fast and simple. But takes a TON of time to initially configure for your own needs. So I kinda like Trillian the best.
-
elitegangsta
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 17 (Jun 30, 2008)
Exceptionally clean and customizable. Next to Adium for Mac, this is an outstanding chat client. I've had issues however connection to AOL servers at times which seems to be a problem with the software, not AOL for I can connect using Pidgin or Trillian easily. All-in-all a great piece of software, especially while still in alpha, pre version 1 status!!
-
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 16 (Jun 18, 2008)
I think that changes under the hood are more important because it is so very easy to change the look of it on your own with a plugin or 2.
My biggest gripe has been the same for years now and with each build it still hangs after being open and left alone for awhile. Why can they not fix this?! They did fix my only other problem with MSN file tranfers some builds ago -
voidx
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 15 (May 29, 2008)
psycros - rating based on not working link - sometimes I really dont understand...
miranda - I used it for quite a long time but I switched to qip and Pidgin. I agree with AntiochMedia, miranda looks same for years, developers should focus also on progression that can be seen by first look, not only on changes under the hood. -
AntiochMedia
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 15 (May 28, 2008)
I love and use Miranda exclusively, however, as with Foobar, it's very difficult to convince others to switch when the default install is very plain and there is a lack of initiative on the development team to make the product viable to end users. Foobar is making those changes now as they get close to the 1.0 mark. WinAMP is a great example of how an application can appeal to both power users and end users - and it's something I'd like Miranda to move towards. The endless releases of bug fixes, none of which I've ever noticed, are a little boring. I'd like to see an entire version focused on user experience.
-
aszure
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 15 (May 28, 2008)
psycros...you're a tool. Links work fine.
Nice client. Light on memory, good on features. Prefer Pidgin (aka gaim), but this is a great alternative. -
Joco
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 15 (May 28, 2008)
Just converted another user to Miranda. My wife was reluctant to IM. She got friends on Yahoo Messenger and MSN. And got confused by two different IMs. After I installed her Miranda and helped to configure some options and put some nice skins. She now opted for Miranda for good.
-
-
allsiante
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 12 (Mar 27, 2008)
I use miranda since it's first releases, and it has never ever failed me. I use it for 2 msn accounts, icq, yahoo and aim, and it's the best there can be in easyness, portability (I just copied its folder onto my portable hdd and use it everywhere I can plug it in), memory footprint and stability. The best.
-
dpcdpc11
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 12 (Mar 26, 2008)
been a long time user of this great piece of software... but my only problem is that in the Yahoo protocol i've always had this damn lag when someone is writing something to me... and i've got a pretty good broadband connection.. the same lag i've noticed in the yahoo 9 beta... and i'm running miranda in both windows xp and 2003 server and the same lag occures.
-
lotherius
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 10 (Feb 27, 2008)
A bit arcane to configure...
Also, when I have 3 networks configured, the status menus at the bottom ALL show "AIM", even though they are actually AIM/Yahoo/MSN. -
Alnag
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 8 (Jan 17, 2008)
Have the previous reviewers tried the file transfers lately? I guess no. The issue of passive user not working is past. It is working like charm. For that reason I give highest score.
-
Diam0nd
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test Build 7 (Jan 8, 2008)
Best free messenger around. Yahoo, MSN and other crap dont even come close. This is small, light, has less than zero spam and amazingly flexible!
I still prefer Trillian for my messaging needs, BUT if its not Trill, its definately Miranda! -
tannman1
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test 6 (Jan 2, 2008)
This all inclusive Instant Messenger can be customized by the user for each IM service used. I agree its stable and easy to use IF you have experience beyond logging on to yahoo doing light messenging. However some users who have limited knowledge may have a bit of difficulty at first but after some use should be comfortable using it.
-
rubicant
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test 5 (Dec 30, 2007)
Very good, lightweight IM client. With that said, I think a lot of people (myself included) prefer Pidgin because it supports more features in many protocols such as the OSCAR protocol. File transfers, for example, are functional in Pidgin. Miranda is very customizable but you've got to put a lot of work into it to get it up and running.
-
cricri_pingouin
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test 5 (Dec 18, 2007)
Pidgin? "Its OK program" (sic) but Miranda is far better.
Why? Well, just because I decided to say so I guess.
A 5 from me, very stable even in beta, and connects me successfully to all IM protocols I need. In fact, it connects to too many of them, I have to delete plugins for protocols I don't use (e.g. GG, Jabber and AIM). Of course, this takes me a good 5 seconds on each decompression.
In case people are put off by the look, other "skins" are bundled to fit better in today's desktops. -
dpcdpc11
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test 5 (Dec 18, 2007)
if you say pidgin is better.. than you don't know Miranda's potential.. you can customize it and do whatever you want with it... not like pidgin...
best multi protocol IM software for Windows.. sometime i get this lag in sending/receiving messages in Yahoo protocol... did anyone experience this lag problem?? -
-
-
AntiochMedia
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test 3 (Nov 27, 2007)
I have to say - these betas and alphas are kinda boring to me =). I love Miranda and it seems that none of these bug fixes have ever made a difference in my experience. It's solid and works very well! I can't wait until the application matures to a place wherein support for Audio/Video is added. My main desire? Better Skype integration than is offered with the plugin.
-
brusco
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test 2 (Nov 26, 2007)
Light on resources, extremely configurable, covers the main protocols. As good as it gets.
-
Tenoq
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test 2 (Nov 25, 2007)
Awesome program and I'm a long time fan. Could only really be made better (for me) with a native Linux version. Tried running it under WINE, but no joy. :(
Still, best Windows IM, easily. -
dpcdpc11
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test 2 (Nov 24, 2007)
just perfect.. easy your computer's resources and using scriver, IEview and smileyadd is all you need to make it look just the way you want to.
i also had some crashes with this version... but remember this is only a test version... use the 0.7.3 stable version for your daily use. -
ninjeratu
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test 2 (Nov 24, 2007)
bigmana: You do realize that you can use themes .. right? The default themes is simple for a reason.
Test2 resolved a startup crash issue for me and some odd errors in the MSN protocol. For a test version it's quite stable. -
bigmama
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test 2 (Nov 24, 2007)
Maybe the program is very good, but i don't like its GUI.
-
..::][Ben][::..
Reviewing 0.8.0 Test 1 (Nov 20, 2007)
Compact, minimalistic, highly customizable - great program. Btw. i hate trillian, i´v tryed it many times over the last years but it seems it doesen´t get better, still bugy and lacks important options.
-
armpit
Reviewing 0.7.1 (Oct 19, 2007)
Best one there is. Compact, minimalistic, stable, highly customizable.
-
trixeo
Reviewing 0.7.1 Preview Release 1 (Oct 18, 2007)
Miranda (Stable) 0.7.1 Released
http://sourceforge.net/p...iles.php?group_id=94142 -
JeremyGNJ
Reviewing 0.7.1 Preview Release 1 (Oct 17, 2007)
Good program, nice and clean!! Does everything i need for basic instant messaging. I had grown tired of all the crazy features in trillian, since I didnt use them!
I love that miranda is NOT skinned. Just a simple window based on STANDARD UI.
I have to rate it a 3 because it regularly has issues with lock ups and bad screen draws. This seems to only happen when it's been running for many hours. -
-
version
Reviewing 0.7.1 Preview Release 1 (Oct 17, 2007)
Never had an issue settings up multiple accounts with miranda. Always worked fine 'out of the box' for me. Small footprint and fast is another thing i like about this client. Many many options to customize its look and feel if you so desire.
I mainly use Pidgin for IM but Miranda is great when your playing games online and don't want your IM program to eat all your ram.
Great freeware. -
Metshrine
Reviewing 0.7.0 (Oct 2, 2007)
I like this application but it takes far too much time to get working in ways that almost every other client works out of the box. Try using multiple accounts from one medium, you wont be able to without going through a process that most home users wont be able to figure out.
-
-
mackley
Reviewing 0.7.0 (Oct 2, 2007)
Miranda (with some plugin and customization) is the best multi-medium messenger software for PC Windows !
-
trixeo
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 11 (Oct 2, 2007)
Miranda 0.7.0 (Stable)
https://sourceforge.net/...iles.php?group_id=94142 -
comeoffit
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 10 (Sep 22, 2007)
Lean and fast, highly customizable, free. What can you ask for?
BTW, if the Beta isn't stable for you, please give the Stable build a try.
P.S. MSN and ICQ runs fine for me, as have been for years. From time to time I read that somebody couldn't get it work but it never happened to me, insofar.
@Master-
Please try getting help at the Miranda IM forums they are very helpful there.
@kashin
You can change where your profile is located. Edit mirandaboot.ini to point to the current folder. Near the top change the folder to
ProfileDir=. -
Master-
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 10 (Sep 21, 2007)
Still doesnt work for me with MSN.
Havent been fixed in like 8-9 releases. -
taaaki
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 9 (Sep 17, 2007)
@kashin: you probably overwrote your mirandaboot.ini
Note: Do not overwrite your mirandaboot.ini file when upgrading over an existing installation. -
kashin
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 9 (Sep 17, 2007)
This turned into garbage now. I downloaded the latest Preview released and installed it over my old files. Now it won't recognize my old profile because they started storing them in C:\Document and Settings\blah blah blah instead of Miranda's own folder. The reason I was using Miranda was because it DIDN'T put junk all over my hard drive. But that's gone now and this thing is useless to me.
-
LRN
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 9 (Sep 12, 2007)
Miranda 4eva!
BTW, BetaNews ARE fast! http://www.miranda-im.org/blog/ still says that latest version is Preview #8... -
hRLE
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 8 (Sep 8, 2007)
I agree, the best third party IM software. Again, speed, small footprint, less resources. This software is powerfull! You can change every little thing in options. It is plug-in able. The plug-ins are endless (and good...). It has some small stability and compatability issues but nothing to be worry about. The best IM software out there.
-
-
Comit
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 8 (Sep 6, 2007)
Best 3rd party IM out there. Don't be fooled by the bleh screenshot, you can make it look pretty spiff with a bit customizing. Gotta love its 1MB~ memory footprint when idle too.
-
cricri_pingouin
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 8 (Sep 6, 2007)
Ferahgo: thanks for the tip, it loads my profile from the install directory again :)
Works great, another 5. -
Master-
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 6 (Aug 30, 2007)
Cant login to the msn network. Says i need to write in aim and icw, wich ive deactivated..
-
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 5 (Aug 27, 2007)
Always a 5* from me but while I love how they have incorporated some of the plug-ins I use into the core BUT they have also made the others obsolete. I know that plug-ins are on the 3rd party developer but they add fuctionality that I find usefull and have become accustome to. Now if these plugins are still being developed thats fine but if they are not I have now lost some of my functionality
-
a7
Reviewing 0.7.0 Preview Release 5 (Aug 27, 2007)
Probablement le meilleur client de messagerie instantanée sous windows :)
-
Nikkie
Reviewing 0.7 Preview Release 4 (Aug 25, 2007)
Great i.m client to mod and make into whatever you want.i like the skins and protocal plugins (myspace i.m) ...good stuff.
-
radiomaffia
Reviewing 0.7 Preview Release 4 (Aug 24, 2007)
Miranda looks the same like Trillian used to do but then years behind. It's up to you to choose your own chatclient, but I did a real good alternative here for now I guess
-
Tenoq
Reviewing 0.7 Preview Release 4 (Aug 23, 2007)
I always praise Miranda, but I have to level one criticism at the program - Linux functionality. It vaguely works under Wine, but too much friggin around is needed. I can't wait until someone 'picks up the gauntlet' and starts a port to native Linux support! Just wish I could do it myself. :)
Nonetheless, still the best IM client for Windows. Keep up the good work! -
Ferahgo
Reviewing 0.7 Preview Release 4 (Aug 23, 2007)
Just delete the mirandaboot.ini and your old profile will be back I guess :)
-
cricri_pingouin
Reviewing 0.7 Preview Release 3 (Aug 21, 2007)
Aaah, right, my fault, I didn't look hard enough.
I found the development builds in their foum, along with ZIP version:
http://forums.miranda-im.org/forumdisplay.php?f=37
Me happy again :)
*EDIT* DArn, it wouldn't import my database, I had to setup my accounts again :( -
dhry
Reviewing 0.7 Preview Release 1 (Aug 17, 2007)
No need to cri cri, pingouin. Get it here: http://www.miranda-im.or...release-1-now-available/
-
cricri_pingouin
Reviewing 0.7 Preview Release 1 (Aug 15, 2007)
I couldn't find a version without the installer, I prefer the good old ZIP archive, and couldn't find it.
-
incisor
Reviewing 0.7 Preview Release 1 (Aug 14, 2007)
It's simply the best multi protocol instant messenger out there. Small and configurable to your requirements (and taste).
@comeoffit:
simply install the "SecureIM" addon (plugin) and you have what you are missing...
You can find tons of amazing addons....just try it. -
armpit
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 36 (Aug 8, 2007)
Awesome piece of software. Been using it for 3 years.
-
AntiochMedia
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 36 (Aug 7, 2007)
I have come to love Miranda after trying it a few times and bailing back to Trillian or Gaim. After I became frusterated with the bloat that GAIM has due to GTK, and the lack of updates to Trillian (I tried an alpha of Astra and well... I understand what 'Alpha' means more than ever now)...
So Miranda lacks a lot of great features... it lacks webcams ... it doesn't have the secure chat that Trillian has as a stock option... and yeah, it takes some configuring to get it just right.
I'd suggest Miranda to users who use Foobar as their MP3 players. If you'd like an incredible amount of flexibility and appreciate a solid core at the heart of your apps with few frills, Miranda is the way to go.
Just be patient with it. It can do what you want it to do (unless that includes audio / video stuff). You just have to spend some time with it and the results are very rewarding.
I've used Miranda now for about a year. -
comeoffit
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 34 (Jul 24, 2007)
Comparing MIM's usability to a stick-shift Porsche is a very poor analogy. As just one example: When I set up an IM client, one of the most important things I do is enable some sort of encryption scheme. With a good client, it is easy and simple. With MIM, I have to try different plugins, different versions of plugins, then I have to configure them, and test them--and then I have to walk other people through plugin installation and setup (because invariably, some of my contacts are not extremely computer literate).
If I have a stick-shift Porsche, at least I do not generally face the prospect of having to teach others to drive it. They can continue to drive whatever they want; our cars do not have to be "compatible".
I know it feels nice to insult people by saying that they don't "do things for themselves", but again, this completely misses the point. I do everything for myself, but that doesn't mean I want to struggle with poor usability every step of the way.
I've said it before, and I'll say it again. There are two kinds of people who come here: Those who think that configurability has to come at the expense of usability, and those who know better. -
Pensador
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 34 (Jul 23, 2007)
*Full Offline Messaging support for MSN*
Sweet :) -
-
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 33 (Jul 3, 2007)
@comeoffit
The only thing about Metshrine that I can't understand is why after all these builds he or she hasn't configured it yet!! I mean the same belly aching build after build. I took the time long ago and I've never had to do it again.
Akeru is right that this isn't perfect. It lacks a few options that something like MSN has but that means it also lacks the huge footprint and all the advertising.
To knock a program that takes some time to get to work the way you want is like saying a Porsche that comes in stick isn't a great piece of engineering because you need to learn to drive it.
I've said it before and I'll say it agian.
There are 2 kinds of people here, those who like to take the time to do things for themselves and those who don't. Miranda is for those who do -
Akeru
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 32 (Jun 26, 2007)
To comeoffit:
The beauty of Miranda IM to me is not that it's so configurable, but that it's so lightweight. I've done deep customization of the application, and it looks and performs excellent when set up that way, but I always end up going back to plain old Miranda IM in the end, because I miss its blazing speed and tiny footprint. I don't care for doing everything you're complaining about. In fact, I don't use anything other than what it comes with, and most of that I even disable.
The reason I give it a 4 of 5 is that while the client works very well, it seems that not all protocols have enough developer support. Also, you'll find that clients tend to have incompatibility between each other for file transfers and such. Things like that need to be ironed out. -
comeoffit
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 32 (Jun 26, 2007)
I've been using Miranda IM (MIM) for years, and still use it today. It has many strengths, including configurability and flexibility.
However, Metshrine makes some very good, unassailable points. MIM is far too hard and time-consuming to set up and configure. Now that I've put all that time and effort in, I really enjoy using MIM, but I wouldn't want to go through it again, nor would I want to help someone else set up their installation exactly as they want it.
The people who can't grasp what Metshrine is saying don't understand the concept of "usability". You can, as I've done, set up MIM exactly as you want it, and it will work well. It will be powerful, complete with (for example) customized, tabbed message windows, popup messages, reconnection capability, encrypted messaging, and so on.
But it shouldn't take hours to get it set up that way!
One of my correspondents and I spent an hour and a half the other day getting one particular plugin set up and working semi-correctly. We're both very experienced computer users (especially him--a hardcore developer). This is just one illustrative case in point.
If I was rating MIM only on "end result", I'd easily give it a 5. But when I consider ground-up usability, it goes way down.
That's what "not to like"!
@Akeru: I understand your point of view. I do not really have the option of running a bare-bones MIM. I use it for work, and encryption is essential. I also deal with 10s of thousands of messages (no exaggeration), so plugins like History++ (as just one example) are required. I really doubt MIM would perform noticeably better even if I did away with all that stuff anyway. -
Metshrine
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 32 (Jun 26, 2007)
Takes way too long to get working the same way that other clients come configured as standard. Doesnt support various features from the various protocols (MSN, ICQ, AIM). Doesnt support multiple accounts without having to manually copy/paste dll's.
A noble effort but at this time only half-baked. -
brusco
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 32 (Jun 26, 2007)
What's not to like?
It small, efficient, configurable, flexible and free. -
Diam0nd
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 31 (Jun 19, 2007)
Great free messenger. I like QIP more though (shame its ICQ-only atm).
-
Joco
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 31 (Jun 19, 2007)
Ran dbTools conversion, works OK.
@Metshrine, it is true that Miranda option settings are quite overwhelming. And the update procedure is quite complicate for a casual user. That is the reaction I usually see when people try Miranda. They got discouraged after the first 10 minutes. Although they were really impressed when they see Miranda on my machine.
However, the complexity is all relative. For example, I don't know MSN Messenger even if it seems simpler. And my daughter can handle herself Miranda Dev update after I showed her once.
I can not speak for people who don't want to spend the effort to learn. But, for me, to get rid of the ads, pop up, stupid icons and renaming the buddy name in something humanly readable, I am willing to learn anything. And learning how to use Miranda is small as an effort to the benefits you get. Not mentioning that Miranda is open source, so its development won't be steered toward any questionable commercial destiny. -
Diam0nd
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 30 (Jun 14, 2007)
MoparMan16
By same same token you can call EVERY messaging client a rip off of another one. You can say that MACOS is a rip off of linux and windows, and so on and so forth. Well, brain power is a hard thing to gather I guess ;/
Great client! -
User61
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 30 (Jun 13, 2007)
Ripoff? Miranda was available way before Trillian was even thought of.
-
MoparMan16
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 30 (Jun 12, 2007)
seems like a rip off version of cerulean studios' trillian which is easy to use with minimal tweaking
-
Pensador
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 30 (Jun 12, 2007)
Miranda IM is not for everyone. Out of the box it might not be the way you want it to be, but it's strength is in its high customization. At first it was a bit overwhelming but once I got the hang of it, it becomes a very powerful tool.
-
Metshrine
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 29 (Jun 6, 2007)
Blaxima:
Why do I test a product I dont like? I like Miranda, however, it has such glaring functionality problems that I will rate it low when it deserves it. Testing a product is just that, testing. I test all sorts of applications as I am sure most of the people here on BETANEWS do.
Miranda requires far too much configuration and plugins out of the box just to get the same functionality you can get out of other clients. Want multiple accounts? Tell mom and pop to make a copy of A dll file and see what response you get.
Miranda has a lot of promise, however, the amount of work required to get basic functionality working is its biggest downfall.
By the way, I suggest you learn what TROLLING is, because thats all your post is doing. That, and flaming against me. If you dont like my review, drink water and drive on, otherwise, get off my back and learn to take criticism or ignore where required. -
Mystiqq
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 29 (May 30, 2007)
FYI, these are alpha builds. Are they nessary? Well, i dont know. Who cares?
This is simply the best IM around. I wouldnt suggest this to any "pc newbies" but if you like tweaking and customizing, this is for you. Theres simply tons of plugins for this, allowing to do to pretty much anything. -
Mandeep
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 29 (May 30, 2007)
I love this client just because of how customizable it is, but is it really necessary to have 29 builds? What? Are they afraid to go 0.7.1? I guess just like all open source most programs don't like hitting 1.0.
Also, I like how Blaxima puts it, this is definitely for those who aren't worthless and like doing everything for themselves. -
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 28 (May 22, 2007)
do i miss MSN emoticons and other nags? NO! do i miss webcam support? yes... i love this little program and it's definitely worth spending some time customizing it! my only gripe is webcam support and to be honest I haven't even read into it maybe there's already a way... anyhow keep up the good work!
-
Diam0nd
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 28 (May 22, 2007)
Agree with Metshrine. But Miranda is still a kick-ass client.
-
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 27 (May 18, 2007)
@Metshrine
Why is it you have more comments on a product you don't like then those who do like it? Why would you keep testing a product you don't like?
Yes, it does require plugins to have it work in a customizable way. Yes, it needs plugins to take advantage of the many great skins out there, But it works right out of the box for those who only want to have a multi protocol IM. Stop being so mileading with your trolling!
Personally I had issues with MSN and sending files and it use to hang on me but it hasn't for many builds now. I'd rather do a little leg work and find plug-ins that suit my needs rather than be forced in having a bloated client.
There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those who like to do things for themselves and those who don't. Miranda is for those who do -
Metshrine
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 27 (May 18, 2007)
This is ok if you have an hour or two to spend configuring this, finding plugins, and installing them to get it to work like every other client and support BASIC functionality, otherwise, I would stay away.
-
AntiochMedia
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 26 (May 8, 2007)
Trillian is better than Miranda as far as support for webcams and other features that many users will demand.
Miranda is a superior engine that has an amazing amount of flexibility and can be customized to be the perfect messenger for any individual who does not need voice and video. I've really enjoyed it and appreciate the low memory footprint.
Pidgin/Gaim has the upperhand in a FEW areas such as the audio / video pursuit. I really wish that more developers would jump onboard with Miranda, however, I do not know the politics surrounding it's development team and thus don't know if it could end out being the Mozilla of chat. It would be really nice if it would be, however, I see Gaim doing that first as its use of the GTK framework would put it in a much better place to transition to the Mozilla framework. -
-
stisev
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 22 (Apr 14, 2007)
Miranda is the best free (long live open source!) IM client. Hands down.
-
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 22 (Apr 10, 2007)
wow... just wow!
this little progam is amazing! i had tried it a couple times but never spent any time trying to customize it and eventually got rid of it... i spent about an hour yesterday downloading plugins and skins and it looks amazing!! it works very well too and i just uninstalled Windows Live Messenger, so this is my #1 right now! -
Joco
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 21 (Apr 2, 2007)
>cricri_pingouin: it's not the best looking
Please have a look at these skins. You certainly know about this in anyway. I assume you meant the default skin.
http://browse.deviantart...order=9&alltime=yes
I use Miranda at work. My collegues using MSN or GTalk are very impressed by its simplicity, multi-protocol, flexibility and also the look. -
Tene
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 21 (Apr 2, 2007)
Kopete just isn't in the same league ...
I wish the devs would start using wxWidgets. Sigh. -
-
cricri_pingouin
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 20 (Mar 28, 2007)
It's not the "best ever", and it's not the best looking, but it's small, portable, updated often and does the job well. For these reasons, this is my messenging program of choice, and I give it a 5.
-
Diam0nd
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 20 (Mar 28, 2007)
Long live Miranda!
p.s. Disasterpiece, NICE reason to rate it one, smartass. -
armpit
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 18 (Mar 21, 2007)
Best IM client available. Lightweight, minimalistic and stable. Tons of settings, highly customizable, lots of plugins for everything imaginable. Great piece of software.
-
8bitmorethan
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 18 (Mar 12, 2007)
I believe Miranda to be the best IM client available.. IF you're into minimalistic IM applications! Is extremely lightweight and (on my system) stable. Also v0.7 a18 has nice warm colored clean icons (compared to earlier 0.7 alphas). Great software :)
-
Disasterpiece
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 18 (Mar 8, 2007)
they should work on the msn plugin. It still suck's!
-
-
LRN
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 17 (Mar 7, 2007)
They fixed tray icon dissapearing bug, so i'm happy.
For those who complain about "not ready for use right away" - try Miranda Packs, build by others. If You're too lazy (too stupid?) to configure Miranda to suit your needs - download prebuilt package (there's plenty of them).
I'm not sure that there's a freaking lot of people who requires multiple accounts AND can't copy dll in the same time (it's also not the thing you should do every morning, just once for each new account). If they can't find out that they sould copy dll then they officially SUCK, because they can't google for "miranda multiple accounts". -
bugmenot
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 17 (Mar 6, 2007)
This IM client has far too many quirks and things that dont work as they do in the official client (multiple account support is none-existent unless you copy dll files, tell me if a home user will bother with this) and requires far too much time to configure to get working "decently".
-
Metshrine
Reviewing 0.7.0 Test Build 17 (Mar 6, 2007)
Miranda has far too many little annoyances and bugs for my liking. I have reported numerous bugs on their site and bug tracker, only to receive the reply that it must be my computer when I can get it reproduced on several other peoples computers.
Miranda, by default, is not ready for primetime use. It takes about 20-30 minutes of configuration to get it to the bare minimum of what the official clients can do, and the default skin is dead ugly.
In my opinion (Please take note of that word), trillian pro beats this hands down and trillian astra will blow this out of the water. -
Diam0nd
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 15 (Feb 23, 2007)
Best free messenger around. Fast, light and flexible as hell :)
-
netean
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 14 (Feb 12, 2007)
Miranda is OK
but it does'nt look good from the start and I found it a bit fiddly to set up - not enough to be off putting, it just felt more of a fiddle than Trillian, Gaim, msn, yahoo etc.
Bit disappointed that I can't log into Google talk... apparently it need SSL installed (seperately) on my machine - no other app I use needs this installed so not sure why it's necessary.
I also get a bit narked about it ALWAYS asking me to put in my irc details when it starts. and always giving me a little pop up box when I connect to servers (both of which are just really annoying)
other than that. it's small, light on memory usage, and seems to work with most clients (msn, yahoo aim etc)
In my opinion though Trillian Basic is way better than this, (the pro version even more so) and GAIM is a bit better. -
Jalandar
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 10 (Jan 19, 2007)
@brotherS
But the point is that such a widely used feature shouldn't require all of that. It should be built in to the UI. -
-
Joco
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 10 (Jan 18, 2007)
My 12 years old daughter's mocked me with my MirandaIM because it doesn't have all the "fun" features of MSN. After a while, her frustration with MSN grows to a point she asked me to install Miranda on her computer. She got fed up with a tons of flashing icons, a buddy list full of silly screen names, pop up screens, advertisement, etc. After about a week, she was sold to Miranda for good. Thanks to Miranda's flexibility, tabbed message window, skins, etc.
-
-
brotherS
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 9 (Jan 16, 2007)
@Jalandar:
True, it isn't that obvious, but then there's #miranda (irc.freenode.net) and the Miranda forums :) -
brusco
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 8 (Jan 12, 2007)
such a small efficient app. stable and very configurable.
-
Slavic
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 8 (Jan 11, 2007)
As it can be read in the release notes, this version is primarily for testing the development of new menu interface. I would like to suggest all non-beta people don't use it and wait for the next more stable beta.
-
Cyrop
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 8 (Jan 11, 2007)
Awesome software, cant imagine using an IM without it.
As for "but lacks many features for power users", I really dont think you have looked at it enough - it is the IM for power users. Ohh and the support of multiple accounts has been planned for a long time, its just hard to do without breaking support for the hundreds of plugins, but is still planned.
Be careful with this build, it is slightly unstable in some aspects - for more info : the build discussion section of the Miranda Forums :) -
Jalandar
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 7 (Jan 6, 2007)
Good client, but lacks many features for power users, such as multiple account support for individual protocols. In over an hour on the site the only way I found to make that work involved manually copying and changing the names of .dll files. For such an often used feature, the UI should include support for that.
Back to Trillian or Gaim for me. -
ag2k1
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 7 (Jan 4, 2007)
"Can't live without you, babe. Can't see me without you, babe" :D It was, it is and will be the most valuable app in my PC. So many freaking addons so nice look, so fast .... 5
-
Diam0nd
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 7 (Dec 18, 2006)
Not bad. Really really nod bad :)
What's new:
http://files.miranda-im.org/builds/ChangeLog.txt -
phiber0ptik
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 7 (Dec 18, 2006)
Well, it is good but the preferences is... to much for a simple user :) I must say I like GAIM better. For those who want full control of everything and uses all possible IM-protocols, go for this one :) And btw, great plugin-support. 5 for the more advance user, 3-4 for a totally amateur :)
-
Diam0nd
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 6 (Dec 6, 2006)
For a free client, Miranda is great. Definately best FREE client outta there.
-
thealanberman
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 5 (Dec 4, 2006)
@brusco: The development builds are available on the miranda site, they're just hidden under the "development" section of the site.
http://www.miranda-im.org/development/ -
brusco
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 4 (Nov 30, 2006)
hey sld, miranda betas have been released around here for along time, seemingly exclusivley. you should check here often as other software authors also post beta news here and nowhere else.
as a miranda user myself i can recomment this to anyone sick and tired of their official im client's bloat, slowness and increasing space given over to ads rather than features/ease of use. -
sld
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 2 (Nov 26, 2006)
Haha, I used Miranda 0.3x for over a year and there were zilch updates. When I finally got fed-up with the stagnation I went back to mainstream MSNMsgr (Didn't need ICQ anymore). Suddenly, 0.7 is out for testing.
It was a pleasure using even 0.3x. -
Mandeep
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 2 (Nov 25, 2006)
I've been a long time Trillian user because of its ease of use and many plugins. I tried Miranda IM out a long, long time ago when it first began and at the time it didn't have the plugins and support that it has now. I downloaded this version and was very suprised to see it had the newest AIMOscar plugin installed by default. For now I'm sticking with Miranda because it has so many customization options than anyone could ever dream of. I rate this a 4 out of 5 because I had to spend about 30 minutes getting everything the way I like it.
-
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 2 (Nov 25, 2006)
@brotherS
Thanx, I will post my problem at the forum as it still hangs for me
Am I the only one that has files move at a snails pace when I send or recieve them? I installed MSN messenger again and the files flew along using that. -
-
bullka
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 2 (Nov 25, 2006)
Very nice piece of application.
Where could I find an unicode version of this (and all later) builds?
Thanks! -
DipThong
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 2 (Nov 24, 2006)
tenroq, how about posting a source that PROVES microsoft is inserting code to break third party clients still? They did that back in the day, back when AOL was doing the same with AIM, but ceased this almost 3 years ago. Lets talk about holding a grudge.
-
-
brotherS
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 1 (Nov 21, 2006)
A great program! I run a copy of it from my USB stick.
@Blaxima: that's unusual and never happened to me. I suggest you ask in the forums, should be easy to fix. -
AntiochMedia
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 1 (Nov 14, 2006)
Out of curiosity, what does Miranda IM's roadmap look like for v0.7? What milestones qualifies a .1 shift? It seems that the only reason for a number shift is the closing of v0.6 and the development path for v0.7 hasn't been decided yet.
-
-
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 1 (Nov 13, 2006)
.7??? what happened to an official release of .6?? isn't .5 still the official one?
I made the swtich to this and have abondened messenger forever. Love the plug in approach but one knock on it that has yet to be fixed in that I find this program hangs if you don't use it while its running. Many times it appears that I'm still online yet if I try to send a message after being idle for awhile it says It can't send message because I'm not connected! -
Tene
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 1 (Nov 13, 2006)
Miranda's GUI is superb. It's simple, neat, functional, and native. The only glitch I can find that's present in the latest builds is that the clist menus aren't themed as menus but as application background.
Overall, a superb and simple messenger.
As an aside I love the everything-as-a-plugin approach. -
Joe Dirt
Reviewing 0.7 Test Build 1 (Nov 13, 2006)
They need a new look. This GUI looks like like it was built in 1999.
-
Metshrine
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 16 (Oct 31, 2006)
4/5 because of an outstanding bug that causes MY experience to suffer with this program. The client gets a 5 from me when it functions for me like it deserves one.
Other than the bug I've mentioned in the past, a great program. Well worth a try. -
Tenoq
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 16 (Oct 31, 2006)
Metshrine, I did not say it was anti-competitive to introduce new features - I'm all for adding in new functions to MSN (although one has to ask why it took them so long to catch up with ICQ's offline messaging). What IS anti-competitive is deliberately introducing code to block or harm other IM clients - which is exactly what Microsoft have done. If you don't see anything wrong with a closed-source protocol that deliberately blocks 3rd-party IM clients, then you've got rocks in your head.
-
Targaff
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 16 (Oct 31, 2006)
Metshrine: I clearly do know what a review is, being a critical appraisal of a product as a whole; you on the other hand seem to think a review is limited to solely how one niggling bug affects you, and hang whatever else might conceivably be taken into account. Moreover you don't seem to understand the meaning of hypocrisy, since I clearly did rate the program - or did you miss the bar o' 5 that accompanied my comment?
I can only presume that you actually meant "review" and not "rate", in which case I'd point out that I've already amply expressed my opinion of the program elsewhere in these reviews, I use it on a daily basis and despite the faults that do exist consider it far better than the alternatives that are currently available - that is why I gave it a 5.
Now you tell me, are you reviewing the program, or are you reviewing the bug? Because if you're doing the former your comments and rating don't gel, and if you're doing the latter your "review" belongs on the bugtracker, not here. -
McHale
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 15 (Oct 25, 2006)
Trillian - resource hog. GAIM - not bad but SLOW development and not very customizable.
I've been using Miranda for over a year now and have upgraded to each and every beta.
By far, most customizable, powerful IM client out there. Couldn't live without it.
-Mc -
Targaff
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 14 (Oct 16, 2006)
Metshrine: your rating has nothing to do with the client and everything to do with the perceived treatment of your single, solitary bug. You know, the one that has 3 pages of forum thread dedicated to it, where the respective developer himself (who, incidentally, is currently on hiatus) posts to state that he's unsure of why it's happening or how to replicate it.
Yes, it's a bug. Yes, it's in the bugtracker. No, no-one knows how to fix it at the moment, but frankly it's relatively minor and in your own words, other than that, it's a "great IM client." So how about you rate it accordingly? -
Metshrine
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 14 (Oct 16, 2006)
Same issue as I've outlined below twice now. My thread goes unanswered at the forums, as well as the bug report, being blown off as an issue with GAIM when in fact every other IM client I've used, trillian, naim, the official clients, etc, all work fine when interacting with gaim. Until this bug is resolved, a 3/5 for an otherwise outstanding IM client.
And tenoq, its not anti-competitive when MSN is upgraded to add new features. Other clients just have to adapt and edit their code to work. If MS never updated the code for the MSN protocol, we wouldnt have any of the features that are available in it today. So please, before you go off on your anti-ms rant, learn what it is exactly you are complaining about.
EDIT:
How is a bug that annoys a user not related to the client? Do you know what a review is? I am sorry, but a bug that annoys a user is plenty of reason to rate a program lower. The developer also stated its in the way the gaim client sends messages out in HTML format (along with its handling of special characters). The odd thing is, no other client has an issue receiving these messages. So please, before you attack me (and do so hypocritically, where you whine about me rating it poorly and dont rate the program itself), learn what a review is and dont tell a user how they should rate an application. I will rate this a 5 when I feel it deserves it. With this bug, I cannot rate it a 5 because to me it is not a 5.
So, how about you give a review, which is the point of this listing, and not dedicate it to flaming me or telling me how I SHOULD RATE the application. I will rate it as I see fit and not how YOU FEEL I SHOULD. -
Nikkie
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 12 (Oct 10, 2006)
Great client to get all you ever wanted in an i.m..
-
Tenoq
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 12 (Oct 10, 2006)
Idiot reviewers, as usual.
This client isn't suppose to do all the frilly bulls*** that the native IM clients do - it's purpose is to give you a messaging client, not a toy. And it fulfills that purpose with 5 stars.
Rating it less because it doesn't do something it's designed not to do is foolish: it's like rating DVD Decrypter a 3 because it doesn't have an e-mail editor built-in.
And for the nuffie below who rated it a 1 because his friends PCs have issues, that's just ludicrous.
Anyway, another 5 stars, the program is still working as well as always. MSN glitch has almost been completely resolved - one just wishes Microsoft would stop the anti-competitive behaviour of introducing the code to mess with programs like Miranda. -
cricri_pingouin
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 12 (Oct 9, 2006)
I like the fact that I just need to unzip the program, and that it stores all my settings in a single file, hence making it very portable and a breeze to update.
Besides, it works very well and is very stable, even in beta stages. It superseded Trillian on my machine a while back. -
-
WebWarp
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 12 (Oct 5, 2006)
"and the client on the other side crashes ..." now that tells that its msn, and not miranda, that have problems right... !
-
kpouer
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 11 (Oct 2, 2006)
Each time I speak using MSN protocol, if my contact uses a true Microsoft client, my Miranda is disconnected and the client on the other side crashes ...
-
Metshrine
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 11 (Sep 26, 2006)
Same issue as below. This is the only client, that when interacting with gaim clients, that cant properly handle html messages or special characters sent via the gaim client. All other clients handle it fine. My bug report also seems to be in a state of being ignored as happened to my forum post.
3/5 for an otherwise good IM client -
adamlau
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 10 (Sep 22, 2006)
As stable a development build as ever. Highly recommended.
-
Mystenes
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 9 (Sep 20, 2006)
all versions of miranda are here
http://www.miranda-im.org/development/ -
-
nant`
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 9 (Sep 19, 2006)
Build 9 has a bug in the User Details module (unable to edit own details).
It has been fixed by now for the next build. -
reets
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 7 (Sep 8, 2006)
These alpha builds are looking awesome. Love what has been changed with the clist and the rearrangement of the options window.
-
jk-
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 5 (Sep 4, 2006)
The more options the better, this has become my favorite instant messaging client (particularly since gaim won't work with newer gtk versions which gimp requires).
-
Targaff
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 5 (Sep 1, 2006)
Desides is right, and it is not wrong to say that Miranda's extensibility is simultaneously its biggest asset and its biggest problem. The fact is that the mess in the options dialogue is a recognized issue, but for now at least it's not one that's going to be solved, not without either breaking a lot of plugins or some ingenious tinkering on somebody's part. Configuring it just so can and usually does take hours.
That said, however, Miranda's target audience has never really been the "pick up and play" cross section, and while it is obviously a drawback, the program is nevertheless eminently suited to the sort of person who is quite prepared to tinker about with this and that to set it up just how they like it. Marking it down for not being something it was never really minded to be is therefore a little churlish in my eyes. -
Desides
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 5 (Sep 1, 2006)
"You rate a program low based on you inability to use features that are not even native to or necessary for it to work properly??!?!?!"
Reading comprehension, friend. I said that the program's huge amount of options are a liability because they impose a steep learning curve. Software should be simple and intuitive in use and configuration. Miranda does not meet that standard. -
Blaxima
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 5 (Sep 1, 2006)
@desides
You rate a program low based on you inability to use features that are not even native to or necessary for it to work properly??!?!?!
Miranda is an extremely customizable(if u wish) and lightweight multi protocol IM and does suffer from a few bugs but this really does not effect its day to day perfomance much. Besides the devopment is done a regular basis to correct outstanding issues.
4.5*
Edit
You open the program and are prompted to enter your accounts(ie yahoo, msn etc..)and voila you are connected. This is no different than Trillian. The steep learning curve is only if you WANT to customize it. Dont mislead people into thinking that it wont work for them right out of the box. Options are just that. Comprehension eh? -
Metshrine
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 4 (Aug 29, 2006)
This is a great client, however there is one outstanding issue that prevents me from rating it a 5. Right now, and in past builds, when I receive an html message with quotes, the messages contains what appear to be messed up HTML tags. You can see more of a description here
http://forums.miranda-im.../showthread.php?t=10374
But other than that, great IM client. -
Desides
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 3 (Aug 22, 2006)
Miranda suffers from too much customizability--the sheer amount of configurable options is insane, and when combined with the amount of plugins and variants of those plugins, it's extremely difficult for a person new to the program to quickly match the features of, say, Trillian.
dhry, the 0.6 series so far are development builds for what will eventually become the final build of version 0.6. -
obox
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 3 (Aug 21, 2006)
Good build. No bugs. No problems.
A few GUI's updates... -
dhry
Reviewing 0.6 Test Build 2 (Aug 17, 2006)
So what exactly is different about the 0.6 series? And why are there two AIM contacts named "Snoopy" in the screenshot?
-
chronon
Reviewing 0.5 (Jul 29, 2006)
Great client fully customizable by installing plugins, support several protocols (msn, aim, yahoo, ...), a must have. I can't leave without it!
-
Dwarden
Reviewing 0.5 (Jul 29, 2006)
Must have program for anyone who got more than 100 contacts on IM ...
-
Zankur
Reviewing 0.5 (Jul 29, 2006)
This is very easy to use,light IM messenger with no fuss or trouble.
It may not have any fancy features of msn or yahoo messenger,but its definetly good for people who like not to waste their 128mb ram machines or P-I units. -
AntiochMedia
Reviewing 0.5 (Jul 28, 2006)
Amazing flexibility - as of v0.5, I've switched from Trillian (and formerly Gaim v2.0 Beta 2).
I could go into a long rant about what is better etc. etc. - but will simply say - it's extremely object oriented, full-featured, and has a low memory footprint.
Will need modern features such as webcams, etc. to compete with Trillian / Gaim v2.0. -
IMKey
Reviewing 0.5 (Jul 28, 2006)
betanews download link takes you to the ansi version... get the unicode version off the official site... support for a lot more languages.
-
ILLEGALien
Reviewing 0.5 (Jul 28, 2006)
Now includes the AIM OSCAR Protocol and is more customizable than any other IM software out there. Simple if you want it to be; But very powerful and can get overwhelming - the Miranda community/forum is there to help.
-
VictorAnderson
Reviewing 0.5 (Jul 28, 2006)
Almost impossible to ever get a 5 from me, but Miranda earns a 5 for sure. Works perfectly, uses hardly no resources, its free, has lots of cool plugin toys if you want. Fine piece of programming.
-
giwo
Reviewing 0.5 (Jul 28, 2006)
As light on system resources as ever, the interface is much improved with clist_modern, and ultimately the best (and most configurable) Multi-Network IM client out there.
-
Eemeli
Reviewing 0.5 (Jul 28, 2006)
I have used this program several years. and I like this program. It's best of the best of the best. I give it 5 points. Thanks who ever is making this app.
-
-
-
-
Mystenes
Reviewing 0.5 Preview Release 3 (Jul 20, 2006)
no problems here. all files upgraded properly. i used installer version. currently i use pre 3 version.
-
slimy
Reviewing 0.5 Preview Release 2 (Jul 17, 2006)
Miranda IM 0.5 Preview Release 2 is now available for download. The following changes were made since Preview Release 1:
Fixed MSN connection issue with MSN’s new protocol changes
Memory leak fix for Yahoo
Included DBTool and fixed a critical issue with clearing RTL events
Installer should now run on Windows 95
Known installer bugs:
The AIM Invisible status icon is not included in the proto_AIM.dll icon pack.
Before you download this release, please be aware of the following:
This release has been tested and should not contain any major bugs, however we can make no promises. As always, please backup your profile and plugins before installing.
We need users to test both the zip and the installer to verify that initial setup is working correctly. If you are upgrading from 0.4.0.3 please let us know if the installer does not upgrade your installation correctly.
It is very import that you report any bugs you find as soon as possible. The quicker we get reports of issues with this release, the quicker we can officially release a stable 0.5. -
dazed
Reviewing 0.5 Preview Release 1 (Jul 14, 2006)
Moving from v4 to v5 surely took some time, espicially upgrading all plugins.. some that are only available in the forums and not in the download area (popup+ for instance, which is a must have! The version available from the addons site is not compatible with v5)
Hopefully the plugin for checking upgrades of plugins will take care of some of these problems from now on?
As said before: If you have time(knowledge) to configure this... then Miranda is absolutely the most awesome and most powerful IM available. Once configured you can transport your installation by just copying files, this is what appeals the most to me!
If you don't have time/knowledge then Miranda is a great working IM with ugly GUI that easily can be made portable (ie. run from USB stick without being administrator)
Miranda rocks! -
munga42
Reviewing 0.5 Preview Release 1 (Jul 14, 2006)
YOu need some plugins to fix the gui..
THis one need a redesign definately. -
Joco
Reviewing 0.5 Preview Release 1 (Jul 14, 2006)
Take care, the download link at Betanews is the ANSI version. That will break your Unicode Plug-Ins.
Unicode version here:
http://www.miranda-im.or...release-1-now-available/
EDIT: sorry for reposting the link. I didn't see nant's post yesterday. -
HelgeFossmo
Reviewing 0.5 Preview Release 1 (Jul 14, 2006)
tpacko2: you can configure the GUI to look just like you want, and there's skins to use aswell just look around at www.miranda-im.org
-
-
nant`
Reviewing 0.5 Preview Release 1 (Jul 13, 2006)
It is now, see release notes here: http://www.miranda-im.or...release-1-now-available/
-
-
Zerbe
Reviewing 0.5 Test Build 60 (Jul 11, 2006)
I started using Miranda a few years ago when Trillian started going towards the way of the bloat and I havent looked back. Development of Miranda has been on and off, but it seems lately there has been a lot going for it. Best IM evar.
-
Reviewing 0.5 Test Build 60 (Jul 11, 2006)
tried using it a while ago and it was way too raw for me back then... i only use MSN nowadays... but with the client nearing a 15mb download package and apparently 150mb installation (im not convinced windows is right here... folder is only 35mb) but anyway... this 1.5mb client seems like a great idea for use at work or wherever you don't need all the eyecandy and special features!
GREAT WORK! -
giwo
Reviewing 0.5 Test Build 60 (Jul 10, 2006)
I've been using Miranda IM ever since I got tired of Trillian hogging all of my resources. It's a great little program that is hugely customizable, and it seems to just get better with every new build.
-
-
horsecharles
Reviewing 0.5 Test Build 59 (Jun 26, 2006)
Haven't benn able to get most releases post-4.3 to start/install properly/work on win9x.......
-
Ferahgo
Reviewing 0.5 Test Build 58 (Jun 21, 2006)
Wonderful, as usual. Any feature that you may want is available by plugin, this build fixes quite some really critical bugs (MSN timeout!)
Nevertheless, you should go on using loadavatars.dll from #57, doesn't work on quite a lot of machines, mine included. -
bid
Reviewing 0.6 Alpha Build 1 (Jun 7, 2006)
Finally version 0.5 is about to get out the door. Been using it since 2002. Still lovin' it.
P.S> Why oh why would someone post 0.6 Alpha when 0.5 RC is the one that actually works. -
Klusternisse
Reviewing 0.6 Alpha Build 1 (Jun 7, 2006)
this version doesn't work at all :D
errormessages and so on
it's alpha so i guess it gonna be better -
nant`
Reviewing 0.6 Alpha Build 1 (Jun 6, 2006)
Note that 0.6 is the new development branch of Miranda-IM.
Miranda 0.5 (previously known as 0.4.3 (or 0.4.0.3 here on BetaNews *sigh*)) currently at build 57 (released a few hours ago) will be the next official, stable, release of Miranda, if no showstopper bugs will show up.
Just to clarify any future mess... ;) -
ryulinho
Reviewing 0.6 Alpha Build 1 (Jun 6, 2006)
Free, open-source, updated often, light on system resources and formidably stable, the most configurable IM out there is the best there is for Windows. I had been using Trililan before stumbling upon this gem. I had never managed to configure Trillian’s interface to my liking. Miranda’s interface is simple and efficient right out of the box. With a little fine-tuning, how minimalist it can become is a gift in today’s bloated interface world.
-
theheff
Reviewing 0.6 Alpha Build 1 (Jun 6, 2006)
never really been a Miranda IM fan, but this alpha release definitely caught my eye. love the new interface! keep up the good work!!
-
womfalcs7
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Alpha Build 55 (May 22, 2006)
It's the best in my opinion. Small size, speedy and smooth installation, uses minimal resources, and a lot more. I just love it.
-
allsiante
Reviewing 0.4.3.0 Alpha Build 54 (May 15, 2006)
On Windows Miranda has been my personal favourite for I don't even remember how many years now. Superb example of a simple, usable, fast and good piece of software. Fabulously magnificent :) Ok, I think I've said it all :D
-
Mystenes
Reviewing 0.4.3.0 Alpha Build 53 (May 10, 2006)
great proggie, full of features, fully customizable
small, fast, works everywhere -
Adrian79
Reviewing 0.4.3.0 Alpha Build 53 (May 6, 2006)
Aim's direct connection thingie is missing :-(
-
Joco
Reviewing 0.4.3.0 Alpha Build 53 (May 5, 2006)
Especially with these skins and icon set:
Luna Element 5 Skin: http://www.deviantart.com/view/31289577/
Proxal Icon Set v2: http://www.deviantart.com/view/17102198/ -
Nikkie
Reviewing 0.4.3.0 Alpha Build 52 (May 5, 2006)
I love it . This messenger client has endless posibilites ..
-
Joco
Reviewing 0.4.3.0 Alpha Build 51 (Apr 24, 2006)
This apps is perfect for me. The UI is not agressive as others. With one single light program, I can communicate with all other people. I love the tabbed window plugin. One single window for all communication threads. No ads, no kids' icons & noise distraction.
-
bid
Reviewing 0.4.3.0 Alpha Build 51 (Apr 24, 2006)
I have been using this under Win x64 for over a month. Granted it is not natively running at 64-bit, but it works flawlessly.
-
WebWarp
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 19 RC1 (Mar 22, 2006)
Still doesn't work under x64 as it did in the past :(
-
Tenoq
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 19 RC1 (Mar 20, 2006)
Still a great program. Unfortunately I'm still afflicted with the MSN timeout issue, which doesn't have any resolution on the horizon. When this is fixed, my rating will be back to 5. :)
-
kubesa
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 19 RC1 (Mar 20, 2006)
Important: If you use the alpha testing builds of the future v0.4.3, you should NOT upgrade to v0.4.0.3. This is not compatible with the alpha builds.
-
nant`
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 19 RC1 (Mar 20, 2006)
These BetaNews guys haven't bothered changing this in eons, I doubt they'll care now.
There are issues with MenuOrder and clist_nicer in this build, so beware. Other than that -- great as always! :) -
chronon
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 19 RC1 (Mar 20, 2006)
Nice IM client, you can configure it the way you want...
NOTE: OH MY GOD! PLEASE, I BEG YOU!! CORRECT THE VERSION INFORMATION, IT'S VERSION 0.4.3 RC1 NOT 0.4.0.3 RC1 -
Deedstyger
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 48 Alpha (Mar 16, 2006)
best instant messenger for basic needs, slow machines. :)
if i need a videochat what i do is starting msn messenger, if not simply continuing to use miranda. :) -
lane32x
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 (Feb 21, 2006)
Miranda is fantastic. under 8 megs of ram, and basically 0% cpu usage (while transfering files over AIM)!
Lack of tabs kept me away before, BUT TABS ARE a possibility, just copy the Scriver plugin to the plugins directory. http://addons.miranda-im...on=viewfile&id=1885
plugins to use:
-->Scriver for tabs and colored chat ala AIM
(tabsrmm is also a tabs plugin, but it has more glitches)
-->SMileyAddBin for smileys in the text
-->Newawaysys for better away message support. -
memphisangel06
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 (Feb 19, 2006)
i love it...its lite and fast....i just wish could tab in my messenger window..
-
bid
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 (Feb 15, 2006)
Joco: Switch back to the alpha builds. Once you start using the Alpha builds your DB is updated and it is not compatible with the latest release.
Whoever, is updating this listing really needs to pay attention to which version they are advertising.
memphisangel06: You can. Check out scriver and tabsrmm plugins. -
Joco
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 (Feb 14, 2006)
The betanews' link points to 04.03 and not 0.43. After installation, got error message "The png2dib plugin cannot be loaded. it requires Miranda IM 0.4.3 or later". Can you please help. Thanks.
Edit: CPU is locked 100%. Had to kill Miranda32.exe. -
chronon
Reviewing 0.4.3 Build 47 Alpha (Feb 11, 2006)
Miranda is the coolest...again these alphas are v0.4.3!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (LOOK THE ABOUT DIALOG!!!)
-
WebWarp
Reviewing 0.4.3 Build 47 Alpha (Feb 11, 2006)
Najz this time it actully seems to work .. :)
Have had alot of problems with the msn protocol where messages kept saying that they wasn't delived but no problems so fare and no delay whick also has been a big problem .. Hope it last this time ..
Great litle program with alot of oppertunities.. -
-
-
Mystiqq
Reviewing 0.4.3 Build 47 Alpha (Feb 11, 2006)
This isnt 0.4.0.4, its still 0.4.0.3 but never build.
-
LRN
Reviewing 0.4.3 Build 47 Alpha (Feb 11, 2006)
/me love Miranda!
With few additional plugins and proper tuning she becomes unbeatable (for ICQ, at least).
Alpha-builds are very rich in terms of new features, and stable enougth to use, not only to test.
uncbean, you should try to run miranda32.exe (typically located in c:\program files\miranda im\)
You know, "exe" files is actually the programms, not shourtcuts on your desktop or in your menu.
Miranda is designed in the way it does not rely on windows registry or other things like that. Because of this, Miranda works everywhere and everytime you launch it, and you don't need to reinstall it every time. -
nant`
Reviewing 0.4.3 Build 47 Alpha (Feb 11, 2006)
Did we go "back to the future"? This is not 4.0.4, but 0.4.3!
Best as ever. -
Targaff
Reviewing 0.4.3 Build 47 Alpha (Feb 10, 2006)
Adrian: AIM file transfers are there in the most recent alphas, you're not looking hard enough. Direct Connections will follow in due course.
templar: yes, they're not releasing new versions, that's why there was a new stable released not a fortnight ago and these dev builds are released nearly weekly. And Trillian's not much to recommend when it's suffering from the ICQ issue that this version of Miranda fixes.
Not sure about your problems, uncbean, sorry... did the stable version (0.4.0.2) work at all? -
templar™
Reviewing 0.4.3 Build 47 Alpha (Feb 10, 2006)
I used Miranda for about a year or so. It consumes so little memory when running (sometimes only about 512KB!).
But they hardly release any new version. And the countless alpha & beta releases are getting more and more buggy and unuseable.
I gave up on Miranda.... :(
I switched to Trillian instead. It's much more stable and polished.
To uncbean, try Trillian at www.trillian.cc -
uncbean
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 46 Alpha (Feb 6, 2006)
Worked great when initially installed, but disappeared the next time I booted. Reinstalled about 3 times, no icons, not listed in programs, seems to like to work only once. Rats, I had hoped that this would solve my problem of using many messengers :(
-
Adrian79
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 46 Alpha (Feb 4, 2006)
aim direct connection and/or file transfers?
-
Madlew
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 46 Alpha (Jan 31, 2006)
It took a while, but i finally got all the plugins, addons and stuff setup and i really like this program. Wasn't too sure at first because it was pretty bland looking. Haven't had any problems so far. I think this is a keeper.
-
Zerbe
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 46 Alpha (Jan 30, 2006)
Great little program, very light and has tons of plugins. Its nice to see its being worked on again.
-
chronon
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 46 Alpha (Jan 30, 2006)
This recent version are working nice and smooth. Just a correction: current alpha version are v0.4.3 not v0.4.0.3, since v0.4.0.x is being use for minor correction on official releases of miranda, like v0.4.0.2 available on official homepage.
-
ModderXManiac
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 45 Alpha (Jan 17, 2006)
With the release of MiniAIM, of which I now use on my usb drive, I haven't been using this much at all lately.
But you can't beat the # of supported plugins and protocols on this client, nosiree. -
brotherS
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 44 Alpha (Jan 8, 2006)
Great program! I have a copy running on my USB stick too.
-
da3x
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 43 Alpha (Jan 2, 2006)
Works like a charm for me. No problems at all while connecting to IRC, ICQ, Y! and MSN simultanously. And finally this build is the first after some while which remembers the ingnore settings again! I hated the spam with former alpha builds. Now I'm safe again. Thanks!
-
imanino
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 43 Alpha (Jan 2, 2006)
Seems like a great idea and great on memory, but I could never get this program to work with all of my accounts simultaneously.
-
Kramy
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 43 Alpha (Jan 1, 2006)
Looks nice, but it doesn't connect to anything for me(and thus doesn't work). Don't have that problem with Gaim/Trillian, so I guess it's some firewall problem or something?
Either way, only affects it and not other stuff. -
crashoverride
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 43 Alpha (Jan 1, 2006)
It's alright I guess.....but I'll be sticking with gaim.
-
JazzyTech
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 43 Alpha (Jan 1, 2006)
Designed to function with a minimum of system resources, this is the best IM I know of. The program is very simple in it's default form, but has been programmed to be expanded and customized to fit your needs. There are thousands of addons which you can download from the Miranda web site add the functions that *You* want. If you take the time to learn the program you will not regret it. Great program, very active support community, and definitely worth 5 stars IMHO. I've been using it for years and am very happy with it :-)
-
dennishopper
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 42 (Dec 20, 2005)
Simply the best.
I tried trillian, gaim, etc. but got stick to this one.
You can fully customize it.
It uses small resources.
...and works perfect on my usb stick.
There are plenty of plugins available to adopt it to your needs. My favorite is the secureim which adds encryption...
Try it!! -
brotherS
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 42 (Dec 19, 2005)
HurricaneGame wrote:
> looks kinda dull
Well, you can make Miranda look like whatever you want! Transparent, old-school, high-tech... the possibilites are endless. Check the forum and #miranda on irc.freenode.net
Oh yeah, AND you can run Miranda from your USB stick! :) -
HurricaneGame
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 42 (Dec 19, 2005)
I've used it, uninstalled but it's a good program.. small memory use and looks kinda dull but it's very good. ;)
-
Kramy
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 42 (Dec 19, 2005)
I like Miranda's interface and options list a lot, but it throws missing DLL errors when I start it up.
I guess I'm sticking with Gaim. -
Ergo
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 42 (Dec 19, 2005)
Definitely best ICQ client! Configurable and functional... Much better than thrillian
-
Slavic
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 42 (Dec 19, 2005)
I'm using Miranda more than 3 years and count it much better than other multiproticol IMs. I always try to install the last beta release and give my "two penny" to program development as free tester.
Warning! This release is a kind of night build, some functions and plugins could run incorrect in particular configurations. If you don't want to test Miranda, it would be better to download the last stable release. Otherwise, please carefully read the release notes and comments in developers weblog:
http://blog.miranda-im.org/ -
nant`
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 42 (Dec 19, 2005)
Please note that the Clist_Nicer+ build supplied with build #42 will /not/ function. Use the last version of nicer+ that predates this release!
-
munga42
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 42 (Dec 19, 2005)
+ its small
+ multi protocol.
+ plugins
- going into options is like entering the jungle..
- making plugins work is a b**** -
cubebomb
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 41 (Dec 18, 2005)
You people Complint to much- this nice little boy. can be run from anything.....its so small it will fit on a floopy even though i dont think many people these days uses floopy. but if you guys want all the features other im clients have its gonna be as big as they are 4MB or higher ( trillian is like 8 ****ing mb) but you have to rate for what it does..and it does it good, i give it a 5..
-
Crono`
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 41 (Nov 24, 2005)
Nice program, but it's only an old-fashioned IM program, you can't tell people to trash other programs and only use Miranda. If you only want to chat it's almost perfect, but nowadays users have webcams, headsets, and want to use them in an easy way. So, for example, Miranda can't really "replace" msn. Yes it's bloated and slow, but you can SEE your partner with one click, and the registration/installation process it's easy even for unexperienced users.
I'm also noticing some bugs in basic protocol plugins, like the file transfer with trillian users, and some slow upgrades in the msn protocol, so i don't think miranda deserves a 5 anymore. -
Zodiachus
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 41 (Nov 24, 2005)
Miranda is fantastic. You don't have to add anything, just start it, enter your info and type away. If there's a protocol you miss, you can download it.
Three reasons why it is better than the competition:
* It's free. Entirely free. Not a free version with adds or anything, but free.
* It's flexible. You do much to put together a version that suits you, both in looks and functionality. (For looks, I recommend the plugin ieView amongst others).
* It's clean. It does what it says, no bloat, no malware/adware.
I understand if the options can be a bit intimidating for som people, however.
Last tip: Use the update plugin to automatically keep all your plugins up to date. -
MikeEx
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 41 (Nov 24, 2005)
First impression: very lite, basic, dull. featureless. but very fast and little memory usage.
After adding a few plugins, skins, icons, and sounds, it's the best damn looking IM client there is, still uses very little memory.
but it does lack file transfering through the AIM protocol (cmon snaphat!) and that is a very important feature IMO.
also I doesnt clear away messages when users come back to online mode. (or I can't find that option)
and it's alittle difficult to setup.
My uses of IM clients went from Trillian to GAIM to MirandaIM, and I think I'm staying with Miranda. -
-Lord-
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 41 (Nov 23, 2005)
Children:
Did you all forget that this is BETA?!?! Did you forget that you are supposed to be reviewing THIS software and not promoting something else? Analogy this, and battle of the minds that... man just let it go. Either the program worked for you and you liked it, or it didn't and you didn't like it, or it worked for you and you didn't like it... get the trend here?
Just review the program and stop bickering and promoting other software and carrying on like children. Grow up.
As for the software, it's coming along.
As soon as I can get this thing to work properly on a BartPE disk, I'll give it a 10. -
ninjeratu
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 41 (Nov 23, 2005)
Oh yeah. "[..] but I won't because I prefer facts and objectivity"?
Your "facts" are based on your subjective feeling of design and functionality - which most likely is more based on habit than actual understanding of good design and functionality.
Please stop slandering analogies that you don't understand .. especially when you actually try to use them yourself as a container for biased perceptions.
Now understand this.
If you don't like the way Trillian works, you uninstall it .. If you don't like the way Miranda works, you change it. Want Miranda to look and feel like Trillian? You can probably get plugins for that too. Two different philosophies doing the same basic thing .. send messages and files.
Until something else comes along this is THE client to use if you want to personalize your multi-protocol client. If you don't care about that, use Trillian or another client. Hell, use the original clients! The only thing Trillian has going is that it .. works. It's integrated and tested. It's "safe". Nothing else.
And, by the way, of course Miranda works behind firewalls since it uses the same procotols that the original clients use - with the same limitations. Passive to passive have always been a problem for ICQ (and any Peer-to-peer). Sending via the server fixed that in the original client.
(3/5 because I already voted.) -
cricri_pingouin
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 41 (Nov 23, 2005)
First off, although I respect your opinion, please respect mine. You love Miranda, great for you. I did use Miranda for a week or so, and went back to Trillian because I think it's better (as explained before). It's a question of taste. You say my opinion is useless, when in fact the only thing you can condemn me for is having an opinion different from yours. Well, I've got bad news for all narrow minded people: your opinion is not the standard to which everyone else has to comply to. I'm as much entitled to submit my review than you are. And instead of saying "XXX is great, YYY sucks", well at least I give some reasons to justify my point. Note that I never said Miranda was bad, I said it was not as good, and rated it a 4.
And as for the car example, the analogy is so wrong that people can't even argue with it despite the heavy bias. I could take the same analogy and say that Trillian is a Ferrari because it has better design, better functionality and bla and bla whereas Miranda is a Fiat 500 which sucks out of the box and you have to stick lot of crap to it to get it to work decently and bla and bla, but I won't because I prefer facts and objectivity. -
cubebomb
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 40 (Nov 20, 2005)
Come on Ladies- Stop the crying on the little guy here-
fo course trillian is better, but just like the car example- THEY BOTH TAKE YOU THERE!!
so if you want it to look kool Get trillian then and stop giving useless ratings-
5 all the way-- and is ****ing free come on now!! -
SamppaX
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 40 (Nov 18, 2005)
Ok, This is awesome program... At first i was thinking that this sucks, but when you take your time and install some new plug-ins and so on... This program really does almost everything what i need or want... Awesome...
I would give this 5 stars but i would like better plug-in download site and more skins & Plug-ins...
And about trillian = I first liked it but when i used it about 5 days it sucked... Kinda funny = Trillian = First Good Then Bad & Miranda IM = First Bad Then Good...
Oh well.. anyway this is my opinion... =) peace! -
SuzzyWoozy
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 40 (Nov 18, 2005)
Having using YahooMessenger for 5 years now... unfortunately the latest versions form Yahoo have big problems (high memory/cpu usage, hangs/crashes) which drive me crazy...
I'll switch to Miranda, but unfortunately it does not work behind firewalls :( - I'm not able to connect to Yahoo/MSN/ICQ from my corporate network, things that the Yahoo's messenger manages to do (the other proprietary messengers do also for their service).
Too bad for you, Miranda! -
ninjeratu
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 40 (Nov 17, 2005)
Comparing Miranda with Trillian is like comparing an agile sportscar with a beige Volvo.
Both will take you to the mall and if you're happy with the basic comfort package you get with the Volvo, fine. No problem. But it's still a beige Volvo. And, sure, the sportscar is a bit more demanding of the driver. But that's what it's about. Dull but comfortable driving to pick up the kids, or a sleek, fast, fun driving experience that is a bit more demanding.
For all the Trillian/Volvo fan boys: Compare apples with apples.
Trillian is a basic all-in-one package, with limited tweaking/customization possibilities. Miranda is free (no "get PRO for $$ and get an even BETTER version" philosophy), made to be tweakable and .. what most Trillian people doesn't seem to grasp .. the plugin philosophy is an essential part of the whole experience. (Perhaps not surprising since Trillian is very limited.)
If you want something that you can, basically, only skin in a limited way and add a few plugins to .. if you don't care about the two versions commercial bullcrap and don't care about those oh-so-difficult plugins .. Go get your beige Volvo, er, Trillian.
If want to be able to change the look, feel and function of almost everything in a totally free and open client .. Go Miranda. -
cricri_pingouin
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 39 (Nov 16, 2005)
Miranda is good, but Trillian is better. Miranda can be set up to rival with Trillian, but it requires a lot of extra downloads and tweaking. I did most of it, but eventually went back to Trillian nonetheless.
I appreciate that Miranda is light out of the box (that's actually a plus), but it's just too bland.
I'd rate it a 3, but its portability (I can just copy it on my pen drive and carry it around, thus using it without installation) make me shift my rating slightly up, and I'll round it up to a 4. -
simko
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 39 (Nov 11, 2005)
its nice but its way to messy when you try to find what you in need terms of plugins or skins.
For instance if a skin need a special plugin to work it should be packaged with the skin file.
Same goes for other plugins that need other plugins.
Ill stick to Trillian -
Eemeli
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 38 (Nov 8, 2005)
Yeah, this program is great piece of art. And it's even better when you download some plugins. I love this client.
-
urbanriot
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 38 (Nov 8, 2005)
Amazing piece of software. By itself, it's a perfectly stable, powerful instant messenger that takes up barely any RAM (compared to more bloated software such as Trillian which is also a multi protocal chat program). However, it's the plethera of plugins, addons and skins that really make this piece of software amazing and fully customizable. You can make it look, sound and feel like any other IM. I've been running it for years, and I love it.
-
Targaff
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 38 (Nov 7, 2005)
Just to note that #38 was rebuilt with fixes to address some problems that cropped up, so anyone who grabbed it earlier should re-download.
-
brotherS
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Build 38 (Nov 7, 2005)
Looks poor when you install it 'naked', but with plugins and a bit customization it's just AWESOME!
Will buy an USB stick to carry a copy around with me soon - just plug it into a PC and run it without installing it. -
brotherS
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Alpha 36 (Oct 11, 2005)
Miranda has MORE features compared to Trillian etc. - just install the right plugins :)
-
cricri_pingouin
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Alpha 36 (Sep 30, 2005)
Very light, and doesn't need installation. Minimised, with no windows opened, Miranda uses 2.3MB. File transfer worked fine in MSN, but not in Yahoo.
Trillian offers more features, so I'll use Miranda a while and decide later whether to stick to it or go back to Trillian.
*EDIT* after getting smileys, skin and sounds working, I just uninstalled Trillian :) -
Prey521
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Alpha 36 (Sep 30, 2005)
Nice client and nice bundle of plugins. It's no Trillian, but it is still good.
-
ModderXManiac
Reviewing 0.4.0.3 Alpha 36 (Sep 30, 2005)
Now my favorite IM client.
Lightweight, flexible, open-source, almost perfect. -
Dricon
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Alpha 33 (Sep 14, 2005)
Had a problem connecting to AIM at first.
After going to their webiste I found a plugin that fixed it.
Awesome client really, Very nice interface and works well.
Recommended. -
Buzzo
Reviewing 0.4.3 (0.4.0.1 Alpha 30) (Aug 19, 2005)
imanino: which plugins gave you such problems?
-
integrii
Reviewing 0.4.3 (0.4.0.1 Alpha 30) (Aug 14, 2005)
fits on a 1.44 floppy, supports all messengers, minimal and functional, no install needed, easy to setup, perfect for a thumb-drive, hundreds of very useful plugins, and its only alpha.
btw this is beta news's sister site file forum and i hope they keep posting alphas so i can see what kind of software is in development out there. -
-
bid
Reviewing 0.4.3 (0.4.0.1 Alpha 30) (Jun 24, 2005)
Well it is betanews.com after all. Though I agree that they should limit it to betas and not go posting the testing builds. After all they are called testing builds for a reason.
-
nightwolf
Reviewing 0.4.3 (0.4.0.1 Alpha 30) (Jun 24, 2005)
who keeps adding alpha nightly builds here? only the official releases should be posted on here.
-
Enord
Reviewing 0.4.3 (0.4.0.1 Alpha 30) (Jun 23, 2005)
Hey, bright spark. If you haven't noticed AOL has changed many of their customers login names, and sent the new login names to their email address. :)
-
Targaff
Reviewing 0.4.3 (0.4.0.1 Alpha 30) (Jun 23, 2005)
jordenpro: You seem to have omitted the rest of that particular post, which relates to a *fixed* popup plugin that no longer has the exploit you mention. So yeah, good job on the misrepresentation there.
There seems to be a prevailing thought amongst the people who post bad marks here that Miranda is an AIM client, when that's clearly just one small facet of its capabilities. If you're only after an AIM client, then why are you bothering with a multiprotocol client anyway? That's really rather absurd - almost as absurd as blaming it for the issue with nicknames, which I seem to recall was an issue on AOL's end rather than with Miranda. If all you want is an AIM client for swapping files with your friendz, then this clearly wasn't intended for your use in any event; if, on the other hand, you want a messaging program that is simultaneously light, powerful and highly customizable, with good connectivity with all the major protocols, then Miranda might well be up your street. -
tommie
Reviewing 0.4.3 (0.4.0.1 Alpha 30) (Jun 23, 2005)
A programmers main goal is to make the application easier for the user, not the programmer. This is not the case with Miranda IM however, if you want more/extended features - you're going to have to do it on your own. Because asking the plugin authors won't do you any good, this is why code is open source. If you want something that it doesn't have, do it yourself.
Pros:
* Light application
* Highly Customizable
* No advertisements or anything
Cons:
* Somehow it got 2 of my AIM names suspended. I don't think AOL likes these 3rd party applications, if they don't - why did they bother creating the TOC protocol? I know Miranda is linked to the suspension, because after a month of using it, my first name got suspended. Then I created a new name. 1 month later, this name was suspended as well. That was when I uninstalled this application and went back to the default AIM client. I didn't get any response whatsoever when I tried to contact AOL about the suspensions.
* Only thing you can do with the AIM plugin is send and receive messages, you can't: send files, directly connect, set privacy options. -
jordenpro
Reviewing 0.4.3 (0.4.0.1 Alpha 30) (Jun 23, 2005)
Stripped down, yet vulnerable.
"Popup+ Remotely exploitable overflow - by Sam K (19/04/2005)
As reported on various security mailing lists - The Popup+ plugin contains a bug when used with smiley add that lets a remote attack run arbitrary code from a crafted instant message on any protocol."
Yea, I'll stick with AIM. Anyone with computer knowledge can easily strip down AIM the way you want it. Also, I enjoy the Encryption feature AIM offers.
But yes, for the IM Rookies, I do agree this is the program for you. -
-
imanino
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 (Jun 20, 2005)
Beware the presumption that merely removing a plug-in via the methodology suggested works in all cases with this software. That may be your experience, but some of the plug-ins are not so easily dispensed with without reinstalling the main code.
-
brotherS
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 (Jun 20, 2005)
shanghaiteej: you missed the point. Miranda is maybe less than AIM but much, much more!
-
dolboeb
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 26 (Jun 16, 2005)
http://blog.miranda-im.o...-builds-not-for-release/
quote:
Hey,
I don’t know why some sites are posting test builds up as releases but this is not good! The test builds are for debugging only and not for general release. -
shanghaiteej
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 26 (Jun 14, 2005)
No OSCAR support, not fully featured. If you like a stripped down version of AIM, then Miranda is for you. Regardless, great program for every other instant messenger.
-
Buzzo
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 23 (Jun 13, 2005)
imanino: what do you mean? Installing and removing a miranda plugin almost always consists in just copying/deleting a dll file in the %mirandapath%\plugins folder, and (rarely) a dedicated folder.
I think it couldn't be easier than this...
But again: DON'T USE THE FILE INDICATED ON THIS SITE, since it's a nightly build only meant for testing! -
imanino
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 23 (Jun 13, 2005)
The messenger itself is great, but I would like to see a bit more control imposed on the myriad of plug-ins. Some of them are sorely needed, but present problems both within and outside of the program code when you install them and the process for purging an errant plug-in leaves a bit to be desired at best.
-
Enord
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 23 (Jun 11, 2005)
Miranda has all the essential features of other clients while not being bloated. If you take your time to customize it and read about how things work you won't go back to the other bloated messengers. There is an excellent plugin called tabsrmm available at http://www.miranda.or.at/forums/ which adds a tabbed messenger window with many features. There are plugins for popup notify events and even a plugin now which allows scripting. This will always be much messenger of choice. Also, there are NO ADS ANYWHERE.
-
brotherS
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 23 (Jun 11, 2005)
lordgibbness:
You may have not understood the concept of Miranda. You customize it to YOUR needs, there are lots of plugins availabe... fully-featured more than enough then :) -
Buzzo
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 22 Alpha (Jun 10, 2005)
What the hell?
This is not a public release but a *nightly build* meant for testing only!
Guys who want to try Miranda should download the publicly available installer, and not this one!
Damnit... :( -
lordgibbness
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 22 Alpha (Jun 9, 2005)
I used to use Trillian, but it has a few major issues with the MSN network (packets not being received) and so I tried out Miranda. While it works as expected, it just doesn't feel fully featured. I prefer to use Gaim (http://gaim.sourceforge.net) as it is a much nicer app.
-
brotherS
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 22 Alpha (Jun 9, 2005)
Maybe the URL to the change-log should be included above, but it seems a bit unfair to me to rate it 4/5 just because no changes are displayed here...
-
-Lord-
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 21 Alpha (Jun 9, 2005)
I give it a 4 simply because there are no changes posted. It's a decent program, but it still needs a few things. Also, in developing PE disks, this one's a tough one to make run properly, but that's another story.
-
-
gaijin1
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 21 Alpha (Jun 9, 2005)
Miranda has been simply the best multi protocol. Thx for it. People, don´t use another..use the real! ..
-
Joco
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 Build 21 Alpha (Jun 8, 2005)
Thanks to Miranda, now I use IM again. I was fed up with other IMs because they are bloated with a tons of distracting (and useless ?) "features".
-
-
brotherS
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 RC1 (Jun 1, 2005)
httpd.confused: You and others with problems should come to #Miranda (irc.freenode.net), lots of (mostly ;)) friendly people there to help you with problems. Otherwhise you could use the forums too. I love Miranda, it still gets better!
-
Tenoq
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 RC1 (May 15, 2005)
The 'yoinking' of multi-messaging pissed me off no end, and according to the forums it's never coming back. Still using the iSee version of ICQ (8), but for the rest of it, version 4 seems much the same, and works as it should.
-
httpd.confused
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 RC1 (May 15, 2005)
I love Miranda IM, and have used it for years, but the slew of bugs in 0.4 have forced me back to 0.3.3.1. (And no, the problems aren't all due to old, buggy, or incompatible plugins; save your time trying to explain that possibility to me.)
-
-
LRN
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 RC1 (May 14, 2005)
Miranda is cool.
About bugs. Before saying "no bugs" make sure, you tryed long enougth all miranda default protocol plug-ins (AIM, Yahoo, etc), not only ICQ. Myself, i use only this one...It works fine, i can say.
Also, be sure to test thease Miranda Packs - pre-configured miranda clients with logs of preconfigured plug-ins. While they my be not exactly what you really wants, they show, HOW beautiful Miranda CAN be.
Also... Right link is http://prdownloads.sourc...0.4.0.1rc1.exe?download -
k1n6.6h1d0r4
Reviewing 0.4.0.1 RC1 (May 14, 2005)
i dont have any problems at all with miranda...took a little while to work out all the bugs but it is really a great IM...not for those who dont want to build their own IM...for those who do, theres none better
-
Nikkie
Reviewing 0.4 (Apr 11, 2005)
The program is ok but there are far too many bugs . I don't understand why it gets such great reviews ..(btw so short) .. I can't click on the aim icon in the buddylist and it cut off the bottom part of my buddylist . Some funky bugs , This program always has .I have tried this on other computers in the house and i have the same issues .
I'll stick with gaim until miranda makes one stable release ..
Update : I can get around my issues since you can pretty much do whatever you want with this program . im sure the next release will fix the bottom toolbar a bit better .
also , why not have multiple acounts for each network instead of doing all that crap with the dll files etc. -
-
-
-
-
Sharp_Rulez
Reviewing 0.4 (Apr 7, 2005)
I've used miranda since v0.1.2 (was miranda icq); this application rocks!!
-
Floodland
Reviewing 0.4 (Apr 7, 2005)
Haha, Merlyn_3D. I just want to know if Trillian pays well for reviews as yours.
Miranda is the best IM software for PC, by far. You are right about that you need a lot of tweaking, but that's for good, not bad. That's called customization. You can get EXACTLY what you need, where you want, how you want and, using resources efficiently. And this last point is the bigest problem I see in any other IM software. Starting with the pestilent M$N me$$enger and ending with the not so bad (but still fatware) trillian.
And also, don't forget that miranda is FREE. And not only free but open source. six stars if allowed. -
adamlau
Reviewing 0.4 (Apr 7, 2005)
Highly customizeable, minimalist IM client. Up and running with AIM, ICQ, MAN and Yahoo! within minutes. Faster, cleaner and more stable than Trillian Pro 3.1.0.121. Couple with TabSRMM for a complete, lightweight IM solution.
-
Merlyn_3D
Reviewing 0.4 (Apr 7, 2005)
I've tried using this, and it took a LOT of tweaking just to get it to connect to AIM correctly. Then there's the missing features that other clients like GAIM and Trillian include. This uses an older protocol to connect to AIM, which is lacking. It's nice that it's free and like Trillian has a small memory footprint, but I still think Trillian is a much better client, especially if you spring for trillian pro.
-
-
Comit
Reviewing 0.4 RC3 (Apr 6, 2005)
The modular design allows the IM to be customized to an incredible degree. It's extremely flexible, both functional and visual.
The only downside is that when you first install it, it looks basic and naked. You have to spend some time with it to make it look pretty and get some plugins for some useful features.
I originally switched to MIM because I couldn't help notice how much RAM the other big name IMs used up. MIM on the other hand uses only about 3MB, and a half a meg when idle. Getting low resource demanding programs for those that run 24/7 in the background = like adding more RAM for your system. -
-
-
LRN
Reviewing 0.4 RC3 (Apr 6, 2005)
Awesome!
download link is wrong (for me, at least)
try http://prdownloads.sourc...im-v0.4rc3.exe?download -
Mystenes
Reviewing 0.4 RC3 (Apr 6, 2005)
Wspanial program, dla kazdego wymagajcego uzytkownika.
Great programm for every advanced user. -
breakdownv2
Reviewing 0.4 RC3 (Apr 6, 2005)
Truely one of the best Instant Messenger programs ever. Armored with such a mass amount of plugins, unicode support(for almost every protocol) and so many other features to personalize. Its just simply great.
-
bugmenot
Reviewing 0.4 RC3 (Apr 6, 2005)
Simply the best!
Played around with plenty and got sticked to it.
Fast and with the plugins exact the messanger i wanted. -
adamlau
Reviewing 0.4 RC3 (Apr 5, 2005)
Highly customizeable, minimalist IM client. Miranda RC builds are generally stable enough for enterprise deployment. Couple with TabSRMM for a complete, lightweight IM solution.
-
-
-
sftwrmaniac
Reviewing 0.4 RC3 (Apr 5, 2005)
I started using miranda about a year ago and since then I haven't found anything better. If you've ever tried gaim, this is similar but with a very low memory footprint and hundreds of different plugins and ways to customize it. I've heard it works well on linux with wine, too.
-
Nikkie
Reviewing 0.4 RC2 (Mar 30, 2005)
You have to personalize this and be willing to test plugins out a bit and see how they react to eachother . So far so good and its fast . Very nice little program that lets you do almost anything with an instant messenger .
Theres a lot of plugins and ways to customize this or you can leave it simple/to the point . -
Madlew
Reviewing 0.4 RC2 (Mar 17, 2005)
At first, I didn't like this much, it seemed bland, lacking features. But I gave it a try, went to the website and downloaded plugins for it. Now this is my IM client. It takes a little getting used to, you really need to personalize it to appreciate it. Been using it for about 5 months now, sticking with it.
-
bobas
Reviewing 0.4 RC2 (Feb 14, 2005)
A truly fascinating application. There are more various plugins than I have ever seen for any other program.
-
dazed
Reviewing 0.4 RC2 (Jan 22, 2005)
Miranda takes a day or two to configure to suite your personal needs. A front end for finding/updating plugins would be nice...
Once done with configuring Miranda you have the currently most powerful IM for Windows at your hands. If you are a programmer/scripter you can do virtually anything. You can easily move Miranda around, backup up by plain filecopy, or even store/run it on a USB memory stick.
Take your time to customize your copy of Miranda initially, it is well worth the effort since you only do updates after that (which you easily roll back by copying your backup folder to the installation folder :).
This is *THE* IM for Windows, IMHO. Thumbs up! -
bugmenot
Reviewing 0.4 RC2 (Jan 22, 2005)
A solid minimilistic approach to multi-protocol instant messaging. There are however the odd things that put most users off a messenger such as this. People want full support for protocols, and by full support I don't mean cam and voice, I mean bug-free direct connections/file transfers/client server communications. It's a good idea, but it has a long, long way to go to be the best. Development is very slow at this stage.
-
kashin
Reviewing 0.4 RC2 (Jan 21, 2005)
This is the best IM client for Windows by far. The versions from the official site have never crashed for me. I love this thing, it's so configurable and unbloated. It's not like those other crappy programs such as GAIM or Trillian. It has a clean interface and tons of options, plus everything is done through plugins. So you only get the features you want and none of the fluff that other clients force on you. I see some people giving this program a low rating, simply because they don't know how to use it. That's a real shame, those people perhaps need to go take some computer courses.
PS. - It's funny how jtopping complains that he can't get the "stupid smileys" to work. Hilarious, because that's exactly what smileys are -- stupid. Also, nobody should need buddy icons. -
Comit
Reviewing 0.4 RC2 (Jan 21, 2005)
Love it. Has all the features I want, after 3 or 4 plugins anyway. Definantly a great program if you have the time to sit down and customize it just the way you like it. Miranada defines 'customizable'. Also big thumbs up for only using a couple megs of RAM (less than a meg when idle).
-
-
jtopping
Reviewing 0.4 RC2 (Jan 20, 2005)
Needs full support of protocol options that other clients have such as:
File Transfers(through proxies)
Buddy Icons
User Info/Profile updates.
I love bleeding edge software, but the mentality that "everything is a plugin" is good, but sucky when one is breaking the entire program by causing a crash.
I cant even get the stupid smileys to work with the tabbed interface, without frequent crashing -
SaCo
Reviewing 0.4 RC2 (Jan 20, 2005)
didnt really like it well its because im so used 2 GAIM and its dandy tabs :) i have more gmail invites mrfrostbite@gmail.com
tell me where ye saw the posting -
mrmagoo
Reviewing 0.4 RC2 (Jan 20, 2005)
Lacks a console and doesn't support AIM in anyway to speak of. It lacks the viewing of profiles and refuses to send files to Trillian. Also it's sluggish to send messages to MSN/ICQ than other IMs. But it's improving as we speak and I'm looking forward to changing to it in half a year or so, right now there is too many annoyances for me.
-
brotherS
Reviewing 0.4 RC2 (Jan 20, 2005)
"Not too bad"? You should take a better look :) It's unbelievable, it's getting better and better as we speak!
-
-
ModderXManiac
Reviewing 0.4 RC1 (Dec 30, 2004)
Fast, stable, nice look, lots of cool toys.
The MSN Direct/P2P is a great feature, since I can upload files almost 4 times faster than the MSN messenger client.
Its freeware, no need for any upgrades, so Its more likeable than Trillian.
This d/l is worth ever kb if your a chat fanatic like me, and have 50+ screen names. -
-
Edgeman
Reviewing 0.4 RC1 (Dec 18, 2004)
I've used miranda for a long time now, since 0.3.0 I think. But it's a good highly customizable do-it-all messenger client. I use it for yahoo, aim, msn, icq, though it supports jabber and other things. This RC1 is branched off of the nightlies at a fairly stable point, there's a newspost on the frontpage of www.miranda-im.org about where this RC1 comes from.
-
Niksa
Reviewing 0.4 RC1 (Dec 17, 2004)
Since some people wait for stable, not beta versions this is long waited update.
Anyhow, Miranda is perfect. Small, fast and no need for instalation, just unzip it. I keep it on my USB flash disk so I have my IM everywhere I go -
ILLEGALien
Reviewing 0.4 RC1 (Dec 13, 2004)
Would be a 5 if it supported the OSCAR protocol for AIM.
-
brotherS
Reviewing 0.4 RC1 (Dec 13, 2004)
The best IM program I ever used: tiny, fast and extremely customisable... that's what I like! I use it for IRC, ICQ, AIM and MSN.
-
dwarfy
Reviewing 0.4 RC1 (Dec 11, 2004)
After a long what DarthVeda ????
Miranda is updated about every days ... latest 0.4 build from 10th december at 16:04 and 23 seconds.
Precedent build 9, 8, 7, 5, 4 ... etc of december ...
So don't say anything if you don't know. -
zorty
Reviewing 0.4 RC1 (Dec 11, 2004)
I'd really love to know where this 0.4RC1 comes from.. I presume it is in fact 0.3.4.5 (maybe RC1 is an alias name for it).
wassup doesn't know about this build either although it usually does even know about all the nightly builds. It says 0.4alpha built dec 7th. So it is de facto older than 0.3.4.5 (http://files.miranda-im....geLog_200412101701.part)
apart from that I cannot see any major changes in contrast to the lastest nightly I had. -
DarthVeda
Reviewing 0.4 RC1 (Dec 11, 2004)
Finally after a long time they updated the program. It's very good, uses very little memory when compared to other IM clients.
-
aerthling
Reviewing 0.4 RC1 (Dec 10, 2004)
Finally..
The best IM client IMHO. Tiny, fast, extremely customisable, stable and good looking. I love it. It beats the pants off any other. -
-
mxxcon
Reviewing 0.4 RC1 (Dec 10, 2004)
interesting where this 0.4rc came from :/
according to this change log http://files.miranda-im....geLog_200412101701.part they just bumped up version to 0.3.4.5 -
FailedCRC
Reviewing 0.4 RC1 (Dec 10, 2004)
mmm, they need to fix the icon sets, they have black fringes (someone forgot to set the transparency palette?)
-
SFAMonkey
Reviewing 0.3.3.1 (Jun 25, 2004)
Great program. I have found thing that beats it. If I had to give the IM programs awards
First Place: Miranda IM
Second Place: GAIM
Third Place: Trillian
Fourth Place: AIM with ad hack
Fifth Place MSN
Sixth Place: Yahoo -
contranj
Reviewing 0.3.3.1 (Jun 6, 2004)
i love it, i love the fact that it is small, unbloated, and out of the way... just can't use it. let me know when i can look at away messages in aim and then i'll be the first one to download it.
-
Perezoso
Reviewing 0.3.3.1 (Apr 22, 2004)
Changelog here: http://sourceforge.net/p...9&release_id=232457
-
Reviewing 0.3.3.1 (Apr 21, 2004)
This application could get ten demotions and still be awesome. Stable, utterly customizable, extensible, free, open source, flexible, reliable, and just plain awesome. Miranda IM simply crushes all the others like wet dog crap under your shoeless foot in the summertime.
-
war593122
Reviewing 0.3.3.1 (Apr 20, 2004)
The bomb! What can I say. Its free and supports blugins. :)
-
-
XaRaNn
Reviewing 0.3.2 (Feb 24, 2004)
wow this is amazing, u can do almost anything
im using this for all my im needs from now on
still giving it a 5, but 1 thing i didnt like
ive been using icq lite, and switched all my aim contacts to my icq list, but miranda doesnt seem to get them, so that means me losing all my aim contacts
oh well -
illuvatar
Reviewing 0.3.2 (Jan 22, 2004)
Hey I just rediscovered Miranda and immediately threw trillian in the bin... this programme is great! There's so much you can customize! Not only do I use icq, irc and msn networks with it, I also make it check my pop3 mail addresses for new mails, I read rss feeds with it, it checks my computer time with an atomic server and lots more! Have I mentioned that it's free? And it loads very fast? A must-have for serious chatters!
-
Heffel
Reviewing 0.3.2 (Jan 14, 2004)
It simply onwz! Forget about crappy icq pro/lite, miranda ist the tool of the future!
-
Perezoso
Reviewing 0.3.2 (Dec 10, 2003)
http://miranda-im.org/help/doc/faq.php?lang=en&list=category&catnr=5&prog=1&onlynewfaq=0
-
crowbar
Reviewing 0.3.2 (Dec 6, 2003)
My brother is using this program, but how do I make a profile 4 me becose I want to use this as well?
email me the answer: Bosanac82@hotmail.com -
Saturnine
Reviewing 0.3.2 (Nov 30, 2003)
This program is awesome! I have used many other clients, but have not found anything close to this. This program makes Trillian look like poo. The part that I love most about this program is its customization. You can customize it to fit your needs pretty much anyway possible. Keep the features coming!
-
milkshake
Reviewing 0.3.2 (Nov 21, 2003)
Lean program that packs a punch for pure instant messaging. If you don't mind not having smiley icons and all that extra coloured backgrounds, then this will work just fine. Takes up only 880k on my machine.
-
scodan
Reviewing 0.3.1 (Oct 11, 2003)
I recently gave Miranda IM a try, and I was FULLY expecting it to be a complete turd like the others I've tried (yes, including Trillian). I was very surprised to find it stable, well-designed, compatible, and usable. The variety of plug-ins available is great; you can also change Miranda IM's look to suit your taste. I installed Miranda IM along with a weather plug-in (and a slew of other plug-ins), and dumped the crappy weather application I had been running, and eventually even uninstalled ICQ (which--believe me--was quite liberating). This is a real gem.
-
Dwarden
Reviewing 0.3.1 (Aug 22, 2003)
Supports ICQ, MSN, AIM, IRC, YahooIM, JabberIM, GaduGadu, Tlen, Bnet, NetSend, Voice Communication and others ... there is more features available throught plugins in Miranda than You can imagine ... TOP1 IM, definitely
-
Moparx
Reviewing 0.3.1 (Aug 22, 2003)
miranda is the best. it has all the features of trillian and uses less memory. its configurability is a natural winner.
not to mention that it gets better & better each release :) -
oachkatzl
Reviewing 0.3.1 (Aug 22, 2003)
i love miranda IM - it keep getting better and better.
thousands of features and plugins (only if you wish to have them).
miranda IM is as fast as lighning and also very stable and bug-free.
i changed from Trillian Pro and never ever regreted it. -
Cormac
Reviewing 0.3.1 (Aug 22, 2003)
Getting better and better. It really deserves more than a top-rating. Looking forward to version 1.0, though the developement hasn't even begun yet.
-
Gaffa
Reviewing 0.3.1 (Aug 22, 2003)
LOL, because of Prey521's stupid comment, it doesn't have a plain 5-star rating...
-
Floodland
Reviewing 0.3.1 (Aug 21, 2003)
The BEST IM on earth, by far...
I agree that the yahoo plugin sucks pretty much and should be reprogrammed. It hurts, but no other IM will give you so much with consuming so little resources, and have so many plugins, and is so customizable and so powerful.
7 stars if possible. -
Dapple
Reviewing 0.3.1 (Aug 21, 2003)
Well you are obviously blind
YAHOO Protocol 0.0.5.3
Communicate with users of the YAHOO Messenger protocol. If you cannot see your buddy's state always in spite of their online: you delete them and add them again by 'Find/Add Contacts...' when you online (connect to yahoo server). A..
Author: rako
Subcategory: IM Protocols
And there it is Lame as yahoo.
Might pay to look before judgeing next time :) -
Prey521
Reviewing 0.3.1 (Aug 21, 2003)
Doesn't have Yahoo!!! How good can it be, 2.5 at best! Trillian still the bombs......what loser actually uses Jabber? They have that crap but not Yahoo, Add/Remove Programs...goodbye Miranda!!
-
whatever_-_
Reviewing 0.3.1 (Aug 21, 2003)
Well this is the first time I've seen Miranda on Beta News, what a pleasant surprise. :-) Of course, it goes without saying that Miranda is, bar none, the best Instant Messenger client available (on any OS). Low resource useage; intelligent, customizable implementaion of the Windows GUI (don't use Miranda if you absolutely require skinning, that's not what this client is about. Sure a skinning plugin exists, but it sort of goes against what Miranda's about philosophically); I don't think you can name a protocol that isn't supported, since pretty much all of them are (even the most obscure ones noone's ever heard of). It's Open Source. It's such a good client, people have tried more than once to steal its source and market it as their commercial product! Give it a spin, you'll love it's simplicity, power, wealth of features,flexibility, and frugal resource useage. (Incidently, a new alpha build with the latest changes is generated every 24 hours at http://miranda-icq.sourceforge.net/rich/ . I've been running nightlies exclusively for years on multiple machines with no problems. You might want to try that out if you want the absolute latest and greatest.)
-
Aristo
Reviewing 0.3 (Jul 2, 2003)
This is the perfect IM application. Goodbye AIM, ICQ, and MSN! Hello MIM~
-
-
Surge
Reviewing 0.3 (Jun 24, 2003)
Used Trillian, switched to Miranda when 0.21 was released - now when 0.3 is out Miranda trully rulez the Messenging world on Windows machines.. the only disadvantage is that Linux does not have anything even close to functionality of Miranda...
-
mikael.eshammar
Reviewing 0.3 (Jun 24, 2003)
Best IM available, the vast variety of plugins makes the application highly customizable and should be able to meet almost everyones needs. It also leaves a very small memory foot print in contrast to overbloated programs like ICQ, Trillian or AIM.
-
Gaffa
Reviewing 0.3 (Jun 24, 2003)
The only thing missing, is that the rating is not 5. Go rating, go!
-
llama
Reviewing 0.3 (Jun 24, 2003)
This proggie rules!!! Been using it for a month now, and i've no intention of going back to msn/icq/trillian. There is no other program that is more flexible and feature-full than Miranda IM. And perhaps all the other companies (say, Trillian) can learn a thing or two... ICQ did one good thing: online DB of contacts. Miranda is one of the very very few (if not the only one) that supports that. Booya.
-
-
seelengarten
Reviewing 0.3 (Jun 24, 2003)
Forget ICQ and try this. Fast, small, no thrills, no ads. Simply Great!
-
Perezoso
Reviewing 0.2.1 (Jun 15, 2003)
I tried Miranda IM 0.2.1 and now I'm using a 0.3 alpha nightly. Small, fast, efficient and clean piece of work. Miranda works flawlessly behind my router and firewall. Both versions are simply EXCELLENT and the 0.3 alpha nightly build that I'm running is surprisingly stable. I have yet to find a single problem with it. 5/5 HIGHLY RECOMMENDED!
-
insane-pt
Reviewing 0.2 (Feb 3, 2003)
No Ads,No Bloating,No crap - this is the only IM i use on windows and is by far the best in features/slickness/memory usage, oh well.. the stars speak for themselves
-
Dwarden
Reviewing 0.2 (Feb 3, 2003)
Unbeatable IM, so far one of best under win platform !!!
5 stars ! -
loranger
Reviewing 0.2 (Feb 3, 2003)
Also using it for a while... this is the best instant messenger I've ever tried.
Basic and simple, you can add a lot of feature by adding plugins like MSN plugin, Away system plugin, etc...
A huge plugin choice for a perfet tiny software -
Cormac
Reviewing 0.2 (Feb 3, 2003)
I've been using it for years now. Deserves 5 stars, gets 5 stars.
-
jrepin
Reviewing 0.2 (Feb 2, 2003)
Miranda IM is great. I've been using nighlies for quite some time now and I like it a lot. It's small, fast and has a lot of options to set. New Status Notify plugin is also a must have. I use it for Jabber and ICQ. Keep up the excellent job Mitanda IM and plugin developers. You absolutely rock!
-
ilikedirtthe2nd
Reviewing 0.1.2.1 (Mar 13, 2002)
great program! i use it for my daily instant messanger needs and i'm completely satisfied with this tool. not to forget that it is extremely customizable too!
-
horst
Reviewing 0.1.2.0 (Dec 28, 2001)
Cute, clean, slim program that provides you with a no-hassle acces to the ICQ+MSN messaging system. Being behind firewalls and proxies gave no trouble at all.
Best choice. Compared to Trillian or Messenger and ICQ itself it can hardly do anything. But then, it doesn't pretend to.
Discuss Miranda IM
No comments yet
No comments yet